![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#151 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,156
|
Quote:
Bruyneel was the gag of last TDF seeking sponsors, that was a great pleasure and lot of laugh for everyone. What a Wally ! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#152 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 68
|
Quote:
ROFLMAO. Yeah, Oleg Tinkoff is extremely concerned about doping. I haven't had such a good laugh in a long time. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#153 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 219
|
I think I know where you are making your mistake. You define doping as having a criminal charge, which means no doubt. But, this is a public opinion forum, and the standard here is preponderance. Astana had a history of doping in 2007. The team changed management, but did nothing to start a doping control program. Several riders with prior association with Bruyneel have been convicted of doping; Landis and Hamilton. Sounds to me like it was a logical decision. To ban a team, they don't need criminal, just preponderance and it appears to me that is what they had.
Quote:
__________________
He who dies with the most bikes.....Wins |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#154 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,156
|
ASO don't need to ban the doped DISCOTANA riders,
they did just not invite them ! |
|
|
|
|
|
#155 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 68
|
Quote:
No, most doping charges don't involve criminal charges. What I'm saying is that the cycling federations, the race organizers, WADA, and the UCI all have an official definition of doping. Under that definition Bruyneel's team has no positives. So are the race organizers going to conform to their own standards and do things in a professional manner, or are they going to make decisions based upon rumor, innuendo and hearsay. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#156 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: You are here => X
Posts: 10,807
|
Hey Tambourlain... while every cyclist in the world is either watching or competing in the Giro and the TdF, Astana can suck on a banana...
The once-Disco-but-now-we-love-Astana fanboys, like yourself, will probably like to use the banana for more pleasurable things... ![]()
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#157 | ||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 68
|
Quote:
Quote:
Are you arguing with yourself now poulidor? |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#158 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 541
|
Quote:
I'm confused about the insult. Is an unadulterated piece of shit better or worse than an adulterated piece of shit? Last edited by limerickman : 25-02.-2008 at 12:39 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#159 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,156
|
Quote:
An other ? ASTANA won't be on TDF to be unpleasant with all disco fans! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#160 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 68
|
Quote:
And every cyclist in the world will know that the races are meaningless, since three of the five best, including the very best, will not be there. This year, if you want to call yourself the best, you will have to go to the Vuelta and win it. So if you think that's a great Giro or a great TdF, then it makes sense that you also think that a banana is an object of pleasure. This years Tour will be contested by three wheel suckers - Menchov, Evans and Valverde. And it will be won by a well doped up Menchov. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#161 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 219
|
But that is the standard they use, if there is any doubt they don't accept the lab test results. That means, a lot of riders are doping, but not getting caught. Astana and Bruyneel are doping, Astana got caught, Bruyneel hasn't yet. The EPO standard is 50% hematocrit, so riders still take EPO, but not too much so they don't exceed the 50%. Just because they don't test positive, does not mean the riders are not doping. It only means they are not being caught.
Quote:
__________________
He who dies with the most bikes.....Wins |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#162 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: You are here => X
Posts: 10,807
|
Quote:
__________________
Last edited by Crankyfeet : 24-02.-2008 at 10:32 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#163 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: You are here => X
Posts: 10,807
|
Quote:
![]() It disheartens me that you are in such grief at your favorite team's exclusion. Now I am going to be very, very upset that tambourlain is unhappy.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#164 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,572
|
Quote:
they know who is doping you muppet. They know who is flying, ask Mcgee, the riders know who is doing what, it is evident on the road. You assume that teams that avail themselves of sophisticated methods to beat the tests, should be given carte blanche to dope because of said "definition". If anything from Balco, to OP has told you, if you wish for a dope free sport, you cannot rely only on direct analysis testing parameters. You need the policing authorites, non-analytical tests and so on, to butress the enforcement. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#165 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: You are here => X
Posts: 10,807
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
Last edited by limerickman : 25-02.-2008 at 12:40 AM. |
|
|
|
|