![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#31 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Toronto Canada
Posts: 460
|
What's the difference between taking PEDs, and using some advanced technology that no-one else has access to (like aero-bars when they first came out)?
I can't see one. Both are attempts to give you an unfair advantage over other riders. |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 416
|
Quote:
What I was getting at on that post was Lance wasn't "cheating" back then (assuming the reports are true). The rules have changed and people are still doping and it is officially cheating. I'm interested in what people are doing that currently isn't "cheating". Gene doping....now there is a risk if ever I heard one!! At least with hormones or EPO you can stop taking them! Cycling is about man and machine (or woman). What can a person get out of themselves on two wheels with a spring of guide lines. It has been determined from time to time that certain designs can't be used because of the unfair advantage ruling. You should watch the movie "The Flying Scotsman" very funny segments and shows how arrogant the UCI can be when they don't like something/someone. There are MANY limitations on what design elements you can use on a UCI legal road bike.
__________________
******BLATANT ADVERTISING ALERT****** I have ceramic bearings for: Campy/Fulcrum high end hubs/wheels Shimano hubs and pedals check out my ebay items here |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Great Smoky Mountains, TN USA
Posts: 6,119
|
Quote:
Public knowledge!
__________________
Whenever I can't get excited about riding I just fantasize about someone else's bike. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,199
|
Quote:
Yep, mom and dad won't care if their son or daughter wants aero bars because their favorite rider is using a certain piece of equipment, but when kids are able to locate a dealer or internet source because news on the street is you have to use PED's they will blindly use PED's without a doctor or knowledge on how to use. I have to admit that is how I got started way back when. My first injection I had no clue other than put some in a syringe and try not to hit a nerve or artery. My first number of years half of what I used wasn't even real and probably had contaminants. Later we were stupid enough to create certain types of anabolics on the kitchen stove. Some of those guys ended up with abssesses that had to be surgically opened and cleaned. I ended up becoming a dealer so that I could get closer to the source so that everything I used was legit and not fake. It just took me deeper into the badlands. By the way I post these things if only to do one thing and that is bring clarity that using PED's is not just cheating. There are a lot of risks involved and a lot of personal damage and shame that will go along with it. None of these people that are eventually exposed like Landis, Marion Jones, Conseco and so on are having a feel good moment right now.
__________________
My Blog |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Great Smoky Mountains, TN USA
Posts: 6,119
|
Quote:
Yes, bike components won't cause your heart rate to drop to zero in your sleep.
__________________
Whenever I can't get excited about riding I just fantasize about someone else's bike. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The land where the shadows lie
Posts: 3,112
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Toronto Canada
Posts: 460
|
That's not my point.
My point is why is it ok to get an advantage using technology that is not available to everyone, but it is not ok to get an advantage using PEDs? Both are cheating imo, since it is not solely your body, your training, and your desire that helps you win. |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The land where the shadows lie
Posts: 3,112
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 569
|
Quote:
Low pressure chamber, sleeping capsule. Used by Lance. Artificial way to increase red blood cells. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Great Smoky Mountains, TN USA
Posts: 6,119
|
As far bike equipment, bikes and equipment are examined and deemed ok or not. They are out there for the whole world to see. Using covert methods for physical enhancement is a whole other world.
Equipment technology is constantly evolving. I am not saying there have not been instances of cheating using illegal equipment, but it is difficult and rare that someone gets away with it.
__________________
Whenever I can't get excited about riding I just fantasize about someone else's bike. |
|
|
|
|
|
#41 | ||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The land where the shadows lie
Posts: 3,112
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,199
|
It would also seem that an equipment or clothing advantage (like the dimpled swimsuit controversy ) may give a slight percentage of advantage, but to be a larger advantage it would more likely be a very radical difference in equipment one would think.
The difference in using PED's is typically a 10% advantage over natural efforts among similar genetic capabilities. Me taking all the PED's that I could and still live will not help me against a pro cyclists because my genetics are not prime for cycling. So to be clear the comparison is among similar genetic capabilities. 10% +/- is a huge advantage and the other huge advantage in human physiology is a faster recovery time. One could have a miserable day one day and drop the whole field the next day if that sounds familiar. Equipment and clothing does not have that capability without it being something really radical and even then I would be skeptical of the discussion.
__________________
My Blog |
|
|
|
|
|
#43 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Great Smoky Mountains, TN USA
Posts: 6,119
|
Quote:
I agree with the 10% estimate however the other advantages are getting in form much more quickly, pre -season, and as you stated faster recovery which is a big advantage in a mulit-stage race.
__________________
Whenever I can't get excited about riding I just fantasize about someone else's bike. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Toronto Canada
Posts: 460
|
The DarkLord wants to know where technology gave an unfair advantage.
Didn't Lemond barely eke out a TDF win in 1989 when he used aero bars in the time trial, and Fignon didn't have them? How is this conceptually different from gaining an advantage by using PEDs? |
|
|
|
|
|
#45 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: København
Posts: 12
|
Quote:
If Fignon didn't use aero bars then it was because he choose not to, not because he didn't have access. Almost all aspects of racing bikes are regulated by UCI, eg. if your wheeltype hasn't been approved by the UCI, then it isn't allowed in UCI regulated races. There are several reasons for this regulation but the primary reason is no one can race with equipment that gives them an unfair advantage. -- Regards |
|
|
|
|