Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Other Stuff > Your Bloody Soap Box
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Proof positive that Bu$hCo = Nazism

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 21-10.-2006, 10:38 AM   #61
Wurm
Registered User
 
Wurm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,145
Default Re: Proof positive that Bu$hCo = Nazism

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billsworld
Check your profile more carefully. If you wernt such an asshole people would break you balls in such ways.
Nice try but no cigar. The truth is that you dolts instantly hate anyone who exposes your fascist Bu$hCon thugs for what they really are.

It's that simple, simpleton.

Too bad you'll have to eat shit & die soon. Then the REAL fun starts when Der Chimpenfuhrer & Friends get impeached for their war crimes and traitorous gutting of the Constitution.
__________________
"Bush is the first President to admit to an impeachable offense."

- John Dean, former Counsel to the President (Nixon)

The aim of big corporations is to separate fools from their money all of the time and ordinary folks from their money most of the time. The rest of us must fend for ourselves.
Wurm is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 21-10.-2006, 11:06 AM   #62
Wurm
Registered User
 
Wurm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,145
Default Re: Proof positive that Wurm= Stallin

Quote:
Originally Posted by cdpatten
I’m talking about FACTS, not opinion quoting some OPED piece in a blog somewhere. Give us links to the source...the CIA is treating Osama in Dubai.


Nov. 2, 2001, 12:00 PST -- On Oct. 31 the French daily Le Figaro dropped a bombshell. While in a Dubai hospital receiving treatment for a chronic kidney infection last July, Osama bin Laden met with a top CIA official -- presumably the chief of station. The meeting, held in bin Laden's private suite, took place at the American hospital in Dubai at a time when he was a wanted fugitive for the bombings of two U.S. embassies and last year's attack on the USS Cole. Bin Laden was eligible for execution according to a 2000 intelligence finding issued by President Bill Clinton before leaving office in January. Yet on July 14, 2001 he was allowed to leave Dubai on a private jet, and there were no Navy fighters waiting to force him down.

...


Article


> Anticipated responses from The Brainless Ones:

1. "Those damned Frenchies are lyin' - they hate our Freedom Fries!" *boohoo/cry*

2. "I didn't see or hear it on Fux News, or CBS, NBC, CNN, ABC, CNBC, MSNBC, Bloomberg, BBC, AP, UPI, or Reuters...so it must not be true. Only the established corporate media can be believed.

...but if they showed it, then they're all librul elite media types that hate us."

3. "Oh, you got that off'n the innernets - it's all hate-filled blogger bullshit!"

4. "That Ruppert guy is stupid and crazy and hates us. He's a conspiracy theorist, that's what he is. He even lives in Venezuela!"

5. "There IS no evidence. There IS no hospital in Dubai. Heck, there isn't even a CIA! It doesn't exist. I'm just going to close my eyes now. Hmph!"
__________________
"Bush is the first President to admit to an impeachable offense."

- John Dean, former Counsel to the President (Nixon)

The aim of big corporations is to separate fools from their money all of the time and ordinary folks from their money most of the time. The rest of us must fend for ourselves.

Last edited by Wurm : 21-10.-2006 at 12:02 PM.
Wurm is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 21-10.-2006, 12:00 PM   #63
BillM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 331
Default Re: Proof positive that Bu$hCo = Nazism

You forgot the most common and the most appropriate response....


Wurm is a complete idiot so we ignore most of what he posts.
BillM is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 21-10.-2006, 04:47 PM   #64
Wurm
Registered User
 
Wurm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,145
Default Re: Proof positive that Wurm= Stallin

Firstly, I'm not on a first-name basis here with you, and I've never given you any of my personal info. There are good reasons for having usernames or monikers on open WWW forums. We all have usernames. I suggest if you wish to address anyone further here that you use their usernames or some abbreviation thereof, like everyone else does.

As for my sources, they are unassailable and well-documented. You might not like the conclusions that they point to, but your mere anger and dislike in no way contradicts them.

I don't know where or how you're coming by your fictions, but they have no place in any rational discussion.


You've only posted 9 times on Cycling Forums, yet with that small amount you have gone out of your way to post fabrications and antagonize the established members. You've already had your posts modified, been part of the reason for a thread closing, have probably been warned privately, and now unprovoked you've racially slurred an administrator in your above post.

Is this how you normally introduce yourself to a new group? Is this all you can find to do for entertainment?

In fact, I would say that blatantly insulting Lim's heritage as you did constitutes racism, and should be extremely moderated or you should be banned outright.

Quote:
racism

n 1: the prejudice that members of one race are intrinsically superior to members of other races

2: discriminatory or abusive behavior towards members of another race
__________________
"Bush is the first President to admit to an impeachable offense."

- John Dean, former Counsel to the President (Nixon)

The aim of big corporations is to separate fools from their money all of the time and ordinary folks from their money most of the time. The rest of us must fend for ourselves.

Last edited by limerickman : 21-10.-2006 at 08:27 PM.
Wurm is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 21-10.-2006, 10:27 PM   #65
Billsworld
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 797
Default Re: Proof positive that Wurm= Stallin

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wurm
Firstly, I'm not on a first-name basis here with you, and I've never given you any of my personal info. There are good reasons for having usernames or monikers on open WWW forums. We all have usernames. I suggest if you wish to address anyone further here that you use their usernames or some abbreviation thereof, like everyone else does.

As for my sources, they are unassailable and well-documented. You might not like the conclusions that they point to, but your mere anger and dislike in no way contradicts them.

I don't know where or how you're coming by your fictions, but they have no place in any rational discussion.


You've only posted 9 times on Cycling Forums, yet with that small amount you have gone out of your way to post fabrications and antagonize the established members. You've already had your posts modified, been part of the reason for a thread closing, have probably been warned privately, and now unprovoked you've racially slurred an administrator in your above post.

Is this how you normally introduce yourself to a new group? Is this all you can find to do for entertainment?

In fact, I would say that blatantly insulting Lim's heritage as you did constitutes racism, and should be extremely moderated or you should be banned outright.
Having read CDs posts, It appears that your"sources" are not from legeit sources. It also looks like your feeling very brave since you got Lim to moderate anyone that calls your "facts" into question. New Group?.....Looks like he checked in to check out soapbox , read your posts and like the rest of us that have endured your crap , decided to give you some. The ugly tone of this forum is created by you and endorsed by your lackie Lim. If you have no patience to listen to opposing views without the frat boy armpit fart humor, you should exchange email with dave , steve, and lim and giggle , snicker and use the rolleys icon in private...... I admit that some of the points made here by Repubs are just talking points from talk radoi, but its no different than using sources from the moonbats on leftwing blogs.

Last edited by Billsworld : 21-10.-2006 at 10:43 PM.
Billsworld is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 21-10.-2006, 10:35 PM   #66
BillM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 331
Default Re: Proof positive that Wurm= Stallin

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billsworld
Having read CDs posts, It appears that your"sources" are not from legeit sources. It also looks like your feeling very brave since you got Lim to moderate anyone that calls your "facts" into question. New Group?.....Looks like he checked in to check out soapbox , read your posts and like the rest of us that have endured your crap , decided to give you some. The ugly tone of this forum is created by you and endorsed by your lackie Lim. If you have no patience to listen to opposing views without the frat boy armpit fart humor, you should exchange email with dave , steve, and lim and giggle , snicker and use the rolleys icon in private...... I admit that some of the points made here by Repubs are just talking points from talk radoi, but its no different than sources from the moonbats on leftwing blogs.


YEAH...what he said.
BillM is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 22-10.-2006, 03:46 AM   #67
davidmc
Registered User
 
davidmc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: metro dc USA
Posts: 3,394
Default Re: Proof positive that Wurm= Stallin

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billsworld
Having read CDs posts, It appears that your"sources" are not from legeit sources. It also looks like your feeling very brave since you got Lim to moderate anyone that calls your "facts" into question. New Group?.....Looks like he checked in to check out soapbox , read your posts and like the rest of us that have endured your crap , decided to give you some. The ugly tone of this forum is created by you and endorsed by your lackie Lim. If you have no patience to listen to opposing views without the frat boy armpit fart humor, you should exchange email with dave , steve, and lim and giggle , snicker and use the rolleys icon in private...... I admit that some of the points made here by Repubs are just talking points from talk radoi, but its no different than using sources from the moonbats on leftwing blogs.

You make a good point here. Along those lines, it takes a man to admit his mistakes & Bush & his cabinet (I use that term "loosely" ) & some of the members of this soapbox have not done so. I presume everyone here belongs to the human species no matter how far "down the ladder", as it were, & humans are imperfect w/ the exception of myself of course
__________________
I'm completely in favor of the separation of Church and State. My idea is that these two institutions screw us up enough on their own, so both of them together is certain death.
George Carlin
US comedian and actor (1937 - )
davidmc is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 22-10.-2006, 03:49 AM   #68
Wurm
Registered User
 
Wurm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,145
Default Re: Proof positive that Wurm= Stallin

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billsworld
It appears that your"sources" are not from legeit sources.
Really? How are they not "legeit"? (sic) Because you said so? Let's see if you can show that my sources are not credible.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billsworld
It also looks like your feeling very brave since you got Lim to moderate anyone that calls your "facts" into question.
Lim did not moderate anything but the abusive or inappropriate language here, and you know it. You and your pals have quickly degenerated into base reactionaries. Repeating lies over and over (like most Repigs are wont to do) does not turn them into facts, no matter how often you try.

cdpatten's remarks are racist and should be moderated or he/she should be banned.
__________________
"Bush is the first President to admit to an impeachable offense."

- John Dean, former Counsel to the President (Nixon)

The aim of big corporations is to separate fools from their money all of the time and ordinary folks from their money most of the time. The rest of us must fend for ourselves.
Wurm is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 22-10.-2006, 04:39 AM   #69
Billsworld
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 797
Default Re: Proof positive that Wurm= Stallin

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wurm
Really? How are they not "legeit"? (sic) Because you said so? Let's see if you can show that my sources are not credible.

