![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kansas City, USA
Posts: 3,574
|
Quote:
If we assume that athletes of all levels can sustain and benefit from a weekly training load of ~1000 TSS/wk, then that's still 14 hrs per week with an average IF of .85 (ie, all SST all the time), which would still track with "accepted wisdom" from the OP's point of view. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 490
|
Quote:
How many hours of L4 were you doing per week in previous years? Any L2 then? I would bet that your total training volume in previous years did not get you up to a CTL of 120. That could have something to do with you running out of gas last year. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 490
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 890
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 466
|
Quote:
typical week was probably typical of the working guys on the forum 2/3 x 20min L4 x 2/3 per week 2 hrs SST 1/2 x per week 5 x 5min at L5 once a week 6 x 1min L6 once a fortnight a few sprints on the "big ring" 2 hr outdoor ride on the weekend if the weather was OK..... total volume - 10-12 hrs per week, most of it done at an "uncomfortable", "this will get me used to racing" kind of pain. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,572
|
Quote:
Because I do the majority of my training indoors on an ergometer, my average IF is higher than an almost anyone else's. Still, even on 12 h/wk I'd be hard-pressed to get my CTL over 100 TSS/d. IOW, when expressed in terms of TSS your chronic training load is probably at least 20% higher this year, and quite possibly more. Last edited by acoggan : 13-03.-2008 at 06:43 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 175
|
Quote:
You're attributing this to you winter base but you should also attribute it to the SST and L4 workouts from last year. Also not working full time cannot be over looked. Of course results will perhaps be the true testiment to your new training protocol. But to be honest psychologically you'd have to say you feel better this time otherwise all that ill health and riding slow in the cold would appear to be a complete waste of time ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 490
|
Quote:
2/3 x 20min L4 x 2/3 per week ---> Let's call this ~200 TSS on avg 2 hrs SST 1/2 x per week ---> = ~220 TSS 5 x 5min at L5 once a week ---> =~120 TSS 6 x 1min L6 once a fortnight ---> =~100 TSS a few sprints on the "big ring" [in a] 2 hr outdoor ride ---> =~100 TSS Grand total = 740 TSS/week =~105 CTL after 16 weeks. Potentially not a huge difference from 120. Hard to say since the numbers are so rough but my gut feeling just from the description (forgetting about the math) is that you may not have gone above 100 though. Let's see what you think about "all L2, all the time" in September. I'm genuinely curious. Last edited by Steve_B : 13-03.-2008 at 06:52 AM. Reason: Addition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 490
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 50
|
my knees are hurting at the thought of it!
-Mike Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 128
|
So... in terms of mitochondria, vascularisation and making the ole ticker more efficient, what is it that more hours achieves?
Is it that things are damaged more so build up stronger, or that going to extreme fatigue levels makes you fitter? When I'm doing 2x20s, would doing 4x20s make me fitter? The thought of that is rather overwhelming, but if that's what it takes... But how about keeping doing what I'm doing? Surely the improvements will come eventually. Mind you, I'd be pretty useless as a dad if I was absolutely exhausted and probably ill more often. I guess there's a physiological limit, a maximum amount of damage/repair that 8-10 hours affords, that will see me forever doomed to stare at Cadel's back wheel as he disappears up the Ventoux... |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kansas City, USA
Posts: 3,574
|
Quote:
The body adapts to the training stimulus provided. More stimulus = more adaptation. "Alls you can do is alls you can do." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 103
|
Quote:
Did you also notice that Sam is the same guy who one the best hand made bike recently. Sold the bike for 13,000 to Lance Armstrong. I use to work and ride with Sam when he was doing the HPV thing. The crazy thing is Sam has a good engine but not a great one (he TTs at 43-45kph on regular TT bike). It is amazing on just how slippery those HPVs are. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 86
|
Quote:
But the question at hand is when do you reach diminshing returns? I would imagine that at some point improvement begins to level off no matter how many hours you put in or how many 2 x 20s you do, and performance may even suffer as you add training load. Maybe the only way to know is to push yourself to the breaking point and use available tools, the Performance Manager for example, to then manage your training up to your own personal point of diminishing returns. |
|
|
|
|