Discuss!! Question #1

Fred Fredburger

Ryan Cousineau wrote:
> In article <namdnXNDj4q695DVnZ2dnUVZ_v2pnZ2d@comcast.com>,
> Fred Fredburger <FredFredburger@WhereAreTheNachos.Huh> wrote:
>
>> Ryan Cousineau wrote:
>>> In article <cqCdnYaVDPoM1JDVnZ2dnUVZ_oLinZ2d@comcast.com>,
>>> Fred Fredburger <FredFredburger@WhereAreTheNachos.Huh> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Kyle Legate wrote:
>>>>> ST wrote:
>>>>>> That is the first response at all that makes since. It is a pretty simple
>>>>>> question. Either they are all genetic or they are not..
>>>>> ...or some gradation in between. Grownups see things in shades of gray.
>>>> If I see any in here, I'll ask them about that.
>>> Dumbass: my license says RMMA4 on it.
>>>
>> Thank God for google. Without it, I wouldn't know that you are either a
>> bacteriologist, a mortgage modification agreement, a boxer, or something
>> in Polish that I couldn't understand.
>>
>> But I'll back off. Mortgage modification agreements frighten me. I don't
>> want to chance it.
>
> Close enough:
>
> <http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cach...adian-cycling.c
> om/cca/documents/information/2006%2520Licencing%2520codes.xls+uci+road+li
> cense+codes&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&client=safari>
>

So, if I may summarize, your claim is that your UCI license proves your
adulthood. This claim is based upon the equivalence of "Master 30-39" to
"Adult".

The second part seems questionable to me, but that pales in comparison
to the brilliance of your concept of an "Adulthood License". Good call!
They should be mandatory for anyone who wishes to perform any "Adult"
activity, including voting and procreation.

Fred Fredburger

SLAVE of THE STATE wrote:
> On Apr 21, 11:49 am, Donald Munro <fat-dumb...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> ronaldo_jeremiah wrote:
>>>> What makes you sure there is such a thing as free will?
>> SLAVE of THE STATE wrote:
>>
>>> I've never gotten any one in rbr to bite on that one.
>> We need to develop more free won't to stop us responding to bots.
>
> What makes you know you're not a bot?

So what if he is?

Everybody has a world view that consists of so many unexamined
assumptions that we might as well be bots. The best of us manage to
examine a few of the more obtrusive assumptions and learn a thing or two
occasionally.

Generally, that's a lot of work for not much pay. The union sucks.

Fred Fredburger

Paul G. wrote:

> The American tax payer pays for
> everything- including your free AK-47.

Only true if the US taxpayer reaches you before the Iranian and Syrian
taxpayer.

ST

On 4/21/08 10:51 PM, in article
YOURhoward-66E24C.22514621042008@newsgroups.comcast.net, "Howard Kveck"
<YOURhoward@h-SHOESbomb.com> wrote:

> In article <C431D288.53814%no@no.com>, ST <no@no.com> wrote:
>
>> You guys are picking the easy answer. Consensual versus not.
>
> Because it's the right answer.
>
>> There are relationships WE, as humans (even just Americans) consider
>> perverted
>> even though they agree as partners. I am not asking for an expanation of how
>> we
>> deal with the situation to make it work.
>>
>> Where is the line between a born pre-disposition and and an inert
>> uncontrolled desire? When does it, supposedly go from genetic and
>> uncontrollable to free will?
>
> Steve, you're trying to find a way to "prove" that homosexuality is a
> conscious
> choice and one that can be reversed. The entire child molestor aspect of this
> is
> unrelated. You may find homosexual relationships "perverted" - no one is
> making you
> be in one. The fact that some portion of society finds homosexual
> relationships
> "perverted" doesn't matter, as the participants in that relationship are not
> harming
> each other or society. The same can not be said for a child molestor. And the
> "consensual" part of the equation is the important one. The rest of your
> so-called
> argument is simply gibberish.

Yo!
Stop with the trying to just discern my views and thoughts! I am asking a
question you assbags do not know. Where is the line between genetic and
personal choice?? No more, no less......

I NEVER in any thing here posted a personal point of view condemning being
gay. Where??

You are doing exactly what I mentioned a few posts ago. You are wimping out
on posting a viewpoint and saying "If it does not harm anyone...." pretty
candyass.

What if a 13 year old consented?? That is OK by your judgment?

Paul G.

On Apr 22, 8:05 pm, Fred Fredburger
<FredFredbur...@WhereAreTheNachos.Huh> wrote:
> Paul G. wrote:
> > The American tax payer pays for
> > everything- including your free AK-47.
>
> Only true if the US taxpayer reaches you before the Iranian and Syrian
> taxpayer.

shhh...... They're "triple dipping". Everybody knows you can't have
too many assault rifles, and the more you have, the safer everyone
is.
-Paul

ST

On 4/22/08 8:05 PM, in article DoudnYp9SJojNZPVnZ2dnUVZ_gydnZ2d@comcast.com,
"Fred Fredburger" <FredFredburger@WhereAreTheNachos.Huh> wrote:

> Paul G. wrote:
>
>> The American tax payer pays for
>> everything- including your free AK-47.
>
> Only true if the US taxpayer reaches you before the Iranian and Syrian
> taxpayer.


http://groups.google.com/group/rec....hl=en&lnk=gschg


Active older topics
Discuss!! Question #1 <------------------------------------
110 new of 110 - Apr 23
Gay pride salute
14 new of 14 - Apr 22
Paris-Roubaix street formula for Tours ?
7 new of 7 - Apr 22
lickton's gets no more business from me!
34 new of 34 - Apr 22
More velodrome fun?
10 new of 10 - Apr 22
Riding with a splinted finger?
10 new of 10 - Apr 22
Global Warming
306 new of 306 - Apr 22
Can't Get Life Insurance
4 new of 4 - Apr 22
wheels
16 new of 16 - Apr 22
Doping and the French
31 new of 31 - Apr 22
NYC bicycle racing
5 new of 5 - Apr 22
FAQ Location and Weekly posting for Rec.Bicycles.*
2 new of 2 - Apr 22
Lance In Boston
2 new of 2 - Apr 22
Re-living the TdF "horses racing the peloton" scene
5 new of 5 - Apr 21

ST

On 4/22/08 9:31 AM, in article
c4576c34-e73e-41f8-b051-c6cda634c72...ooglegroups.com, "Paul G."
<carbide@egine.com> wrote:

> On Apr 19, 8:12 pm, ST <n...@no.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> I weigh 27lbs less than I did at this time last year.... My body fat is less
>> than 6% right now.
>> ... Do you have a 31" waist? (at 182lbs) I have bigger arms than many others
>> legs.. I have more visible veins
>> (low body fat for you dumbasses) than you jokers....
>>
>> You are gonna have to come up with some new smear material.......
>
> All that sounds very gay... not that there's anything wrong with
> being gay. But you have to work on that self-loathing thing. Accept
> yourself for what you are.
> -Paul
>
> (that ought to make all those "visible veins" pop out!)


Aha! You are getting aroused, therefore you must be a homophobe that is
actually a closet gay!!

ST

On 4/22/08 3:17 PM, in article
6f13ce2c-9025-49ac-b880-d527ae5f5be...ooglegroups.com,
"ronaldo_jeremiah" <ronaldo_jeremiah@yahoo.com> wrote:

> On Apr 21, 9:36*pm, ST <n...@no.com> wrote:
>> It is so easy to yank your chain too isn't it... Like I did not read the
>> thing myself. What an assbag.
>
> Sorry. I just assumed you couldn't read.
>
> -rj


That is your guys problem.... You ASSume too much.

Howard Kveck

In article <C4340146.53979%no@no.com>, ST <no@no.com> wrote:

> On 4/21/08 10:51 PM, in article
> YOURhoward-66E24C.22514621042008@newsgroups.comcast.net, "Howard Kveck"
> <YOURhoward@h-SHOESbomb.com> wrote:
>
> > In article <C431D288.53814%no@no.com>, ST <no@no.com> wrote:
> >
> >> You guys are picking the easy answer. Consensual versus not.
> >
> > Because it's the right answer.
> >
> >> There are relationships WE, as humans (even just Americans) consider
> >> perverted even though they agree as partners. I am not asking for an expanation
> >> of how we deal with the situation to make it work.
> >>
> >> Where is the line between a born pre-disposition and and an inert
> >> uncontrolled desire? When does it, supposedly go from genetic and
> >> uncontrollable to free will?
> >
> > Steve, you're trying to find a way to "prove" that homosexuality is a
> > conscious choice and one that can be reversed. The entire child molestor aspect of
> > this is unrelated. You may find homosexual relationships "perverted" - no one is
> > making you be in one. The fact that some portion of society finds homosexual
> > relationships "perverted" doesn't matter, as the participants in that relationship
> > are not harming each other or society. The same can not be said for a child
> > molestor. And the "consensual" part of the equation is the important one. The rest
> > of your so-called argument is simply gibberish.
>
> Yo!
> Stop with the trying to just discern my views and thoughts! I am asking a
> question you assbags do not know. Where is the line between genetic and
> personal choice?? No more, no less......

The question has been answered. You can't understand the answer.

> I NEVER in any thing here posted a personal point of view condemning being
> gay. Where??

Your question is all about your point of view, Steve. Pretty simple, really. And
the statement, "There are relationships WE, as humans (even just Americans) consider
perverted even though they agree as partners" says it pretty loud and clear.

> You are doing exactly what I mentioned a few posts ago. You are wimping out
> on posting a viewpoint and saying "If it does not harm anyone...." pretty
> candyass.

Ah, the old challenge to my manhood - "wimping out", "candyass". Whatever.

> What if a 13 year old consented?? That is OK by your judgment?

A thirteen year old *can't* consent. I'd imagine a deep thinker like you would
know that.

--
tanx,
Howard

Whatever happened to
Leon Trotsky?
He got an icepick
That made his ears burn.

remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?

Michael Press

In article <rubrum-50E8B6.15234621042008@news.sf.sbcglobal.net>,
Michael Press <rubrum@pacbell.net> wrote:

[...]

rj, you sent me email but my reply bounced.

The original message was received at Tue, 22 Apr 2008 00:04:47 -0500
from adsl-70-231-158-102.dsl.snfc21.sbcglobal.net [70.231.158.102]

**----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<ronaldo_jeremiah@yahoo.com>
***(reason: 554 delivery error: dd This user doesn't have a yahoo.com account (ronaldo_jeremiah@yahoo.com) [0] - mta335.mail.re4.yahoo.com)

**----- Transcript of session follows -----
.... while talking to c.mx.mail.yahoo.com.:
DATA
<<< 554 delivery error: dd This user doesn't have a yahoo.com account (ronaldo_jeremiah@yahoo.com) [0] - mta335.mail.re4.yahoo.com
554 5.0.0 Service unavailable
Reporting-MTA: dns; nlpi001.prodigy.net
Received-From-MTA: DNS; adsl-70-231-158-102.dsl.snfc21.sbcglobal.net
Arrival-Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 00:04:47 -0500

Final-Recipient: RFC822; ronaldo_jeremiah@yahoo.com
Action: failed
Status: 5.0.0
Remote-MTA: DNS; c.mx.mail.yahoo.com
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 554 delivery error: dd This user doesn't have a yahoo.com account (ronaldo_jeremiah@yahoo.com) [0] - mta335.mail.re4.yahoo.com
Last-Attempt-Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 00:04:50 -0500

--
Michael Press

Donald Munro

Fred Fredburger wrote:
> The second part seems questionable to me, but that pales in comparison to
> the brilliance of your concept of an "Adulthood License". Good call!
> They should be mandatory for anyone who wishes to perform any "Adult"
> activity, including voting and procreation.

So you'll have to exchange licenses with anyone you tap/nail.

Donald Munro

Paul G. wrote:
> shhh...... They're "triple dipping". Everybody knows you can't have too
> many assault rifles, and the more you have, the safer everyone is.

Sounds like Charlton Heston went to Iraq when he died.

bjw@mambo.ucolick.org

On Apr 21, 5:22 pm, ronaldo_jeremiah <ronaldo_jerem...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> On Apr 21, 5:46 pm, ST <n...@no.com> wrote:
> > "ronaldo_jeremiah" <ronaldo_jerem...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > P.S. Here is an interesting article:
>
> > >http://tinyurl.com/2zw2g4
>
> > > P.P.S. I guarantee every dumbass on r.b.r. will examine the length of
> > > their fingers after alook at that article.
>
> > My index finger is longer.
>
> An index/ring finger length ratio > 1 is associated with being gay.
>
> I wonder if this will change Stevie's attitudes toward homosexuality.
> You know, now that he's out.
>

So, if on your left hand your index finger is longer
than your ring finger, but on your right hand your
index is shorter than your ring finger - does that
mean you're supposed to use the left hand for
wanking while thinking about men and the right hand
for wanking when thinking about women?

Ben

P.S. I'm asking for a friend.

Donald Munro

bjw@mambo.ucolick.org wrote:
> So, if on your left hand your index finger is longer than your ring
> finger, but on your right hand your index is shorter than your ring finger
> - does that mean you're supposed to use the left hand for wanking while
> thinking about men and the right hand for wanking when thinking about
> women?

If you wank with either hand it means you're ambidextrous which is a
double hit against you.