Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Tech Corner > Cycling Equipment
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


What is the truth behind bike weight? Does it really help THAT much?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 17-02.-2008, 09:28 PM   #226
TheDarkLord
Registered User
 
TheDarkLord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,846
Default Re: What is the truth behind bike weight? Does it really help THAT much?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigbananabike
There must be SOME difference in speed between a heavier bike and a lighter ('faster wheel') bike.
For training I ride my steel framed single speed or my alloy Felt F80 with R500 wheels. My normal hilly training rides give me an average speed(or lack of speed ! ) of 25kph.
Racing - I use my race only bike (Fausto Coppi alloy with Ksyriums and 20mm tyres, not a lot lighter than the Felt). A race example(sure I spent most of the time in the middle of the bunch) of my speed is 36 kph for 48 kms. A race the other week 72kms (a lot of it by myself) at average 31 kph.
There must be a bike component in there somewhere.
Do you train alone? The big difference between riding alone vs riding in a group/race is the drafting that reduces the air drag significantly. About the second race you mentioned above - maybe the extra adrenalin in the race accounted for the difference? And yes, there will be SOME difference between a heavy and light bike. But it will be very small, and probably unnoticeable, especially if your fitness is improving since the latter will swamp the former.
TheDarkLord is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 18-02.-2008, 04:49 AM   #227
Bigbananabike
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 667
Default Re: What is the truth behind bike weight? Does it really help THAT much?

Hi.
Yep, you're right - I do train alone(mainly) so its just me plodding into the wind....
I knew that'd be the biggest variable + riding with others inspires one to go faster (even if they're behind).
My fitness would be the same - even in our race season my training pace doesn't get any faster but I get faster racing.
Strange huh?!


Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDarkLord
Do you train alone? The big difference between riding alone vs riding in a group/race is the drafting that reduces the air drag significantly. About the second race you mentioned above - maybe the extra adrenalin in the race accounted for the difference? And yes, there will be SOME difference between a heavy and light bike. But it will be very small, and probably unnoticeable, especially if your fitness is improving since the latter will swamp the former.
Bigbananabike is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 18-02.-2008, 09:21 AM   #228
artemidorus
Registered User
 
artemidorus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 2,179
Default Re: What is the truth behind bike weight? Does it really help THAT much?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigbananabike
There must be SOME difference in speed between a heavier bike and a lighter ('faster wheel') bike.

Of course there is - on a steep ascent, the difference in speeds is directly proportional to the weight difference of the total system. If I trimmed my 8.7kg bike to the UCI limit (and I have no intention of doing that!) I'd be about 2% faster on a steep climb. On a 20min climb, this would be 24 seconds - a pretty fair margin. Even if you just want to hand your mates a caning, this'll help.
On the flat, there is no difference in steady speed. On a descent, a light bike is a slight disadvantage.
__________________
"All that we see and seem is but a dream, within a dream..."
artemidorus is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 18-02.-2008, 10:11 PM   #229
Tapeworm
Registered User
 
Tapeworm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 92
Default Re: What is the truth behind bike weight? Does it really help THAT much?

Quote:
Originally Posted by artemidorus
Of course there is - on a steep ascent, the difference in speeds is directly proportional to the weight difference of the total system. If I trimmed my 8.7kg bike to the UCI limit (and I have no intention of doing that!) I'd be about 2% faster on a steep climb. On a 20min climb, this would be 24 seconds - a pretty fair margin. Even if you just want to hand your mates a caning, this'll help.
On the flat, there is no difference in steady speed. On a descent, a light bike is a slight disadvantage.



Sorry, just curious, why is the light bike a disadvantage on the decent?
__________________
Ride like you mean it
Tapeworm is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 19-02.-2008, 07:21 AM   #230
sogood
Registered User
 
sogood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sydney, AU
Posts: 2,132
Send a message via AIM to sogood
Default Re: What is the truth behind bike weight? Does it really help THAT much?

F=ma.
__________________
Morphed Bianchi Camaleonte IV 2006, Ridley Damocles 2006, Garmin, Mac
sogood is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 19-02.-2008, 08:28 AM   #231
TheDarkLord
Registered User
 
TheDarkLord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,846
Default Re: What is the truth behind bike weight? Does it really help THAT much?

Quote:
Originally Posted by sogood
F=ma.
So? How does that translate to a disadvantage for light-weight bike? Considering just the weight, the accelerating force when descending = m*g*gradient where m is the mass, g is the acceleration due to gravity, and gradient is the gradient (well, actually gradient is the tangent of the slope angle, while the actual quantity that counts is the sine of the angle, but for gradients of the order of 10%, the difference is negligible). So, just by gravity, there should not be any dependence on mass of the bike.
TheDarkLord is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 19-02.-2008, 08:29 AM   #232
artemidorus
Registered User
 
artemidorus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 2,179
Default Re: What is the truth behind bike weight? Does it really help THAT much?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tapeworm
Sorry, just curious, why is the light bike a disadvantage on the decent?

On a descent, the major retarding force is air drag, which is independent of weight. The major propelling force is gravity, which is proportional to the total system mass. The more the system mass, the higher the propelling force, and drag doesn't change.
__________________
"All that we see and seem is but a dream, within a dream..."
artemidorus is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 19-02.-2008, 09:07 AM   #233
TheDarkLord
Registered User
 
TheDarkLord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,846
Default Re: What is the truth behind bike weight? Does it really help THAT much?

Quote:
Originally Posted by artemidorus
On a descent, the major retarding force is air drag, which is independent of weight. The major propelling force is gravity, which is proportional to the total system mass. The more the system mass, the higher the propelling force, and drag doesn't change.
Artemidorus, propelling force is larger for a heavier bike, but the acceleration is force divided by mass, and so it is independent of bike mass. If you drop two weights, one light and the other heavy, both will reach the ground at the same time if the air drag is the same on both. So, if the air drag is the same for both the light bike and heavier bike, I don't see how a light bike has a disadvantage.
TheDarkLord is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 19-02.-2008, 09:24 AM   #234
artemidorus
Registered User
 
artemidorus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 2,179
Default Re: What is the truth behind bike weight? Does it really help THAT much?

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDarkLord
If you drop two weights, one light and the other heavy, both will reach the ground at the same time if the air drag is the same on both.

Wrong. They will hit the ground at the same time if there is no air drag, or if the air drag is the same proportion of their masses. If they have the same absolute drag, then the heavier mass will hit the ground first.
__________________
"All that we see and seem is but a dream, within a dream..."
artemidorus is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 19-02.-2008, 09:33 AM   #235
sogood
Registered User
 
sogood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sydney, AU
Posts: 2,132
Send a message via AIM to sogood
Default Re: What is the truth behind bike weight? Does it really help THAT much?

Actually, mass independence is only true in a vacuum ie. In a system without resistance. For a bike with a cyclist on top, aero drag and system friction will all retard the rolling bike.
__________________
Morphed Bianchi Camaleonte IV 2006, Ridley Damocles 2006, Garmin, Mac
sogood is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 19-02.-2008, 10:00 AM   #236
TheDarkLord
Registered User
 
TheDarkLord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,846
Default Re: What is the truth behind bike weight? Does it really help THAT much?

Quote:
Originally Posted by artemidorus
Wrong. They will hit the ground at the same time if there is no air drag, or if the air drag is the same proportion of their masses. If they have the same absolute drag, then the heavier mass will hit the ground first.
Ok, I get it. The drag force is independent of mass, and hence, the drag per unit mass is less for the heavier bike. Is there any estimate on what the actual gain is?
TheDarkLord is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 19-02.-2008, 10:21 AM   #237
artemidorus
Registered User
 
artemidorus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 2,179
Default Re: What is the truth behind bike weight? Does it really help THAT much?

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDarkLord
Ok, I get it. The drag force is independent of mass, and hence, the drag per unit mass is less for the heavier bike. Is there any estimate on what the actual gain is?

Anecdotally, at 90kg I can roll past most people if none of us are pedalling, often at 1-2km/h more than they are doing. Clearly there are some potential confounders with that example, but the differences are not completely trivial.
__________________
"All that we see and seem is but a dream, within a dream..."
artemidorus is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 19-02.-2008, 10:35 AM   #238
sogood
Registered User
 
sogood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sydney, AU
Posts: 2,132
Send a message via AIM to sogood
Default Re: What is the truth behind bike weight? Does it really help THAT much?

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDarkLord
Ok, I get it. The drag force is independent of mass, and hence, the drag per unit mass is less for the heavier bike. Is there any estimate on what the actual gain is?

Not quite. But the common reference of a heavier rider is that their aero drag is not proportional to the increased weight when compared with a lightweight rider. So heavy riders will progressively gain more advantage with increasing weight. But if you are talking about two bikes (same design without the rider but differing weight), then there's no resistive difference b/n the two, but there will be a difference in the propulsive force on a downhill.
__________________
Morphed Bianchi Camaleonte IV 2006, Ridley Damocles 2006, Garmin, Mac
sogood is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 19-02.-2008, 11:00 AM   #239
TheDarkLord
Registered User
 
TheDarkLord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,846
Default Re: What is the truth behind bike weight? Does it really help THAT much?

Quote:
Originally Posted by sogood
But if you are talking about two bikes (same design without the rider but differing weight), then there's no resistive difference b/n the two, but there will be a difference in the propulsive force on a downhill.
But what counts is force per unit mass, right? So, don't see how that alone will make a difference. Since drag is proportional to the square of velocity, if you write out the equation of motion, it will be

mg sin(theta) - kv^2 = ma,

where theta is the slope angle, and k is a coefficient related to drag, v is the velocity. So, while drag per unit mass is less, the propulsive force per unit mass is the same. So, don't see how increased propulsive force will lead to the difference here.
TheDarkLord is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 19-02.-2008, 11:11 AM   #240
sogood
Registered User
 
sogood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sydney, AU
Posts: 2,132
Send a message via AIM to sogood
Default Re: What is the truth behind bike weight? Does it really help THAT much?

I am no physicist and there are lots of far better qualified people here to answer this.

My understanding is that given the same bike apart from weight (same resistive forces), the propulsive force on the heavier bike would be greater due to its mass (g is a constant and same for both bikes). So as a result, the net force (propulsive) on the heavier bike is greater than the lighter bike).

Am I wrong to explain it this way?
__________________
Morphed Bianchi Camaleonte IV 2006, Ridley Damocles 2006, Garmin, Mac
sogood is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 06:44 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet