Discuss!! Question #1

Robert Chung

On Apr 23, 12:50 am, "b...@mambo.ucolick.org" <b...@mambo.ucolick.org>
wrote:

> So, if on your left hand your index finger is longer
> than your ring finger, but on your right hand your
> index is shorter than your ring finger - does that
> mean you're supposed to use the left hand for
> wanking while thinking about men and the right hand
> for wanking when thinking about women?
>
> Ben
>
> P.S. I'm asking for a friend.

http://www.boingboing.net/2008/04/2...aphic-uk-o.html

Fred Fredburger

ST wrote:

> Now you ARE talking law! So there is a line then?? But you are saying
> "perverted" is all in the mind? No moral line at all??

There can be no moral line without a basis for morality. Not everyone
has the same one. Some people aren't aware they have one, maybe they
have one anyway, maybe they don't.

Read Emmanuel Kant. If you do, you'll find that "Because no one else is
harmed" can be derived from his ideas. It's pretty straightforward.

ST

On 4/23/08 5:35 PM, in article
f9e2416c-9a92-47f3-9c0d-8840e604b1f...ooglegroups.com, "Paul G."
<carbide@egine.com> wrote:

> On Apr 23, 12:36 pm, ST <n...@no.com> wrote:
>> On 4/23/08 9:26 AM, in article
>> 8b6d5968-ddd7-4e2f-bcd7-8c2e8083e...@x19g2000prg.googlegroups.com, "Paul G."
>>
>> <carb...@egine.com> wrote:
>>> On Apr 22, 8:55 pm, ST <n...@no.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> Yo!
>>>> Stop with the trying to just discern my views and thoughts! I am asking a
>>>> question you assbags do not know. Where is the line between genetic and
>>>> personal choice?? No more, no less......
>>
>>> You're so transparent. It's obvious why you are obsessed with finding
>>> the answer- you're asking this gay question "for a friend", right?
>>> You will find the answer you seek within.
>>
>> I am sick of you elitist wing bags acting like you are the shitz and you
>> know everything. I knew this was the ?? to yank your chain.
>
> There's nothing wrong with being gay. Lots of famous, successful
> people are gay. So are you a "pitcher" or a "catcher"? Ass seems to
> be constantly on your mind- enough with the "assbag" this and
> "asshole" that.

Dude!!! I NEVER made the judgment call here! This is the problem with you
assbags! Knock off the juvenile name calling and TELL ME were is the line
between genetic and not.. None of you KNOW!

Just SAY SO!!

Howard Kveck

In article <C434DC54.539D4%no@no.com>, ST <no@no.com> wrote:

> On 4/22/08 10:03 PM, in article
> YOURhoward-21C18D.22035522042008@newsgroups.comcast.net, "Howard Kveck"
> <YOURhoward@h-SHOESbomb.com> wrote:
>
> > In article <C4340146.53979%no@no.com>, ST <no@no.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On 4/21/08 10:51 PM, in article
> >> YOURhoward-66E24C.22514621042008@newsgroups.comcast.net, "Howard Kveck"
> >> <YOURhoward@h-SHOESbomb.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> In article <C431D288.53814%no@no.com>, ST <no@no.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> You guys are picking the easy answer. Consensual versus not.
> >>>
> >>> Because it's the right answer.
> >>>
> >>>> There are relationships WE, as humans (even just Americans) consider
> >>>> perverted even though they agree as partners. I am not asking for an
> >>>> expanation
> >>>> of how we deal with the situation to make it work.
> >>>>
> >>>> Where is the line between a born pre-disposition and and an inert
> >>>> uncontrolled desire? When does it, supposedly go from genetic and
> >>>> uncontrollable to free will?
> >>>
> >>> Steve, you're trying to find a way to "prove" that homosexuality is a
> >>> conscious choice and one that can be reversed. The entire child molestor
> >>> aspect of
> >>> this is unrelated. You may find homosexual relationships "perverted" - no
> >>> one is
> >>> making you be in one. The fact that some portion of society finds
> >>> homosexual
> >>> relationships "perverted" doesn't matter, as the participants in that
> >>> relationship
> >>> are not harming each other or society. The same can not be said for a
> >>> child
> >>> molestor. And the "consensual" part of the equation is the important one.
> >>> The rest
> >>> of your so-called argument is simply gibberish.
> >>
> >> Yo!
> >> Stop with the trying to just discern my views and thoughts! I am asking a
> >> question you assbags do not know. Where is the line between genetic and
> >> personal choice?? No more, no less......
> >
> > The question has been answered. You can't understand the answer.
>
> Where?? If it was we would NEVER have a problem in our society with this
> issue in the future..

"Problem with this" - this what? Pedophilia is a problem, but homosexuality is to
a shrinking number of people. You're in the minority now.

http://tinyurl.com/3ulpt4

> >> I NEVER in any thing here posted a personal point of view condemning being
> >> gay. Where??
> >
> > Your question is all about your point of view, Steve. Pretty simple, really.
> > And the statement, "There are relationships WE, as humans (even just Americans)
> > consider perverted even though they agree as partners" says it pretty loud and
> > clear.
>
> It is in the LAW dickhead! You think I made it up?

What law are you talking about? I think you misunderstood my statement - I was
referring to gay relationships (which is the one where partners can agree to be in).

> >> You are doing exactly what I mentioned a few posts ago. You are wimping out on
> >> posting a viewpoint and saying "If it does not harm anyone...." pretty candyass.
> >
> > Ah, the old challenge to my manhood - "wimping out", "candyass". Whatever.
>
> As you guys are trying to call me a closet-gay in your responses?????

No, I'm saying your debate technique is that of a child on a playground.

> >> What if a 13 year old consented?? That is OK by your judgment?
> >
> > A thirteen year old *can't* consent. I'd imagine a deep thinker like you
> > would know that.
>
> Now you ARE talking law! So there is a line then?? But you are saying
> "perverted" is all in the mind? No moral line at all??

No, silly dude, it's generally considered that (law or no law) a thirteen year old
doesn't have the emotional experience to make an informed decision about being in a
serious relationship (sexual or otherwise). That isn't the case in other countries,
so there is a cultural aspect ot it. Being the man of the world you are, you should
know this.

--
tanx,
Howard

Whatever happened to
Leon Trotsky?
He got an icepick
That made his ears burn.

remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?

Kyle Legate

ST wrote:
>
> Dude!!! I NEVER made the judgment call here! This is the problem with you
> assbags! Knock off the juvenile name calling and TELL ME were is the line
> between genetic and not.. None of you KNOW!
>
> Just SAY SO!!
>
We know, but since you couldn't possibly understand the answer we're not
gonna tell you.

Bob Schwartz

Robert Chung wrote:
> On Apr 23, 12:50 am, "b...@mambo.ucolick.org" <b...@mambo.ucolick.org>
> wrote:
>
>> So, if on your left hand your index finger is longer
>> than your ring finger, but on your right hand your
>> index is shorter than your ring finger - does that
>> mean you're supposed to use the left hand for
>> wanking while thinking about men and the right hand
>> for wanking when thinking about women?
>>
>> Ben
>>
>> P.S. I'm asking for a friend.
>
> http://www.boingboing.net/2008/04/2...aphic-uk-o.html

Speaking of logos, check out the logo of the Wisconsin
Tourism Federation:

http://www.witourismfederation.org/

Bob Schwartz

SLAVE of THE STATE

On Apr 23, 8:50*pm, ST <n...@no.com> wrote:

> Would a preference for farm animals be genetic too??

FDR didn't like piggies and proved it. He liked screwing people
though.

Paul G.

On Apr 23, 8:50 pm, ST <n...@no.com> wrote:
>
> Make a call chicken shit elite assbags..

So assbagger- bagged any good asses lately?

SLAVE of THE STATE

On Apr 23, 10:58*pm, Howard Kveck <YOURhow...@h-SHOESbomb.com> wrote:

> > It is in the LAW dickhead!
>
> What law are you talking about?

http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/02-102.ZS.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_v._Texas

Bob Schwartz

ST wrote:
> Dude!!! I NEVER made the judgment call here! This is the problem with you
> assbags! Knock off the juvenile name calling and TELL ME were is the line
> between genetic and not.. None of you KNOW!
>
> Just SAY SO!!

I think assbagging is some sort of euphemism that
has a special meaning to you guys out in California.
It sounds like what people used to refer to as
'cruising'.

Do I have that right?

The bizarre use of upper case reminds me of this guy:
http://members.aol.com/rem547/

Bob Schwartz

SLAVE of THE STATE

On Apr 24, 10:21*am, Bob Schwartz <bob.schwa...@REMOVEsbcglobal.net>
wrote:
> ST wrote:
> > Dude!!! I NEVER made the judgment call here! This is the problem with you
> > assbags! Knock off the juvenile name calling and TELL ME were is the line
> > between genetic and not.. None of you KNOW!
>
> > Just SAY SO!!
>
> I think assbagging is some sort of euphemism that
> has a special meaning to you guys out in California.

Dumbassbag-

It is only San Diego.

Donald Munro

SLAVE of THE STATE wrote:
> Dumbassbag-

Whats French for Dumbassbag ?

Ted van de Weteringe

Donald Munro wrote:
> SLAVE of THE STATE wrote:
>> Dumbassbag-
>
> Whats French for Dumbassbag ?

Conchon?

Robert Chung

On Apr 24, 10:21 am, Bob Schwartz <bob.schwa...@REMOVEsbcglobal.net>
wrote:

> I think assbagging is some sort of euphemism that
> has a special meaning to you guys out in California.
>
> Do I have that right?

Didn't Steve once post a picture of his fat ass bagged in a diaper?