![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Gambrills, Maryland
Posts: 163
|
Quote:
Yes, the internal combustion engine does put out a lot of foul smelling by-products. However, the belief that this is ruining the ozone layer is a myth unsupportable by science. You can always find a "scientist" or two who will swear to anything, but the science is the ozone layer is pretty much immune to auto exhaust. Solar power is not viable. It may work on a small scale, but what do you do at night or when there is cloud cover? Storage batteries? You want a bunch of storage batteries in your basement, with the acid and fumes coming off them? You may, but I sure don't. Wind farms? The technology is far from perfected and it is not an ecnomically viable alternative. Besides, the environmentalists who say this is the answer don't want any of the windfarms anywhere near where they live. So all we have to do is close the doors at NASA and use the money to solve all the countries problems? What about all the people who work at NASA, the industries that exist solely or almost solely to support NASA and space flight? What about all the good things that have been invented for the space program that have become invaluable in our everyday life, like Teflon? We could just as easily disestablish the EPA and use that money to clean up smokestacks, exhaust fumes, and other "pollutants." We could even use EPA's money to study the manufacture of artificaial ozone. How about the Departments of Education, HHS, Agriculture, and countless bureaus and organizations that have no authority for existence? We could take that money and turn it back to the states, where the problem of the homeless can be better handled. But, then, we run into the same problems as with NASA. One man's cash cow is another man's life and livelihood. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 145
|
....ok.
everything seams a lot simpler when ur 14...
__________________
SPECIALIZED BigHit: Because the engine is fearless. When we say BigHit we mean it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Gambrills, Maryland
Posts: 163
|
Quote:
Twisties, I am sorry for going off like that, and you are so right that when you are 14 everything is very simple. I am just a tad older than you, in fact, I have children that are more than twice your age. Hang in there and as you get older things tend to get a lot more involved. Wait a minute! Do a Peter Pan and stay 14 forever! ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Manchester,NH
Posts: 98
|
Quote:
I say we build all the nations Nuclear Power plants right there in Maryland right in your back yard. And hope we dont have a Six Mile Island meltdown like it nearly happened. Or how about Savanna? Don't be so quick to build nuclear. That waste sticks around for many years after you are dead and gone and forgotten. It sticks around so long that nobody can guarantee that the usa will be even speaking english or even be on this planet called earth. So yeah. You want Nuclear power. Build it in your back yard and bury your nuclear waste with a half-life of 10.000 years in your front yard, not mine. Want that right in your back yard?
__________________
Cannondale Caad 5 Stars and Stripes Limited Paint scheme Dura-Ace 9 Spd Mavic Open Pro 32 3 cross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 750
|
Quote:
Ya know, Twisties, what they really resent is that we are out there moving our butts and doing something that is ecologically and idealogically sound, we are enjoying ourselves, getting some excercise instead of just sitting behind the wheel of some fat oversized car, polluting ourselves and the rest of the world. It's like the way SOME smokers look at you when you quit smoking: They wish they had the "couilles" (pardon my French) to do the same thing, but they're still there polluting themselves and everyone around. They're just jealous they're not doing the right thing, dammit. Or maybe we cyclists just look hotter than most motorists do (for all of the above reasons), so they're trying to kill us all off ... they don't like the competition. I was thinking about printing up some small cards with the road regulations concerning cyclist printed up on them. ANybody try that already? Sara |
|
|
|
|