![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
jobst.brandt@stanfordalumni.org wrote:
> > I think you should read the FAQ item first at: > > http://www.sheldonbrown.com/brandt/over-the-bars.html > > before giving the usual endless pitch about the superiority of > recumbents. Going over the bars, especially with disk brakes, is > highly unlikely to be caused by locking the front wheel, but rather > follows the scenario described in the FAQ. > The problem with the concept of "bracing with the arms" to use the front brake of an upright bicycle is that--by nature--most crashes are basically unanticipated. That's why there's crashes. And as I noted--a bicycle doesn't need to tip completely over forward to be unsafe during a panic stop. Merely un-weighting the rear tire enough for the rear end to swing out left or right can result in a crash. This is easy to demonstrate on pretty much any upright bicycle with decent front brakes, and just about impossible to do on any long-wheelbase recumbent. If one is worried about "going over the bars" during a panic stop, it *IS* possible to pick a bicycle that basically won't ever do it. ~ |
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On May 1, 2:33*am, "mike.a.sch...@gmail.com" <mike.a.sch...@gmail.com>
wrote: > Disk brakes have more stopping power and any such 'stomp' can result > in a flip, not requiring any irregularities. *Due to their design, > recumbents are immune from such a flip. Even regular road brakes are strong enough to do this. |
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
TBerk wrote:
> > Yeah, I have a feeling a got one of them on the line right now. > > > TBerk The difference is between someone telling you it's your fault and to fix the bike and keep riding, and someone else telling you there's another kind of bike that this sort of thing /never/ happens on, and that you can't even /make/ it happen if you /try/. ------ Recumbents aren't better at all things but they have significant advantages in several aspects, and emergency braking tends to be one of them. ~ |
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
> Disk brakes have more stopping power and ...
No they don't. Every unassisted brake system has the energy from your two hands to work with to drive rubber pads into the rotor or rim. You can make this more or less efficient, but you can't change this fundamental limitation. JG |
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Thu, 1 May 2008 06:47:38 -0700 (PDT), landotter
<landotter@gmail.com> wrote: >On Apr 30, 10:49 pm, TBerk <bayareab...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> Obviously I would assume they could if you clamp down fast enough. > >Yes, if you don't brace yourself and are unfamiliar with the brake and >grab wildly, any powerful brake can be dangerous--but so can many >things in life. Well adjusted brakes should be easy to modulate, >provided you're not inebriated and have practiced a few panic stops, >and shouldn't necessitate the purchase of a new bicycle. > >Be careful when posting questions like this, because you may attract >'bent riders, who are bearded hammers in search of nails--sometimes >with orange flippy flags! I do NOT have orange flippy flags!!!!!! ROFLMAO __o | Every time I see an adult on a bicycle.... _`\(,_ | I no longer despair for the human race. (_)/ (_) | ---H.G. Wells--- |
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On May 1, 12:51 pm, Harry Brogan
<hbrogan57_AT_NOSPAM_DOT_YAHOO_DOT_COM> wrote: > On Thu, 1 May 2008 06:47:38 -0700 (PDT), landotter > > <landot...@gmail.com> wrote: > >On Apr 30, 10:49 pm, TBerk <bayareab...@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> Obviously I would assume they could if you clamp down fast enough. > > >Yes, if you don't brace yourself and are unfamiliar with the brake and > >grab wildly, any powerful brake can be dangerous--but so can many > >things in life. Well adjusted brakes should be easy to modulate, > >provided you're not inebriated and have practiced a few panic stops, > >and shouldn't necessitate the purchase of a new bicycle. > > >Be careful when posting questions like this, because you may attract > >'bent riders, who are bearded hammers in search of nails--sometimes > >with orange flippy flags! > > I do NOT have orange flippy flags! Yellow? |
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
>> TBerk <bayareab...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> Obviously I would assume they could if you clamp down fast enough. > landotter <landotter@gmail.com> wrote: >> Yes, if you don't brace yourself and are unfamiliar with the brake and >> grab wildly, any powerful brake can be dangerous--but so can many >> things in life. Well adjusted brakes should be easy to modulate, >> provided you're not inebriated and have practiced a few panic stops, >> and shouldn't necessitate the purchase of a new bicycle. >> Be careful when posting questions like this, because you may attract >> 'bent riders, who are bearded hammers in search of nails--sometimes >> with orange flippy flags! Harry Brogan wrote: > I do NOT have orange flippy flags!!!!!! ROFLMAO Not yet? Tom Sherman can probably help you choose a nice flippy orange one. -- Andrew Muzi <www.yellowjersey.org/> Open every day since 1 April, 1971 ** Posted from http://www.teranews.com ** |
