![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,234
|
This is following a discution that took place in an other thread (Figuring out 2x20 wattage, by gregkeller), during which one simple question got asked :
Level 4 training Is 2X20min with some rest in between, the same as 1X40min. Same power number, somewhere in L4 spectrum. - Same RPE (at the end of the work)? - Same adaptation following the workout? - Does rest in between impact on RPE, or Adaptation? - Is 3X20 the same as 60 (same power of course)? If possible, some litterature on the subject would be appreciated. Or else, just your thoughts that's cool. Thanks Last edited by SolarEnergy : 23-01.-2006 at 12:47 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 178
|
Quote:
Solar, i asked a similar question on a previous thread (Alternatives to classical FT intervals) see http://www.cyclingforums.com/t31229...-intervals.html Andy provided a response in there re: time requirements for physiological responses Vs adaptions. He was not aware of any studies/literature that specifically examined the physiological adaptation perspective of various interval lengths. I think his recommendation was for lengths 15 - 30min, but you could achieve similar 'responses' by using much shorter intervals provided that the rest period is also very short. Andy also made reference to 'other ways' of achieving LT/FT improvements, but left us hanging on what they were Not sure this exactly answers all your questions though ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,234
|
Thanks a lot. I read it. That helps.
But as you may guess, that doesn't answer the question per se. Anyway, I'll keep searching. Cheers |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |||||
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 4,115
|
This is too easy.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
A question back at you. Why do you think the adaptation benefit would be greater for one protocol or the other. I mean, what is the logic behind it? Last edited by RapDaddyo : 24-01.-2006 at 12:46 AM. |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Johannesburg
Posts: 189
|
Isn't this the whole reasoning behind doing intervals instead of one continuous effort? i.e. a lower RPE for the same adaption. Which makes it easier to do mentally?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,234
|
Quote:
To better answer your question, I would need to understand better why we train at L4 at the first place. What are the strains involve, and how the body respond and adapt to those strains. How does the body become better at lactate removal? Mitochondria play huge role in improvement. But do they improve as a result of direct L4 training? If yes, how do they respond to effort of longer duration compared to efforts of shorter duration. You see guys, I have been trying to find a graph (plots) where I could see At a constant power X = minutes Ys = Lactate curve, Ventillatory threshold curve, Heart rate thresholde curve and any other relevant curve, to see how they evolve. That would help me believe you. 1n study, with myself. A lot of things are going on by the 20th minute of a L4 effort, I may just be psychological, but what if... As a coach, until I know for sure, I must be careful and stick to my opinion, that if you are to do more than one L4 training a week, you'd better vary interval duration, to potentially embrace the whole spectrum of L4 better. IOW, you won't see me recommending 2X20 twice of 3times a week, at the same power level. Too narrow. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | ||
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 4,115
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 639
|
Good idea Solar. I am currently advising 2x20 at the end of a 4 day microcycle. For the second L4 workout, 4x10 at a higher power (top of L4) with less recovery. Best scheduled after a rest day.
As the macrocycle progresses, we'll move to 2x30 or straight 60 and 5x10 with 2 off. After that, base is over! We see how easily 5x10,2 prepares the athlete (physically, mentally, and physiologically) for upcoming V02 Max work. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | ||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,234
|
Quote:
Quote:
I see approach L4 from the top first (2X20 followed by 4X10), then a bit more by the base (2X30, 1X60). After that phase, you get into L5. Sounds pretty cool. Do you think 1X60 result into the same adaptation, compared to 2X30, same power? |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,234
|
Quote:
RD, do you know how many times a week he did this workout? Over what total mileage volume (roughly)? Thanks again. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 4,115
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 418
|
This is interesting. I have been on the l4 threshold power program for 3 weeks now. This week is my recovery week. Total days spent on l4 threshold work is 10 days with various interval combinations and intensities (1 x30, 3x20, 3x10, 1x20, and 2x20). Total miles for the 3 weeks is 610 miles. During Feb, I will increase my intensity to upper L4 or lower L5 or some L4/L5/L4. Maybe this Friday or Sunday I will do another 2x20 test just to see how much I have improved. Or if I can still complete the test with higher AP with couple of minutes spent on L5.
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 4,115
|
Quote:
P.S., that hill has served me well too. I'm beginning to set my sights on an AP that starts with a "4." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 639
|
Quote:
Nanocycles? 4 day and 3 day cycles make up my week. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kansas City, USA
Posts: 3,689
|
Quote:
FT is close to, but slightly higher than the power that can be generated at LT (1 mmol/L over baseline).* FT is lower than OBLA, though, which means that blood lactate will build up initially until it reaches a steady-state value which is maintained for the remainder of the interval. The rate of this buildup is related to the metabolic events in exercising muscles, which have half-lives of ~30sec.** From that, I'd say that blood lactate begins rising from its initial concentration soon after the interval starts, and continues to rise for ~5 half-lives (2.5 minutes) before reaching a steady state concentration < 4 mmol/L, which is maintained for the rest of the work duration. * - http://www.peakscoachinggroup.com/P...ningChapter.pdf page 4 ** - page 10 |
|
|
|
|