![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Seattle, WA/Vancouver BC
Posts: 388
|
Hey everyone.
This question has been causing quite a quandry in my mind. I've vacillated with this query for some time now (about a year) and have come to the conclusion that I MUST lose weight (about 5kgs down to 80kgs) in order to be competitive on the road here in British Columbia. Because I'm relatively new to the cycling scene (6/06 got my first road bike) I'm still in the mindset that I want to be pretty good at all the disciplines - road races, crits, time trials, track racing. I've had some decent results in all the disciplines this past season, but I want to really turn it up a notch or two for 2008 and get an upgrade to Cat. 3 on the road and be able to dictate the outcome of race rather than endure it. I'm coming from a background of American football so I have fast twitch muscles in great abundance, couple that with the fact that I naturally have a low body fat percentage (~4% at 85kgs), I have really struggled in trying to lose weight since I've got to this point. I'm basically embarking on trying to lose muscle that took 20+ years to build (I'm 40 now and when I got on my road bike I was 96kgs). What's been working for me the past month is keeping track of EVERYTHING I eat and making a balance sheet of input versus expenditure. I'm seeing good, albeit slow, results. So, for I what I want to achieve (good all-arounder in all disciplines) how do you guys feel - everything else being equal, is it more important for one to lose weight (but keep same or a little less power), or would it be more advantageous for a cyclist to try and improve his power (but at the same weight or a little more)? Both serve the purpose to improve the almighty power to weight ratio, but is one more effective than the other???? FYI, my FTP at present is in the low 340s and this is with very limited focused Level 4 work. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,451
|
Quote:
Anyway, I'd definitely work on dropping a few kilos and I'd do most of it during your winter base work so you can eat a stable diet and refuel yourself during the season. Is 80 kg a good target for you, hard to say. Only you know whether that's reasonable or if you can go even further but I'd definitely try to drop weight if you can safely do so. Good luck, Dave |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kansas City, USA
Posts: 3,617
|
The 2 most obvious answers would be:
1) both together and then 2) whichever one you feel you could change by the larger amount Beyond those, increasing power will help in every racing discipline that you could engage in, whereas dropping weight only helps while riding uphill or trying to accelerate quickly. I'd give the edge to increasing power for that reason. There are lots of races where big guys are just as competitive. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,588
|
If you're really only 4% body fat then it is highly unlikely that you can lose any additional mass w/o seeing your absolute power actually decline. Your climbing may still benefit from an increase in power/mass, but other aspects of your performance may very well go backwards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,451
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Seattle, WA/Vancouver BC
Posts: 388
|
Thanks for the replies thus far, gentlemen.
The reason I've targeted weight loss as my primary goal is due to the fact I have an abundance of upper body muscle (chest and back) that is of absolutely no benefit to me while cycling. I realize one can not necessarily target weight loss but I'm willing to sacrifice (in the short term) some leg mass to get the accompanying loss of mass in my upper body. I'm hypothesizing that I can regain the leg mass/power after I've lost the desired amount of upper body muscle. Am I on the right track?? The road races in the BC area definitely are of the hilly variety and while I can presently power up a hill with the smaller guys, it's the repeatability that is giving me a hard time. Body fat percentage was measured with a computerized machine similar to an MRI machine. It provided a total body scan (lean mass, fat mass, bone mass, bone density, etc). Can't recall the name, but the test was comprehensive and almost as accurate as a dunk test. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 79
|
As a 225lb powerlifter I will say Leg strength can obliterate a smaller rider in some areas. I can out sprint a 155lb friend on flats, downhills & shorter climbs.
Problem is on longer climbs (or rides for that matter), I burn out due to the extra upper body muscle that my heart & lungs has to try to feed therefore my heart rate skyrockets as he casually passes me. Smaller guys have better cardio which is what's needed in distance cycling. Needless to say I won't be doing any double centurys anytime soon. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kansas City, USA
Posts: 3,617
|
Quote:
Heh, tell that to the "Core Strength" apologists. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 55
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Seattle, WA/Vancouver BC
Posts: 388
|
Quote:
LOL, needless to say you won't be entering any road races that have even the slightest hill... I will however... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,146
|
IMHO an increase in power will help you in more ways than a decrease in weight can. The toughest hill I have to ride around here makes a decrease of 10 lbs roughly equal to an increase in power of 24 watts in FTP. But the 24 watts would also be more useful in a flat TT.
__________________
Romans 5:10 For if, when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, being reconciled, we shall be saved by his life. http://www.earnharts.com/html/reala...ecific.asp?id=3 |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kansas City, USA
Posts: 3,617
|
Quote:
I wouldn't put quick accelerations into that category, no. In any case, my point was that while either an increase in power or a decrease in weight will help in the situations you mention, an increase in power will also help with flat TT's and crits. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Registered User
|
Wouldnt it be wise to see what power to weigh ratio you desire or require and then calculate how much weigh loss it would take to achieve it then what increase in watts to also achieve it? Although the answer is obvious I 'll say it anyways, I am sure its a bit of both.
I too am very early in my development of ftp and I have easily lost 31 lbs. But since hitting my current weight, I am finding it very difficult to budge the last 5 lbs I want to lose (and I dont have much if any excess upper body mass. So I for one have to increase watts more than lose weight. 5 lbs lost and 36 more watts would make me near unbeatable in the State TT. Both will be very hard to achieve anytime soon. Ray
__________________
My Blog: http://raysracingadventures.blogspot.com/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Seattle, WA/Vancouver BC
Posts: 388
|
I appreciate the replies thus far although there doesn't appear to be a consensus. Because I'm relatively early in the development of FTP, it could be possible I could have both (having my cake and eating it...). Time will tell...
At present, with the weight loss that has already occurred I subjectively feel I indeed have lost some power, but I have not tested this. I will also add that the road racing is going to be my primary focus next year (I take my sprinting ability in crits for granted as my muscle composition is predominantly type 2 muscle fibers and my neuromuscular power is very good - power profile slopes downward). Ergo, going well in the hilly road races is going to be of utmost importance. I believe the weight loss should be my primary focus... |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 66
|
If I had 4% body fat I would be well pleased so maybe not qualified to give advice, but.. As a stronger person, have you checked your power profile against cadence? I'm a bigger rider and I found the one thing that gave me the most improvement in the last season was moving away from the 90 rpm target to more like 60. My hr is much more controllable on the climbs when I let the muscles do the work rather than cadence. I don't worry about the flats anymore because we have a good advantage there!
Another thing I've noticed - If you'r really putting the miles in, unfortunately all the muscles you don't need fall off(upper body)! I say unfortunately becuase it's still nice to look good! Quote:
|
|
|
|
|