![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,464
|
Quote:
The key as Alex points out is that you can try to find that cutting edge where you get the best theoretical return for your investment in training time or you can back off a little and get nearly all the training benefit without killing yourself physically or mentally. Working your 2x20s right up at 100-105% of FTP might give you the best results on paper, but will you be able to complete multiple efforts and can you physically or mentally do these several days a week all winter? Dropping those down to 90-95% of FTP makes it a lot less daunting and from a training adaptation standpoint you'll get the vast majority of the training benefits with a much better chance of sticking with the program all winter. I tend to split the difference with one day a week where I try to push my 20 minute efforts (2x20s or 3x20s) right up to FTP. These are my mini time trial days where I try to see if I've improved and I do them early in my training week, usually on Tuesdays. Then I work down in intensity but up in duration for the remainder of the training week with perhaps 2x25 or 2x30 at 90-95% followed by something like 2x45 at 85-90% of FTP. I find this approach easier mentally than trying for full FTP efforts every time I train and was able to work a program like that for nearly 7 months last winter without frying myself. I introduced L5 work only towards the end of indoor training and saved the harder work for outdoors when the weather warmed up. Anyway, there's no set answer to your question because you can't prescribe an exact intensity without also asking whether a rider will be able to stick to the program and continue doing it week in and week out for long enough to see real gains. This stuff only works if you do it hard enough, frequently enough and for long enough(both duration of individual repeats and over enough weeks or months) to get your body to adapt. Push the first condition and you might not be able to satisfy the latter two. -Dave |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 76
|
Quote:
I know that I can't do 105-100% very often without choosing to not get on the bike. I will focus on the 90-95% range and decrease intensity and increase duration as my week progresses. Now that I am getting more structure I hope to see my FTP move up over the next several months. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 186
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,676
|
Here's another example of the HR variability at quasi-steady state power (not mine BTW). In this case at 93% of FTP.
Power is yellow and the dotted line is average for the interval. Heart rate is red and the dotted line is the average for last 4-5 mins 10 sec smoothing applied. |
|
|
|