Cycling Forums   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage

Go Back   Cycling Forums > Bike Racing > Road Racing > rec.bicycles.racing
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Re: Al Those Great Scientists Here

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 17-05.-2008, 09:24 AM   #16
Jack Hollis
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Al Those Great Scientists Here

On Fri, 16 May 2008 16:49:35 -0700, "Phil Holman"
<piholmanc@yourservice> wrote:

>>That asswipe Ralph Nader scared the crap out of everyone in the US
>>about "highway safety," so that combined with low fuel prices lowered
>>demand for small cars in the US. That might change.

>
>Don't hold your breath. Seeking to significantly reduce the size of US
>cars (SUVs) is similar to implementing more gun controls. The good of
>the majority is secondary to individual freedoms. It's a "nobody wants
>to drive around in a smart car until everyone else is driving around in
>a smart car" mentality.
>
>Phil H


SUV sales in the US have been dropping since 2005 and this trend is
likely to continue. Unfortunately, one of the things that could
prolong the SUV is that in an economic slowdown, some people cant
afford to buy a new car.
  Reply With Quote
Old 17-05.-2008, 09:44 AM   #17
Ryan Cousineau
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Al Those Great Scientists Here

In article <YOURhoward-9FA199.17164516052008@newsgroups.comcast.net>,
Howard Kveck <YOURhoward@h-SHOESbomb.com> wrote:

> In article <vIKdnVzV2L4OgLPVnZ2dnUVZ_orinZ2d@comcast.com>,
> "Phil Holman" <piholmanc@yourservice> wrote:
>
> > >That asswipe Ralph Nader scared the crap out of everyone in the US
> > >about "highway safety," so that combined with low fuel prices lowered
> > >demand for small cars in the US. That might change.

> >
> > Don't hold your breath. Seeking to significantly reduce the size of US
> > cars (SUVs) is similar to implementing more gun controls. The good of
> > the majority is secondary to individual freedoms. It's a "nobody wants
> > to drive around in a smart car until everyone else is driving around in
> > a smart car" mentality.

>
> I want to drive around in a Smartcar now.


Don't do it! It's not worth it!

--
Ryan Cousineau rcousine@gmail.com http://www.wiredcola.com/
"In other newsgroups, they killfile trolls."
"In rec.bicycles.racing, we coach them."
  Reply With Quote
Old 17-05.-2008, 10:06 AM   #18
Phil Holman
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Al Those Great Scientists Here


"Jack Hollis" <xsleeper@aol.com> wrote in message
news:b69s245i05pljq85tbv784oh0c07tga4de@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 16 May 2008 16:49:35 -0700, "Phil Holman"
> <piholmanc@yourservice> wrote:
>
>>>That asswipe Ralph Nader scared the crap out of everyone in the US
>>>about "highway safety," so that combined with low fuel prices lowered
>>>demand for small cars in the US. That might change.

>>
>>Don't hold your breath. Seeking to significantly reduce the size of US
>>cars (SUVs) is similar to implementing more gun controls. The good of
>>the majority is secondary to individual freedoms. It's a "nobody wants
>>to drive around in a smart car until everyone else is driving around
>>in
>>a smart car" mentality.
>>
>>Phil H

>
> SUV sales in the US have been dropping since 2005 and this trend is
> likely to continue. Unfortunately, one of the things that could
> prolong the SUV is that in an economic slowdown, some people cant
> afford to buy a new car.


Interesting, I wonder what the average weight statistic looks like.

Phil H


  Reply With Quote
Old 17-05.-2008, 10:35 AM   #19
Bret
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Al Those Great Scientists Here

On May 16, 6:16*pm, Howard Kveck <YOURhow...@h-SHOESbomb.com> wrote:
> In article <vIKdnVzV2L4OgLPVnZ2dnUVZ_orin...@comcast.com>,
> *"Phil Holman" <piholmanc@yourservice> wrote:
>
> > >That asswipe Ralph Nader scared the crap out of everyone in the US
> > >about "highway safety," so that combined with low fuel prices lowered
> > >demand for small cars in the US. *That might change.

>
> > Don't hold your breath. Seeking to significantly reduce the size of US
> > cars (SUVs) is similar to implementing more gun controls. The good of
> > the majority is secondary to individual freedoms. It's a "nobody wants
> > to drive around in a smart car until everyone else is driving around in
> > a smart car" mentality.

>
> * *I want to drive around in a Smartcar now.


My wife wants one. She doesn't own a car now and gets around on a 50cc
scooter, bikes and buses, so a Smartcar would be an upgrade for her.
She only really needs a car for when it snows (I drive her to work
then) and I'm not sure the Smartcar makes sense for that. If Honda
make a hybrid version of the Fit or something similar, we'll be all
over it.

Bret
  Reply With Quote
Old 18-05.-2008, 12:12 PM   #20
Howard Kveck
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Al Those Great Scientists Here

In article <4ee58552-b561-4b73-83a6-96ef1ac9a986@y38g2000hsy.googlegroups.com>,
Bret <bret.wade@gmail.com> wrote:

> On May 16, 6:16*pm, Howard Kveck <YOURhow...@h-SHOESbomb.com> wrote:
> > In article <vIKdnVzV2L4OgLPVnZ2dnUVZ_orin...@comcast.com>,
> > *"Phil Holman" <piholmanc@yourservice> wrote:
> >
> > > >That asswipe Ralph Nader scared the crap out of everyone in the US
> > > >about "highway safety," so that combined with low fuel prices lowered
> > > >demand for small cars in the US. *That might change.

> >
> > > Don't hold your breath. Seeking to significantly reduce the size of US
> > > cars (SUVs) is similar to implementing more gun controls. The good of
> > > the majority is secondary to individual freedoms. It's a "nobody wants
> > > to drive around in a smart car until everyone else is driving around in
> > > a smart car" mentality.

> >
> > * *I want to drive around in a Smartcar now.

>
> My wife wants one. She doesn't own a car now and gets around on a 50cc
> scooter, bikes and buses, so a Smartcar would be an upgrade for her.
> She only really needs a car for when it snows (I drive her to work
> then) and I'm not sure the Smartcar makes sense for that. If Honda
> make a hybrid version of the Fit or something similar, we'll be all
> over it.


The Smartcar site has a FAQ that includes the snow question. It makes it sound
like they'd do fine in snowy conditions.

http://www.smartusa.com/smart-car-faq.aspx

Getting around on a scooter can be entertaining.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EcG8oxbMqWc

--
tanx,
Howard

Whatever happened to
Leon Trotsky?
He got an icepick
That made his ears burn.

remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?
  Reply With Quote



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 07:54 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com