![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 63
|
Quote:
If you go to analyticalcycling.com and run one of his calculators for weight on a hill climb you'll see just how insignificant a few hundred grams matters on most climbs you'll encounter in typical cat races in the US. At just about every race I've been to you'll find racers lined up to "unload" more than a few hundred grams before the race so if you're that worried about it just get in line and do your business before the race. I've found that having a set of Zipp 404 tubulars with a PT hub and another set of OP's for training is a good option for both aerodynamics on race day and durability while training during the week. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 4,115
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 577
|
Quote:
Scott, I've read some stuff on your site and your posts here and say I'm very impressed with your evidence based aproach to training. That being said, I'm very surprized that you picked tubs for your race wheels. What gives? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 63
|
Quote:
I actually didn't stumble onto that data until this year, but based on it and a few short tests I've done I'm thinking about another tire option, especially since my rear Tufo has a hole in it right now. Here's a very short test I did a while back. based on the data I posted to Topica a few months ago, the % difference between the Michelins and Tufos should be around 3.7% (I think the data came from Road magazine) and my test proved to be 3.2%. I'm not sure what the repeatability is of a PT so this one time test is really nothing more than a comparison of two data points. Comparison holding speed Tufo S33 Special Tubulars: Duration: 1:08 Work: 8 kJ TSS: 0.2 (intensity factor 0.356) Norm Power: 116 Distance: 0.292 mi Min Max Avg Power: 77 174 124 watts Heart Rate: 97 106 101 bpm Cadence: 53 88 68 rpm Speed: 15.1 15.8 15.5 mph Torque: 32 74 52 lb-in Michelin Pro Clinchers: Duration: 1:11 Work: 8 kJ TSS: 0.3 (intensity factor 0.368) Norm Power: 120 Distance: 0.302 mi Min Max Avg Power: 44 185 120 watts Heart Rate: 99 118 105 bpm Cadence: 51 114 69 rpm Speed: 14.8 16.2 15.5 mph Torque: 18 77 50 lb-in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 343
|
It's worthwhile to note that this is comparing some of the worst (for rolling resistance) tubulars and some of the best clinchers. The performance of something like a Veloflex Carbon or even a Vittoria Evo CX tub appears to be much closer to the Michelin clincher.
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: northern, mexico - texas
Posts: 170
|
Quote:
I would think that a 303 would be the best allround PT wheel. Accelerates fairly quickly (compared to a 404) and still has a some aero advantage. The 404's can be pretty unforgiving on fast crit corners. (i've done a few p1/2 crits on aero wheels, it can be sketchy) I still don't like the idea of training on zipps or any carbon. The just don't have the durability. I also only race on tubulars and i would never train on them. Flats, expense etc... jm |
|
|
|
|