Mountain Bikers' Alleged "Love of Nature"

Mike Romain

Lloyd wrote:
> On Apr 15, 10:01 am, Mike Romain <roma...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>> V-for-Vendicar wrote:
>>> "Siskuwihane" <Siskuwiha...@gmail.com> wrote
>>>> Ah yes, what a great way to prove a point, calling someone an idiot.
>>> Google. 2 seconds
>>> Mars Warming Due to Dust Storms, Study Finds
>>> Kate Ravilious
>>> for National Geographic News
>>> April 4, 2007
>>> Temperatures on Mars have increased slightly over a 20-year period due to
>>> the action of Martian winds, scientists have found.
>>> ...
>> Ah yes, it is the 'wind' on Mars and 'pollution' on earth. LOL! What
>> about 'our' wind and all the extra storms 'we' have had in the last 20
>> years, hmm...
>>
>> Now this extra wind wouldn't have anything at all to do with the solar
>> cycle now would it.
>>
>> Man oh man some folks will believe anything someone trying to make money
>> feeds them.
>>
>> Mike
>
> And some idiots think they know more than scientists, when they really
> have trouble tying their shoes.

And we feel really bad for you about that too Lloyd. You really should
have taken that basket weaving 101 course like you mommy said and maybe
you could have caught up.

Mike

Bill Sornson

Lloyd wrote:
> On Apr 15, 10:01 am, Mike Romain <roma...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>> V-for-Vendicar wrote:
>>> "Siskuwihane" <Siskuwiha...@gmail.com> wrote
>>>> Ah yes, what a great way to prove a point, calling someone an
>>>> idiot.
>>
>>> Google. 2 seconds
>>> Mars Warming Due to Dust Storms, Study Finds
>>> Kate Ravilious
>>> for National Geographic News
>>
>>> April 4, 2007
>>> Temperatures on Mars have increased slightly over a 20-year period
>>> due to the action of Martian winds, scientists have found.
>>
>>> ...
>>
>> Ah yes, it is the 'wind' on Mars and 'pollution' on earth. LOL!
>> What about 'our' wind and all the extra storms 'we' have had in the
>> last 20 years, hmm...
>>
>> Now this extra wind wouldn't have anything at all to do with the
>> solar cycle now would it.
>>
>> Man oh man some folks will believe anything someone trying to make
>> money feeds them.
>>
>> Mike
>
> And some idiots think they know more than scientists, when they really
> have trouble tying their shoes.

But only the "right scientists", right? Ones that dare question the current
so-called consensus (which by definition has no place in scientific inquiry)
are labeled kooks and heretics. Google "founder of the weather channel" for
just one example.

HTH (BKIW)

V-for-Vendicar

"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote
> They also haven't explained how Mars has somehow, without our influence,
> warmed up 'more' than the earth in the same period.

And Uranus cooling.

MMMMMMMMMOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNNNN

V-for-Vendicar

"Siskuwihane" <Siskuwihane1@gmail.com> wrote
> Ah yes, what a great way to prove a point, calling someone an idiot.

Google. 2 seconds
Mars Warming Due to Dust Storms, Study Finds
Kate Ravilious
for National Geographic News

April 4, 2007
Temperatures on Mars have increased slightly over a 20-year period due to
the action of Martian winds, scientists have found.

....

V-for-Vendicar

> On average about 1 to 1.5 months shorter than it used to be.
> Winter is 4 months long.


"Puppet_Sock" <puppet_sock@hotmail.com> wrote
> So you are down to claiming 2.5 months now?

Yup, pretty much. It is now as if the middle 1 to 1.5 months of winter
have been erase and the starting and ending weeks of winter adjusted
accordingly.

Officially Winter is 3 months long of course, but defined in terms of first
snow an last thaw, its 4..

jazu

OMG
You still yaping against cyclist.
What is your problem?

Mike Romain

V-for-Vendicar wrote:
> "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote
>> Now this extra wind wouldn't have anything at all to do with the solar
>> cycle now would it.
>
> Absolutely nothing, for if it did, a warmig would be apparent every 11
> years.
>
> MMMMMMMMMMOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNN
>

Not into science eh.

You might want to read a bit on The report that when there are fewer
sunspots, the earth cooled (see Maunder Minimum, Little Ice Age)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Willie_Soon

Mike

V-for-Vendicar

"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote
> Now this extra wind wouldn't have anything at all to do with the solar
> cycle now would it.

Absolutely nothing, for if it did, a warmig would be apparent every 11
years.

MMMMMMMMMMOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNN

V-for-Vendicar

"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote
> And we feel really bad for you about that too Lloyd. You really should
> have taken that basket weaving 101 course like you mommy said and maybe
> you could have caught up.

Idiot KKKonservative Romain remains blissfully ignorant of the fact that
the solar cycle is 22 years long.

MMMMMMMMMOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOONNNNNNNNN

Mike Romain

V-for-Vendicar wrote:
> "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote
>> And we feel really bad for you about that too Lloyd. You really should
>> have taken that basket weaving 101 course like you mommy said and maybe
>> you could have caught up.
>
> Idiot KKKonservative Romain remains blissfully ignorant of the fact that
> the solar cycle is 22 years long.
>
> MMMMMMMMMOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOONNNNNNNNN
>
>
For someone loose with words, you are awful dumb. You 'assume' I mean
the 'Hale' sun cycle which is 22 years.

You conveniently forget about the Gleissberg cycle which is 87 years
'or' Suess cycle which is 210 years or the Hallstatt cycle which is 2300
years or the Schwabe cycle which is 11 years.

Then there are the carbon 14 sun cycles of 105, 131, 232, 385, 504, 805,
2,241 years.

Or the Upper Permain cycle that shows 2500 year sun cycles.

Then you can get into the Milankovich earth cycles and on and on...

Yup, global warming is all man made for sure eh. LOL!

Figure we had fern trees growing at the North Pole in the Triassic
period and tell me more about this 'man made' global warming. I have
fern fossils I picked up on the shore of James Bay even.

Mike

V-for-Vendicar

"Bill Sornson" <askme@ask.me> wrote
> But only the "right scientists", right? Ones that dare question the
> current so-called consensus (which by definition has no place in
> scientific inquiry) are labeled kooks and heretics.

There are no legitimate scientists questioning the broad issue of Global
Warming.

What remains are shills working for KKKonservative propaganda groups like
the CATO institute and the Marchall Institute.

Hell, most of your denialist scientists turn out to be either
non-existant, dead people, TV Weather men, or KKKonservative Political
Fossils.

DI

"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:48062d00$0$28158$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshosting.com...
> V-for-Vendicar wrote:
>> "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote
>>> And we feel really bad for you about that too Lloyd. You really should
>>> have taken that basket weaving 101 course like you mommy said and maybe
>>> you could have caught up.
>>
>> Idiot KKKonservative Romain remains blissfully ignorant of the fact
>> that the solar cycle is 22 years long.
>>
>> MMMMMMMMMOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOONNNNNNNNN
> For someone loose with words, you are awful dumb. You 'assume' I mean the
> 'Hale' sun cycle which is 22 years.
>
> You conveniently forget about the Gleissberg cycle which is 87 years 'or'
> Suess cycle which is 210 years or the Hallstatt cycle which is 2300 years
> or the Schwabe cycle which is 11 years.
>
> Then there are the carbon 14 sun cycles of 105, 131, 232, 385, 504, 805,
> 2,241 years.
>
> Or the Upper Permain cycle that shows 2500 year sun cycles.
>
> Then you can get into the Milankovich earth cycles and on and on...
>
> Yup, global warming is all man made for sure eh. LOL!
>
> Figure we had fern trees growing at the North Pole in the Triassic period
> and tell me more about this 'man made' global warming. I have fern
> fossils I picked up on the shore of James Bay even.
>
> Mike


Don't confuse him with facts, he can't understand them/

Tom Sherman

Mike Romain wrote:
> V-for-Vendicar wrote:
>> "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote
>>> And we feel really bad for you about that too Lloyd. You really
>>> should have taken that basket weaving 101 course like you mommy said
>>> and maybe you could have caught up.
>>
>> Idiot KKKonservative Romain remains blissfully ignorant of the fact
>> that the solar cycle is 22 years long.
>>
>> MMMMMMMMMOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOONNNNNNNNN
>>
> For someone loose with words, you are awful dumb. You 'assume' I mean
> the 'Hale' sun cycle which is 22 years.
>
> You conveniently forget about the Gleissberg cycle which is 87 years
> 'or' Suess cycle which is 210 years or the Hallstatt cycle which is 2300
> years or the Schwabe cycle which is 11 years.
>
> Then there are the carbon 14 sun cycles of 105, 131, 232, 385, 504, 805,
> 2,241 years.
>
> Or the Upper Permain cycle that shows 2500 year sun cycles.
>
> Then you can get into the Milankovich earth cycles and on and on...
>
> Yup, global warming is all man made for sure eh. LOL!
>
> Figure we had fern trees growing at the North Pole in the Triassic
> period and tell me more about this 'man made' global warming. I have
> fern fossils I picked up on the shore of James Bay even.
>
Unaware of plate tectonics, eh?

--
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
The weather is here, wish you were beautiful

Mike Romain

Tom Sherman wrote:
> Mike Romain wrote:
>> V-for-Vendicar wrote:
>>> "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote
>>>> And we feel really bad for you about that too Lloyd. You really
>>>> should have taken that basket weaving 101 course like you mommy said
>>>> and maybe you could have caught up.
>>>
>>> Idiot KKKonservative Romain remains blissfully ignorant of the fact
>>> that the solar cycle is 22 years long.
>>>
>>> MMMMMMMMMOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOONNNNNNNNN
>>>
>> For someone loose with words, you are awful dumb. You 'assume' I mean
>> the 'Hale' sun cycle which is 22 years.
>>
>> You conveniently forget about the Gleissberg cycle which is 87 years
>> 'or' Suess cycle which is 210 years or the Hallstatt cycle which is
>> 2300 years or the Schwabe cycle which is 11 years.
>>
>> Then there are the carbon 14 sun cycles of 105, 131, 232, 385, 504,
>> 805, 2,241 years.
>>
>> Or the Upper Permain cycle that shows 2500 year sun cycles.
>>
>> Then you can get into the Milankovich earth cycles and on and on...
>>
>> Yup, global warming is all man made for sure eh. LOL!
>>
>> Figure we had fern trees growing at the North Pole in the Triassic
>> period and tell me more about this 'man made' global warming. I have
>> fern fossils I picked up on the shore of James Bay even.
>>
> Unaware of plate tectonics, eh?
>

Nope, I am fully aware of it unlike you obviously and the 'fact' that
the north pole was still at the north pole or we could just call it the
'top of the world' so as to not confuse, back when the super-continent
of Panagea was at it's hey day in the Triassic period.

The top of the world had coniferous and fern trees and the equator was
more desert like and dry.

Mike