![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 09:59:57 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane
<Siskuwihane1@gmail.com> wrote: >On Apr 29, 10:26*am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote: >> On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 04:21:41 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane >> >> <Siskuwiha...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >On Apr 28, 12:32*am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote: >> >> On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 19:49:55 -0700 (PDT), pmh <pmhil...@verizon.net> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >A broken collarbone has less than zero correlation with genetic >> >> >variation through natural selection. Neither can be rationally >> >> >discussed in terms of the other. >> >> >> Idiot. Injuries and death from mountain biking is natural selection at >> >> work, weeding out those with no morals and no sense. >> >> >Like what happened to your cat because you had no morals or sense. A >> >poor animal had to die because of your supidity. >> >> BS. He was run over by a car. I had nothing to do with it, AS YOU WELL >> KNOW, LIAR. > >Cats do not get outside on their own, irresponsible owners let them >out. You are an IRRESPONSIBLE PET OWNER. No, it would be irresponsible to confine a cat to an indoor life. You, on the other hand, should be so confined, for society;s sake. -- I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8 years fighting auto dependence and road construction.) Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of! http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande |
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Mike Vandeman" <mjvande@pacbell.net> wrote in message news:kn7l141rsje6uer53rjgek11gmas2h5ek5@4ax.com... >> >>You let your cat run wild through a congested residential neighborhood >>on a regular basis despite your being aware that cats threaten "wildlife" > > No, I wasn't aware of that. Liar. You mention in his schmaltzy epilogue that you knew cats preyed on birds and small animals. What are they? Domesticated? > >>and there was frequent traffic. >>You didn't live up to your responsibility as a citizen of your neighborhood >>or as a pet owner. > > It's not a cat owner's responsibility to keep their cat out of the > street. They have a right to a life. DUH. It is a pet owners responsibility to procide a safe and healthy environment for a pet. They have a right to a life and if you get involved with one they have a right to expect you to provide it. And if you choose to live in a city with an animal you have every responsibility to keep it safe, and to keep the neighborhood wildlife safe, and to keep your animal from roaming and spreading its piss crap and genetic code all over town. You want to let your animal roam? Go live in the country. Lazy-check Bad role model -double check Lying, Denying, Can't see what's in front of his eyes (cognitive dissonance) You qualify for your own thesis. One thing MV. I like animals, have pets and I think your behavior and lack of responsibility as regards your pet were reprehensible. Your wacko trolling is harmless but your total refusal to accept your role in the cat's death fully illustrates your lack of character and your lack of humanity. May you receive all that you deserve. JP |
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On May 2, 12:59*am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 09:59:57 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane > > > > > > <Siskuwiha...@gmail.com> wrote: > >On Apr 29, 10:26*am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote: > >> On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 04:21:41 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane > > >> <Siskuwiha...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >On Apr 28, 12:32*am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote: > >> >> On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 19:49:55 -0700 (PDT), pmh <pmhil...@verizon.net> > >> >> wrote: > > >> >> >A broken collarbone has less than zero correlation with genetic > >> >> >variation through natural selection. Neither can be rationally > >> >> >discussed in terms of the other. > > >> >> Idiot. Injuries and death from mountain biking is natural selection at > >> >> work, weeding out those with no morals and no sense. > > >> >Like what happened to your cat because you had no morals or sense. A > >> >poor animal had to die because of your supidity. > > >> BS. He was run over by a car. I had nothing to do with it, AS YOU WELL > >> KNOW, LIAR. > > >Cats do not get outside on their own, irresponsible owners let them > >out. You are an IRRESPONSIBLE PET OWNER. > > No, it would be irresponsible to confine a cat to an indoor life. You, > on the other hand, should be so confined, for society;s sake. Then they should be free 24/7 but you CHOOSE to OWN them because you are SELFISH. |
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Apr 29, 12:59 pm, Siskuwihane <Siskuwiha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 29, 10:26 am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 04:21:41 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane > > > <Siskuwiha...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >On Apr 28, 12:32 am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote: > > >> On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 19:49:55 -0700 (PDT), pmh <pmhil...@verizon.net> > > >> wrote: > > > >> >A broken collarbone has less than zero correlation with genetic > > >> >variation through natural selection. Neither can be rationally > > >> >discussed in terms of the other. > > > >> Idiot. Injuries and death from mountain biking is natural selection at > > >> work, weeding out those with no morals and no sense. > > > >Like what happened to your cat because you had no morals or sense. A > > >poor animal had to die because of your supidity. > > > BS. He was run over by a car. I had nothing to do with it, AS YOU WELL > > KNOW, LIAR. > > Cats do not get outside on their own, irresponsible owners let them > out. You are an IRRESPONSIBLE PET OWNER. In many jurisdictions a cat at large is the same offense as a dog at large. It might be prosecuted less often, but it's a reflection on general safety and treating one's pets in a responsible manner. "Having a life" and being treated in a responsible manner are not directly connected. The one is a philosophical generality while the other is a civic responsibility. While one can never countervail any of Mikey's blither-blather, the occasional post which educes said response provides a modicum of amusement in slow times and jogs others' sensibilities as to Mikey's near-total misanthropy. PH |
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Here's a quick quiz we will never see answers to because Mike will
dodge again. The true answers are in caps. Of course those answers are subject to change depending on Mike's Depakote dosages. Did you fly or not? YES or no Did you lie about me being a mtber? YES or no Did you lie about other's occupations such as airline sources? YES or no Did you write a book? yes or NO Did you tell people you walked to an airport that is not possible to walk to in Australia? YES or no Is your website entirely quotes from others? YES or no Did you not say 'my country found me more valuable back home" in response to hiding from the draft? YES or no Are you the Swedish Chef from the muppets? yes or no Did you not keep a good eye on your poor cat? yes or no and with this question...cat's a detrimental to society when left outdoors and unfixed due to the needless killing off of animals not in the cycle. what kind of irresponsible fool would preach envirofriendly topics and do the opposite behind closed doors? a dishonest one like you. Do you not work for one of the worst companies that kill nature and trees in the name of technology? YES or no We could go on and on. |
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Fri, 02 May 2008 21:53:13 GMT, "JP" <vze2wx8p@verizon.net> wrote:
> > > > >"Mike Vandeman" <mjvande@pacbell.net> wrote in message news:kn7l141rsje6uer53rjgek11gmas2h5ek5@4ax.com... > >>> >>>You let your cat run wild through a congested residential neighborhood >>>on a regular basis despite your being aware that cats threaten "wildlife" >> >> No, I wasn't aware of that. > >Liar. You mention in his schmaltzy epilogue that you knew >cats preyed on birds and small animals. "If I had known how many birds and other animals are killed by cats, even well fed ones, I probably would never have chosen to adopt them." What part of "if" don't you understand? What are they? Domesticated? >> >>>and there was frequent traffic. >>>You didn't live up to your responsibility as a citizen of your neighborhood >>>or as a pet owner. >> >> It's not a cat owner's responsibility to keep their cat out of the >> street. They have a right to a life. DUH. > >It is a pet owners responsibility to procide a safe and healthy environment for a pet. No, no one can protect an animal from all possible hazards. >They have a right to a life and if you get involved with one they have a right to expect >you to provide it. And if you choose to live in a city with an animal you have every >responsibility to keep it safe, and to keep the neighborhood wildlife safe, and to keep your >animal from roaming and spreading its piss crap and genetic code all over town. >You want to let your animal roam? Go live in the country. > >Lazy-check >Bad role model -double check >Lying, Denying, Can't see what's in front of his eyes (cognitive dissonance) > >You qualify for your own thesis. > > >One thing MV. >I like animals, have pets So you keep your cockroaches indoors at all times? Or on a leash? and I think your behavior and lack of responsibility >as regards your pet were reprehensible. >Your wacko trolling is harmless but your total refusal to accept your >role in the cat's death fully illustrates your lack of character >and your lack of humanity. > >May you receive all that you deserve. Your threat is duly noted, hypocrite. >JP -- I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8 years fighting auto dependence and road construction.) Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of! http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande |
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Fri, 2 May 2008 14:57:48 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane
<Siskuwihane1@gmail.com> wrote: >On May 2, 12:59*am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote: >> On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 09:59:57 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane >> >> >> >> >> >> <Siskuwiha...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >On Apr 29, 10:26*am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote: >> >> On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 04:21:41 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane >> >> >> <Siskuwiha...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >On Apr 28, 12:32*am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote: >> >> >> On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 19:49:55 -0700 (PDT), pmh <pmhil...@verizon.net> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >A broken collarbone has less than zero correlation with genetic >> >> >> >variation through natural selection. Neither can be rationally >> >> >> >discussed in terms of the other. >> >> >> >> Idiot. Injuries and death from mountain biking is natural selection at >> >> >> work, weeding out those with no morals and no sense. >> >> >> >Like what happened to your cat because you had no morals or sense. A >> >> >poor animal had to die because of your supidity. >> >> >> BS. He was run over by a car. I had nothing to do with it, AS YOU WELL >> >> KNOW, LIAR. >> >> >Cats do not get outside on their own, irresponsible owners let them >> >out. You are an IRRESPONSIBLE PET OWNER. >> >> No, it would be irresponsible to confine a cat to an indoor life. You, >> on the other hand, should be so confined, for society;s sake. > >Then they should be free 24/7 but you CHOOSE to OWN them because you >are SELFISH. BS. No one can "own" another living thing with a mind of its own. -- I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8 years fighting auto dependence and road construction.) Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of! http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande |
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Fri, 2 May 2008 17:58:17 -0700 (PDT), pmh <pmhilton@verizon.net>
wrote: >On Apr 29, 12:59 pm, Siskuwihane <Siskuwiha...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Apr 29, 10:26 am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote: >> >> >> >> > On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 04:21:41 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane >> >> > <Siskuwiha...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >On Apr 28, 12:32 am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote: >> > >> On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 19:49:55 -0700 (PDT), pmh <pmhil...@verizon.net> >> > >> wrote: >> >> > >> >A broken collarbone has less than zero correlation with genetic >> > >> >variation through natural selection. Neither can be rationally >> > >> >discussed in terms of the other. >> >> > >> Idiot. Injuries and death from mountain biking is natural selection at >> > >> work, weeding out those with no morals and no sense. >> >> > >Like what happened to your cat because you had no morals or sense. A >> > >poor animal had to die because of your supidity. >> >> > BS. He was run over by a car. I had nothing to do with it, AS YOU WELL >> > KNOW, LIAR. >> >> Cats do not get outside on their own, irresponsible owners let them >> out. You are an IRRESPONSIBLE PET OWNER. > >In many jurisdictions a cat at large is the same offense as a dog at >large. Name ONE such jurisdiction, liar. It might be prosecuted less often, but it's a reflection on >general safety and treating one's pets in a responsible manner. >"Having a life" and being treated in a responsible manner are not >directly connected. The one is a philosophical generality while the >other is a civic responsibility. > >While one can never countervail any of Mikey's blither-blather, the >occasional post which educes said response provides a modicum of >amusement in slow times and jogs others' sensibilities as to Mikey's >near-total misanthropy. > >PH -- I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8 years fighting auto dependence and road construction.) Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of! http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande |
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Fri, 2 May 2008 18:50:36 -0700 (PDT), "maguahiker@gmail.com"
<maguahiker@gmail.com> wrote: >Here's a quick quiz we will never see answers to because Mike will >dodge again. The true answers are in caps. Of course those answers are >subject to change depending on Mike's Depakote dosages. > >Did you fly or not? YES or no >Did you lie about me being a mtber? YES or no >Did you lie about other's occupations such as airline sources? YES or >no >Did you write a book? yes or NO >Did you tell people you walked to an airport that is not possible to >walk to in Australia? YES or no >Is your website entirely quotes from others? YES or no >Did you not say 'my country found me more valuable back home" in >response to hiding from the draft? YES or no >Are you the Swedish Chef from the muppets? yes or no >Did you not keep a good eye on your poor cat? yes or no and with this >question...cat's a detrimental to society when left outdoors and >unfixed due to the needless killing off of animals not in the cycle. >what kind of irresponsible fool would preach envirofriendly topics and >do the opposite behind closed doors? a dishonest one like you. >Do you not work for one of the worst companies that kill nature and >trees in the name of technology? YES or no > >We could go on and on. That's easy: you are wrong on all counts. Of course, liar. Still waiting for your explanation of why you deliberately LIED: "I found this picture of Mike Vanderman protesting a bike race...he is trying to run down the biker...that crazy Mike!! He's always good for a laugh. http://bikehugger.com/images/blog/nugget-thumb.jpg" You aren't going to live this down, until you admit your dishonesty. -- I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8 years fighting auto dependence and road construction.) Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of! http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande |
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Mike Vandeman wrote:
> On Fri, 2 May 2008 18:50:36 -0700 (PDT), "maguahiker@gmail.com" > <maguahiker@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Here's a quick quiz we will never see answers to because Mike will >> dodge again. The true answers are in caps. Of course those answers are >> subject to change depending on Mike's Depakote dosages. >> >> Did you fly or not? YES or no >> Did you lie about me being a mtber? YES or no >> Did you lie about other's occupations such as airline sources? YES or >> no >> Did you write a book? yes or NO >> Did you tell people you walked to an airport that is not possible to >> walk to in Australia? YES or no >> Is your website entirely quotes from others? YES or no >> Did you not say 'my country found me more valuable back home" in >> response to hiding from the draft? YES or no >> Are you the Swedish Chef from the muppets? yes or no >> Did you not keep a good eye on your poor cat? yes or no and with this >> question...cat's a detrimental to society when left outdoors and >> unfixed due to the needless killing off of animals not in the cycle. >> what kind of irresponsible fool would preach envirofriendly topics and >> do the opposite behind closed doors? a dishonest one like you. >> Do you not work for one of the worst companies that kill nature and >> trees in the name of technology? YES or no >> >> We could go on and on. > > That's easy: you are wrong on all counts. Of course, liar. > > Still waiting for your explanation of why you deliberately LIED: > > "I found this picture of Mike Vanderman protesting a bike race...he is > trying to run down the biker...that crazy Mike!! He's always good for > a laugh. > > http://bikehugger.com/images/blog/nugget-thumb.jpg" > > You aren't going to live this down, until you admit your dishonesty. Dude, "Vanderman" (sic) is NOT the same as "Vandeman" (sic). Notice that one has an "r" and the other does not. -- Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia The weather is here, wish you were beautiful |
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On May 2, 11:53*pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 2 May 2008 17:58:17 -0700 (PDT), pmh <pmhil...@verizon.net> > wrote: > > > > > > >On Apr 29, 12:59 pm, Siskuwihane <Siskuwiha...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Apr 29, 10:26 am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote: > > >> > On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 04:21:41 -0700 (PDT), Siskuwihane > > >> > <Siskuwiha...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >On Apr 28, 12:32 am, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote: > >> > >> On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 19:49:55 -0700 (PDT), pmh <pmhil...@verizon.net> > >> > >> wrote: > > >> > >> >A broken collarbone has less than zero correlation with genetic > >> > >> >variation through natural selection. Neither can be rationally > >> > >> >discussed in terms of the other. > > >> > >> Idiot. Injuries and death from mountain biking is natural selection at > >> > >> work, weeding out those with no morals and no sense. > > >> > >Like what happened to your cat because you had no morals or sense. A > >> > >poor animal had to die because of your supidity. > > >> > BS. He was run over by a car. I had nothing to do with it, AS YOU WELL > >> > KNOW, LIAR. > > >> Cats do not get outside on their own, irresponsible owners let them > >> out. You are an IRRESPONSIBLE PET OWNER. > > >In many jurisdictions a cat at large is the same offense as a dog at > >large. > > Name ONE such jurisdiction, liar. You're such an uninformed idiot, Michael J. Vandeman. http://64.233.169.104/search?q=cach...clnk&cd=3&gl=us B.Running at Large:No dog or cat shall be permitted torun at large in the City.Dogs or cats, which are on any street,sidewalk, alley or other public place in the City without being held securely by a leash, shall be deemed to be running at large.(Ord. 2002-143,§3,2002) |
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On May 2, 11:55*pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 2 May 2008 18:50:36 -0700 (PDT), "maguahi...@gmail.com" > > > > > > <maguahi...@gmail.com> wrote: > >Here's a quick quiz we will never see answers to because Mike will > >dodge again. The true answers are in caps. Of course those answers are > >subject to change depending on Mike's Depakote dosages. > > >Did you fly or not? YES or no > >Did you lie about me being a mtber? YES or no > >Did you lie about other's occupations such as airline sources? YES or > >no > >Did you write a book? yes or NO > >Did you tell people you walked to an airport that is not possible to > >walk to in Australia? YES or no > >Is your website entirely quotes from others? YES or no > >Did you not say 'my country found me more valuable back home" in > >response to hiding from the draft? YES or no > >Are you the Swedish Chef from the muppets? yes or no > >Did you not keep a good eye on your poor cat? yes or no and with this > >question...cat's a detrimental to society when left outdoors and > >unfixed due to the needless killing off of animals not in the cycle. > >what kind of irresponsible fool would preach envirofriendly topics and > >do the opposite behind closed doors? a dishonest one like you. > >Do you not work for one of the worst companies that kill nature and > >trees in the name of technology? YES or no > > >We could go on and on. > > That's easy: you are wrong on all counts. Of course, liar. > > Still waiting for your explanation of why you deliberately LIED: > > "I found this picture of Mike Vanderman protesting a bike race...he is > trying to run down the biker...that crazy Mike!! He's always good for > a laugh. > > http://bikehugger.com/images/blog/nugget-thumb.jpg" > > You aren't going to live this down, until you admit your dishonesty. Michael J. Vandeman, why did you lie and post that I worked for an airline? |
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quick Dodge again...
Did you fly or not? YES or no Did you lie about me being a mtber? YES or no Did you lie about other's occupations such as airline sources? YES or no Did you write a book? yes or NO Did you tell people you walked to an airport that is not possible to walk to in Australia? YES or no Is your website entirely quotes from others? YES or no Did you not say 'my country found me more valuable back home" in response to hiding from the draft? YES or no Are you the Swedish Chef from the muppets? yes or no Did you not keep a good eye on your poor cat? yes or no and with this question...cat's a detrimental to society when left outdoors and unfixed due to the needless killing off of animals not in the cycle. what kind of irresponsible fool would preach envirofriendly topics and do the opposite behind closed doors? a dishonest one like you. Do you not work for one of the worst companies that kill nature and trees in the name of technology? YES or no ANSWER THEM DIRECTLY. You just lied about all of them just now when you said I was wrong on all accounts. You prior answers are all out there in past posts. You are a liar. Perhaps the worst accusation you have ever made against me is here.......why is this included in answer to my post. I never asked you this? Are you lying again? Those words were never said by me yet are included in your response to me. I have never threatened you. you should at least admit that you are wrong here. This is a simple forum and you are now accusing me of threats. You're not worthy of a threat. no man is. You cut and pasted that in there and that was not my post. >May you receive all that you deserve. Your threat is duly noted, hypocrite. AND it says VANDERMAN! On May 2, 11:55*pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote: > On Fri, 2 May 2008 18:50:36 -0700 (PDT), "maguahi...@gmail.com" > > > > > > <maguahi...@gmail.com> wrote: > >Here's a quick quiz we will never see answers to because Mike will > >dodge again. The true answers are in caps. Of course those answers are > >subject to change depending on Mike's Depakote dosages. > > >Did you fly or not? YES or no > >Did you lie about me being a mtber? YES or no > >Did you lie about other's occupations such as airline sources? YES or > >no > >Did you write a book? yes or NO > >Did you tell people you walked to an airport that is not possible to > >walk to in Australia? YES or no > >Is your website entirely quotes from others? YES or no > >Did you not say 'my country found me more valuable back home" in > >response to hiding from the draft? YES or no > >Are you the Swedish Chef from the muppets? yes or no > >Did you not keep a good eye on your poor cat? yes or no and with this > >question...cat's a detrimental to society when left outdoors and > >unfixed due to the needless killing off of animals not in the cycle. > >what kind of irresponsible fool would preach envirofriendly topics and > >do the opposite behind closed doors? a dishonest one like you. > >Do you not work for one of the worst companies that kill nature and > >trees in the name of technology? YES or no > > >We could go on and on. > > That's easy: you are wrong on all counts. Of course, liar. > > Still waiting for your explanation of why you deliberately LIED: > > "I found this picture of Mike Vanderman protesting a bike race...he is > trying to run down the biker...that crazy Mike!! He's always good for > a laugh. > > http://bikehugger.com/images/blog/nugget-thumb.jpg" > > You aren't going to live this down, until you admit your dishonesty. > -- > I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to > humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8 > years fighting auto dependence and road construction.) > > Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of! > > http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - |
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
maguahiker@gmail.com wrote:
> [...] > ANSWER THEM DIRECTLY. You just lied about all of them just now when > you said I was wrong on all accounts. You prior answers are all out > there in past posts. You are a liar. > Perhaps the worst accusation you have ever made against me is > here.......why is this included in answer to my post. I never asked > you this? Are you lying again? Those words were never said by me yet > are included in your response to me. I have never threatened you. you > should at least admit that you are wrong here. This is a simple forum > and you are now accusing me of threats. You're not worthy of a threat. > no man is. You cut and pasted that in there and that was not my post. > >> May you receive all that you deserve. > > Your threat is duly noted, hypocrite.[...] If you really want to get to Mikey V., I suggest investing in a decent hard-tail MTB, and finding some beginner level trails to start out on. I suggest the hard-tail, since it will be about half the price of a similar quality full-suspension bike - for beginner use you should be able to find a proper bike in the $600-700 range. No need for anything better unless you get the bug and want to tackle the more technical stuff. Just moderate trail/fire road riding away from urban areas has its own attractions. -- Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia The weather is here, wish you were beautiful |
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Exactly the response I would expect from an unprincipled lying hypocrite
lacking humanity and social responsibility. Here's a more clearly worded "threat" Mike. Can't wait to meet you so I can transform your face into hamburger. Note it, report it, forward it to the FBI, SFPD, and/or anyone else you think might actually give a crap about your continued existence. Depressingly short list I'm sure. JP |
|