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On 2008-05-01, JG <jchg@cox.net> wrote:
>> Disk brakes have more stopping power and ... > > No they don't. Every unassisted brake system has the energy from your > two hands to work with to drive rubber pads into the rotor or rim. > You can make this more or less efficient, but you can't change this > fundamental limitation. You sort of can, with leverage. It's not really the energy from your hands that's important, but the force they can apply. That force can be geared up to give you as much force as you want on the rim/disk. You need four times as much force on a disk because it has about a quarter the radius of the wheel. But in either case you just gear it so it feels right for people with averagely normal hand strength. This isn't the difficult part of brake design. Lots of cars didn't used to have servo assistance on the brakes. All the force and work required to brake came from your leg. And yet you could slow down a tonne of car from 70mph like that. The difficult part is getting rid of all the heat that the brakes are converting the bike's kinetic energy into. Bicycle rims have enough heat capacity to just soak up the heat for most stopping situations, but they can overheat badly if you need to keep them on continuously because you want to go down a hill quite slowly. Disks have less capacity, but get hotter, so dissipate heat to the air more rapidly. So I reckon they're better for sustainable braking down long hills. But for emergency stops either kind of brake (of decent quality and level of maintenance) will be able to tip you over the handlebars if you aren't careful. |
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Thu, 1 May 2008 11:21:35 -0700 (PDT), landotter
<landotter@gmail.com> wrote: >On May 1, 12:51 pm, Harry Brogan ><hbrogan57_AT_NOSPAM_DOT_YAHOO_DOT_COM> wrote: >> On Thu, 1 May 2008 06:47:38 -0700 (PDT), landotter >> >> <landot...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >On Apr 30, 10:49 pm, TBerk <bayareab...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> Obviously I would assume they could if you clamp down fast enough. >> >> >Yes, if you don't brace yourself and are unfamiliar with the brake and >> >grab wildly, any powerful brake can be dangerous--but so can many >> >things in life. Well adjusted brakes should be easy to modulate, >> >provided you're not inebriated and have practiced a few panic stops, >> >and shouldn't necessitate the purchase of a new bicycle. >> >> >Be careful when posting questions like this, because you may attract >> >'bent riders, who are bearded hammers in search of nails--sometimes >> >with orange flippy flags! >> >> I do NOT have orange flippy flags! > >Yellow? FUNNY!!!!......No....not yellow either.....Here's a photo.... http://i255.photobucket.com/albums/...01012003_02.jpg __o | Every time I see an adult on a bicycle.... _`\(,_ | I no longer despair for the human race. (_)/ (_) | ---H.G. Wells--- |
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Ben C? wrote:
>>> Disk brakes have more stopping power and... >> No they don't. Every unassisted brake system has the energy from >> your two hands to work with to drive rubber pads into the rotor or >> rim. You can make this more or less efficient, but you can't >> change this fundamental limitation. > You sort of can, with leverage. As is apparent, leverage cannot be arbitrarily changed without other effects that require difficult redesign. Dual pivot rim brake calipers are a classic example. To achieve the higher MA required by today's riders pad clearance had to be reduced and this required forced centering to prevent brake drag. Disks have the same problem. > It's not really the energy from your hands that's important, but the > force they can apply. That force can be geared up to give you as > much force as you want on the rim/disk. In what units are you measuring "energy" or do you mean "force"? > You need four times as much force on a disk because it has about a > quarter the radius of the wheel. But in either case you just gear it > so it feels right for people with averagely normal hand > strength. This isn't the difficult part of brake design. That isn't the parameter of interest. Disk diameter and coefficient of friction both have a major effect on the ratio between application force and brake torque. > Lots of cars didn't used to have servo assistance on the brakes. > All the force and work required to brake came from your leg. And > yet you could slow down a tonne of car from 70mph like that. Drum brakes used massive self servo action to achieve useful braking. Because that effect is highly unpredictable, they had both lock-up and fade. That is why we use disks today. You may recall that this was discussed here at great length. > The difficult part is getting rid of all the heat that the brakes > are converting the bike's kinetic energy into. Apparently the bicycle industry is not addressing that part of the problem when the surface area and thermal mass their gossamer rings of steel have. I have asked brake manufacturers why their disks are mostly air with a thin pattern of thin steel between. For cooling is the answer. Maybe they should tell the automotive and railway people about their theory. > Bicycle rims have enough heat capacity to just soak up the heat for > most stopping situations, but they can overheat badly if you need to > keep them on continuously because you want to go down a hill quite > slowly. It depends on gradient that gives (vertical) foot (rider weight (pounds) per second. The slower you go the less cooling and the less wind drag on the rider. There is a narrow trade-off between brake cooling and speed which was discussed here recently. > Disks have less capacity, but get hotter, so dissipate heat to the > air more rapidly. So I reckon they're better for sustainable > braking down long hills. By that measure, a wafer thin disk is all it takes, surface area and mass be damned. > But for emergency stops either kind of brake (of decent quality and > level of maintenance) will be able to tip you over the handlebars if > you aren't careful. I doubt it. I don't know many riders who can raise the rear wheel while traveling at normal road speeds. In contrast, I have seen people go over the bars: http://tinyurl.com/3kunfl Jobst Brandt |
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Thu, 01 May 2008 12:02:27 -0500, DougC wrote:
> jobst.brandt@stanfordalumni.org wrote: >> >> I think you should read the FAQ item first at: >> >> http://www.sheldonbrown.com/brandt/over-the-bars.html >> >> before giving the usual endless pitch about the superiority of >> recumbents. Going over the bars, especially with disk brakes, is >> highly unlikely to be caused by locking the front wheel, but rather >> follows the scenario described in the FAQ. >> > > The problem with the concept of "bracing with the arms" to use the front > brake of an upright bicycle is that--by nature--most crashes are > basically unanticipated. That's why there's crashes. > > And as I noted--a bicycle doesn't need to tip completely over forward to > be unsafe during a panic stop. Merely un-weighting the rear tire enough > for the rear end to swing out left or right can result in a crash. > Or, like the Raptor trike, be badly designed - that one had a very small bolt loaded in shear about 1" from the front wheel axle as a means of controlling brake torque. It broke when the ten-year old was riding it; the steering arm went forward pulling him over the front wheels and out of the trike; fortunately he was on the pavement at the time. It's been fixed now; the brake torque is now taken by a triangluted arrangement that is much larger and much stronger, with only a few ounces additional weight. |
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On May 1, 6:47 pm, Harry Brogan
<hbrogan57_AT_NOSPAM_DOT_YAHOO_DOT_COM> wrote: > On Thu, 1 May 2008 11:21:35 -0700 (PDT), landotter > > > > <landot...@gmail.com> wrote: > >On May 1, 12:51 pm, Harry Brogan > ><hbrogan57_AT_NOSPAM_DOT_YAHOO_DOT_COM> wrote: > >> On Thu, 1 May 2008 06:47:38 -0700 (PDT), landotter > > >> <landot...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >On Apr 30, 10:49 pm, TBerk <bayareab...@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> >> Obviously I would assume they could if you clamp down fast enough. > > >> >Yes, if you don't brace yourself and are unfamiliar with the brake and > >> >grab wildly, any powerful brake can be dangerous--but so can many > >> >things in life. Well adjusted brakes should be easy to modulate, > >> >provided you're not inebriated and have practiced a few panic stops, > >> >and shouldn't necessitate the purchase of a new bicycle. > > >> >Be careful when posting questions like this, because you may attract > >> >'bent riders, who are bearded hammers in search of nails--sometimes > >> >with orange flippy flags! > > >> I do NOT have orange flippy flags! > > >Yellow? > > FUNNY!!!!......No....not yellow either.....Here's a photo.... > > http://i255.photobucket.com/albums/...%20Rig/1000Mile... You could accent Old Glory with an international Pantheon of flippy flags! Might affect your aerodynamics. |
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Thu, 1 May 2008 01:33:03 -0700 (PDT), "mike.a.schwab@gmail.com"
<mike.a.schwab@gmail.com> wrote: >On Apr 30, 10:49 pm, TBerk <bayareab...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> Obviously I would assume they could if you clamp down fast enough. >> >> I ask because I bruised some rib bones this week when I stomped the >> front brake and *surprise* I found out later my front rim has a bubble >> bend in it from (I guess) a pot hole at some recent time. >> >> Made for a portion of the rim that just wasn't going to get past the >> brake pads, not while I was trying to actually use said brakes. >> >> It would seem a better setup would be one unaffected by a slightly >> bent rim, or so I wonder. >> >> TBerk >> it would have been funny if it hadn't hurt so much at the time > >Disk brakes have more stopping power and any such 'stomp' can result >in a flip, not requiring any irregularities. Due to their design, >recumbents are immune from such a flip. Even the relatively ineffectual old "atom" drum brake could "unhorse" you under the right circumstances. ** Posted from http://www.teranews.com ** |
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
mike.a.schwab@gmail.com aka Mike Schwab wrote:
> On Apr 30, 10:49 pm, TBerk <bayareab...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> Obviously I would assume they could if you clamp down fast enough. >> >> I ask because I bruised some rib bones this week when I stomped the >> front brake and *surprise* I found out later my front rim has a bubble >> bend in it from (I guess) a pot hole at some recent time. >> >> Made for a portion of the rim that just wasn't going to get past the >> brake pads, not while I was trying to actually use said brakes. >> >> It would seem a better setup would be one unaffected by a slightly >> bent rim, or so I wonder. >> >> TBerk >> it would have been funny if it hadn't hurt so much at the time > > Disk brakes have more stopping power and any such 'stomp' can result > in a flip, not requiring any irregularities. Due to their design, > recumbents are immune from such a flip. Recumbents with PROPER weight distribution will skid the front wheel instead of sending the rider over the bars. Some early bad designs, such as the Hypercycle, would send the rider off the front under heavy braking, and had too little weight on the rear wheel for it to provide much braking. I often wonder if the Hypercycle and its ilk are responsible for much of the negative attitudes towards recumbents by certain riders. Certainly, if a rider's only experience was the ill handling, poor climbing and poor braking Hypercycle, they would not look kindly on recumbents as a whole. -- Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia The weather is here, wish you were beautiful |
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On May 1, 9:25 am, Michael Press <rub...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> In article <rubrum-523F33.09195101052...@news.sf.sbcglobal.net>, > Michael Press <rub...@pacbell.net> wrote: > > > > > In article > > <3d81ffd1-3ac3-4758-a96c-27a116cd2...@n1g2000prb.googlegroups.com>, > > TBerk <bayareab...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > On Apr 30, 9:48 pm, jobst.bra...@stanfordalumni.org wrote: > > > > The Berk wrote: > > > > > Obviously I would assume they could if you clamp down fast enough. > > > > > I ask because I bruised some rib bones this week when I stomped the > > > > > front brake and *surprise* I found out later my front rim has a > > > > > bubble bend in it from (I guess) a pot hole at some recent time. > > > > > Made for a portion of the rim that just wasn't going to get past the > > > > > brake pads, not while I was trying to actually use said brakes. > > > > > It would seem a better setup would be one unaffected by a slightly > > > > > bent rim, or so I wonder. > > > > > http://www.sheldonbrown.com/brandt/over-the-bars.html > > > > > > it would have been funny if it hadn't hurt so much at the time > > > > > Don't laugh. I wouldn't be so ready to tell all that I used bicycle > > > > brakes in such a clumsy manner. Skilled motorcyclists do nose-down > > > > wheelies at high speed, often crossing the finish line on only the > > > > front wheel. That takes a bit of extra skill. A motorcyclist crashed > > > > fatally yesterday in East Palo Alto doing that. > > [...] > TBerk, sorry. I was not paying attention, > and did not see you are the original poster. > > -- > Michael Press Not a problem, in fact I am able to modulate the front brake, even in panic stops just fine. What got me this time was a deformation of the front wheel; one that didn't show as a side to side wobble where I would have noticed it out of the corner of my eye but a symetrical dent on both walls. Brakes stopped 'real quick like' despite not otherwise being locked up. TBerk |
|