MTB Training program recommendations

maguahiker@gmail.com

On Feb 4, 11:58*pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 19:24:38 -0800 (PST), Siskuwihane
>
>
>
>
>
> <Siskuwih...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Feb 3, 8:17*pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> >> On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 12:45:36 -0800 (PST), Siskuwihane
>
> >> <Siskuwih...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >On Feb 3, 2:16*pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> >> >> On Sat, 2 Feb 2008 13:34:42 -0800 (PST), Siskuwihane
>
> >> >> <Siskuwih...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >On Feb 1, 8:42*pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> >> >> >> On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 05:03:43 -0800 (PST), mike <mlawr...@gmail.com>
> >> >> >> wrote:
>
> >> >> >> >Mike Vandeman;
>
> >> >> >> >I don't mean to sound like an ass, but what the hell does your ("pure
> >> >> >> >habitat") have to do with my winter training?
>
> >> >> >> Probably nothing. Ever hear of a "signature"? It's on every one of my
> >> >> >> posts.
>
> >> >> >> >If you ever get a chance, come up to Northern Ontario in the spring
> >> >> >> >time and honk your car horn at the first moose you see on/near the
> >> >> >> >road.
>
> >> >> >> I don't own a car.
>
> >> >> >How do you get to the airport to attend "Lectures Given at
> >> >> >International Environmental Conferences"?
> >> >> >Walk?
>
> >> >> Interestingly, there are some airports that one can walk to. I walked
> >> >> to the Adelaide, Australia airport from where I was staying.San
> >> >> Diego's airport is within walking distance of downtown. I'm sure there
> >> >> are lots of others.
>
> >> >Only greedy people who have no concern for the enviroment use air
> >> >travel. They know full well that jets dump pollution directly in the
> >> >upper troposphere and lower stratusphere.
>
> >> >Next time take a sailboat.
>
> >> >"By 2050, carbon-dioxide emissions from airliners are expected to grow
> >> >two to 10 times the 1992 level, thanks to increasing air traffic,
> >> >according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report co-
> >> >authored byDr. Penner. By then, aircraft emissions will have risen to
> >> >5 percent of the cause of global warming, IPCC says.
>
> >> >New research suggests the problem could be even bigger. "Contrails can
> >> >be called a cause of warming and definitely need to be considered in
> >> >climate-change models," says Patrick Minnis, an atmospheric scientist
> >> >at Langley Research Center in Hampton, Va., part of the National
> >> >Aeronautics and Space Administration."
>
> >> >""Aviation's impact on the environment could be immense. Jet engines
> >> >directly emit greenhouse gases by burning kerosene."
>
> >> Have you ever flown in an airplane, hypocrite?
>
> >NO, I never have so calling me a hypocrite is a LIE.
>
> I guess you've never ridden in a motor vehicle, huh, hypocrite?
>
> >YOU are the hypocrite for using a form of travel that is damaging to
> >the planet when you could be going by SAILBOAT or using conference
> >calling.
>
> --
> I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
> humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
> years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)
>
> Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!
>
> http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Mikey

If we wanted your expert opinion...we would ask it regarding your
specialty...what is that now besides being a true asshole...I believe
it is dietary? ? ?

Mike Vandeman

On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 21:31:44 -0800 (PST), "f.effigy@gmail.com"
<f.effigy@gmail.com> wrote:

>It seems counter intuitive to have people flying to an environmental
>conference. Maybe you could push for a more distributed conference,
>with local groups getting together to teleconference with other groups
>around the world. It would preserve local face-to-face interaction
>that reinforces the community aspect, but allow a global audience for
>lectures (as well as more flexible timing via recorded playback). VoIP
>(video and/or voice) technology could enable discussions of large
>size. I believe Focus The Nation got together a webcast on the 31st to
>many groups across the nation. Shouldn't be too hard do it several
>times a day to a smaller audience.
>
>If it's all about making sacrifices to preserve our life support
>systems, then why not lead by example?

I have always made that suggestion, of course. As soon as the
technology is available & affordable, and conference organizers want
to do it, it will happen. Video would present privacy problems.
--
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

Mike Vandeman

On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 03:52:09 -0800 (PST), Siskuwihane
<Siskuwihane@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Feb 4, 11:58*pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>> On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 19:24:38 -0800 (PST), Siskuwihane
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <Siskuwih...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Feb 3, 8:17*pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>> >> On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 12:45:36 -0800 (PST), Siskuwihane
>>
>> >> <Siskuwih...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >On Feb 3, 2:16*pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>> >> >> On Sat, 2 Feb 2008 13:34:42 -0800 (PST), Siskuwihane
>>
>> >> >> <Siskuwih...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >On Feb 1, 8:42*pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>> >> >> >> On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 05:03:43 -0800 (PST), mike <mlawr...@gmail.com>
>> >> >> >> wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> >Mike Vandeman;
>>
>> >> >> >> >I don't mean to sound like an ass, but what the hell does your ("pure
>> >> >> >> >habitat") have to do with my winter training?
>>
>> >> >> >> Probably nothing. Ever hear of a "signature"? It's on every one of my
>> >> >> >> posts.
>>
>> >> >> >> >If you ever get a chance, come up to Northern Ontario in the spring
>> >> >> >> >time and honk your car horn at the first moose you see on/near the
>> >> >> >> >road.
>>
>> >> >> >> I don't own a car.
>>
>> >> >> >How do you get to the airport to attend "Lectures Given at
>> >> >> >International Environmental Conferences"?
>> >> >> >Walk?
>>
>> >> >> Interestingly, there are some airports that one can walk to. I walked
>> >> >> to the Adelaide, Australia airport from where I was staying.San
>> >> >> Diego's airport is within walking distance of downtown. I'm sure there
>> >> >> are lots of others.
>>
>> >> >Only greedy people who have no concern for the enviroment use air
>> >> >travel. They know full well that jets dump pollution directly in the
>> >> >upper troposphere and lower stratusphere.
>>
>> >> >Next time take a sailboat.
>>
>> >> >"By 2050, carbon-dioxide emissions from airliners are expected to grow
>> >> >two to 10 times the 1992 level, thanks to increasing air traffic,
>> >> >according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report co-
>> >> >authored byDr. Penner. By then, aircraft emissions will have risen to
>> >> >5 percent of the cause of global warming, IPCC says.
>>
>> >> >New research suggests the problem could be even bigger. "Contrails can
>> >> >be called a cause of warming and definitely need to be considered in
>> >> >climate-change models," says Patrick Minnis, an atmospheric scientist
>> >> >at Langley Research Center in Hampton, Va., part of the National
>> >> >Aeronautics and Space Administration."
>>
>> >> >""Aviation's impact on the environment could be immense. Jet engines
>> >> >directly emit greenhouse gases by burning kerosene."
>>
>> >> Have you ever flown in an airplane, hypocrite?
>>
>> >NO, I never have so calling me a hypocrite is a LIE.
>>
>> I guess you've never ridden in a motor vehicle, huh, hypocrite?
>
>
>I drive them all the time but that doesn't make me a hypocrite because
>I'm not speaking out against environmental damage like YOU DO.

So you are an environmental rapist, which is much worse than being a
hypocrite.

>I can drive, fly, burn raw gas in a barrel in my back yard, dump motor
>oil down the sewer and or any number of things that damage the planet.
>While some those actions may even be against the law, it would never
>make me a hypocrite because I don't go making speaches at
>international environmental conferences. It however makes you a liar
>and a fake.
>
>Only selfish people fly on jets when they could be taking a SAILBOAT.
--
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

Mike Vandeman

On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 08:31:46 -0800 (PST), "maguahiker@gmail.com"
<maguahiker@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Feb 4, 11:58*pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>> On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 19:24:38 -0800 (PST), Siskuwihane
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <Siskuwih...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Feb 3, 8:17*pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>> >> On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 12:45:36 -0800 (PST), Siskuwihane
>>
>> >> <Siskuwih...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >On Feb 3, 2:16*pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>> >> >> On Sat, 2 Feb 2008 13:34:42 -0800 (PST), Siskuwihane
>>
>> >> >> <Siskuwih...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >On Feb 1, 8:42*pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>> >> >> >> On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 05:03:43 -0800 (PST), mike <mlawr...@gmail.com>
>> >> >> >> wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> >Mike Vandeman;
>>
>> >> >> >> >I don't mean to sound like an ass, but what the hell does your ("pure
>> >> >> >> >habitat") have to do with my winter training?
>>
>> >> >> >> Probably nothing. Ever hear of a "signature"? It's on every one of my
>> >> >> >> posts.
>>
>> >> >> >> >If you ever get a chance, come up to Northern Ontario in the spring
>> >> >> >> >time and honk your car horn at the first moose you see on/near the
>> >> >> >> >road.
>>
>> >> >> >> I don't own a car.
>>
>> >> >> >How do you get to the airport to attend "Lectures Given at
>> >> >> >International Environmental Conferences"?
>> >> >> >Walk?
>>
>> >> >> Interestingly, there are some airports that one can walk to. I walked
>> >> >> to the Adelaide, Australia airport from where I was staying.San
>> >> >> Diego's airport is within walking distance of downtown. I'm sure there
>> >> >> are lots of others.
>>
>> >> >Only greedy people who have no concern for the enviroment use air
>> >> >travel. They know full well that jets dump pollution directly in the
>> >> >upper troposphere and lower stratusphere.
>>
>> >> >Next time take a sailboat.
>>
>> >> >"By 2050, carbon-dioxide emissions from airliners are expected to grow
>> >> >two to 10 times the 1992 level, thanks to increasing air traffic,
>> >> >according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report co-
>> >> >authored byDr. Penner. By then, aircraft emissions will have risen to
>> >> >5 percent of the cause of global warming, IPCC says.
>>
>> >> >New research suggests the problem could be even bigger. "Contrails can
>> >> >be called a cause of warming and definitely need to be considered in
>> >> >climate-change models," says Patrick Minnis, an atmospheric scientist
>> >> >at Langley Research Center in Hampton, Va., part of the National
>> >> >Aeronautics and Space Administration."
>>
>> >> >""Aviation's impact on the environment could be immense. Jet engines
>> >> >directly emit greenhouse gases by burning kerosene."
>>
>> >> Have you ever flown in an airplane, hypocrite?
>>
>> >NO, I never have so calling me a hypocrite is a LIE.
>>
>> I guess you've never ridden in a motor vehicle, huh, hypocrite?
>>
>> >YOU are the hypocrite for using a form of travel that is damaging to
>> >the planet when you could be going by SAILBOAT or using conference
>> >calling.
>>
>> --
>> I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
>> humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
>> years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)
>>
>> Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!
>>
>> http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>Mikey
>
>If we wanted your expert opinion...we would ask it regarding your
>specialty...what is that now besides being a true asshole...I believe
>it is dietary? ? ?

No, I'm an expert on everything, compared to you.
--
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

Mike Vandeman

On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 16:02:04 GMT, "JP" <vze2wx8p@verizon.net> wrote:

>
>"Bill Sornson" <askme@ask.me> wrote in message
>news:47a7f9e5$0$4944$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
>> f.effigy@gmail.com wrote:
>>> It seems counter intuitive to have people flying to an environmental
>>> conference. Maybe you could push for a more distributed conference,
>>> with local groups getting together to teleconference with other groups
>>> around the world. It would preserve local face-to-face interaction
>>> that reinforces the community aspect, but allow a global audience for
>>> lectures (as well as more flexible timing via recorded playback). VoIP
>>> (video and/or voice) technology could enable discussions of large
>>> size. I believe Focus The Nation got together a webcast on the 31st to
>>> many groups across the nation. Shouldn't be too hard do it several
>>> times a day to a smaller audience.
>>>
>>> If it's all about making sacrifices to preserve our life support
>>> systems, then why not lead by example?
>>
>> ROTFL Great stuff! ROTFL
>>
>
>Pul-eeze.
>He's a troll hiding behind an environmental banner.
>He's got no real interest in the environment.
>He's got no legitimate credentials.
>He's done no legitimate research.
>
>As millions of acres and the wilderness and wildlife thereon
>are destroyed by mining and drilling and development
>he rants about the destructive effects of eighteen inch wide
>singletrack.
>
>The only good example he'll make is when his remains become compost.
>Until them he is quite useless.

Sorry, none of this excuses your flagrant rape of the environment. You
are fooling NO ONE.
--
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

Siskuwihane

On Feb 6, 8:11*pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 21:31:44 -0800 (PST), "f.eff...@gmail.com"
>
> <f.eff...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >It seems counter intuitive to have people flying to an environmental
> >conference. Maybe you could push for a more distributed conference,
> >with local groups getting together to teleconference with other groups
> >around the world. It would preserve local face-to-face interaction
> >that reinforces the community aspect, but allow a global audience for
> >lectures (as well as more flexible timing via recorded playback). VoIP
> >(video and/or voice) technology could enable discussions of large
> >size. I believe Focus The Nation got together a webcast on the 31st to
> >many groups across the nation. Shouldn't be too hard do it several
> >times a day to a smaller audience.
>
> >If it's all about making sacrifices to preserve our life support
> >systems, then why not lead by example?
>
> I have always made that suggestion, of course. As soon as the
> technology is available & affordable, and conference organizers want
> to do it, it will happen. Video would present privacy problems.
> --

There are no privacy problem using a SAILBOAT, DUH!

Siskuwihane

On Feb 6, 8:13*pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 03:52:09 -0800 (PST), Siskuwihane
>
>
>
>
>
> <Siskuwih...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Feb 4, 11:58*pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> >> On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 19:24:38 -0800 (PST), Siskuwihane
>
> >> <Siskuwih...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >On Feb 3, 8:17*pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> >> >> On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 12:45:36 -0800 (PST), Siskuwihane
>
> >> >> <Siskuwih...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >On Feb 3, 2:16*pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> >> >> >> On Sat, 2 Feb 2008 13:34:42 -0800 (PST), Siskuwihane
>
> >> >> >> <Siskuwih...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >On Feb 1, 8:42*pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 05:03:43 -0800 (PST), mike <mlawr...@gmail.com>
> >> >> >> >> wrote:
>
> >> >> >> >> >Mike Vandeman;
>
> >> >> >> >> >I don't mean to sound like an ass, but what the hell does your ("pure
> >> >> >> >> >habitat") have to do with my winter training?
>
> >> >> >> >> Probably nothing. Ever hear of a "signature"? It's on every one of my
> >> >> >> >> posts.
>
> >> >> >> >> >If you ever get a chance, come up to Northern Ontario in the spring
> >> >> >> >> >time and honk your car horn at the first moose you see on/near the
> >> >> >> >> >road.
>
> >> >> >> >> I don't own a car.
>
> >> >> >> >How do you get to the airport to attend "Lectures Given at
> >> >> >> >International Environmental Conferences"?
> >> >> >> >Walk?
>
> >> >> >> Interestingly, there are some airports that one can walk to. I walked
> >> >> >> to the Adelaide, Australia airport from where I was staying.San
> >> >> >> Diego's airport is within walking distance of downtown. I'm sure there
> >> >> >> are lots of others.
>
> >> >> >Only greedy people who have no concern for the enviroment use air
> >> >> >travel. They know full well that jets dump pollution directly in the
> >> >> >upper troposphere and lower stratusphere.
>
> >> >> >Next time take a sailboat.
>
> >> >> >"By 2050, carbon-dioxide emissions from airliners are expected to grow
> >> >> >two to 10 times the 1992 level, thanks to increasing air traffic,
> >> >> >according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report co-
> >> >> >authored byDr. Penner. By then, aircraft emissions will have risen to
> >> >> >5 percent of the cause of global warming, IPCC says.
>
> >> >> >New research suggests the problem could be even bigger. "Contrails can
> >> >> >be called a cause of warming and definitely need to be considered in
> >> >> >climate-change models," says Patrick Minnis, an atmospheric scientist
> >> >> >at Langley Research Center in Hampton, Va., part of the National
> >> >> >Aeronautics and Space Administration."
>
> >> >> >""Aviation's impact on the environment could be immense. Jet engines
> >> >> >directly emit greenhouse gases by burning kerosene."
>
> >> >> Have you ever flown in an airplane, hypocrite?
>
> >> >NO, I never have so calling me a hypocrite is a LIE.
>
> >> I guess you've never ridden in a motor vehicle, huh, hypocrite?
>
> >I drive them all the time but that doesn't make me a hypocrite because
> >I'm not speaking out against environmental damage like YOU DO.
>
> So you are an environmental rapist, which is much worse than being a
> hypocrite.
>
LIAR! I drive a Honda Insight which is one of the most environmently
friendly cars.

