![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,622
|
Quote:
I didn't mean to misquote you, I just trimmed your lengthy post down to what I thought was the most important fact: you're apparently not using the data that your powermeter provides to change how you train for the better, so there really isn't much point in owning it (unless you're the type who gets pleasure from, e.g., filling up training logs). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: AZ
Posts: 863
|
I question what percentage of PM owners use them properly. At the races quite a few riders show up with SRM or PT. It use to intimidate me till I notice after the attacks they are all gone. I have not encountered one strong PM user yet. Did a race yesterday. As soon as the climbs started the PM users were bye bye.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | ||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kansas City, USA
Posts: 3,692
|
Quote:
Ha! My target event is 3.5 weeks away, so I'm still trying to pound out that last fitness step with extra doses of L5/L6 TSS. I did have Monday off after the MO State RR this weekend, but TSB was still around -15 last night. I was planning to taper up to +20 for a 50-mile RR target. Any thoughts on whether I should shoot for being 'fresh-er'? Quote:
I think you're right. The labels aren't wrong, it's just that there are enough of us who train frequently but only race occasionally that the fitness bars have been raised across all categories (to really have an expectation of being able to win, anyway). It's Lance's fault! ![]() ![]() Under the current USCF points system, it probably takes 15-20 races a year for a rider to be 'forced' into their correct race category, while I do closer to 8-12. In any case, I'm going to move up after this target event even if I don't get forced out. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kansas City, USA
Posts: 3,692
|
Quote:
Well sure, 'cause they're so.... dang.... heavy! ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: AZ
Posts: 863
|
Quote:
Are you saying that is the reason I dropped them? lol. Well I won my first yesterday. The course had 11 miles of climbing, fit me well. TSB was -0.7 ATL 80 CTL 92 French, when you won last year what was your TSB? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | ||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kansas City, USA
Posts: 3,692
|
Quote:
Sounds like you whipped them though, nice job. Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 639
|
I take a break from structured power work. I think it is important to go out and just ride sometimes. Don't go by power, but use your PM for post-ride analysis.
I've found with a few athletes I coach that the PM limits true potential and training load. Go out, tape over the wattage (for those who I know watch it too much) and go ride hard. Very hard. You may be surprised with what you end up. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,622
|
Quote:
I wouldn't. In fact, depending on how the race is likely to play out, your natural strengths/weaknesses, etc., even +20 might be a tad too "fresh". |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,622
|
Quote:
So, I take it that you don't race against this guy? http://www.srm.de/bilder/Rennfahrer...er2007Sinke.jpg ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: East Coast
Posts: 127
|
Quote:
Is this the best howling I'm going to get? I'm disappointed. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,622
|
Quote:
Us vanity-user types are all too busy laughing at you for your choice of powermeter. I mean, c'mon: using an Ergomo and, worse still, calling yourself Ergoman is like trying to score with the chics by driving a Kia and calling yourself Kiaman. If you're going to dress (your bike, that is) to impress, everybody knows that you need to get an SRM. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 1,557
|
Quote:
Yeah, I know I was teasing you with my denial... the truth is I think I haven't devoted the mental energy towards really learning how to use it to the utmost. Funny thing is it seems I know as much or more than every other power user I talk to (excluding internet forums), which makes me think there are a lot of power meters out there being used even less productively than I use mine. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 1,557
|
Quote:
See this is what I am talking about... WTF is TSB? ATL? CTL? that's it, I am going back to going hard and looking at my speed. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 1,557
|
Quote:
Great so now we are condoning power meters as a bonafide data collection tool only. May as well have stuck with my Polar Power... of course I collect more data with SRM and now know that my 5 second power is not that bad after all. yeah that was worth $3000 . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kansas City, USA
Posts: 3,692
|
Quote:
I expect those of us that do use PMs effectively are already convinced of their utility. There's really no point in howling against those that don't, although I'm happy to race with them. I can understand the sentiment that it is possible to get the same training benefit without one, but that's only because I've trained with one for 2 years now and could possibly mimic power training by using perceived exertion alone. I find that people who have never trained with a PM are susceptible to all the traditional cycling myths, no matter how many years they've been riding or at what level they have competed. In my mind, using a PM isn't really a compromise to consider, since I don't suffer from any negative effects* such as those that the OP has mentioned. It's purely a benny for me, but I can see how others might not see it that way. * - in fairness, I do suffer the weight penalty during races as a result of my addiction to power data, but that's the only negative that I can think of. |
|
|
|
|