Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Bike Racing > Grand Tours - Giro - Tour de France - Vuelta a España
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Check out this tool

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 29-12.-2007, 03:38 PM   #31
snood
Registered User
 
snood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 154
Default Re: Check out this tool

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crankyfeet
Seems there are smart dopers and dumb dopers. Smart dopers don't get caught of course. But of the dumb dopers who get caught, there are dumb and really dumb dopers. And the ones that are caught in the headlights and start frantically digging an escape tunnel only to find themselves digging deeper into a cavernous hole.

The lawyers like the really dumb dopers and fans that give them money.
snood is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 29-12.-2007, 05:04 PM   #32
cyclingheroes
Registered User
 
cyclingheroes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,456
Default Re: Check out this tool

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crankyfeet
Seems there are smart dopers and dumb dopers. Smart dopers don't get caught of course. But of the dumb dopers who get caught, there are dumb and really dumb dopers. And the ones that are caught in the headlights and start frantically digging an escape tunnel only to find themselves digging deeper into a cavernous hole.

Some are protected, some are not. Phonak wasn't, Astana wasn't.
__________________
Cycling pictures


www.cyclingheroes-pictures.com
cyclingheroes is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 29-12.-2007, 05:25 PM   #33
Bro Deal
Registered User
 
Bro Deal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Resting by the Tumtum tree
Posts: 6,320
Default Re: Check out this tool

Quote:
Originally Posted by cyclingheroes
Some are protected, some are not. Phonak wasn't, Astana wasn't.

Are you ever going to elaborate? Can't you creat another account and post info under a different name.
__________________
"You are like the wind and I like the lion. You form the tempest. The sand stings my eyes and the ground is parched. I roar in defiance but you do not hear. But between us there is a difference. I, like the lion, must remain in my place. While you like the wind will never know yours." -- Mulay Hamid El Raisuli, Lord of the Riff, Sultan to the Berbers, Last of the Barbary Pirates
Bro Deal is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 29-12.-2007, 06:51 PM   #34
Gregers
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Centre of UK
Posts: 513
Default Re: Check out this tool

Have you ever done that kind of thing anywhere, Bro?
Gregers is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 29-12.-2007, 07:04 PM   #35
Crankyfeet
Registered User
 
Crankyfeet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: You are here => X
Posts: 10,676
Default Re: Check out this tool

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bro Deal
Are you ever going to elaborate? Can't you creat another account and post info under a different name.
Its pretty obvious what he's getting at. Protection money...right? But what I can't understand is why Astana couldn't pay to be untouchable? Surely the oil boys in Astana have handled a few backhanders in their time?
__________________


Crankyfeet is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 29-12.-2007, 07:16 PM   #36
cyclingheroes
Registered User
 
cyclingheroes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,456
Default Re: Check out this tool

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crankyfeet
Its pretty obvious what he's getting at. Protection money...right? But what I can't understand is why Astana couldn't pay to be untouchable? Surely the oil boys in Astana have handled a few backhanders in their time?

Ofcourse they could pay, they could take over the whole store....
__________________
Cycling pictures


www.cyclingheroes-pictures.com
cyclingheroes is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 29-12.-2007, 07:21 PM   #37
Bro Deal
Registered User
 
Bro Deal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Resting by the Tumtum tree
Posts: 6,320
Default Re: Check out this tool

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crankyfeet
Its pretty obvious what he's getting at. Protection money...right? But what I can't understand is why Astana couldn't pay to be untouchable? Surely the oil boys in Astana have handled a few backhanders in their time?

It doesn't necessarily have to be money, but it would not surprise me if it was. It could be as simple as friendships between people within the UCI and some teams. It could be that some national federations give their teams a heads up on random testing. It could be sort of a systemic thing where the whole testing system is leaky and people share info as a matter of professional courtesy; if you are unlucky enough to be out of the loop then you are screwed.

I have said before that I have not seen a smoking gun on this. There have been a number of coincidences over the years that make you wonder about things. Several sources have said that they were given advance warning on random testing, but that does not have to equal teams being favored at the expense of other teams.

It would be nice if CH would give a few hints about the actual mechanism of corruption.
__________________
"You are like the wind and I like the lion. You form the tempest. The sand stings my eyes and the ground is parched. I roar in defiance but you do not hear. But between us there is a difference. I, like the lion, must remain in my place. While you like the wind will never know yours." -- Mulay Hamid El Raisuli, Lord of the Riff, Sultan to the Berbers, Last of the Barbary Pirates
Bro Deal is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 29-12.-2007, 07:23 PM   #38
Gregers
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Centre of UK
Posts: 513
Default Re: Check out this tool

That's right, Crank. I imagine that the majority of teams, including Astana, would have the means to pay if that is what is required to be 'protected'. So why is Heroes implying that specific teams are looked after whilst others are not? What does it require to be given a free pass?
If Heroes doesn't wish to associate himself with it directly, I wonder if he might consider PMing this info to a trusted confidante and filter it out tangentially.
Gregers is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 29-12.-2007, 07:46 PM   #39
thunder
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,572
Default Re: Check out this tool

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gregers
That's right, Crank. I imagine that the majority of teams, including Astana, would have the means to pay if that is what is required to be 'protected'. So why is Heroes implying that specific teams are looked after whilst others are not? What does it require to be given a free pass?
If Heroes doesn't wish to associate himself with it directly, I wonder if he might consider PMing this info to a trusted confidante and filter it out tangentially.

it is in the UCI's interest to catch some, as scapegoats for all that get a tip off and free pass.

Leukemans and Lotz pay for Boonen's pass.

etc etc
thunder is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 29-12.-2007, 07:48 PM   #40
Bro Deal
Registered User
 
Bro Deal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Resting by the Tumtum tree
Posts: 6,320
Default Re: Check out this tool

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gregers
That's right, Crank. I imagine that the majority of teams, including Astana, would have the means to pay if that is what is required to be 'protected'. So why is Heroes implying that specific teams are looked after whilst others are not? What does it require to be given a free pass?
If Heroes doesn't wish to associate himself with it directly, I wonder if he might consider PMing this info to a trusted confidante and filter it out tangentially.

Here is a guess: Back in the day when the doping issue was starting to be taken more seriously, teams cultivated sources within the testing framework, giving money for their help. This eventually changed from teams seeking out sources to pay to sources seeking teams to pay to sources not being happy with teams that did not pay. Eventually you have a situation of institutionalized corruption.

There is a little problem though. In order to shake down a team, you need someone to deal with. For teams with internal doping programs this is not a problem. For teams where the management has left the riders to fend for themselves there is no one to deal with.

Phonak and Astana were both run by the same outfit, we can assume that they ran the two teams the same way. So even though the Kazakhs have the money to pay, there was no one in the team management to pass it along to the UCI.
__________________
"You are like the wind and I like the lion. You form the tempest. The sand stings my eyes and the ground is parched. I roar in defiance but you do not hear. But between us there is a difference. I, like the lion, must remain in my place. While you like the wind will never know yours." -- Mulay Hamid El Raisuli, Lord of the Riff, Sultan to the Berbers, Last of the Barbary Pirates
Bro Deal is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 29-12.-2007, 08:06 PM   #41
thunder
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,572
Default Re: Check out this tool

no, the UCI just had it in for Rhis Biver Rominger and the Swiss guys. For some reason.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bro Deal
Here is a guess: Back in the day when the doping issue was starting to be taken more seriously, teams cultivated sources within the testing framework, giving money for their help. This eventually changed from teams seeking out sources to pay to sources seeking teams to pay to sources not being happy with teams that did not pay. Eventually you have a situation of institutionalized corruption.

There is a little problem though. In order to shake down a team, you need someone to deal with. For teams with internal doping programs this is not a problem. For teams where the management has left the riders to fend for themselves there is no one to deal with.

Phonak and Astana were both run by the same outfit, we can assume that they ran the two teams the same way. So even though the Kazakhs have the money to pay, there was no one in the team management to pass it along to the UCI.
thunder is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 29-12.-2007, 08:39 PM   #42
TheDarkLord
Registered User
 
TheDarkLord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,846
Default Re: Check out this tool

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crankyfeet
The upside for him in keeping his lie, is that by continuing it, he still retains a few thousand people who "believe" in him. And within those few thousand people, are his closest friends and family. To admit the lie now, would crush those people and his relationship with them.

Just in a pathetic situation, lying to retain a few supporters, but treated with contempt by everyone else.
That is so similar to what FL is doing. Maybe the only thing left for Hamilton to do is to write a book on why he is innocent.
TheDarkLord is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 29-12.-2007, 08:56 PM   #43
Crankyfeet
Registered User
 
Crankyfeet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: You are here => X
Posts: 10,676
Default Re: Check out this tool

Quote:
Originally Posted by thunder
it is in the UCI's interest to catch some, as scapegoats for all that get a tip off and free pass.

Leukemans and Lotz pay for Boonen's pass.

etc etc
Well its easy to understand why the UCI would view Boonen and Contador as worthy and protected pin-up boys for cycling, while seeing Rasmussen and a few expendable domestiques as scapegoats.

So Floyd must have really pissed them off.

I still wonder though how much control they have over massaging the lab results. I could see them being able to warn certain parties of impending random tests, but they can't warn them of when they're going to win.
__________________


Crankyfeet is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 29-12.-2007, 09:42 PM   #44
TheDarkLord
Registered User
 
TheDarkLord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,846
Default Re: Check out this tool

I remember seeing a post earlier (maybe by Lim?) on how exactly FL pissed off UCI.
TheDarkLord is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 29-12.-2007, 09:46 PM   #45
Crankyfeet
Registered User
 
Crankyfeet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: You are here => X
Posts: 10,676
Default Re: Check out this tool

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDarkLord
I remember seeing a post earlier (maybe by Lim?) on how exactly FL pissed off UCI.
Well there's the one he states in his book of how he asked for the monies to be paid to him out of the UCI team payment insurance fund when he was owed money early in his career.

And he's generally not the sort of guy to tactfully sidestep embarrassing truths about the UCI. He publicly humiliated them about his situation in the media AFAIK to the point where the UCI threatened him with something.
__________________


Crankyfeet is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 10:58 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet