![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Zebee Johnstone <zebeej@gmail.com> wrote in
news:slrnfrath7.26g.zebeej@gmail.com: > In aus.bicycle on Fri, 15 Feb 2008 21:26:59 +1100 > Aeek <aeeeeeek@tpg.com.au> wrote: >> On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 21:09:25 +1100, ritcho >><ritcho.34thiz@no-mx.forums.cyclingforums.com> wrote: >> >>>.. which is why I prefer to slow, but remain silent when passing >>>people on shared paths. If they're in front of me, it's my >>>responsibility to miss them. >> >> I say "Good Morning!" as I do that (in the morning). >> Defuses any agro about not ringing my bell. > > I gave up on voice because so few people thought it was directed at > them. Whereas most peds on a path can make the bell-bicycle-move > connection. > > I ring reasonably early and watch for which way they move. Had 2 the > other day who went one to each side, so I slowed right down to ride > between them. Mostly they'll move one side or the other. If they are > already off to one side, I'll go as far as I can to the other side. I do any or all of the things mentioned so far, depending on time of day, location and my assessment of the peds' activities and body language as I approach. Bell and voice are useless if the ped is wearing earphones, but the very worst ones are those who are having an argument with somebody on the other end of a mobile. They can jump all over the place without regard for anything coming up behind. I note that signs have recently gone up on Pyrmont Bridge, restricting the south side to pedestrians only. That is a good idea. Now if only they would paint a nice big green strip down the other side, with little white bicycles painted at frequent intervals. -- beerwolf |
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On 15 Feb 2008 11:23:19 GMT, Zebee Johnstone <zebeej@gmail.com> wrote:
>In aus.bicycle on Fri, 15 Feb 2008 21:26:59 +1100 >Aeek <aeeeeeek@tpg.com.au> wrote: >> >> I say "Good Morning!" as I do that (in the morning). >> Defuses any agro about not ringing my bell. > >I gave up on voice because so few people thought it was directed at >them. Whereas most peds on a path can make the bell-bicycle-move >connection. My voice is too late to affect them, just being "friendly". I bell sometimes, and sometimes I have a bell. |
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Aeek wrote:
> On 15 Feb 2008 11:23:19 GMT, Zebee Johnstone <zebeej@gmail.com> wrote: > >> In aus.bicycle on Fri, 15 Feb 2008 21:26:59 +1100 >> Aeek <aeeeeeek@tpg.com.au> wrote: > >>> I say "Good Morning!" as I do that (in the morning). >>> Defuses any agro about not ringing my bell. >> I gave up on voice because so few people thought it was directed at >> them. Whereas most peds on a path can make the bell-bicycle-move >> connection. > > My voice is too late to affect them, just being "friendly". > I bell sometimes, and sometimes I have a bell. My experience is mostly based on Canberra's mixed use recreation paths - note that they are not cycle paths despite the white line down the middle. My voice is big enough to be effective, and seems to produce a more predictable outcome than any bell, buzzer or horn. I call "bike behind" in a sonorous voice and they mostly do the right thing. Most predictable - single joggers. Least preductable - groups of four talking and strolling. Most dangerous - two people with three dogs. |
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
beerwolf wrote:
> Zebee Johnstone <zebeej@gmail.com> wrote in > >> I ring reasonably early and watch for which way they move. Had 2 the >> other day who went one to each side, so I slowed right down to ride >> between them. Mostly they'll move one side or the other. If they are >> already off to one side, I'll go as far as I can to the other side. > > I do any or all of the things mentioned so far, depending on time of > day, location and my assessment of the peds' activities and body > language as I approach. Bell and voice are useless if the ped is wearing > earphones, but the very worst ones are those who are having an argument > with somebody on the other end of a mobile. They can jump all over the > place without regard for anything coming up behind. The best (worse?) I've come across was the bloke who, as I approached from the rear with a "excuse me, coming through on the right", told his girlfriend who was walking side-by-side with him to "stay where you are - don't get off the path". Which is one reason why I really do prefer mixing it with traffic on the road, rather than shared lanes. |
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Peter Cremasco wrote:
> The best (worse?) I've come across was the bloke who, as I approached > from the rear with a "excuse me, coming through on the right", told his > girlfriend who was walking side-by-side with him to "stay where you are > - don't get off the path". > > Which is one reason why I really do prefer mixing it with traffic on the > road, rather than shared lanes. LOL, reminds of the time I was trying to get my motorbike up onto the footpath in the CBD at the lights. A group of young stockbroker types (I worked just up from the Exchange) were kind of in my way when one of them deliberately moved in front of me (with a smirk to his mates) so I couldn't get up onto the footpath. He soon found out that wet tyres and dirty roads combine to make a big mark on a nice clean suit when he was nudged out of the way. ![]() DaveB |
|