Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Bike Racing > Grand Tours - Giro - Tour de France - Vuelta a España
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


No Tour for Astana

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 24-02.-2008, 12:18 PM   #181
doctorSpoc
Registered User
 
doctorSpoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 897
Default Re: No Tour for Astana

Quote:
Originally Posted by tambourlain
OP is being reopened to determine if they can get Fuentes based upon medical malpractise or the mishandling of blood. This reopening has nothing to do with the atheletes.
wft? oh yeah... and none of the atheletes will be question and none of their names will be mentioned at any time during the trial... how many working brain cells do you have online... one... two?

also Tori is out for blood as well (literally and figuratively) and with the tour going through italy a big drug raid will be a nice addition to the tour festivities... Tori is shooting to get that OP blood tested and have a few spaniard go down for the count...

bottom line just too much down side and risk with Contador in the tour... it would just be stupid and foolish to let him ride... Contador gets to ride when the dust settles on OP
doctorSpoc is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 24-02.-2008, 01:32 PM   #182
tambourlain
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 67
Default Re: No Tour for Astana

Quote:
Originally Posted by thunder
He said he was peaking for the third week cos he knew he was gonna get the dope then.

No mindless one, he had peaked too early when he won the Dauphine and it had hurt him. So he learned from his mistake. In the 2007 Dauphine he did poorly because he was well before his peak. And I don't care a rats ass about any conspiracy theories for which you don't have a shred of evidence.
tambourlain is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 24-02.-2008, 01:37 PM   #183
thunder
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,530
Default Re: No Tour for Astana

Quote:
Originally Posted by tambourlain
No mindless one, he had peaked too early when he won the Dauphine and it had hurt him. So he learned from his mistake. In the 2007 Dauphine he did poorly because he was well before his peak. And I don't care a rats ass about any conspiracy theories for which you don't have a shred of evidence.

the Dauphine is about 6 weeks before the third week of the Tour.

You can still peak for the Tour, and not peak for the Dauphine, without resorting to justification why your dope fuelled third week of the tour will be so strong.

Fuckwit.
thunder is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 24-02.-2008, 01:40 PM   #184
tambourlain
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 67
Default Re: No Tour for Astana

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crankyfeet
Probably explains why he was so crap in the 2006 TdF ITT's.

He was sick in the 2006 TDF, idiot. Play any stupid game you want, but Levi comes up clean, despite your obvious effort to create something where nothing exists. It says a lot more about what a butthead you are than it says about Levi.
tambourlain is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 24-02.-2008, 01:41 PM   #185
Crankyfeet
Registered User
 
Crankyfeet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: You are here => X
Posts: 10,005
Default Re: No Tour for Astana

Quote:
Originally Posted by tambourlain
No mindless one, he had peaked too early when he won the Dauphine and it had hurt him. So he learned from his mistake. In the 2007 Dauphine he did poorly because he was well before his peak. And I don't care a rats ass about any conspiracy theories for which you don't have a shred of evidence.
Why was Armstrong always upset when riders talked about doping and broke the omerta? If he was clean... shouldn't he have been a crusader against doping in the peleton?
__________________


Crankyfeet is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 24-02.-2008, 01:42 PM   #186
thunder
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,530
Default Re: No Tour for Astana

Quote:
Originally Posted by tambourlain
He was sick in the 2006 TDF, idiot. Play any stupid game you want, but Levi comes up clean, despite your obvious effort to create something where nothing exists. It says a lot more about what a butthead you are than it says about Levi.

ask Odessa or his wife whatever her name is. She has a big mouth.


LEVI = DOPER.

In LL's defence, he is not doing anything the top riders at the Tour are not.But Disco have got their doping down to a fine art form. Think Einstein PLUS Van Gogh
thunder is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 24-02.-2008, 01:44 PM   #187
Crankyfeet
Registered User
 
Crankyfeet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: You are here => X
Posts: 10,005
Default Re: No Tour for Astana

Quote:
Originally Posted by tambourlain
He was sick in the 2006 TDF, idiot. Play any stupid game you want, but Levi comes up clean, despite your obvious effort to create something where nothing exists. It says a lot more about what a butthead you are than it says about Levi.
If he was sick lamebrain, why did he not tell his team and let someone else lead? If he was sick and kept his team chugging for him right up until the penultimate stage... what a friggin' egotistical jerk. No wonder his team was slagging him at the press conferences.

Please don't use the argument that he only realised he was sick in the last TT. His first TT was equally as poor.
__________________


Crankyfeet is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 24-02.-2008, 01:47 PM   #188
thunder
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,530
Default Re: No Tour for Astana

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crankyfeet
If he was sick lamebrain, why did he not tell his team and let someone else lead? If he was sick and kept his team chugging for him right up until the penultimate stage... what a friggin' egotistical jerk. No wonder his team was slagging him at the press conferences.

Please don't use the argument that he only realised he was sick in the last TT. His first TT was equally as poor.

he was sick, but then manages to climb in the top 3 in the first mtn stage, and does a lot of wheelsucking. Only Landis and Evans worked. Bit of Sastre at the start. Maybe Mench pulled thru once or twice.

LL is a doper, face it dude.
thunder is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 24-02.-2008, 01:48 PM   #189
tambourlain
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 67
Default Re: No Tour for Astana

Quote:
Originally Posted by doctorSpoc
wft? oh yeah... and none of the atheletes will be question and none of their names will be mentioned at any time during the trial... how many working brain cells do you have online... one... two?
That would be two more than you. The atheletes don't know anything about Fuentes lab proceedures or how well he kept records or how well he kept his blood sorted. They have already been question on the earlier issue, which is if Fuentes did anything to harm their health. The atheletes will not be questioned on this go around.

also Tori is out for blood as well (literally and figuratively) and with the tour going through italy a big drug raid will be a nice addition to the tour festivities... Tori is shooting to get that OP blood tested and have a few spaniard go down for the count...

Contador already volunteered to have his blood tested against the Fuentes blood bags. So the odds there are zero.
tambourlain is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 24-02.-2008, 01:49 PM   #190
thunder
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,530
Default Re: No Tour for Astana

Quote:
Originally Posted by tambourlain
That would be two more than you. The atheletes don't know anything about Fuentes lab proceedures or how well he kept records or how well he kept his blood sorted. They have already been question on the earlier issue, which is if Fuentes did anything to harm their health. The atheletes will not be questioned on this go around.

also Tori is out for blood as well (literally and figuratively) and with the tour going through italy a big drug raid will be a nice addition to the tour festivities... Tori is shooting to get that OP blood tested and have a few spaniard go down for the count...

Contador already volunteered to have his blood tested against the Fuentes blood bags. So the odds there are zero.

why is Levi so good.

why did he never show anything in the classics, or when he was 24 or 25.

Spell it out to you dude.

DOPER!
thunder is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 24-02.-2008, 01:51 PM   #191
tambourlain
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 67
Default Re: No Tour for Astana

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crankyfeet
Why was Armstrong always upset when riders talked about doping and broke the omerta? If he was clean... shouldn't he have been a crusader against doping in the peleton?

You obviouly have very limited concentration.
tambourlain is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 24-02.-2008, 01:59 PM   #192
thunder
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,530
Default Re: No Tour for Astana

Quote:
Originally Posted by tambourlain
You obviouly have very limited concentration.

Tambourlain, you know NOTHING about cycling mate. you are, in Aussie parlance, a wanker.
thunder is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 24-02.-2008, 01:59 PM   #193
Crankyfeet
Registered User
 
Crankyfeet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: You are here => X
Posts: 10,005
Default Re: No Tour for Astana

Quote:
Originally Posted by tambourlain
Contador already volunteered to have his blood tested against the Fuentes blood bags. So the odds there are zero.
Yes... the odds are near zero. It is highly likely that under Saiz at LS - young Alberto would have been the only one in the team who refused to be part of the team administered drug program. He would have just flat refused to compromise his principles, knowing that one day he would like to ride for the whiter than white Disco train.

Dream on numbskull...
__________________


Crankyfeet is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 24-02.-2008, 02:00 PM   #194
tambourlain
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 67
Default Re: No Tour for Astana

Quote:
Originally Posted by thunder
he was sick, but then manages to climb in the top 3 in the first mtn stage, and does a lot of wheelsucking. Only Landis and Evans worked. Bit of Sastre at the start. Maybe Mench pulled thru once or twice.

LL is a doper, face it dude.

Let's see, he performed too well because he came in third, and he didn't perform well enough because he was wheelsucking. Buy yourself a brain. There isn't a single fucking cyclist that performs well all the time or poorly all time. If you expect the same performance from every cyclist all the time then you will have to conclude that the entire peleton is doping. Your entire rant is nothing but a manufactured accusation; because the truth is that Levi is more consistent than the vast majority of riders. And the variation that you see in Levi's performance is less than what you see in most riders performance. Your dumb fuck conspiracy theory is something that you manufactured to fit your prejudice - nothing less.
tambourlain is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 24-02.-2008, 02:01 PM   #195
thunder
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,530
Default Re: No Tour for Astana

Quote:
Originally Posted by tambourlain
Let's see, he performed too well because he came in third, and he didn't perform well enough because he was wheelsucking. Buy yourself a brain. There isn't a single fucking cyclist that performs well all the time or poorly all time. If you expect the same performance from every cyclist all the time then you will have to conclude that the entire peleton is doping. Your entire rant is nothing but a manufactured accusation; because the truth is that Levi is more consistent than the vast majority of riders. And the variation that you see in Levi's performance is less than what you see in most riders performance. Your dumb fuck conspiracy theory is something that you manufactured to fit your prejudice - nothing less.

no, you may remember, alot of riders where scared after OP at the 2006 tour, and there were a few suspicious performances.

Hincapie and LL being the two obvious ones.
thunder is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 06:21 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet