Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Tech Corner > Power Training
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


which computrainer

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 30-04.-2008, 09:11 AM   #16
strader
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 113
Default Re: which computrainer

I ended up picking up the Computrainer after all. I did a quick test on it after a 15 minute warm up at ~200 watts, and a calibration value of 2.05 lbs. Here's how it compared to my powertap (which I remembered to zero this time) over three 5 minute trials at 300, 250, and 200 watts:

Computrainer Powertap
300 watts 316 watts -5.1%
250 watts 264 watts -5.3%
200 watts 212 watts -5.6%

Not bad, but I'd like them to track a bit closer. 316 watts feels a lot harder for me than 300.
The unit also develops a nasty buzz at around 22 mph wheel speed. I can feel it though the bike. Could it just be an unbalanced tire? Something loose on the trainer? Right now I'm using a Michelin Carbon, but I have a conti home trainer tire sitting in a box waiting to be used.
strader is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-05.-2008, 04:21 PM   #17
Porkyboy
Registered User
 
Porkyboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Northumberland. UK
Posts: 77
Default Re: which computrainer

Quote:
Originally Posted by strader
I ended up picking up the Computrainer after all. I did a quick test on it after a 15 minute warm up at ~200 watts, and a calibration value of 2.05 lbs. Here's how it compared to my powertap (which I remembered to zero this time) over three 5 minute trials at 300, 250, and 200 watts:

Computrainer Powertap
300 watts 316 watts -5.1%
250 watts 264 watts -5.3%
200 watts 212 watts -5.6%

Not bad, but I'd like them to track a bit closer. 316 watts feels a lot harder for me than 300.
The unit also develops a nasty buzz at around 22 mph wheel speed. I can feel it though the bike. Could it just be an unbalanced tire? Something loose on the trainer? Right now I'm using a Michelin Carbon, but I have a conti home trainer tire sitting in a box waiting to be used.
Hi

FWIW my advice would be as follows:
  1. Fit Conti tyre.
  2. Inflate to 110psi.
  3. Run routine and set calibration with trainer and tyre cold, ensure press on force is about 3lbs at this stage.
  4. Warm up tyre and trainer for 10 minutes, at least 8 minutes done @ 175W.
  5. Recalibrate trainer, this should now give you a press on force of about 2.4-2.6lbs.
  6. You are now properly calibrated, perform tests at about 90RPM , away you go, post results here
  7. Re-run calibration after tests, the reading should be VERY close to the reading obtained in step 5, if the unit and tyre were properly warmed up.
My experience is that with press on forces in the lower end of the range, and 2 is the absolute minimum, you may well get "micro slips" of the tyre, especially at higher wattages if the cadence is lowish, the above routine avoids this. Bear in mind if you are going to do any work standing up, steep gradient settings, high wattages, you may well need to set a press on force of above 3 to avoid "micro slips" which are not obvious when they are happening on any trainer.

Can't help you will the buzz!

Cheers.

PBUK
__________________
What do you mean your legs are hurting? Give it some welly man!
Visit My Training Weblog
Porkyboy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-05.-2008, 10:01 AM   #18
strader
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 113
Default Re: which computrainer

In case anyone is interested in the follow-up, after following rmur's calibration procedure my computrainer and powertap track much closer:

CT PT % diff
300 299 -0.3%
250 252 0.7%
200 204 1.9%
150 156 3.8%

The slopes cross over around 280ish watts, which I call Good Enough (TM). I figure workouts paced by either one should be within a couple of TSS points.
strader is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-05.-2008, 03:26 PM   #19
Porkyboy
Registered User
 
Porkyboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Northumberland. UK
Posts: 77
Default Re: which computrainer

Hi Strader

Quote:
Originally Posted by strader
In case anyone is interested in the follow-up, after following rmur's calibration procedure my computrainer and powertap track much closer:

CT PT % diff
300 299 -0.3%
250 252 0.7%
200 204 1.9%
150 156 3.8%

The slopes cross over around 280ish watts, which I call Good Enough (TM). I figure workouts paced by either one should be within a couple of TSS points.
I've re-read the thread and am not quite clear in my own mind exactly which exactly is rmurs callibration procedure as based on your experiences I'd like to try following it. Any chance of a 1,2,3 noddy guide?

Thanks for your help.

PBUK
__________________
What do you mean your legs are hurting? Give it some welly man!
Visit My Training Weblog
Porkyboy is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 02:04 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet