![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,052
|
Quote:
I could only read the abstract but where does it say the kilo rider went all out and aimed at the highest possible speed instead of accelerating up to what was almost his maximum possible speed? This would be simple to measure. We can see in the times of the top few riders that some are better in the first lap than others, while a few are slower at the beginning can be faster in the third lap and win the race. Whether their slower start is intentional or not, the winner isn't always the guy with the lowest first lap time. Interesting that the pursuiter went all out for about 12 seconds then backed off. I've heard some people say you shouldn't go all out right from the start of a pursuit because the start isn't that important compared to the possible penalty to be paid later. And of course, people who do not spend their life training for the kilo sometimes find that a pacing strategy that works best for them (lowest time for the event) will not be one that aims at their highest possible speed at the start. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | ||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,558
|
Quote:
It was (albeit not necessarily the way you think). Quote:
They didn't (actually, a better way of putting it is, they might have). |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 104
|
Quote:
whos the rider coogy? andy
__________________
http://www.velodrome.org.uk - A Home for Cyclists |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,558
|
Quote:
As you might expect, the paper doesn't say - for each of the three subjects it just gives a few physical characteristics, shows a sample power file during their respective events (i.e., kilo, flying 200 m, 500 m), and states that they all are or were World Champions in sprint (i.e., non-endurance) track cycling. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 797
|
Quote:
Why cant someone post a file that shows a 10.5 200 and the guys height and weight. Then do the same for a Kilo....maybe a 105 or so...No names ,no dates, no pics just a file. The only one I have seen is the sample on the SRM website. Ok I am going back to my corner |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,558
|
Quote:
Well I would, but I'm not sure that it would be ethical of me to do so. MSSE now owns the copyright to the paper, and while posting it after it is published would probably fall under the "fair use" exemption, doing so before it is published seems questionable to me. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 797
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Posts: 396
|
Here is a 1.04.8 Kilo from 2004 NZ Track Nationals on a 285 outdoor concrete track (poorly designed bankings).
Hamish Ferguson Cycling Coach |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 797
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 104
|
cool yeah thats good
__________________
http://www.velodrome.org.uk - A Home for Cyclists |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 797
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,052
|
Quote:
Experiment to see what approach works best for you. Try standing start 650-750 meters max efforts to help decide. Look at your max speeds after accelerating so you learn what yours should be for your lowest kilo time. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | ||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,558
|
Quote:
FWIW, it's perfectly normal for your peak power during a standing start in a typical gear to be lower than your true maximum power. Muscular fatigue occurs very rapidly, so to generate maximum power you need to be at optimum cadence after only a few seconds. Also BTW, the fact that you make maximum power at 130-140 rpm suggests that you may be skewed a bit towards the fast twitch end of things (see more below). OTOH, somebody with a lot of slow twitch fibers (like me) will achieve maximum power at slightly lower cadence, e.g., 120 rpm. Quote:
Again, the magnitude of decline in power over 30 s suggests that you're more fast twitch than average. (I could even calculate a percentage for you from a regression equation I developed as part of my masters thesis, but it would only be an estimate since the correlation, while high, certainly isn't perfect). All things considered, Bill, it appears that you've done the right thing by focussing on track cycling...except, of course, for the fact that you don't have one nearby! ![]() |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 797
|
Quote:
Ill try a few things when I get to Fla in a couple of weeks; first being shorts. My best max of a standing start last year was 36mph, compared to 38.5mph off a jump. I have gotten better since then, but I have been farting around with crank lenght an gearing. Geeze I would kill for a local coach. Thanks WarrenLast edited by Billsworld : 14-02.-2006 at 03:56 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 797
|
Quote:
.When I finally get this crank length thing sorted out and I am not working around weather, I will have my friend attatch my powertap info and everone can pick on me My numbers to date are not very noteworthy, but I am having fun, improving , and learning alot from training and from guys on this site. Thanks again |
|
|
|
|