Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Other Stuff > Your Bloody Soap Box
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Will Israel Strike First?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 04-12.-2005, 08:34 AM   #46
jhuskey
Registered User
 
jhuskey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Great Smoky Mountains, TN USA
Posts: 6,570
Default Re: Will Israel Strike First?

Quote:
Originally Posted by darkboong
Sure, I've got some nice medium-weight 54% ABV Rum.

Over ... and out ...



Cin cin.
__________________
Sobriety is over rated!
jhuskey is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-12.-2005, 08:38 AM   #47
FredC
Registered User
 
FredC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,819
Default Re: Will Israel Strike First?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ptlwp
Israeli's are no more a cult type of people than are French, German, English, Irish, Scottish, Welsh, British, Australian, Viet Nam; you get the picture. The Scots wear kilts, for instance, but that does not make them a cult.

Every country stands up for itself in anyway it can, except for Frenchies and Italians, I suppose. The Poles were just plain stupid for not having the Jews in their armies; SNAFU.....Bulgaria was the only country to have the balls to say "FU" to what the Nazi's asked them to do regarding "the final solution".

I think all you folks on the continent have a very bad case of xenophobia, which none of you can own up to. Shame. Divide and conquer, and that ya'll were.

Sorry....

The Israelis in general are not a cult, but the Zionists are.
__________________
The media is a self perpetuating publicity stunt.
FredC is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-12.-2005, 10:04 AM   #48
ptlwp
Registered User
 
ptlwp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 544
Default Re: Will Israel Strike First?

Quote:
Originally Posted by FredC
The Israelis in general are not a cult, but the Zionists are.

Calling Israelis' Zionists is like calling Catholics' Vaticanists.
__________________
"All that is necessary for evil to succeed is for good men to do nothing." Sir Edmund Burke
ptlwp is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-12.-2005, 11:08 AM   #49
darkboong
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,534
Default Re: Will Israel Strike First?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ptlwp
Calling Israelis' Zionists is like calling Catholics' Vaticanists.


No, it is not remotely similar. If you are taking medication, you are taking too much. Best wishes for your recovery.

Talking of too much medication : time for me to sleep well in preparation for a brute of a hangover.
darkboong is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-12.-2005, 11:24 AM   #50
ptlwp
Registered User
 
ptlwp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 544
Default Re: Will Israel Strike First?

Quote:
Originally Posted by darkboong
No, it is not remotely similar. If you are taking medication, you are taking too much. Best wishes for your recovery.

Talking of too much medication : time for me to sleep well in preparation for a brute of a hangover.

Think about things when you are sober, please. Sobriety has a way of making one see clearer and not resort to name calling when your number is up.
__________________
"All that is necessary for evil to succeed is for good men to do nothing." Sir Edmund Burke
ptlwp is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-12.-2005, 01:06 PM   #51
FredC
Registered User
 
FredC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,819
Default Re: Will Israel Strike First?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ptlwp
Calling Israelis' Zionists is like calling Catholics' Vaticanists.

Read #48 again. I didnt say that.
__________________
The media is a self perpetuating publicity stunt.
FredC is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-12.-2005, 01:17 PM   #52
FredC
Registered User
 
FredC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,819
Default Re: Will Israel Strike First?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ptlwp
Calling Israelis' Zionists is like calling Catholics' Vaticanists.

To my knowledge there is no such thing as a 'Vaticanist'. Please explain. We await in expected wonderment.
You are such an adherent that you don't even know what a Zionist is. You married out. You don't keep Kosher, along with the rest of your family, and you write vaarkenvlees, or naknik hazir in Hebrew, and no doubt eat it as well.
__________________
The media is a self perpetuating publicity stunt.
FredC is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-12.-2005, 09:09 PM   #53
darkboong
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,534
Default Re: Will Israel Strike First?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ptlwp
Think about things when you are sober, please. Sobriety has a way of making one see clearer and not resort to name calling when your number is up.


Your statement is still bollocks in the cold light of day. *IF* you are taking head medication I suggest you redice the dose.
darkboong is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-12.-2005, 05:48 AM   #54
Carrera
Registered User
 
Carrera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Staffordshire
Posts: 4,816
Default Re: Will Israel Strike First?

Lim, I will go so far as to say that out of the three of you, I find you to be the most rational. I'm well aware what your views are with regard to Israel as you have outined these several times over. This is basically your own opinion and, so far as I'm concerned, we live in a free world where people have the right to a particular viewpoint.
Fine, you personally dispute Israel's right to re-take land and displace the Palestinians. I, on the other hand, believe the hollocaust brought about a crisis situation whereby the Jewish people were justified for going on the offensive.
It doesn't matter who agrees with whom. This land was the subject of dispute between the Arab States and Israel in the same way as the Falkands was disputed between Britain and Argentina. In such cases, countries may choose to go to war and this is what happened. Israel and the Arab States went to war and Israel won that war. Thatcher likewise went to war with Argentina and won her own war.
There is a saying in Latin -"Ius Belli" or the law of war. How many countries do you know apart from Israel who occupy territory on the basis of war?
I know of no such precedent where the losers of a conflict should have some kind of a right to dictate terms to the winners of a conflict. This would be like Hannibal trying to tell Rome how to conduct itself in Africa after Carthage had already lost that war. It doesn't happen.



Quote:
Originally Posted by limerickman
I have already outlined to you the historical facts concerning Palestine earleir
(read my earlier message).
The Jewish "claim" to what is Palestine is based on events in 1300bc.

What happened since 1300bc isn't indoctrination - it is fact.
The Jewish people lost control of Palestine 3,000 years ago and did not regain control of apart of Plaestine until 1948 (creation of Israel).


So to invoke issues from 3,000 years to support a "claim" about the ownership of a piece of land - land that was out of Jewish control for 3,000 years - makes that claim tenuous, at best.





With respect, I would suggest that it is the Jewish people who continually
allege that they're victims.
Throughout their history they've repeated this calim of victimhood.
Victims of Famine, victims of Persians, victims of Macedonians, victims of Chadeans, victims of Syrians, victims of Romans, victims of Christians, victims of Cruscades, victims of Muslims, victims of the Bolscheviks, victims of Nazi's.




There was relative peace from 14th century to 20 century in the Ottoman empire.
Western (Britain and the USA) only took an interest in the Middle East because of oil (from 1919 onwards).

You forget that it was the West that carved up the map of the Middle East
in 1920.
you forget that it was the West that installed "royal" families in Saudi and Jordan.
You forget that it was the West that drew up sweetheart deals for the oil companies like Royal Dutch Shell and BP guaranteeing commission on every single barrel of oil prooduced from the Middle East.
You forget that it was the oil companies that persuaded Brtain and America to annex land from Iraq (it's 14th province) and call it Kuwait when vast oil reseerves were found there.
You forget that it was the West that allow Israeli/Jewish terrorists to attack and force the displacement of nearly 1m people from the land they occupied for since 12th century in 1948.

Si I'd say that the Arabs have at the very least good reason to say they have been victims of the West and Israel.







The Arab world was more advanced that the West to 14th century : why the Arab world stagnated when they were ahead of us is not known.
It certainly wasn;t because of Islam (which was founded in 6th century) otherwise if it was due to Islam, why did the Arab world get ahead of the West between the 6th and 14th centuries ?




Made to understand ?
Is this Melanie Philips speak ?

We've been meddling in their affairs for the past 100 years at least and look where it's got us ?

You need to start posting some facts here instead of waffling.

Some time back you (falsely) claimed that 6 muslim men were arrested in Bradford for the murder of a policewoman.
6 men weren;t arrested at the time you posted that.
Indeed the police never referred to anyone as being Muslim.

You need to start posting facts and not opinions.
Carrera is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-12.-2005, 06:13 AM   #55
darkboong
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,534
Default Re: Will Israel Strike First?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Carrera
Fine, you personally dispute Israel's right to re-take land and displace the Palestinians. I, on the other hand, believe the hollocaust brought about a crisis situation whereby the Jewish people were justified for going on the offensive.


Very easy for you to say that Crappy when it's not you and your family getting shot and frog-marched off their property by a bunch of IMMIGRANTS. You keep whining about a Arab/Muslim invasion by immigration, yet you have absolutely no problem with Zionists displacing millions of people from their homes of thousands of years in another country.

Your point of view is fundamentally inconsistent.
darkboong is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-12.-2005, 06:31 AM   #56
Carrera
Registered User
 
Carrera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Staffordshire
Posts: 4,816
Default Re: Will Israel Strike First?

Maybe Israel should have adopted the same tactics as your country and driven the Palestinians out altogether so they wouldn't be able to retaliate or protest? At least that's what happened to the Agentinians - there are none left on the island at all. You yourself pointed that out.
As Don Shipman hinted before, it's not Jewish people who are colonising Europe but Middle Eastern Arabs. The ethnic majority of major cities of the U.K. and France will be moslem not Jewish within the next few years and we'll be a less toerant society as a result.
This wouldn't be a problem if those particular immigrants accepted western norms and ceased trying to impose militant Islam within European borders. But, as expereince has shown, whenever these people don't get their own way they set fire to cars, buildings and anything within reach, fully aware that our gutless politicians will cave in at the drop of a hat - terrified of being called racist.
Therefore, I sympathise with the Israelis. At least they have the backbone to stand up for their freedoms.



Quote:
Originally Posted by darkboong
Very easy for you to say that Crappy when it's not you and your family getting shot and frog-marched off their property by a bunch of IMMIGRANTS. You keep whining about a Arab/Muslim invasion by immigration, yet you have absolutely no problem with Zionists displacing millions of people from their homes of thousands of years in another country.

Your point of view is fundamentally inconsistent.
Carrera is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-12.-2005, 06:38 AM   #57
limerickman
Community Team
 
limerickman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: at the bar
Posts: 12,649
Default Re: Will Israel Strike First?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Carrera
we live in a free world where people have the right to a particular viewpoint.


...and you're free to express the views that you have Carrera.
Your views are endorsed and supported by many people.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Carrera
Fine, you personally dispute Israel's right to re-take land and displace the Palestinians. I, on the other hand, believe the hollocaust brought about a crisis situation whereby the Jewish people were justified for going on the offensive.


I acknowledge that the Holocaust was wrong and I accept that something had to be done to protect the Jewish people.
However, this is where you and I part : the creation of Israel and more importantly the displacement of 1m people was not the ethical or just solution in my opinion.
If the Jewish people needed to go on the offensive, it was against the Nazi regime, if anyone.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Carrera
This land was the subject of dispute between the Arab States and Israel in the same way as the Falkands was disputed between Britain and Argentina. .


I don't wish to be pedantic - but Israel did not exist pre-1948.

The only reason a dispute arose was because the Jewish people forcibly removed the Palestinians from the territory called the statelet of israel.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Carrera
Israel and the Arab States went to war and Israel won that war..


Israel won the 1967 and 1973 wars.

They're now locked in to a guerilla war - which brings us back to the original issue.
The outcome to the guerilla war is undetermined as of now.
__________________
.."But finally the last thing I’ll say to the people who don’t believe in cycling, the cynics and the sceptics. I'm sorry for you. I’m sorry that you can’t dream big. [I]I'm sorry you don't believe in miracles. You should believe in these athletes, and you should believe in these people. I'll be a fan of the Tour de France for as long as I live. And there are no secrets" - this is a hard sporting event and hard work wins it - Armstrong 2005 TDF
morelike hypocrisy.
limerickman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-12.-2005, 06:46 AM   #58
darkboong
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,534
Default Re: Will Israel Strike First?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Carrera
Maybe Israel should have adopted the same tactics as your country and driven the Palestinians out altogether so they wouldn't be able to retaliate or protest? At least that's what happened to the Agentinians - there are none left on the island at all. You yourself pointed that out.


The fact that you are trying to be clever comparing the Falkands invasion of 1980 to the Palestinian diaspora of 1948 illustrates that you really don't have any understanding or care about the problem at hand. Justifying holocaust with holocaust demonstrates that you lack any kind of moral compass.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Carrera
As Don Shipman hinted before, it's not Jewish people who are colonising Europe but Middle Eastern Arabs. The ethnic majority of major cities of the U.K. and France will be moslem not Jewish within the next few years and we'll be a less toerant society as a result.


Don takes the piss both ways.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Carrera
This wouldn't be a problem if those particular immigrants accepted western norms and ceased trying to impose militant Islam within European borders.


That particular bunch is a vanishingly small proportion of the total. Sure, they're wrong and they need dealing with along with all the other militant fucktards, including Zionists and the self-serving power-crazed nastinesses like Blair and Bush. Same goes for you for that matter, you are no better.
darkboong is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-12.-2005, 01:19 AM   #59
Carrera
Registered User
 
Carrera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Staffordshire
Posts: 4,816
Default Re: Will Israel Strike First?

Lim, my views are essentially a minority in this country. You'll never see my face in a BBC question time audience although you may well see Melanie Phillips from time to time.
As I said before, I'm not an expert on Israel a dn probably know more about Chechnya and the Caspian region than the Middle East. But I have read enough scribings by Max Hastings and Melanie Phillips to know Israel has a certain valid basis for its claim on the disputed territories.
As MP pointed out, Palestine was originally created by the Romans at a time when the Romans had been struggling to control Jewish religious fervour and uprisings. Later invasions by Arabs also displaced Jewish people.
But my point about the hollocaust is simple. If you were yourself Jewish and had relatives who had maybe fled Russia due to pogroms under the Tsars, or fled Poland, France or Germany, you would be none too keen on events that have been taking place in France and Denmark. You would be counting yourself lucky there is a state called Israel where you can take refuge. Not only that but it's a stronger state than people imagine. They probably have a far better trained army than the U.S. in relation to size.
Again, the simple fact is we disagree but academics as a whole have been disagreeing over the disputed lands for decades.
As I said before, the truth is there is no real absolute right or wrong. I agree with you the Palestinians obviously do have rights if you look at the situation in a certain way but they are not the only displaced peoples on the globe - as a result of some war.
When the academics and historians fail to agree, disputed land claims are usually solved by war (seemingly China plans to do this). Israel won its conflict against far greater odds and, in my book, this is now the deciding factor. I suppose it also works to their advantage that a wave of evangelical fervour is sweeping through the U.S. (ask dave MC) and so many American tourists see Israel as being a kind of Christian Holy Land they have no wish to lose to Islam.
Sure, religion is complicated stuff and I'm glad I'm secular.

Quote:
Originally Posted by limerickman
...and you're free to express the views that you have Carrera.
Your views are endorsed and supported by many people.




I acknowledge that the Holocaust was wrong and I accept that something had to be done to protect the Jewish people.
However, this is where you and I part : the creation of Israel and more importantly the displacement of 1m people was not the ethical or just solution in my opinion.
If the Jewish people needed to go on the offensive, it was against the Nazi regime, if anyone.




I don't wish to be pedantic - but Israel did not exist pre-1948.

The only reason a dispute arose was because the Jewish people forcibly removed the Palestinians from the territory called the statelet of israel.




Israel won the 1967 and 1973 wars.

They're now locked in to a guerilla war - which brings us back to the original issue.
The outcome to the guerilla war is undetermined as of now.
Carrera is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-12.-2005, 01:25 AM   #60
Carrera
Registered User
 
Carrera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Staffordshire
Posts: 4,816
Default Re: Will Israel Strike First?

"Don takes the piss both ways."

He plays a shrewd game of poker and has no enemies. His is the voice of calm, moderation and balance.
Fred used to get away with a lot more but lately he's been rumbled as he made the mistake of insulting other forum members instead of just me.
Myself, I'm very impulsive so if I'm having a bad day you'll probably get a rant. On my good days I'm more inclined to reason.
Today I'm in a bad mood, though, because of being p****d around over my boat.

Quote:
Originally Posted by darkboong
The fact that you are trying to be clever comparing the Falkands invasion of 1980 to the Palestinian diaspora of 1948 illustrates that you really don't have any understanding or care about the problem at hand. Justifying holocaust with holocaust demonstrates that you lack any kind of moral compass.



Don takes the piss both ways.



That particular bunch is a vanishingly small proportion of the total. Sure, they're wrong and they need dealing with along with all the other militant fucktards, including Zionists and the self-serving power-crazed nastinesses like Blair and Bush. Same goes for you for that matter, you are no better.
Carrera is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 11:08 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet