![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#91 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On May 31, 9:37 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 31 May 2008 18:32:05 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero > > > > <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote: > >On May 31, 3:59 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote: > >> On Sat, 31 May 2008 12:02:56 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero > > >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >On May 31, 12:51 am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote: > >> >> On Fri, 30 May 2008 08:48:29 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero > > >> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >On May 29, 10:50 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, 29 May 2008 21:27:24 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero > > >> >> >> >"Real", as in supporting your position? Or "real" as in actual > >> >> >> >scientific research? > > >> >> >> >If you mean the latter, it's already been provided, on numerous > >> >> >> >occasions > > >> >> >> The mountain biker-authors misstated their own results, in > >> >> >> order to make mountain biking appear less harmful. > > >> >> >Since nowhere do the authors make any claims as to whether or not they > >> >> >actually own any bikes whatsoever, I guess you took the "make it up" > >> >> >option. > > >> >> No, I just asked them. DUH! > > >> >Without proof, I'll just consider that yet another in a long line of > >> >stuff you just made up. > > >> Whatever. > > >Exactly. More stuff you just made up. I knew you'd never be able to > >provide proof of your blatantly-false and ridiculous claim, because > >you just made it up on the spot. You are truly LOL funny. > > It's okay. Since when is it OK to make up stuff, Mike? It's not OK. The "fact" that those authors are MTBers is a "fact" you invented, made up, fabricated. Lying is wrong, Mike. You should be ashamed of yourself. E.P. |
|
|
|
#92 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 00:48:47 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero
<gcmschemist@gmail.com> wrote: >On May 31, 9:37 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote: >> On Sat, 31 May 2008 18:32:05 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero >> >> >> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >On May 31, 3:59 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote: >> >> On Sat, 31 May 2008 12:02:56 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero >> >> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >On May 31, 12:51 am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote: >> >> >> On Fri, 30 May 2008 08:48:29 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero >> >> >> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >On May 29, 10:50 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Thu, 29 May 2008 21:27:24 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero >> >> >> >> >> >"Real", as in supporting your position? Or "real" as in actual >> >> >> >> >scientific research? >> >> >> >> >> >If you mean the latter, it's already been provided, on numerous >> >> >> >> >occasions >> >> >> >> >> The mountain biker-authors misstated their own results, in >> >> >> >> order to make mountain biking appear less harmful. >> >> >> >> >Since nowhere do the authors make any claims as to whether or not they >> >> >> >actually own any bikes whatsoever, I guess you took the "make it up" >> >> >> >option. >> >> >> >> No, I just asked them. DUH! >> >> >> >Without proof, I'll just consider that yet another in a long line of >> >> >stuff you just made up. >> >> >> Whatever. >> >> >Exactly. More stuff you just made up. I knew you'd never be able to >> >provide proof of your blatantly-false and ridiculous claim, because >> >you just made it up on the spot. You are truly LOL funny. >> >> It's okay. > >Since when is it OK to make up stuff, Mike? It's not OK. The "fact" >that those authors are MTBers is a "fact" you invented, made up, >fabricated. Lying is wrong, Mike. You should be ashamed of yourself. YOU are the liar. Everything I said is true, and EASILY VERIFIABLE by anyone who cares to check, which obviously doesn't include you. >E.P. -- I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8 years fighting auto dependence and road construction.) Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of! http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande |
|
|
|
#93 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Jun 1, 10:40 am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 00:48:47 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero > > > > <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote: > >On May 31, 9:37 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote: > >> On Sat, 31 May 2008 18:32:05 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero > > >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >On May 31, 3:59 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote: > >> >> On Sat, 31 May 2008 12:02:56 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero > > >> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >On May 31, 12:51 am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, 30 May 2008 08:48:29 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero > > >> >> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >On May 29, 10:50 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Thu, 29 May 2008 21:27:24 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero > > >> >> >> >> >"Real", as in supporting your position? Or "real" as in actual > >> >> >> >> >scientific research? > > >> >> >> >> >If you mean the latter, it's already been provided, on numerous > >> >> >> >> >occasions > > >> >> >> >> The mountain biker-authors misstated their own results, in > >> >> >> >> order to make mountain biking appear less harmful. > > >> >> >> >Since nowhere do the authors make any claims as to whether or not they > >> >> >> >actually own any bikes whatsoever, I guess you took the "make it up" > >> >> >> >option. > > >> >> >> No, I just asked them. DUH! > > >> >> >Without proof, I'll just consider that yet another in a long line of > >> >> >stuff you just made up. > > >> >> Whatever. > > >> >Exactly. More stuff you just made up. I knew you'd never be able to > >> >provide proof of your blatantly-false and ridiculous claim, because > >> >you just made it up on the spot. You are truly LOL funny. > > >> It's okay. > > >Since when is it OK to make up stuff, Mike? It's not OK. The "fact" > >that those authors are MTBers is a "fact" you invented, made up, > >fabricated. Lying is wrong, Mike. You should be ashamed of yourself. > > Everything I said is true... A claim for which you provide no proof. Prove that even one of those authors even owns a bike, any bike, and I'll be happy to continue the discussion. Otherwise, you're just stalling and trying to evade the real truth - that you just plain made it up. E.P. |
|
|
|
#94 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 14:34:06 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero
<gcmschemist@gmail.com> wrote: >On Jun 1, 10:40 am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote: >> On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 00:48:47 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero >> >> >> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >On May 31, 9:37 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote: >> >> On Sat, 31 May 2008 18:32:05 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero >> >> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >On May 31, 3:59 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote: >> >> >> On Sat, 31 May 2008 12:02:56 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero >> >> >> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >On May 31, 12:51 am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Fri, 30 May 2008 08:48:29 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero >> >> >> >> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >On May 29, 10:50 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, 29 May 2008 21:27:24 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero >> >> >> >> >> >> >"Real", as in supporting your position? Or "real" as in actual >> >> >> >> >> >scientific research? >> >> >> >> >> >> >If you mean the latter, it's already been provided, on numerous >> >> >> >> >> >occasions >> >> >> >> >> >> The mountain biker-authors misstated their own results, in >> >> >> >> >> order to make mountain biking appear less harmful. >> >> >> >> >> >Since nowhere do the authors make any claims as to whether or not they >> >> >> >> >actually own any bikes whatsoever, I guess you took the "make it up" >> >> >> >> >option. >> >> >> >> >> No, I just asked them. DUH! >> >> >> >> >Without proof, I'll just consider that yet another in a long line of >> >> >> >stuff you just made up. >> >> >> >> Whatever. >> >> >> >Exactly. More stuff you just made up. I knew you'd never be able to >> >> >provide proof of your blatantly-false and ridiculous claim, because >> >> >you just made it up on the spot. You are truly LOL funny. >> >> >> It's okay. >> >> >Since when is it OK to make up stuff, Mike? It's not OK. The "fact" >> >that those authors are MTBers is a "fact" you invented, made up, >> >fabricated. Lying is wrong, Mike. You should be ashamed of yourself. >> >> Everything I said is true... > >A claim for which you provide no proof. Prove that even one of those >authors even owns a bike, any bike, and I'll be happy to continue the >discussion. Otherwise, you're just stalling and trying to evade the >real truth - that you just plain made it up. Thanks for demonstrating that mountain bikers don't care about the truth. You should do your own research, so you don't have to look like the fool you are. >E.P. -- I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8 years fighting auto dependence and road construction.) Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of! http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande |
|
|
|
#95 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Jun 2, 7:52*am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 14:34:06 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero > > > > > > <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote: > >On Jun 1, 10:40 am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote: > >> On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 00:48:47 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero > > >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >On May 31, 9:37 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote: > >> >> On Sat, 31 May 2008 18:32:05 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero > > >> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >On May 31, 3:59 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote: > >> >> >> On Sat, 31 May 2008 12:02:56 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero > > >> >> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >On May 31, 12:51 am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Fri, 30 May 2008 08:48:29 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero > > >> >> >> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> >On May 29, 10:50 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, 29 May 2008 21:27:24 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero > > >> >> >> >> >> >"Real", as in supporting your position? *Or "real" as inactual > >> >> >> >> >> >scientific research? > > >> >> >> >> >> >If you mean the latter, it's already been provided, on numerous > >> >> >> >> >> >occasions > > >> >> >> >> >> *The mountain biker-authors misstated their own results, in > >> >> >> >> >> order to make mountain biking appear less harmful. > > >> >> >> >> >Since nowhere do the authors make any claims as to whether ornot they > >> >> >> >> >actually own any bikes whatsoever, *I guess you took the "make it up" > >> >> >> >> >option. > > >> >> >> >> No, I just asked them. DUH! > > >> >> >> >Without proof, I'll just consider that yet another in a long line of > >> >> >> >stuff you just made up. > > >> >> >> Whatever. > > >> >> >Exactly. *More stuff you just made up. *I knew you'd never be able to > >> >> >provide proof of your blatantly-false and ridiculous claim, because > >> >> >you just made it up on the spot. *You are truly LOL funny. > > >> >> It's okay. > > >> >Since when is it OK to make up stuff, Mike? *It's not OK. *The "fact" > >> >that those authors are MTBers is a "fact" you invented, made up, > >> >fabricated. *Lying is wrong, Mike. *You should be ashamed of yourself. > > >> Everything I said is true... > > >A claim for which you provide no proof. *Prove that even one of those > >authors even owns a bike, any bike, and I'll be happy to continue the > >discussion. *Otherwise, you're just stalling and trying to evade the > >real truth - that you just plain made it up. > > You should do your own research... I did, and nowhere in any of the research you provided was there even a single mention of whether or not the authors even owned a bike of any kind. Remember, we're talking about the actual researchers, not the guy that did the review article. Which is why I used that term originally. So prove it, Mike. Prove that any of those researchers owns a bike. Or make something else up, or change the subject. Like you always do when someone smarter than you calls you on your BS. E.P. |
|
|
|
#96 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Mon, 2 Jun 2008 10:51:43 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero
<gcmschemist@gmail.com> wrote: >On Jun 2, 7:52*am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote: >> On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 14:34:06 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero >> >> >> >> >> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >On Jun 1, 10:40 am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote: >> >> On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 00:48:47 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero >> >> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >On May 31, 9:37 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote: >> >> >> On Sat, 31 May 2008 18:32:05 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero >> >> >> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >On May 31, 3:59 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Sat, 31 May 2008 12:02:56 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero >> >> >> >> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >On May 31, 12:51 am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, 30 May 2008 08:48:29 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero >> >> >> >> >> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >On May 29, 10:50 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, 29 May 2008 21:27:24 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >"Real", as in supporting your position? *Or "real" as in actual >> >> >> >> >> >> >scientific research? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >If you mean the latter, it's already been provided, on numerous >> >> >> >> >> >> >occasions >> >> >> >> >> >> >> *The mountain biker-authors misstated their own results, in >> >> >> >> >> >> order to make mountain biking appear less harmful. >> >> >> >> >> >> >Since nowhere do the authors make any claims as to whether or not they >> >> >> >> >> >actually own any bikes whatsoever, *I guess you took the "make it up" >> >> >> >> >> >option. >> >> >> >> >> >> No, I just asked them. DUH! >> >> >> >> >> >Without proof, I'll just consider that yet another in a long line of >> >> >> >> >stuff you just made up. >> >> >> >> >> Whatever. >> >> >> >> >Exactly. *More stuff you just made up. *I knew you'd never be able to >> >> >> >provide proof of your blatantly-false and ridiculous claim, because >> >> >> >you just made it up on the spot. *You are truly LOL funny. >> >> >> >> It's okay. >> >> >> >Since when is it OK to make up stuff, Mike? *It's not OK. *The "fact" >> >> >that those authors are MTBers is a "fact" you invented, made up, >> >> >fabricated. *Lying is wrong, Mike. *You should be ashamed of yourself. >> >> >> Everything I said is true... >> >> >A claim for which you provide no proof. *Prove that even one of those >> >authors even owns a bike, any bike, and I'll be happy to continue the >> >discussion. *Otherwise, you're just stalling and trying to evade the >> >real truth - that you just plain made it up. >> >> You should do your own research... > >I did, and nowhere in any of the research you provided was there even >a single mention of whether or not the authors even owned a bike of >any kind. But I provided their email addresses, so you could ask them themselves. AND DID YOU? OF COURSE NOT, because you don't really waht the truth. >Remember, we're talking about the actual researchers, not the guy that >did the review article. > >Which is why I used that term originally. > >So prove it, Mike. Prove that any of those researchers owns a bike. > >Or make something else up, or change the subject. Like you always do >when someone smarter than you calls you on your BS. But not smart enough to send an email? ![]() >E.P. -- I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8 years fighting auto dependence and road construction.) Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of! http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande |
|
|
|
#97 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Jun 3, 7:36 am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Jun 2008 10:51:43 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero > > > > <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote: > >On Jun 2, 7:52 am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote: > >> On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 14:34:06 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero > > >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >On Jun 1, 10:40 am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote: > >> >> On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 00:48:47 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero > > >> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >On May 31, 9:37 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote: > >> >> >> On Sat, 31 May 2008 18:32:05 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero > > >> >> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >On May 31, 3:59 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Sat, 31 May 2008 12:02:56 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero > > >> >> >> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> >On May 31, 12:51 am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, 30 May 2008 08:48:29 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero > > >> >> >> >> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> >On May 29, 10:50 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, 29 May 2008 21:27:24 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >"Real", as in supporting your position? Or "real" as in actual > >> >> >> >> >> >> >scientific research? > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >If you mean the latter, it's already been provided, on numerous > >> >> >> >> >> >> >occasions > > >> >> >> >> >> >> The mountain biker-authors misstated their own results, in > >> >> >> >> >> >> order to make mountain biking appear less harmful. > > >> >> >> >> >> >Since nowhere do the authors make any claims as to whether or not they > >> >> >> >> >> >actually own any bikes whatsoever, I guess you took the "make it up" > >> >> >> >> >> >option. > > >> >> >> >> >> No, I just asked them. DUH! > > >> >> >> >> >Without proof, I'll just consider that yet another in a long line of > >> >> >> >> >stuff you just made up. > > >> >> >> >> Whatever. > > >> >> >> >Exactly. More stuff you just made up. I knew you'd never be able to > >> >> >> >provide proof of your blatantly-false and ridiculous claim, because > >> >> >> >you just made it up on the spot. You are truly LOL funny. > > >> >> >> It's okay. > > >> >> >Since when is it OK to make up stuff, Mike? It's not OK. The "fact" > >> >> >that those authors are MTBers is a "fact" you invented, made up, > >> >> >fabricated. Lying is wrong, Mike. You should be ashamed of yourself. > > >> >> Everything I said is true... > > >> >A claim for which you provide no proof. Prove that even one of those > >> >authors even owns a bike, any bike, and I'll be happy to continue the > >> >discussion. Otherwise, you're just stalling and trying to evade the > >> >real truth - that you just plain made it up. > > >> You should do your own research... > > >I did, and nowhere in any of the research you provided was there even > >a single mention of whether or not the authors even owned a bike of > >any kind. > > But I provided their email addresses, so you could ask them > themselves. AND DID YOU? Yes, I did. Not one of them replied in the affirmative. Checking up on your fabrications is trivial, Mike. Why bother making stuff up that's so easily refuted? E.P. |
|
|
|
#98 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Tue, 3 Jun 2008 16:55:57 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero
<gcmschemist@gmail.com> wrote: >On Jun 3, 7:36 am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote: >> On Mon, 2 Jun 2008 10:51:43 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero >> >> >> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >On Jun 2, 7:52 am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote: >> >> On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 14:34:06 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero >> >> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >On Jun 1, 10:40 am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote: >> >> >> On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 00:48:47 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero >> >> >> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >On May 31, 9:37 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Sat, 31 May 2008 18:32:05 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero >> >> >> >> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >On May 31, 3:59 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> On Sat, 31 May 2008 12:02:56 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero >> >> >> >> >> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >On May 31, 12:51 am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, 30 May 2008 08:48:29 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero >> >> >> >> >> >> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >On May 29, 10:50 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, 29 May 2008 21:27:24 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >"Real", as in supporting your position? Or "real" as in actual >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >scientific research? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >If you mean the latter, it's already been provided, on numerous >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >occasions >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> The mountain biker-authors misstated their own results, in >> >> >> >> >> >> >> order to make mountain biking appear less harmful. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >Since nowhere do the authors make any claims as to whether or not they >> >> >> >> >> >> >actually own any bikes whatsoever, I guess you took the "make it up" >> >> >> >> >> >> >option. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> No, I just asked them. DUH! >> >> >> >> >> >> >Without proof, I'll just consider that yet another in a long line of >> >> >> >> >> >stuff you just made up. >> >> >> >> >> >> Whatever. >> >> >> >> >> >Exactly. More stuff you just made up. I knew you'd never be able to >> >> >> >> >provide proof of your blatantly-false and ridiculous claim, because >> >> >> >> >you just made it up on the spot. You are truly LOL funny. >> >> >> >> >> It's okay. >> >> >> >> >Since when is it OK to make up stuff, Mike? It's not OK. The "fact" >> >> >> >that those authors are MTBers is a "fact" you invented, made up, >> >> >> >fabricated. Lying is wrong, Mike. You should be ashamed of yourself. >> >> >> >> Everything I said is true... >> >> >> >A claim for which you provide no proof. Prove that even one of those >> >> >authors even owns a bike, any bike, and I'll be happy to continue the >> >> >discussion. Otherwise, you're just stalling and trying to evade the >> >> >real truth - that you just plain made it up. >> >> >> You should do your own research... >> >> >I did, and nowhere in any of the research you provided was there even >> >a single mention of whether or not the authors even owned a bike of >> >any kind. >> >> But I provided their email addresses, so you could ask them >> themselves. AND DID YOU? > >Yes, I did. > >Not one of them replied in the affirmative. Now they aren't even being honest! I ugess they are gun-shy from having their bad "research" exposed. Did you expect a mountain biker to be HONEST?!!! >Checking up on your fabrications is trivial, Mike. Why bother making >stuff up that's so easily refuted? > >E.P. -- I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8 years fighting auto dependence and road construction.) Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of! http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande |
|
|
|
#99 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On May 29, 6:44 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 28 May 2008 08:45:45 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero > > > >The evidence has already been provided. > > BS. Unless you can provide some real evidence, you are just LYING > again. The part you trimmed addresses that. E.P. |
|
|
|
#100 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Jun 3, 9:52 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jun 2008 16:55:57 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero > > > > <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote: > >On Jun 3, 7:36 am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote: > >> On Mon, 2 Jun 2008 10:51:43 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero > > >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >On Jun 2, 7:52 am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote: > >> >> On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 14:34:06 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero > > >> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >On Jun 1, 10:40 am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote: > >> >> >> On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 00:48:47 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero > > >> >> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >On May 31, 9:37 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Sat, 31 May 2008 18:32:05 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero > > >> >> >> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> >On May 31, 3:59 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> On Sat, 31 May 2008 12:02:56 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero > > >> >> >> >> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> >On May 31, 12:51 am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, 30 May 2008 08:48:29 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero > > >> >> >> >> >> >> <gcmschem...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> >> >On May 29, 10:50 pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, 29 May 2008 21:27:24 -0700 (PDT), Ed Pirrero > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >"Real", as in supporting your position? Or "real" as in actual > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >scientific research? > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >If you mean the latter, it's already been provided, on numerous > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >occasions > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> The mountain biker-authors misstated their own results, in > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> order to make mountain biking appear less harmful. > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >Since nowhere do the authors make any claims as to whether or not they > >> >> >> >> >> >> >actually own any bikes whatsoever, I guess you took the "make it up" > >> >> >> >> >> >> >option. > > >> >> >> >> >> >> No, I just asked them. DUH! > > >> >> >> >> >> >Without proof, I'll just consider that yet another in a long line of > >> >> >> >> >> >stuff you just made up. > > >> >> >> >> >> Whatever. > > >> >> >> >> >Exactly. More stuff you just made up. I knew you'd never be able to > >> >> >> >> >provide proof of your blatantly-false and ridiculous claim, because > >> >> >> >> >you just made it up on the spot. You are truly LOL funny. > > >> >> >> >> It's okay. > > >> >> >> >Since when is it OK to make up stuff, Mike? It's not OK. The "fact" > >> >> >> >that those authors are MTBers is a "fact" you invented, made up, > >> >> >> >fabricated. Lying is wrong, Mike. You should be ashamed of yourself. > > >> >> >> Everything I said is true... > > >> >> >A claim for which you provide no proof. Prove that even one of those > >> >> >authors even owns a bike, any bike, and I'll be happy to continue the > >> >> >discussion. Otherwise, you're just stalling and trying to evade the > >> >> >real truth - that you just plain made it up. > > >> >> You should do your own research... > > >> >I did, and nowhere in any of the research you provided was there even > >> >a single mention of whether or not the authors even owned a bike of > >> >any kind. > > >> But I provided their email addresses, so you could ask them > >> themselves. AND DID YOU? > > >Yes, I did. > > >Not one of them replied in the affirmative. > > Now they aren't even being honest! By what standard? Your imaginary conspiracy of MTBers flooding the peer-reviewed literature with pro-MTB propaganda? LOL. The word "logic" and "Vandeman" should never appear in the same newsgroup together. E.P. |
|