![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 175
|
Does everyone use the recommended wheel circumference '2060' or have you measured it accurately. Mine back wheel circumference works out at 2113
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | ||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,378
|
Quote:
Quote:
Good luck, Dave |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,378
|
Quote:
-Dave |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 175
|
Quote:
![]() Last edited by Ade Merckx : 02-12.-2007 at 05:30 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Draper, Utah
Posts: 400
|
Quote:
. I'm pretty sure the circumference is not what it used to be. I just use 2096 mm estimate (average for new 23mm tires) all year round and call it good. If you use the KK computer to estimate your power, then yes, you want your wheel circumference to be more accurate, otherwise it shouldn't play any major role in your training.
__________________
blog |
|
|
|
|