![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Resting by the Tumtum tree
Posts: 6,291
|
Here is his speech to the ECU. He stopped one step short of accusing the ASO of buying yellow cake uranium.
-------- Presidents and Officials of the member-federations of the European Cycling Union, Dear Colleagues and Friends, Welcome to this annual meeting of the UEC Congress. As always, it is an honour and a pleasure to address the representatives of our Sport in Europe, west and east, north and south. Cycling is increasingly becoming global and winning new followers year on year. However, only one region in the world is the birthplace of Cycling and the repository of its heritage. And that is Europe. All of us in this room are aware that we live in momentous times. Since we know each other very well allow me to dispense with pleasantries and get to the point… with brutal frankness. Yes, these are troubled times. Our Sport is faced with a clear and present danger. Never before in the history of the International Cycling Union – the worldwide federation of federations— has the institutional foundation of our sport been threatened in the way it is today. And yet, we stand divided… Divided, hesitant and unaware of the lethal nature of the challenges that we face. Therefore, I cannot stand before you today with a “business as usual” attitude. It is my duty to present to you the grave issues at hand and the enormous stakes at risk. I will do so, as you know I always do, in clear and plain language. It is also my obligation to advise you about UCI’s position in this conflict, formed in strict compliance with its Constitution and its Regulations. Which I will also do so in unmistakable terms. And finally, as head of the Governing Body for Cycling worldwide, it is appropriate that I brief you on the stance that UCI will take in this crisis. It will be, in a nutshell, the only possible one: We as an organization, and I as its President, will fulfil our mandate. One word keeps resonating in my mind lately. I think it’s time to say it out loud: The word is Enough! In the last two years, those who have opposed UCI at every turn have justified their actions with a smokescreen of false pretences.
Amaury Sports Organization… A. S. O. Before going on, I should confess here that I have been too prudent, too patient… some of my closest associates would say I might have even been naïve. Despite the arrogance and the provocations; despite the breaches of agreements… I made efforts to keep the dialogue open, to accept mediation, to avoid burning bridges… Dialogue with many parties may have been difficult –even tense—at times, but it has been honest and ultimately productive. As a result, we have reached meaningful solutions for issues with all members of the cycling family… except for one: ASO. By deciding to run the Paris-Nice race outside the UCI rules of participation, ASO have crossed the line of what is legal, what is proper and what is fair. If successful, they will attain their main objective: a total shift in the balance of power in cycling:
But those actions expose them. The agenda behind ASO’s relentless attitude of refusal to accept anything but their own conditions –their own business imperatives— has finally come into clear focus. Look at the contract that ASO proposed to the teams for their participation in Paris-Nice. This is what they mean by regenerating the sport! This is what they mean by protecting the legacy of some of the world’s greatest races!
These most recent events have only one upside. They have once and for all torn down the façade behind which ASO has been hiding its true intent. It is now crystal-clear to all that the merchants will stop at nothing in the pursuit of their exclusive financial interests. A History professor I met recently at a social event explained to me three key steps in any conspirator’s manual for a successful coup d’état:
Yes, sometimes I fear we are not totally conscious of the magnitude of the challenge that is being cast at our feet.
Today, here, in this room, sits a Federation president that has chosen to throw its support behind the Paris-Nice in the new form that its organizers have imposed It is difficult for me to witness how the steward that has received the trust of the entire French Federation would take the route of de facto secession to support a private concern. I can not understand how this attitude might preserve the interests of all the constituents of the French Cycling Federation. And I am saddened when one of our member federations seems unable –or unwilling—to withstand the pressure of economic and political power. M. Pittalier: Let me make one final appeal to you and your federation today. I make it from the bottom of my heart both as President of the UCI and as a former cyclist…
And I ask all of you to equally reflect deeply and sincerely on these issues. We have a collective duty here today, and in upcoming days, weeks and months. It is to preserve, to protect and enforce the rules of our Sport. They are there to ensure fairness. They can be changed, of course, through a thoughtful, legal and democratic process… They can be adapted to new demands, to new opportunities… But they can not be thrown out when they cease to serve the interests of just one party. The UCI is prepared to live up to this duty. And I am personally committed to the two core elements of the mandate I was given when elected to preside our organization:
But these last events have only strengthened my resolve. I am not only committed. I am totally dedicated to this task. I will not allow a full-fledged aggression of our Organization. I will continue ensuring that UCI’s resources apply –rigorously but fairly—the full weight of our regulations. I have said ENOUGH! I ask you to say the same here today and act in consequence. Thank you.
__________________
"You are like the wind and I like the lion. You form the tempest. The sand stings my eyes and the ground is parched. I roar in defiance but you do not hear. But between us there is a difference. I, like the lion, must remain in my place. While you like the wind will never know yours." -- Mulay Hamid El Raisuli, Lord of the Riff, Sultan to the Berbers, Last of the Barbary Pirates |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 224
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,840
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: You are here => X
Posts: 10,494
|
Is everyone here blinded by their love for ASO, and their bitterness at the UCI? If cycling becomes controlled by a sports promoter, unlike any other sport in the Olympics, or any other major sport, you can just kiss it's ass goodbye. Pro cycling to the sport of cycling will become the same as pro wrestling to the sport of wrestling. It will become a renegade show. Yes the sport needs promoters, and they need to have a profit incentive, but they don't get to administer the sport.
You guys bleat about the farking doping cheaters, and how it ruins the integrity of the sport. If ASO are running things, forget about integrity. We need to fix UCI, not hand the sport over to businessmen.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 422
|
This sounds like something which could have come out of the Fuhrerbunker in the early days of 1945 (and since I don't say this about someone else's post, you cannot invoke Goodwin's law here).
Where are the Belgian, Italian, Dutch, German, Swiss and Spanish federations in this? I thought I read somewhere that at least some of those federations support the French cycling federation. ETA: apparently, the teams are trying to force a decision between ASO and UCI by appealing to the CAS A decision is anticipated for Friday. Last edited by Cobblestones : 06-03.-2008 at 08:24 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 541
|
Quote:
Don't know, but Steve Johnson of US Cycling has come out in support of UCI in this (maybe not necessarily this speech). Doesn't seem like we're hearing much from the big name retired racers. You'd think Armstrong would come out swinging against ASO, but then, maybe he can't stomach supporting the UCI either. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Resting by the Tumtum tree
Posts: 6,291
|
Quote:
![]() " For us there are only two possiblities: either we remain UCI or we come under the thumb of the ASO. This latter must not occur; even if we are small, we are a force. A well-organized group can conquer a strong enemy. If you stick close together and keep bringing in new people, we will be victorious over the ASO." "As Fuehrer of cycling and Chancellor of the UCI, I can thank God at this moment that he has so wonderfully blessed us in our hard struggle for what is our right, and beg Him that we and all other nations may find the right way, so that not only the UCI but all Europe may once more be granted the blessing of peace."
__________________
"You are like the wind and I like the lion. You form the tempest. The sand stings my eyes and the ground is parched. I roar in defiance but you do not hear. But between us there is a difference. I, like the lion, must remain in my place. While you like the wind will never know yours." -- Mulay Hamid El Raisuli, Lord of the Riff, Sultan to the Berbers, Last of the Barbary Pirates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Resting by the Tumtum tree
Posts: 6,291
|
Quote:
What Johnson said sounded like it was written by the UCI. I swear when I was reading it I was thinking he must have taken a UCI e-mail and slightly altered it.
__________________
"You are like the wind and I like the lion. You form the tempest. The sand stings my eyes and the ground is parched. I roar in defiance but you do not hear. But between us there is a difference. I, like the lion, must remain in my place. While you like the wind will never know yours." -- Mulay Hamid El Raisuli, Lord of the Riff, Sultan to the Berbers, Last of the Barbary Pirates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 224
|
Well, try as he might, McQuaid certainly didn't win over Pitallier:
http://beta.velonews.com/article/73...-go-to-court-if |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 95
|
Crankyfeet, at least someone here is thinking rationally.... Kudos for you!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Resting by the Tumtum tree
Posts: 6,291
|
Quote:
The UCI needs to get rid of McQuaid and Vedruggen. They are incompetent and their reign has been an unmitigated disaster. As long as those two are in charge there will be severe problems. The other possibility is to break away from the UCI and set up an equivalent organization that just handles the pro side of the sport.
__________________
"You are like the wind and I like the lion. You form the tempest. The sand stings my eyes and the ground is parched. I roar in defiance but you do not hear. But between us there is a difference. I, like the lion, must remain in my place. While you like the wind will never know yours." -- Mulay Hamid El Raisuli, Lord of the Riff, Sultan to the Berbers, Last of the Barbary Pirates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 541
|
This is all like watching two countries escalate before going to war. All we need is some "shoving" incident involving Leclerc or McQuaid in Sarajevo.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 422
|
Quote:
No, I see the potential problems just as well when ASO takes over professional cycling. However, right now, at this point in time, potential problems down the road take the back seat compared to the very real problems we have right now. The real problem is that UCI is incapable of governing the sport. How did, for example, Astana get a pro license for this year? This should never have happened. It's a disgrace. ASO is just reacting to this kind of bullshit which comes out of the UCI offices. At present, I feel the the commercial interests of ASO have a better overlap with the sport of pro cycling than the (not very clear) interests of UCI (whatever they may be). In general, (and this is the same Cranky is saying), the UCI needs to be fixed, right now, to have a working governing body of cycling. I wonder whether a coalition of the great national cycling federations (France, Italy, Netherlands, Belgia, Spain, possibly Germany) could bring about such change and overthrow the Verbruggen old boys. Alternatively, pressure could come from the other end (IOC), but I'm not holding my breath there. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,088
|
Quote:
There is no reason for ASO to control the sport. Never forget that cycling is not only road cycling... But road cycling races need authority agreements. Sport in France is ONLY regulate by federations . That is similar in almost all countries in Europe so the power will stay to federations. For exemple football in France is still regulate (pro or amateurs) by french federation.
__________________
Let Astana and McQuaid whine ! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 271
|
I'm backing Cranky on this one. Not backing the UCI, mind you.
For everyone to run to loving embrace of the ASO is idiocy. They care for themselves alone; to think otherwise is to delude oneself. That said, McQuaid has lost it. He criticises the arbitrary expulsions of teams and riders but then arbitrarily destroys the careers of VDB, Sinkewitz, Hamilton, Botero (but not Millar) even after they have served their time. One form of despotism for another. His ramming through the ProTour, rather than amending it so that both sides might accept it, is his idea of leaving open the door to acceptable compromises for all. ************** Incidentally, I thought the idea floated by someone else of paying the PT teams, rather than the other way around, was a good one. Cf. the English Premier League, which has a strict promotion/relegation system, and where the teams in the league share some of the broadcasting rights money. When a team is relegated they lose out on a whole bunch of cash (meaning they usually have to sell of players), so the incentive to do well at every opportunity is always there. Perhaps you could still retain the financial and organisational requirements (so that teams don't collapse mid-season, and pay riders), but a cash incentive would be a powerful way of encouraging that. ************** It wasn't just the Reichskanzler who had fiery speeches: Even though large numbers of European races and many old and famous Monuments have fallen or may fall into the grip of the ASO and all the odious apparatus of its rule, we shall not flag or fail. We shall go on to the end, we shall fight in France, we shall fight on the mountain passes and climbs, we shall fight with growing confidence and growing strength on the cobblestones, we shall defend our sport, whatever the cost may be, we shall fight in the media, we shall fight in the courts, we shall fight in the commentary boxes and on the internet, we shall fight on Cyclingforums; we shall never surrender... |
|
|
|