Lim did not moderate anything but the abusive or inappropriate language here, and you know it. You and your pals have quickly degenerated into base reactionaries. Repeating lies over and over (like most Repigs are wont to do) does not turn them into facts, no matter how often you try.

cdpatten's remarks are racist and should be moderated or he/she should be banned.
Well before your lackie moderated CD, he pointed out afew of your sources to be a complete joke. No respect in that industry! Have lim repost it and we can disect your "sources.
Billsworld is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 22-10.-2006, 04:43 AM   #70
Billsworld
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 797
Default Re: Proof positive that Wurm= Stallin

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billsworld
Well before your lackie moderated CD, he pointed out afew of your sources to be a complete joke. No respect in that industry! Have lim repost it and we can disect your "sources.
Never mind ...Yawn..Back in retirement
Billsworld is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 22-10.-2006, 05:31 AM   #71
BillM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 331
Default Re: Proof positive that Wurm= Stallin

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wurm
Really? How are they not "legeit"? (sic) Because you said so? Let's see if you can show that my sources are not credible.

Lim did not moderate anything but the abusive or inappropriate language here, and you know it. You and your pals have quickly degenerated into base reactionaries. Repeating lies over and over (like most Repigs are wont to do) does not turn them into facts, no matter how often you try.

cdpatten's remarks are racist and should be moderated or he/she should be banned.

The simple fact that it is YOU posting them discredits your sources. That was easy.
BillM is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 22-10.-2006, 05:53 AM   #72
Carrera
Registered User
 
Carrera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Staffordshire
Posts: 4,782
Default Re: Proof positive that Wurm= Stallin

I think Bush is getting closer towards admitting he goofed. If he doesn't know now that Iraq has been a major diplomatic blunder, he never will. They believed after 9/11 you could somehow compare Iraq with post imperial Japan and( by creating a democratic Iraq), bring freedom and democracy to the Middle East.
I'd love to see freedom and democracy in Iraq, Iran and Syria but it cannot be forced.
At any rate, if anything, Bush's second term has been one of weakness. Even the Kennedy clan was more confrontational than a second term Bush. I think Bush has been very weakened and has lost respect and credibility. He seems impotent in the face of North Korean missile tests and we all know Bush himself knows he goofed.

Quote:
Originally Posted by davidmc
You make a good point here. Along those lines, it takes a man to admit his mistakes & Bush & his cabinet (I use that term "loosely" ) & some of the members of this soapbox have not done so. I presume everyone here belongs to the human species no matter how far "down the ladder", as it were, & humans are imperfect w/ the exception of myself of course
__________________
"Everybody has a philosophy. However, what philosophy you have is a matter of choice, and most people don't make a conscious choice with regard to what philosophy they accept."
Carrera is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 22-10.-2006, 06:01 AM   #73
BillM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 331
Default Re: Proof positive that Bu$hCo = Nazism

While I agree with much of what you said I have to take issue with the statement that Bush appears impotent in the face of the NK crisis. I think he was quite determined and resolved....and made no bones about what would be the end result if necessary.

You must have seen it differently.
BillM is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 22-10.-2006, 07:35 AM   #74
Carrera
Registered User
 
Carrera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Staffordshire
Posts: 4,782
Default Re: Proof positive that Bu$hCo = Nazism

I do know Bush couldn't win a war against North Korea. The North Koreans would be in the South like yesterday if necessary, a bit like the Red Army poised to invade West Germany back in the Cold War days.
Bush knows war with North Korea would be a bloodbath. Bush also knows North Korea would not fire the first shot.
The thing is, none of this would have happened, had Bush not recklessly invaded Iraq. Thanks to the Iraq invasion, we now have a nutty, hardline regime in Iran, tensions in Israel and the North Koreans reacting to what they consider to be a threat.
However, it's pretty pointless moaning about Bush without end, I confess. The question is, what can be done? That's a tough one. If Bush pulls out of Iraq, the terrorists will take over that country and it will become a major terrorist recruitment site for anti-Western fanatics. If Bush stays in Iraq, he will more than likely suffer in the polls back home. The only possible way out might be a U.N. force but the Europeans are probably too afraid to get involved in such a mess as Iraq.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BillM
While I agree with much of what you said I have to take issue with the statement that Bush appears impotent in the face of the NK crisis. I think he was quite determined and resolved....and made no bones about what would be the end result if necessary.

You must have seen it differently.
__________________
"Everybody has a philosophy. However, what philosophy you have is a matter of choice, and most people don't make a conscious choice with regard to what philosophy they accept."
Carrera is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 22-10.-2006, 09:40 AM   #75
BillM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 331
Default Re: Proof positive that Bu$hCo = Nazism

South Korea 20 years ago and South Korea today are two very different animals....they are more than capable of defending themselves.

Their would be significant civilian loss of life however in the initial artillery bombardment as they are very close to the border...but I think they could handle NK...as long as China stayed out.

I don't think North Korea could feed their army for very long in the field.

It's all speculation though I guess.
BillM is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 08:56 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet