Cycling Forums   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage

Go Back   Cycling Forums > General > The Bike Café > aus.bicycle
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Does Facebook support the advocating injuring or worse cyclists?

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 22-02.-2008, 12:57 PM   #16
kottebulle
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Does Facebook support the advocating injuring or worse cyclists?

There is also this group:

http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=7496964237&ref=share>which

"I would love to knock that cyclist off the road when im driving!"

Less members, but still promotes the wrong message.

--
Message posted using http://www.talkaboutcycling.com/group/aus.bicycle/
More information at http://www.talkaboutcycling.com/faq.html

  Reply With Quote
Old 22-02.-2008, 01:10 PM   #17
Bean Long
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Does Facebook support the advocating injuring or worse cyclists?

Did anyone check out the group Admins? One of them is a fan of "cycling"
according to their Facebook page. Work that one out??
  Reply With Quote
Old 22-02.-2008, 01:21 PM   #18
cfsmtb
Registered User
 
cfsmtb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: In low earth orbit
Posts: 4,945
Default Re: Does Facebook support the advocating injuring or worse cyclists?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bean Long
Did anyone check out the group Admins? One of them is a fan of "cycling" according to their Facebook page. Work that one out??


Yes, a one of the new admins I can easily work that one out. Read the groups description, the original creators (whoever they were?) didn't put themselves forward either as admins or owners, so a couple of us decided to be the new admins. Make sense now?

" ... Group closed because we need to think about road use that doesn't involve grievous bodily harm. As this group's name incited violence towards legal road users and the original group's creators were lacking a spine to actually have the guts to name themselves, we have closed this group.

Unfortunately Facebook rules are such that once a group is created its name cannot be changed or edited ..."
cfsmtb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-02.-2008, 01:34 PM   #19
Travis
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Does Facebook support the advocating injuring or worse cyclists?

On Feb 22, 5:51 am, "Theo Bekkers" <tbekk...@bekkers.com.au> wrote:
> Andrew Priest wrote:
> > G'day

>
> > A thought. Does Facebook support the advocating of injuring or your
> > son or, daughter or brother or sister or mum or dad or partner? Well
> > it appears to do so, because it is allowing this group
> > <http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=6125389234&ref=share>which
> > advocates the attacking of cyclists, i.e., road rage, to remain on
> > Facebook. If you don't like what Facebook is allowing let them know at
> >http://www.facebook.com/report.php?...34&h=1b28568e0c.

>
> Hmmm. It's asking me to login to both of those urls. I've never used
> facebook before and don't really want to register (I get enough junkmail
> now), so I can't see what it is you're complaining about. My thinking is
> that therefore it is not a 'public' domain and as I'm very strongly against
> cenorship of any kind, I'll decline to complain about something I can't see
> to be offended about.
>
> Theo


Everything at Facebook requires you to log in. I signed up ages ago,
I haven't done anything at all with it but my page is bustling with
activity anyway because of all my passing aquaintences leaving
Facebook messages, signing the guestbook etc etc. I can see why
Facebook is a good resource for identity theives, even without me
doing anything a surprisingly detailed database of my relationships
has assembled itself...


But the page was pretty horrendous stuff. It didn't appear to be a
joke, which is to say that there wasn't much laughing going on. One
comment, which is typical, was from a young lady that said she
habitually swerves toward cyclists just to give them a scare. The
other day she did that and the cyclist fell off his bike and hurt
himself. She felt a little bit bad over this, but still found it
uproarously funny and couldn't stop laughing as she drove away leaving
some random cyclist with unknown injuries alone at the side of the
road.

It goes beyond the standard aus.cars "get off the fkn road ya poofta"
type stuff into a much darker sadistic sociopathy. I don't see
anything good coming out of creating a forum where scumbags like that
can get together and entertain each other with stories of the latest
cyclist they scared and/or hurt.

At the bottom of the page is a "report this group" link, and when you
click on it you select your reason for reporting the group. One of
the reasons was "attacking a specific person or group" and another was
"violence". Both would qualify, on the face of it this group is
against Facebook's terms of service and should be banned on those
grounds alone, for the same reason that Facebook and YouTube and
similar sites take down any other hate speech material, especially the
kind where violent acts are encouraged.

Travis
  Reply With Quote
Old 22-02.-2008, 01:40 PM   #20
Travis
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Does Facebook support the advocating injuring or worse cyclists?

On Feb 22, 12:10 pm, Bean Long <ben.l...@yourfinger.anu.edu.au> wrote:
> Did anyone check out the group Admins? One of them is a fan of "cycling"
> according to their Facebook page. Work that one out??


I don't think she was the one that created the original obnoxious
group. She only joined it recently and has taken over as the new
admin, her first action seems to have been to close the group down.

Travis
  Reply With Quote
Old 22-02.-2008, 02:20 PM   #21
Theo Bekkers
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Does Facebook support the advocating injuring or worse cyclists?

Travis wrote:
> Theo Bekkers wrote:


>> Hmmm. It's asking me to login to both of those urls. I've never used
>> facebook before and don't really want to register (I get enough
>> junkmail now), so I can't see what it is you're complaining about.
>> My thinking is that therefore it is not a 'public' domain and as I'm
>> very strongly against cenorship of any kind, I'll decline to
>> complain about something I can't see to be offended about.


> Everything at Facebook requires you to log in. I signed up ages ago,
> I haven't done anything at all with it but my page is bustling with
> activity anyway because of all my passing aquaintences leaving
> Facebook messages, signing the guestbook etc etc. I can see why
> Facebook is a good resource for identity theives, even without me
> doing anything a surprisingly detailed database of my relationships
> has assembled itself...


Sounds like a goodd reason n ot to log in.

> But the page was pretty horrendous stuff. It didn't appear to be a
> joke, which is to say that there wasn't much laughing going on. One
> comment, which is typical, was from a young lady that said she
> habitually swerves toward cyclists just to give them a scare. The
> other day she did that and the cyclist fell off his bike and hurt
> himself. She felt a little bit bad over this, but still found it
> uproarously funny and couldn't stop laughing as she drove away leaving
> some random cyclist with unknown injuries alone at the side of the
> road.
>
> It goes beyond the standard aus.cars "get off the fkn road ya poofta"
> type stuff into a much darker sadistic sociopathy. I don't see
> anything good coming out of creating a forum where scumbags like that
> can get together and entertain each other with stories of the latest
> cyclist they scared and/or hurt.
>
> At the bottom of the page is a "report this group" link, and when you
> click on it you select your reason for reporting the group. One of
> the reasons was "attacking a specific person or group" and another was
> "violence". Both would qualify, on the face of it this group is
> against Facebook's terms of service and should be banned on those
> grounds alone, for the same reason that Facebook and YouTube and
> similar sites take down any other hate speech material, especially the
> kind where violent acts are encouraged.


Errm, how does it go? As much as I disagree with some people's stated
opinions, I will defend their right to state them.

Sure you can have rules about content and, if those rules are breached,
there will be consequences. I personally think you shouldn't be allowed to
post anywhere, or log on to anything, withoput using your real email
address.

Theo


  Reply With Quote
Old 22-02.-2008, 03:17 PM   #22
Donga
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Does Facebook support the advocating injuring or worse cyclists?

On Feb 22, 11:49 am, lemmiwinks...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> I'm basing it on the fact that one of them (my girlfriends dog
> technically) eats pretty much any shit it can get it's filthy little
> paws on. It's not that I shit in the yard and wait to see what
> happens, rather I figure if you'll eat dogshit, you'll eat
> anything ;-) On the plus side, it does mean there's probably only 1/2
> the dogshit in the yard that there'd be otherwise. She's a pretty
> good dog apart from that, I just make sure to never, ever, under any
> circumstances let her lick me (goes for any dog really).


My dog and youngest son had a good thing going when the lad was being
toilet-trained. He didn't like sitting on the toilet, so he'd get
naked and head out in the garden. The dog knew the game and followed,
tail wagging. Said lad would lay a turd while dog ate it up with
gusto. Never let a dog lick your face.
  Reply With Quote
Old 22-02.-2008, 03:56 PM   #23
Andrew Priest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Does Facebook support the advocating injuring or worse cyclists?

On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 20:57:00 -0600, "kottebulle"
<kottebulle@fake.hotmail.com> wrote:

>There is also this group:
>
>http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=7496964237&ref=share>which
>
>"I would love to knock that cyclist off the road when im driving!"


Reported.

Andrew
-----
Churchlands, Western Australia
Giant CRX 1; Giant Boulder SE
http://aushiker.com http://aushiker.blogspot.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 22-02.-2008, 04:20 PM   #24
TimC
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Does Facebook support the advocating injuring or worse cyclists?

On 2008-02-22, lemmiwinks.au@gmail.com (aka Bruce)
was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea:
> On Feb 22, 12:18 pm, cfsmtb <cfsmtb.355...@no-
> mx.forums.cyclingforums.com> wrote:
>>
>> > My dogs would eat it. I'm not sure if this is a good thing or not.

>>
>> Sure you should of typed that on a public group, as it inadvertently
>> says a lot about you?

>
> I'm basing it on the fact that one of them (my girlfriends dog
> technically) eats pretty much any shit it can get it's filthy little
> paws on. It's not that I shit in the yard and wait to see what
> happens, rather I figure if you'll eat dogshit, you'll eat
> anything ;-) On the plus side, it does mean there's probably only 1/2
> the dogshit in the yard that there'd be otherwise.


Due to the laws of conservation of mass (conservation of energy,
technically), there is the law of conservation of dog shit.

Thus, you dog will be shitting out everything they eat.

--
TimC
If it weren't for C, we'd be writing programs in BASI, PASAL, and OBOL.
  Reply With Quote



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 08:37 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com