Mike Vandeman

On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 18:04:33 -0800 (PST), Siskuwihane
<Siskuwihane@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Feb 6, 8:13*pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>> On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 03:52:09 -0800 (PST), Siskuwihane
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <Siskuwih...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Feb 4, 11:58*pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>> >> On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 19:24:38 -0800 (PST), Siskuwihane
>>
>> >> <Siskuwih...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >On Feb 3, 8:17*pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>> >> >> On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 12:45:36 -0800 (PST), Siskuwihane
>>
>> >> >> <Siskuwih...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >On Feb 3, 2:16*pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>> >> >> >> On Sat, 2 Feb 2008 13:34:42 -0800 (PST), Siskuwihane
>>
>> >> >> >> <Siskuwih...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >On Feb 1, 8:42*pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 05:03:43 -0800 (PST), mike <mlawr...@gmail.com>
>> >> >> >> >> wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >Mike Vandeman;
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >I don't mean to sound like an ass, but what the hell does your ("pure
>> >> >> >> >> >habitat") have to do with my winter training?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> Probably nothing. Ever hear of a "signature"? It's on every one of my
>> >> >> >> >> posts.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >If you ever get a chance, come up to Northern Ontario in the spring
>> >> >> >> >> >time and honk your car horn at the first moose you see on/near the
>> >> >> >> >> >road.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> I don't own a car.
>>
>> >> >> >> >How do you get to the airport to attend "Lectures Given at
>> >> >> >> >International Environmental Conferences"?
>> >> >> >> >Walk?
>>
>> >> >> >> Interestingly, there are some airports that one can walk to. I walked
>> >> >> >> to the Adelaide, Australia airport from where I was staying.San
>> >> >> >> Diego's airport is within walking distance of downtown. I'm sure there
>> >> >> >> are lots of others.
>>
>> >> >> >Only greedy people who have no concern for the enviroment use air
>> >> >> >travel. They know full well that jets dump pollution directly in the
>> >> >> >upper troposphere and lower stratusphere.
>>
>> >> >> >Next time take a sailboat.
>>
>> >> >> >"By 2050, carbon-dioxide emissions from airliners are expected to grow
>> >> >> >two to 10 times the 1992 level, thanks to increasing air traffic,
>> >> >> >according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report co-
>> >> >> >authored byDr. Penner. By then, aircraft emissions will have risen to
>> >> >> >5 percent of the cause of global warming, IPCC says.
>>
>> >> >> >New research suggests the problem could be even bigger. "Contrails can
>> >> >> >be called a cause of warming and definitely need to be considered in
>> >> >> >climate-change models," says Patrick Minnis, an atmospheric scientist
>> >> >> >at Langley Research Center in Hampton, Va., part of the National
>> >> >> >Aeronautics and Space Administration."
>>
>> >> >> >""Aviation's impact on the environment could be immense. Jet engines
>> >> >> >directly emit greenhouse gases by burning kerosene."
>>
>> >> >> Have you ever flown in an airplane, hypocrite?
>>
>> >> >NO, I never have so calling me a hypocrite is a LIE.
>>
>> >> I guess you've never ridden in a motor vehicle, huh, hypocrite?
>>
>> >I drive them all the time but that doesn't make me a hypocrite because
>> >I'm not speaking out against environmental damage like YOU DO.
>>
>> So you are an environmental rapist, which is much worse than being a
>> hypocrite.
>>
> LIAR! I drive a Honda Insight which is one of the most environmently
>friendly cars.

A car is still a car, and pollutes the air, pollutes the water,
depletes the ozone layer, causes global warming, and kills people and
animals on the road. People who actually care about the environment
don't own cars.
--
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

Mike Vandeman

On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 18:00:47 -0800 (PST), Siskuwihane
<Siskuwihane@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Feb 6, 8:11*pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>> On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 21:31:44 -0800 (PST), "f.eff...@gmail.com"
>>
>> <f.eff...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >It seems counter intuitive to have people flying to an environmental
>> >conference. Maybe you could push for a more distributed conference,
>> >with local groups getting together to teleconference with other groups
>> >around the world. It would preserve local face-to-face interaction
>> >that reinforces the community aspect, but allow a global audience for
>> >lectures (as well as more flexible timing via recorded playback). VoIP
>> >(video and/or voice) technology could enable discussions of large
>> >size. I believe Focus The Nation got together a webcast on the 31st to
>> >many groups across the nation. Shouldn't be too hard do it several
>> >times a day to a smaller audience.
>>
>> >If it's all about making sacrifices to preserve our life support
>> >systems, then why not lead by example?
>>
>> I have always made that suggestion, of course. As soon as the
>> technology is available & affordable, and conference organizers want
>> to do it, it will happen. Video would present privacy problems.
>> --
>
>There are no privacy problem using a SAILBOAT, DUH!

Yes, there are. You need a public mooring. I guess you don't own a
sailboat. By the way, most sailboats have motors.
--
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

Siskuwihane

On Feb 7, 8:10*pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 18:00:47 -0800 (PST), Siskuwihane
>
>
>
>
>
> <Siskuwih...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Feb 6, 8:11*pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> >> On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 21:31:44 -0800 (PST), "f.eff...@gmail.com"
>
> >> <f.eff...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >It seems counter intuitive to have people flying to an environmental
> >> >conference. Maybe you could push for a more distributed conference,
> >> >with local groups getting together to teleconference with other groups
> >> >around the world. It would preserve local face-to-face interaction
> >> >that reinforces the community aspect, but allow a global audience for
> >> >lectures (as well as more flexible timing via recorded playback). VoIP
> >> >(video and/or voice) technology could enable discussions of large
> >> >size. I believe Focus The Nation got together a webcast on the 31st to
> >> >many groups across the nation. Shouldn't be too hard do it several
> >> >times a day to a smaller audience.
>
> >> >If it's all about making sacrifices to preserve our life support
> >> >systems, then why not lead by example?
>
> >> I have always made that suggestion, of course. As soon as the
> >> technology is available & affordable, and conference organizers want
> >> to do it, it will happen. Video would present privacy problems.
> >> --
>
> >There are no privacy problem using a SAILBOAT, DUH!
>
> Yes, there are. You need a public mooring. I guess you don't own a
> sailboat. By the way, most sailboats have motors.
> --

Most public transportation uses internal combustion engines.

DanKMTB@gmail.com

On Feb 7, 8:10*pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 18:00:47 -0800 (PST), Siskuwihane
>
>
>
>
>
> <Siskuwih...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Feb 6, 8:11*pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> >> On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 21:31:44 -0800 (PST), "f.eff...@gmail.com"
>
> >> <f.eff...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >It seems counter intuitive to have people flying to an environmental
> >> >conference. Maybe you could push for a more distributed conference,
> >> >with local groups getting together to teleconference with other groups
> >> >around the world. It would preserve local face-to-face interaction
> >> >that reinforces the community aspect, but allow a global audience for
> >> >lectures (as well as more flexible timing via recorded playback). VoIP
> >> >(video and/or voice) technology could enable discussions of large
> >> >size. I believe Focus The Nation got together a webcast on the 31st to
> >> >many groups across the nation. Shouldn't be too hard do it several
> >> >times a day to a smaller audience.
>
> >> >If it's all about making sacrifices to preserve our life support
> >> >systems, then why not lead by example?
>
> >> I have always made that suggestion, of course. As soon as the
> >> technology is available & affordable, and conference organizers want
> >> to do it, it will happen. Video would present privacy problems.
> >> --
>
> >There are no privacy problem using a SAILBOAT, DUH!
>
> Yes, there are. You need a public mooring. I guess you don't own a
> sailboat. By the way, most sailboats have motors.

What's wrong with a private mooring? Where my family keeps the boats,
moored on private moorings we own holding docks we own, there are no
privacy issues.

Also, "most" sailboats do not have motors. Many do, but "most" do
not.

I know, I know, don't feed the trolls - but I know boats and this one
was too stupid to let pass.

maguahiker@gmail.com

On Feb 7, 8:10*pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 18:00:47 -0800 (PST), Siskuwihane
>
>
>
>
>
> <Siskuwih...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Feb 6, 8:11*pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> >> On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 21:31:44 -0800 (PST), "f.eff...@gmail.com"
>
> >> <f.eff...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >It seems counter intuitive to have people flying to an environmental
> >> >conference. Maybe you could push for a more distributed conference,
> >> >with local groups getting together to teleconference with other groups
> >> >around the world. It would preserve local face-to-face interaction
> >> >that reinforces the community aspect, but allow a global audience for
> >> >lectures (as well as more flexible timing via recorded playback). VoIP
> >> >(video and/or voice) technology could enable discussions of large
> >> >size. I believe Focus The Nation got together a webcast on the 31st to
> >> >many groups across the nation. Shouldn't be too hard do it several
> >> >times a day to a smaller audience.
>
> >> >If it's all about making sacrifices to preserve our life support
> >> >systems, then why not lead by example?
>
> >> I have always made that suggestion, of course. As soon as the
> >> technology is available & affordable, and conference organizers want
> >> to do it, it will happen. Video would present privacy problems.
> >> --
>
> >There are no privacy problem using a SAILBOAT, DUH!
>
> Yes, there are. You need a public mooring. I guess you don't own a
> sailboat. By the way, most sailboats have motors.
> --
> I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
> humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
> years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)
>
> Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!
>
> http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

I was reading some info on Mike Vanderman, that lying bastard, the
other day. It turns out he has always been a hypocrit and coward,
dodging issues and questions with nothing but lies and bad math. I re-
read his old posts...which bored me with repetious babble...and it all
is the same. There is nothing at all factual in any of his banter. I
respect most "real" scientist and naturalist and ecologist, being one
of the above myself, but I really am amazed that anyone would invite
such a huge fraud to speak at any convention. Probably all for profit
environmental groups only as I have witnessed. Of course his response
will be....

Lies, where's the facts...LIAR...DUH....

What intelligent responses he has too...IDIOT...etc. See, that's the
beauty of most of us on here. I don't pretend to be something I am
not. I will state it straight that Mikey is a fraud and an
ASSHOLE...and a dick, etc. But he is a pretender...a sheep, the great
follower. No doubt he profits as has been proven of his banter. What a
fake.

Mike Vandeman

On Sat, 9 Feb 2008 01:01:50 -0800 (PST), "maguahiker@gmail.com"
<maguahiker@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Feb 7, 8:10*pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>> On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 18:00:47 -0800 (PST), Siskuwihane
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <Siskuwih...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Feb 6, 8:11*pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>> >> On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 21:31:44 -0800 (PST), "f.eff...@gmail.com"
>>
>> >> <f.eff...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >It seems counter intuitive to have people flying to an environmental
>> >> >conference. Maybe you could push for a more distributed conference,
>> >> >with local groups getting together to teleconference with other groups
>> >> >around the world. It would preserve local face-to-face interaction
>> >> >that reinforces the community aspect, but allow a global audience for
>> >> >lectures (as well as more flexible timing via recorded playback). VoIP
>> >> >(video and/or voice) technology could enable discussions of large
>> >> >size. I believe Focus The Nation got together a webcast on the 31st to
>> >> >many groups across the nation. Shouldn't be too hard do it several
>> >> >times a day to a smaller audience.
>>
>> >> >If it's all about making sacrifices to preserve our life support
>> >> >systems, then why not lead by example?
>>
>> >> I have always made that suggestion, of course. As soon as the
>> >> technology is available & affordable, and conference organizers want
>> >> to do it, it will happen. Video would present privacy problems.
>> >> --
>>
>> >There are no privacy problem using a SAILBOAT, DUH!
>>
>> Yes, there are. You need a public mooring. I guess you don't own a
>> sailboat. By the way, most sailboats have motors.
>> --
>> I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
>> humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
>> years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)
>>
>> Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!
>>
>> http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>I was reading some info on Mike Vanderman, that lying bastard, the
>other day. It turns out he has always been a hypocrit and coward,
>dodging issues and questions with nothing but lies and bad math. I re-
>read his old posts...which bored me with repetious babble...and it all
>is the same. There is nothing at all factual in any of his banter. I
>respect most "real" scientist and naturalist and ecologist, being one
>of the above myself, but I really am amazed that anyone would invite
>such a huge fraud to speak at any convention. Probably all for profit
>environmental groups only as I have witnessed. Of course his response
>will be....
>
>Lies, where's the facts...LIAR...DUH....
>
>What intelligent responses he has too...IDIOT...etc. See, that's the
>beauty of most of us on here. I don't pretend to be something I am
>not. I will state it straight that Mikey is a fraud and an
>ASSHOLE...and a dick, etc. But he is a pretender...a sheep, the great
>follower. No doubt he profits as has been proven of his banter. What a
>fake.

Your vain attempt to prevent the TRUTH about mountain biking from
being told is duly noted. Obviously, the reason I'm continually
invited to speak is that, UNLIKE YOU, I tell the truth.
--
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

Siskuwihane

On Feb 8, 9:59*am, "DanK...@gmail.com" <DanK...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Feb 7, 8:10*pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 18:00:47 -0800 (PST), Siskuwihane
>
> > <Siskuwih...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >On Feb 6, 8:11*pm, Mike Vandeman <mjva...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> > >> On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 21:31:44 -0800 (PST), "f.eff...@gmail.com"
>
> > >> <f.eff...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >It seems counter intuitive to have people flying to an environmental
> > >> >conference. Maybe you could push for a more distributed conference,
> > >> >with local groups getting together to teleconference with other groups
> > >> >around the world. It would preserve local face-to-face interaction
> > >> >that reinforces the community aspect, but allow a global audience for
> > >> >lectures (as well as more flexible timing via recorded playback). VoIP
> > >> >(video and/or voice) technology could enable discussions of large
> > >> >size. I believe Focus The Nation got together a webcast on the 31st to
> > >> >many groups across the nation. Shouldn't be too hard do it several
> > >> >times a day to a smaller audience.
>
> > >> >If it's all about making sacrifices to preserve our life support
> > >> >systems, then why not lead by example?
>
> > >> I have always made that suggestion, of course. As soon as the
> > >> technology is available & affordable, and conference organizers want
> > >> to do it, it will happen. Video would present privacy problems.
> > >> --
>
> > >There are no privacy problem using a SAILBOAT, DUH!
>
> > Yes, there are. You need a public mooring. I guess you don't own a
> > sailboat. By the way, most sailboats have motors.
>
> What's wrong with a private mooring? *Where my family keeps the boats,
> moored on private moorings we own holding docks we own, there are no
> privacy issues.
>
> Also, "most" sailboats do not have motors. *Many do, but "most" do
> not.
>
> I know, I know, don't feed the trolls - but I know boats and this one
> was too stupid to let pass.- Hide quoted text -

It seems Mikey does own a boat because his wife said he had a little
dinghy.