Cycling Forums   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage

Go Back   Cycling Forums > General > The Bike Café > uk.rec.cycling
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


More bikes fewer cars.

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 16-05.-2008, 03:21 PM   #1
Doug
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default More bikes fewer cars.

Pedaling Toward Cleaner Cities

by Alison Raphael

"WASHINGTON - What single silver bullet can simultaneously reduce air
pollution and oil dependency, roll back urban congestion, and fight
obesity?

It’s not a pill, nor a complicated formula concocted by the World
Bank. People around the world are turning to bicycles by the millions,
as governments rush to create incentives for the low-tech transport
alternative to gas-glugging, smog-making, traffic jam-producing
automobiles.

Some 130 million bikes were produced worldwide in 2007 — more than
double the number of cars rolling off assembly lines (52 million)..."

More:

http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/05/14/8938/

Alas, it doesn't seem to apply to the UK though.

--
Critical Mass London
http://www.criticalmasslondon.org.uk
"We aren't blocking traffic, we are traffic".
  Reply With Quote
Old 16-05.-2008, 06:34 PM   #2
Dogpoop
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: More bikes fewer cars.

Doug typed:
> Pedaling


Good.

> Alas, it doesn't seem to apply to the UK though.


Shame.

--
Dogpoop
http://www.glass-uk.org/
"You would probably do better not to bother with renewable
energy" Doug, UK.Transport 29/04/2008 08:53.


  Reply With Quote
Old 16-05.-2008, 08:37 PM   #3
TimB
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: More bikes fewer cars.

On May 16, 9:34 am, "Dogpoop" <dogp...@hotpop.com> wrote:
> Doug typed:
>
> > Pedaling

>
> Good.
>
> > Alas, it doesn't seem to apply to the UK though.

>
> Shame.
>
> --
> Dogpoophttp://www.glass-uk.org/
> "You would probably do better not to bother with renewable
> energy" Doug, UK.Transport 29/04/2008 08:53.


Doesn't mention carbon emissions and global warming - oh, I see,
American.
In the UK for many years I believe we've bought more bikes than cars
per annum, we just don't use them. Similarly, we have lower car
ownership than countries such as Germany, we just use our cars much
more. Strange habits.
Tim
  Reply With Quote
Old 16-05.-2008, 11:34 PM   #4
Conor
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: More bikes fewer cars.

In article <583ca474-105c-433e-8a3e-
b5958993f7fb@b64g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>, Doug says...
> Pedaling Toward Cleaner Cities
>
> by Alison Raphael
>
> "WASHINGTON - What single silver bullet can simultaneously reduce air
> pollution and oil dependency, roll back urban congestion, and fight
> obesity?
>
> It?s not a pill, nor a complicated formula concocted by the World
> Bank. People around the world are turning to bicycles by the millions,
> as governments rush to create incentives for the low-tech transport
> alternative to gas-glugging, smog-making, traffic jam-producing
> automobiles.
>
> Some 130 million bikes were produced worldwide in 2007 ? more than
> double the number of cars rolling off assembly lines (52 million)..."
>

Still doesn't get me to work 28 miles away in a decent amount of time..

--
Conor

I only please one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow isn't
looking good either. - Scott Adams
  Reply With Quote
Old 16-05.-2008, 11:36 PM   #5
TimB
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: More bikes fewer cars.

On May 16, 2:34 pm, Conor <conor_tur...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> In article <583ca474-105c-433e-8a3e-
> b5958993f...@b64g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>, Doug says...
>
> > Pedaling Toward Cleaner Cities

>
> > by Alison Raphael

>
> > "WASHINGTON - What single silver bullet can simultaneously reduce air
> > pollution and oil dependency, roll back urban congestion, and fight
> > obesity?

>
> > It?s not a pill, nor a complicated formula concocted by the World
> > Bank. People around the world are turning to bicycles by the millions,
> > as governments rush to create incentives for the low-tech transport
> > alternative to gas-glugging, smog-making, traffic jam-producing
> > automobiles.

>
> > Some 130 million bikes were produced worldwide in 2007 ? more than
> > double the number of cars rolling off assembly lines (52 million)..."

>
> Still doesn't get me to work 28 miles away in a decent amount of time..
>
> --
> Conor
>
> I only please one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow isn't
> looking good either. - Scott Adams


That's because you either live or work in the wrong place.
  Reply With Quote
Old 16-05.-2008, 11:48 PM   #6
Conor
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: More bikes fewer cars.

In article <642a0234-7af7-4dcf-b485-5929d0b9be30@
59g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>, TimB says...

> > Still doesn't get me to work 28 miles away in a decent amount of time..


> That's because you either live or work in the wrong place.
>

Well according to our resident eco-mentalist, I can't move to where I
work either as it's in the middle of nowhere and nobody should be
living in the country. Which kind of leaves everyone in a quandry as
food comes from the country.

--
Conor

I only please one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow isn't
looking good either. - Scott Adams
  Reply With Quote
Old 17-05.-2008, 02:03 AM   #7
Tony Dragon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: More bikes fewer cars.

TimB wrote:
> On May 16, 2:34 pm, Conor <conor_tur...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> In article <583ca474-105c-433e-8a3e-
>> b5958993f...@b64g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>, Doug says...
>>
>>> Pedaling Toward Cleaner Cities
>>> by Alison Raphael
>>> "WASHINGTON - What single silver bullet can simultaneously reduce air
>>> pollution and oil dependency, roll back urban congestion, and fight
>>> obesity?
>>> It?s not a pill, nor a complicated formula concocted by the World
>>> Bank. People around the world are turning to bicycles by the millions,
>>> as governments rush to create incentives for the low-tech transport
>>> alternative to gas-glugging, smog-making, traffic jam-producing
>>> automobiles.
>>> Some 130 million bikes were produced worldwide in 2007 ? more than
>>> double the number of cars rolling off assembly lines (52 million)..."

>> Still doesn't get me to work 28 miles away in a decent amount of time..
>>
>> --
>> Conor
>>
>> I only please one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow isn't
>> looking good either. - Scott Adams

>
> That's because you either live or work in the wrong place.


If you ask Doug nicely, and give him all your details he will post a
report on how you can improve your travel ling.

Oh, hang on ......


--
Tony the Dragon
  Reply With Quote
Old 17-05.-2008, 02:39 AM   #8
John Wright
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: More bikes fewer cars.

Tony Dragon wrote:
> TimB wrote:
>> On May 16, 2:34 pm, Conor <conor_tur...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> In article <583ca474-105c-433e-8a3e-
>>> b5958993f...@b64g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>, Doug says...
>>>
>>>> Pedaling Toward Cleaner Cities
>>>> by Alison Raphael
>>>> "WASHINGTON - What single silver bullet can simultaneously reduce air
>>>> pollution and oil dependency, roll back urban congestion, and fight
>>>> obesity?
>>>> It?s not a pill, nor a complicated formula concocted by the World
>>>> Bank. People around the world are turning to bicycles by the millions,
>>>> as governments rush to create incentives for the low-tech transport
>>>> alternative to gas-glugging, smog-making, traffic jam-producing
>>>> automobiles.
>>>> Some 130 million bikes were produced worldwide in 2007 ? more than
>>>> double the number of cars rolling off assembly lines (52 million)..."
>>> Still doesn't get me to work 28 miles away in a decent amount of time..
>>>
>>> --
>>> Conor
>>>
>>> I only please one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow isn't
>>> looking good either. - Scott Adams

>>
>> That's because you either live or work in the wrong place.

>
> If you ask Doug nicely, and give him all your details he will post a
> report on how you can improve your travel ling.
>
> Oh, hang on ......


Can we wait for that one until Vince's report is published? I think
that's what you were referring to..

--
John Wright

What would happen if you eliminated the autism genes from the gene pool?
You would have a bunch of people standing around in a cave, chatting and
socialising and not getting anything done!” - Temple Grandin
  Reply With Quote
Old 17-05.-2008, 06:11 PM   #9
Zog The Undeniable
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: More bikes fewer cars.

Doug wrote:
> Pedaling Toward Cleaner Cities
>
> by Alison Raphael
>
> "WASHINGTON - What single silver bullet can simultaneously reduce air
> pollution and oil dependency, roll back urban congestion, and fight
> obesity?
>
> It’s not a pill, nor a complicated formula concocted by the World
> Bank. People around the world are turning to bicycles by the millions,
> as governments rush to create incentives for the low-tech transport
> alternative to gas-glugging, smog-making, traffic jam-producing
> automobiles.
>
> Some 130 million bikes were produced worldwide in 2007 — more than
> double the number of cars rolling off assembly lines (52 million)..."


In the UK most bikes sold (the £40 "ATB" horrors) are
landfill-in-waiting, doomed to be ridden for one summer than forgotten.

The big problem is that we've become used to long commutes which are
impossible by bike. Half our office comes in from 40 miles away.
  Reply With Quote
Old 18-05.-2008, 03:32 AM   #10
John Kane
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: More bikes fewer cars.

On May 17, 4:11*am, Zog The Undeniable <hrothga...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> The big problem is that we've become used to long commutes which are
> impossible by bike. *Half our office comes in from 40 miles away


But what's the distance for the rest? You may have 50% of your office
within practical commuting distance.

I surprised myself a while ago when I looked up some commuting stats
for Canada (where we have some looong distances) A bit over 60% of
all Canadians had a one way commute of less than 10km.
http://ca.geocities.com/jrkrideau/cycling/commute.png

I wonder what the UK figures are?


John Kane Kingston ON Canada
  Reply With Quote
Old 18-05.-2008, 07:16 AM   #11
Nick Finnigan
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: More bikes fewer cars.

John Kane wrote:
> On May 17, 4:11 am, Zog The Undeniable <hrothga...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>>The big problem is that we've become used to long commutes which are
>>impossible by bike. Half our office comes in from 40 miles away

>
>
> But what's the distance for the rest? You may have 50% of your office
> within practical commuting distance.
>
> I surprised myself a while ago when I looked up some commuting stats
> for Canada (where we have some looong distances) A bit over 60% of
> all Canadians had a one way commute of less than 10km.
> http://ca.geocities.com/jrkrideau/cycling/commute.png
>
> I wonder what the UK figures are?


Average commute distance 8.7 miles, the break down may well be similar.
  Reply With Quote
Old 18-05.-2008, 05:29 PM   #12
Doug
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: More bikes fewer cars.

On 17 May, 22:16, Nick Finnigan <n...@genie.co.uk> wrote:
> John Kane wrote:
> > On May 17, 4:11 am, Zog The Undeniable <hrothga...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>
> >>The big problem is that we've become used to long commutes which are
> >>impossible by bike. Half our office comes in from 40 miles away

>
> > But what's the distance for the rest? You may have 50% of your office
> > within practical commuting distance.

>
> > I surprised myself a while ago when I looked up some commuting stats
> > for Canada (where we have some looong distances) A bit over 60% of
> > all Canadians had a one way commute of less than 10km.
> >http://ca.geocities.com/jrkrideau/cycling/commute.png

>
> > I wonder what the UK figures are?

>
> Average commute distance 8.7 miles, the break down may well be similar.


No problem on a bike.

--
UK Radical Campaigns
www.zing.icom43.net
It takes about 10 acres to feed a car on ethanol for a year.
The world supply of grainland is about three-tenths of an acre per
person.
  Reply With Quote
Old 18-05.-2008, 06:39 PM   #13
Tony Dragon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: More bikes fewer cars.

Doug wrote:
> On 17 May, 22:16, Nick Finnigan <n...@genie.co.uk> wrote:
>> John Kane wrote:
>>> On May 17, 4:11 am, Zog The Undeniable <hrothga...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> The big problem is that we've become used to long commutes which are
>>>> impossible by bike. Half our office comes in from 40 miles away
>>> But what's the distance for the rest? You may have 50% of your office
>>> within practical commuting distance.
>>> I surprised myself a while ago when I looked up some commuting stats
>>> for Canada (where we have some looong distances) A bit over 60% of
>>> all Canadians had a one way commute of less than 10km.
>>> http://ca.geocities.com/jrkrideau/cycling/commute.png
>>> I wonder what the UK figures are?

>> Average commute distance 8.7 miles, the break down may well be similar.

>
> No problem on a bike.
>
> --
> UK Radical Campaigns
> www.zing.icom43.net
> It takes about 10 acres to feed a car on ethanol for a year.
> The world supply of grainland is about three-tenths of an acre per
> person.


That would depend on the terrain & the user, but for most it should be
no problem.

--
Tony the Dragon
  Reply With Quote
Old 18-05.-2008, 08:42 PM   #14
JNugent
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: More bikes fewer cars.

Nick Finnigan wrote:
> John Kane wrote:
>> On May 17, 4:11 am, Zog The Undeniable <hrothga...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> The big problem is that we've become used to long commutes which are
>>> impossible by bike. Half our office comes in from 40 miles away

>>
>>
>> But what's the distance for the rest? You may have 50% of your office
>> within practical commuting distance.
>>
>> I surprised myself a while ago when I looked up some commuting stats
>> for Canada (where we have some looong distances) A bit over 60% of
>> all Canadians had a one way commute of less than 10km.
>> http://ca.geocities.com/jrkrideau/cycling/commute.png
>>
>> I wonder what the UK figures are?

>
> Average commute distance 8.7 miles, the break down may well be similar.


Is that "average" the mode, the mean or the median?
  Reply With Quote
Old 19-05.-2008, 02:24 AM   #15
Roger Merriman
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: More bikes fewer cars.

Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote:

> Doug wrote:
> > On 17 May, 22:16, Nick Finnigan <n...@genie.co.uk> wrote:
> >> John Kane wrote:
> >>> On May 17, 4:11 am, Zog The Undeniable <hrothga...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>>> The big problem is that we've become used to long commutes which are
> >>>> impossible by bike. Half our office comes in from 40 miles away
> >>> But what's the distance for the rest? You may have 50% of your office
> >>> within practical commuting distance.
> >>> I surprised myself a while ago when I looked up some commuting stats
> >>> for Canada (where we have some looong distances) A bit over 60% of
> >>> all Canadians had a one way commute of less than 10km.
> >>> http://ca.geocities.com/jrkrideau/cycling/commute.png
> >>> I wonder what the UK figures are?
> >> Average commute distance 8.7 miles, the break down may well be similar.

> >
> > No problem on a bike.
> >
> > --
> > UK Radical Campaigns
> > www.zing.icom43.net
> > It takes about 10 acres to feed a car on ethanol for a year.
> > The world supply of grainland is about three-tenths of an acre per
> > person.

>
> That would depend on the terrain & the user, but for most it should be
> no problem.


sure if one is a cyclist, but may well not be any faster than other
forms, particaly if count changing time etc, 10 miles or close to at
least, is getting on to the needing to be keen cyclist.

as is the way of averages most are likely to have shorter journeys look
at average wages for comparison only the Mean would give a better idea.

roger
--
www.rogermerriman.com
  Reply With Quote



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 11:14 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com