![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1
|
I am just getting into triathlons and was looking for a bike to buy. I came acrossed the Motobecane Nemesis. I was wondering if anyone has owned one of these or heard anything positive or negative about them. Any input would be greatly appreciated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 9
|
Quote:
As for the bike - it is very stiff, but really fast. The componenets, obviously, are top shelf. Shifts and brakes perfectly. I find 35 miles the farthest I can cover comfortably. Most time trial bikes are very much more extreme - the nemesis is more like a road bike with aero bars and a different seat post angle. But for $1000, it is a shit-hot ride . I will be hammering mine tomorrow evening with 10 or so other time trial/triathletes and it will be fine. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1
|
I would really like to hear some feedback on this bike. I have been looking hard at this bike and I have heard really good things about it and some bad. It seemed like the bad were just people saying "it sucks" without any imput. I can't put much behind an opinion without a reason.
I am looking at bikes up to $1250 like the Giant TCR2 and Cannondale R700. I am also looking at the Felt F80, Specialized Allez Elite (t), Giant OCR1 and Trek 1500 and Trek Pilot 1.2. I don't think that any of these bikes can match the components of the Moto "Nemesis". However, I called two local shops and they bashed the bike. Can somone please tell me why these other bikes with lesser components are so much better? Thanks |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 200
|
[q]I don't think that any of these bikes can match the components of the Moto "Nemesis". However, I called two local shops and they bashed the bike.[/q]Of course they did, because they know that anybody seriously considering the Nemesis will not spend $500 more on an inferior bike in their store, so it threatens their ability to sell bikes. They will probably insult things like frame (which appears the same as in the fuji aloha line) and construction (whatever that means; it's almost entirely good brand parts).
I just ordered mine this week. It'll show up tomorrow and I'll give it a go. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2
|
come back three months from now and tell us how it holds up. something tells me it's another shill post. we'll see.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 200
|
Quote:
Mine came last night. I can confirm it really appears to be the same frame as the Fuji 2.0, at least from pics comparison ![]() I plan on putting up a lengthier post with pics and experiences (such as it not acutally being 90% constructed, unless it takes 20+ hours to put a bike together! Nothing a few hours and beer hasn't solved, though ). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2
|
i'd buy one of their mtb's if they could tell me how much one weighs accembled, guess that's a secret.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 200
|
Quote:
BTW, my nemesis is now totally assembled. It's 19.8 lbs in the 54 cm size. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Registered User
|
I have ridden a Motobecane Record for the past few months, and I have an opinion on the company. You get exactly what you pay for: a sturdy frame that won't turn any heads equipped with a good group and dirt cheap everything else. I am not too disappointed in my purchase, after all my bike was only 550 dollars after shipping, but I have since matched the initial cost in borderline necessary upgrades (among my biggest beefs would be the handlebars which slip out of place no matter how hard you tighten the screws on the stem, or the ugly, and just generally bad quality wheelset.) Honestly, Motobecane is great if you're just looking for an inexpensive and humble bike for exercise, mine serves me well, but if you want something flashy, or a solid performer for racing, either go name brand or upgrade the hell out of your Motobecane.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 200
|
Quote:
Certainly if the peak of performance is desired, nothing by Motobecane will suffice. They have no competitor to the Madone or a cervelo time trial bike. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 200
|
Quote:
Motobecane may not be that much of a price savings on low end bikes vs low-end local store, and they are not competitor to a local store's $7k offering, but I think the $1-3k price range, their bikes will consistently offer better value. I finally got the Nemesis out last night for its first ride after all the adjustments and am happy with it. It feels pretty quick, though I was on a slow bike before ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Registered User
|
Yeah, you're probably right, I'm just a little bitter about my Motobecane...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 200
|
Quote:
Good luck on whatever bike you get next! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 30
|
Quote:
I bought one earlier this year and I have to agree with most of this post. It's a great value. Shipping was quick, but there are a couple of things to be wary of. First, don't use the size chart listed in the ad. I think it's not accurate. My suggestion is to look for a bike with similar geometry and ride that. Then buy your Motobecane based on the size of the bike you are riding. I bought a 52cm instead of the 54, which is what I ride on my road bike. Assembly takes more time than advertised unless you are skilled with tools, which I am not. On the whole, it's a great bike and I'm very happy with mine. Best, Keefe. |
|
|
|
|