![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#211 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 27
|
Quote:
On another note, I run a triple, and I seem to get some weird readings when I am in the biggest gears on the 53. Seems the power readings are a bit high. Anyone else seen this? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#212 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 238
|
Quote:
What's the spacing between the chain and the sensor when in this gearing? If it's >30mm, then you're going to need to shim your sensor up a little higher if you find yourself using those gears often. This may mean that the chain will rub across the top of the case when on a small chainring and small cogs in the back...especially troublesome with the wide range of chainring diameters associated with a triple. Rubbing on the top of the case won't harm it, but you probably want to avoid that type of gear selection (along with the large chainring - large cog selection you originally referred to) just from an excessive cross-chaining standpoint. Heck, you've got a bunch of gears to choose, USE them and don't crosschain! ![]() What's happening is that as the chain gets further from the sensor, it is less able to "pick up" the vertical chain vibration signal and the processing electronics tend to "lock on" to any other signal available...such as the chain pins passing the sensor (the vibration sensor is just "looking" for changes in inductance close to the coil.) This will typically cause your power readings to appear too high. Hope that helps. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#213 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 27
|
Quote:
. I get the higher readings when I am in the large front ring small rear cog. I already have 2 shims to move the chain up, and it currrently rubs in the small ring, middle cog. I will have to measure and see how far away it is.thanks for the insight. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#214 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 238
|
Quote:
For the same reasons listed above, here's another thing to check: Always make sure that the chain passes directly over the case. In fact, make sure it passes over an ~1.5 wide section centered on the "middle" mark. That's where the inductive sensor resides. I'm thinking that perhaps your sensor is skewed slightly inward relative to the chainline and when you're in your large chainring - small cog combo the chain is too far off to the side. Again, it would end up being a lack of "signal" for the sensor. Hope that helps. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#215 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22
|
Quote:
Thanks for the advice though... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#216 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 238
|
Quote:
Don't forget that with a triple the distance between the outer chainring and the inner chainring is larger than on a double. So, unless everything is lined up right, you're more likely to have the chain "off the side" of the module with a triple setup than with a double. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#217 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 48
|
Quote:
I've seen that effect with curved chainstays. With the 53 x 11 combo the chain is a bit too far off to the outside of the sensor and you'll read power 20 to 30 watts too high. Don't know that I notice it though with straight chainstays, even with my 'commuter bike' with an XTR group. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#218 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 5
|
just to add my $0.02
ive been using my polar unit for 2 months now and the few drop outs we're sorted out by jiggling the connectors....very technical i know other than that ive been very happy with the unitbut i had a drop out that lasted for over an hour riding home so thought maybe it was time for new batteries....inserted new batteries(duracell) and i couldn't get the unit to work...tried relearning sensor and it found it just fine...just no cadence and power readings while riding....Grrrrrrrr so i've just tried the bending the battery terminals as suggested by bverdon and voila ive got power and cadence readings i haven't tried it out on the road yet but here's hoping so i for one vote for the crappy power pack design....but then maybe there's issues with various parts of the design!!!!! who knows shoots |
|
|
|
|
|
#219 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 4
|
Well, I get to add my name to the list of folks experiencing the drop-outs of power and cadence. I just bought my CS600 and power module and installed it yesterday. My test rides showed the same behavior as others have experienced; loss of power/cadence readings even though the CS600 reports it can communicate with the sensor.
I'll be boxing up by CS600 and Power Module and returning it. Will now look into an Ergo or PT now. Pretty bummed though as I'd hoped this solution would work, however I don't feel like being a beta tester for Polar, especially considering the cost of this product. Good luck to all on this; SteveO |
|
|
|
|
|
#220 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2
|
Add me as well. My connection between battery and paddle first got spotty, then dropped out completely. I'm done with Polar.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#221 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 5
|
Quote:
well it lasted 30mins on the road before dropping out... still think it must be the battery supply...even more annoying after having 2 months of it working 98% of time getting close to send back to polar time i think shoots |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#222 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 12
|
out of utter frustration I de-installed my polar cs600 power kit alltogether...
ive tried everything you guys tried, to come to the same conslusion: I keep experiencing dropouts. I will be contacting polar about all this. Is there anyway I can get a refund? Did someone try? I dont feel for sending this thing back to polar and then receiving it after a number of weeks with the remark that it "works just fine" in our lab...... |
|
|
|
|
|
#223 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 24
|
Didn't try for a refund, but they quickly replaced the paddle with no questions asked. Of course the new paddle didn't work either which pointed me to the battery holder. I fixed that and all has been good so far. I have been through some brutal rides and big temperature swings since the fix with no issues.
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#224 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 27
|
Quote:
I also must say that since I made sure the batteries were in the holder sleeve correctly I haven't had any dropouts either. FWIW |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#225 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 4
|
FWIW... Just got this email from Polar support in Finland:
According to the Power Output serial number you have one of the first versions. Since that we have made improvements of the coil and battery contacts. Please contact your local Polar distributor so they can service your unit... My serial# begins with: C717L.. Sounds like the same runaround others have been getting who replaced their paddles? JohnMcP and J/V: would you agree they've fixed it, or do you still think there are also battery connection problems? SteveO Last edited by SteveO2 : 10-10.-2007 at 12:42 AM. Reason: info updated |
|
|
|