Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Tech Corner > Cycling Equipment
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Advice: Bike for casual riding?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 12-07.-2003, 06:08 AM   #16
1deborah
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 11
Default

>You aren't planning on riding in a dress are ya? ;-)

Never know... but point taken.

OK, it's REALLY dumb question time!

1. Mainly, I clicked on the women's frame because I figured it would have a women's seat and a better arrangement in general for a lower center of gravity. I definitely need the seat, although I assume it's possible to switch out seats. But would the frame on a men's or men's/women's bike not sit me at a more uncomfortable angle than a purely women's bike? Or is this all hype that does not matter?

2. 21 VS 24 speeds... do I NEED 24 speeds? Or even 21? Remember, this is the woman who has never shifted a bike in her life -- the one time I tried shifting that old bike of mine, the chain fell right off it was so surprised. I'll accept that I need to learn about the whole shifting thing, but what would the advantage of 24 over 21 be?

Thanks! (I'm so grateful that no one has made fun of me yet!)
1deborah is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-07.-2003, 06:12 AM   #17
1deborah
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 11
Default

(On the other hand, at 5 foot 3, a step-through frame has its appeal...)
1deborah is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-07.-2003, 06:17 AM   #18
1deborah
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 11
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by coolworx
A couple more pros and cons on the Cypress

Pros:
Good low gear... 28/34 which is about 22 gear inches - fine for all but sheer mountains.

700c tire size - though the width is a bit too high. Go for a 35mm instead of 40mm (less rolling resistance, yet still not skinny-racey-twitchy)

Aluminum frame.

Cons:
Crappy deraillers - upgrade to Shimano LX, and have the bike shop give you credit for the original junkpile. Should add no more than $50 to the price.

Grip Shifters.... did I mention that I hate those suckers?


Cool! Thanks for the review -- I'll ask about the deraillers and the tires. I'll check out the grip shifters and see what I think.
1deborah is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-07.-2003, 06:33 AM   #19
coolworx
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Springfield MA
Posts: 280
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by 1deborah
>You aren't planning on riding in a dress are ya? ;-)

Never know... but point taken.

OK, it's REALLY dumb question time!

1. Mainly, I clicked on the women's frame because I figured it would have a women's seat and a better arrangement in general for a lower center of gravity. I definitely need the seat, although I assume it's possible to switch out seats. But would the frame on a men's or men's/women's bike not sit me at a more uncomfortable angle than a purely women's bike? Or is this all hype that does not matter?

2. 21 VS 24 speeds... do I NEED 24 speeds? Or even 21? Remember, this is the woman who has never shifted a bike in her life -- the one time I tried shifting that old bike of mine, the chain fell right off it was so surprised. I'll accept that I need to learn about the whole shifting thing, but what would the advantage of 24 over 21 be?

Thanks! (I'm so grateful that no one has made fun of me yet!)


First the seat/comfort question... you will go alot further with a properly fitted bicycle ('men's frame') with a decent pair of bicycle shorts - if you are averse to spandex, they do make cotton 'camp-type shorts' with the requisite padded parts.

Now as to number of speeds.... first of all, no matter how many speeds a derailler system bike claims to have there are a fair amount of 'useless gears' - either they 'cross chain'* (meaning using the inner front chainring and outer rear cog - or vice versa) or there are 'duplicates' (A 44/22 and a 28/14 are the same 2-1 ratio), or else they are so close to 'duplicates' as to not really act like another gear - so basically 24 speeds is better than 21 (and 27 better than 24) because you are more likely to end up with 15 or so useful gears.

* crosschaining is very bad for your whole drivetrain - plus it's noisy!

BTW, no such thing as a dumb question.
coolworx is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-07.-2003, 06:40 AM   #20
coolworx
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Springfield MA
Posts: 280
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by 1deborah
(On the other hand, at 5 foot 3, a step-through frame has its appeal...)


What's your inseam?
coolworx is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 13-07.-2003, 02:20 AM   #21
coolworx
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Springfield MA
Posts: 280
Default

By the way, you mentioned that you're in the Boston suburbs...
That would put you very close to one of the Bicycle Gurus of the Net:

http://www.sheldonbrown.com/harris/index.html

Why don't ya stop in when Sheldon's around, and ask for his input! I'm thinking about taking a ride on I-90 East and visiting him myself!
coolworx is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 13-07.-2003, 02:46 AM   #22
1deborah
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 11
Default

Coolworx -- thanks for all the advice, and I had already found Sheldon's website and got the skinny on this whole newfangled shifting thing... great site!

So this morning, we did the American thing -- we went shopping. I did take the very good advice and went to a bike shop, but first called around to see who had what brands in stock. My, but some of us can be oh so snooty! I went to the one that was nicest to me on the phone (expertise is one thing, but expertise plus common courtesy is much more rare) and sat on every bike in the shop. They didn't have the exact models I was looking at in stock (no one did) but I ended up with a very lovely Raleigh C40 for 369.

We just came back from a ride and I LOVE it -- now, given my prior biking experiences, I'd probably love just about anything, but I'm sitting much more comfortably, and shifting like a pro. Ok, shifting like less of a rank amateur.

So thanks again -- I'll probably be back when I'm ready to upgrade some of the components. I really appreciate the help!
1deborah is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 13-07.-2003, 02:59 AM   #23
coolworx
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Springfield MA
Posts: 280
Default

I just looked at the specs and looks like you did pretty well for yourself - 700c tires, a good range of gears [21 - 113 gear inches], and it looks like it has a geometry similar to those old 3 speeds - over which you were waxing nostalgic .

Of course, ya know I'd have had the LBS upgrade the derailleurs and give me credit for the originals - would only add $40 or so!

So congratulations! Now go memorize your gear patterns:
http://vps.arachnoid.com/bike/
coolworx is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 15-07.-2003, 12:28 AM   #24
Geonz
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: On my bike somewhere
Posts: 200
Default

You're going to have a ton of fun. Making the switch from a bike that doesn't fit to one that does -- night & day.
I use about five of my 21 speeds, out here on the prairie. When I hit real hills, I use a few more (and sometimes even go down to the little bitty gear). I did make myself learn the gears though, and my knees are glad I did.
__________________
Sioux Geonz, webmastress
http://www.resourceroom.net
Geonz is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 15-07.-2003, 01:53 AM   #25
1deborah
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 11
Default

Will do, coolworx and geonz -- took a two-hour ride around the McMansion developments here (those oversized, overpriced houses they keep insisting on building around here -- called McMansions because they all look the same and they're EVERYWHERE! Nice gardens though, and nice pavement! Smoooth...)

Anyway, rode for two hours, mostly because I didn't notice the time going by -- so comfortable, so much fun! Thanks for all the advice!
1deborah is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 15-07.-2003, 03:47 AM   #26
coolworx
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Springfield MA
Posts: 280
Default

That's GREAT 1Deb!

Having fun is what it's all about - and you can stay fit to boot!
A lot better than slaving over a stair stepper - eh?
coolworx is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 15-07.-2003, 07:25 PM   #27
Beach Bum
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 4
Default

Deb-

My wife had the same issue.
When I want to haul azz I am on my titanium bike. At those times she isn't with me.

When it's a family outing I have an older mountain bike.

She needs it simple I.E. -Grip Shifters

I like it as reasonable as possible, which also does not cause curse fests.

The "new" Schwinn is chinese made by Pacific. But it packs a bang
for the buck.

$170 for a aluminum frame 21 gear mountain bike with grip shifters. Easy to use. Shimano lower end shifting equipment.
No shocks ... but I would doubt you would ever go off road.

At...... gasp............ Walmart
Beach Bum is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 11:03 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet