![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 287
|
Quote:
Regarding the 1st, I cannot imagine that Bruyneel would have been that ignorant to think that Kloden would not have some dirt just waiting to be dug up. Perhaps he is so full of himself and his ability to skirt getting caught that he honestly believed Kloden would be protected. He miscalculated this way with Basso. Regarding the 2nd question, I would think it would only serve to strengthen ASO's case. It's damned unfortunate that the UCI bungled so badly by allowing Astana to survive after the doping positives from 2007. The ASO should not have the power that they do but the UCI just keeps looking more incompetent to me.
__________________
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take." -- Wayne Gretzsky |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 700
|
regarding the rat... coerced testimony is compromised testimony. period.
it is clear there is an agenda and that is to continue to go after riders on the hit list. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,547
|
Quote:
If you subtract Basso Armstrong Ullrich Vinokourov Heras Beloki Hamilton Landis Mancebo Rumsas (Beloki) Valverde (when on top program) you almost have a top 10 that has been removed from the Tour. All of those riders are still of age to be in the top 10 in the Tour. All have been banned, or in Armstrong's case, retired before any potential sanction. Raimondas Rumsas is my example of what dope can do. Rumsas, no doubt a phenomenally talented rider, BUT, probably no more so that the average pro. I mean, I would take Casar and Moncoutie over him if all were clean. So, Rumsas, without all the advanatages Armstrong has in money, recources, training, dope, doctor, team etc, rides to within 5 minutes of him on GC. I mean, wtf? Also, check Rumsas' timetrials. They are also indicative. He only lost about 1 minute over both tts combined. My point is, Rumsas had a great dope program. But I still think it would have been inferior to Armstrong's dope program. That is what dope can do. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,030
|
Quote:
For riders with less ranking, the odds are just decreasing : sustained output power keeps the key factor!
__________________
Let Astana and McQuaid whine ! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,833
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,547
|
Quote:
I wonder if Armstrong was prescient enough to see that Bruyneel was mates with Verbrugghen and he could get protection. I think he could have had such foresight. Protection + Spanish doctors + US $$$ and resources can anyone tell me the Rumsas of 2002 was no different to Armstrong in terms of performance? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 420
|
Quote:
That was low. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,833
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,454
|
Andreas Klöden: "I hope soon the whole situation will be cleared up."
http://www.cyclingheroes.info/id1350.html |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,011
|
Quote:
Yep they all said it would be "cleared up"......... speaking of which.... paves the way for a comeback with Astana ? _______ Berlin - German prosecutors are seeking a deal with former Tour de France winner Jan Ullrich in which an investigation into alleged deception could be dropped, a news magazine reports. According to the weekly Focus to appear Monday, Ullrich would have to pay 1 million euros (1.54 million euros) and admit his involvement in a Spanish blood doping scandal. According to the report, the prosecutors in Bonn would suspend possible deception charges in which Ullrich's former employer, T-Mobile, is the injured party. Bonn prosecutors had said last week they would be releasing no interim results of their continuing investigations. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 201
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,454
|
German media like to repeat Ullrich news as his name is still selling copies... This is news from about six months ago (and maybe even longer...).
Actually I heard that from the state prosecution personally (in 2007!). It seems to me that they have a problem to go to court with the case.... Its a desperate last try as they can't proof that Ullrich was cheating TM. Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,011
|
Quote:
Well they have no chance now.... T-Mobile were organising the doping ! I'd say Ullrich would love his day in court.... then he can get his darn book out ! "Jan Ullrich: drugs & donuts - my life as a pro cyclists with T-Mobile" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,454
|
Quote:
That's why the old news of paying 1 million for a deal is bollocks. Several sources are telling me that the state prosecution is looking for a way out without loosing their face. They know they won't win a court case but its a problem to close the case after they told German media again and again that they are almost ready to nail Ullrich... |
|
|
|
|