Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Tech Corner > Power Training
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Body composition

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 22-12.-2005, 01:35 AM   #16
Lonnie Utah
Registered User
 
Lonnie Utah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Not quite there
Posts: 968
Default Re: Body composition

Just a comparison, for what it's worth. I'm just about the same height as you 5'7.5" and "in season", my weight is around 136-138 (depending on hydration.) I don't have to do anything special to get there, that's just were everything balances out. In the off season, I'm up to about 142-143. I'm pretty comfortable with that (I'm not a racer). Personally, I'd say add a few more calories and make you mind happier. It's 1/2 the equation and the weight will most likely come back off in the spring with mileage starts to go back up....
__________________
Cheap, Strong and Light.
Pick any Two.
Lonnie Utah is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 22-12.-2005, 01:44 AM   #17
kmavm
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 324
Default Re: Body composition

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigbevans
Can I ask what your objective is being this light at this time of year?

The San Bruno Mountain Hill Climb. Northern California's race season starts very early; in this case, a little bit after dawn on New Year's Day .
kmavm is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 22-12.-2005, 01:54 AM   #18
kmavm
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 324
Default Re: Body composition

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lonnie Utah
Just a comparison, for what it's worth. I'm just about the same height as you 5'7.5" and "in season", my weight is around 136-138 (depending on hydration.) I don't have to do anything special to get there, that's just were everything balances out. In the off season, I'm up to about 142-143. I'm pretty comfortable with that (I'm not a racer). Personally, I'd say add a few more calories and make you mind happier. It's 1/2 the equation and the weight will most likely come back off in the spring with mileage starts to go back up....

That hasn't been my experience previously. I've been in the 153-155 range, in-season and out-, for the last ten years or so, the last three of which have included some real volume (by my standards, at least; 7500-8000 miles / year). Once I started paying closer attention to my diet, I rapidly and painlessly went down to around 140 or so, and saw some dramatic improvements in performance.

At the time I started this thread, I had just pushed things even further, at one point into the low 130's. That's just the kind of stupid idiot I am:
"Oh! I climb better when I'm light! Maybe when I'm WAY WAY TOO LIGHT and I can't think or talk because of low blood sugar for hours a day, I'll win the freaking Tour!"

Too much of a good thing, I think. My body and mind seem MUCH happier around 140-ish. Trying to hold on to my lowest possible weight for too long has definitely compromised my training, and that's letting the tail wag the dog. It's funny: I can't be my lightest AND my strongest at the same time. I guess the bodybuilders are onto something...
kmavm is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 22-12.-2005, 02:54 AM   #19
Lonnie Utah
Registered User
 
Lonnie Utah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Not quite there
Posts: 968
Default Re: Body composition

Quote:
Originally Posted by kmavm
Too much of a good thing, I think. My body and mind seem MUCH happier around 140-ish. Trying to hold on to my lowest possible weight for too long has definitely compromised my training, and that's letting the tail wag the dog. It's funny: I can't be my lightest AND my strongest at the same time. I guess the bodybuilders are onto something...
That's been my experience too. I felt just fine at 138, but I don't have a lot of muscle mass either. So, this thread piqued my interest in my own situation. The previous summer (my first on a bike) I was about where I am now weight wise. I slowly dropped (without too much change in my eating routine) to the 137 lbs I was at when I started tracking it Last Jan. It went up to about 140 in May (I took about 3 weeks off) and back down to the mid 130's in June/July/August and back up in Sept/Oct/Nov. Those numbers correlate well with mileage values for those months as well. I also ski a fair amount in the winter so that makes the numbers from winter a bit fuzzy (I burn a lot of calories trying to keep warm). So I also looked at my "overall feeling" numbers as well. Those peaked in late April when I was in the high 130's/low 140's. Based on the workout I was doing then, I'm sure there was some muscle building during that time. Bottom line, I felt the strongest at high 130's/low 140's.

Edit: All of my weights are post ride and include the effects of hydration loss....
__________________
Cheap, Strong and Light.
Pick any Two.
Lonnie Utah is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 22-12.-2005, 03:33 AM   #20
mises
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 247
Default Re: Body composition

Quote:
Originally Posted by kmavm
That hasn't been my experience previously. I've been in the 153-155 range, in-season and out-, for the last ten years or so, the last three of which have included some real volume (by my standards, at least; 7500-8000 miles / year). Once I started paying closer attention to my diet, I rapidly and painlessly went down to around 140 or so, and saw some dramatic improvements in performance.

At the time I started this thread, I had just pushed things even further, at one point into the low 130's. That's just the kind of stupid idiot I am:
"Oh! I climb better when I'm light! Maybe when I'm WAY WAY TOO LIGHT and I can't think or talk because of low blood sugar for hours a day, I'll win the freaking Tour!"

Too much of a good thing, I think. My body and mind seem MUCH happier around 140-ish. Trying to hold on to my lowest possible weight for too long has definitely compromised my training, and that's letting the tail wag the dog. It's funny: I can't be my lightest AND my strongest at the same time. I guess the bodybuilders are onto something...

I think with some dietary modification you could be just as comfortable at a somewhat lower weight. From what was posted you weren't getting enough fat in your diet and that will cause you to be hungry all the time, nutritional problems with fat soluble vitamins, and some hormonal disturbances that could cause a number of the other effects you mentioned.

Also think most people eat too much during exercise while training and impair improvement in fat metabolism. I think it's better to eat more off the bike and less on the bike. Calculate calories in and out on a weekly basis and eat pretty much the same amount every day whether training or not - recovery is better on the off days and you can feel like you are pigging out those days even though overall you are in balance.

If you have a good estimate of your fat free mass in kg this formula works well for estimating resting caloric requirements: 370+ 21.6*(fat free mass kg). I recently got an indirect calorimeter than uses O2 consumption to calculate RCR and was within 10 kcal a day with the formula.

Unless you ate an extra 15,000 calories in 3 days your rapid weight gain following easing up on your diet was all water from increased carbs. Every gram of carbs puts on about 2g of fluid (that's why people think Atkins is so great when they start it).

Be thankful you don't have strong spare tire genes too! I have looked like Rasmussen before but still had a small spare tire around my middle (at 174cm tall and 58kg). I finally decided I would have to be six feet under to get rid of it. Thanks Dad!
mises is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-01.-2006, 03:57 AM   #21
morganfletcher
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2
Default Re: Body composition

Quote:
Originally Posted by kmavm
The San Bruno Mountain Hill Climb. Northern California's race season starts very early; in this case, a little bit after dawn on New Year's Day .
How did you do?

Morgan
morganfletcher is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-01.-2006, 07:56 AM   #22
kmavm
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 324
Default Re: Body composition

Quote:
Originally Posted by morganfletcher
How did you do?
Being honest with myself, I performed very badly. I reconn'ed the course on the 14th and did 19:54. My time yesterday was 21:45.
kmavm is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-01.-2006, 08:39 AM   #23
frenchyge
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kansas City, USA
Posts: 3,689
Default Re: Body composition

Quote:
Originally Posted by kmavm
Being honest with myself, I performed very badly. I reconn'ed the course on the 14th and did 19:54. My time yesterday was 21:45.

Oh man, 2 minutes off from a practice run? What happened? Was the wind/weather dramatically different, or did you just not feel strong. Hey, bad days happen.
frenchyge is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-01.-2006, 05:06 PM   #24
kmavm
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 324
Default San Bruno Mountain Hill Climb

Quote:
Originally Posted by frenchyge
Oh man, 2 minutes off from a practice run? What happened? Was the wind/weather dramatically different, or did you just not feel strong. Hey, bad days happen.
I can't quite explain it. It didn't feel like a bad day. I got a good night's sleep, good warm-up, etc. My RPE felt considerably better (i.e., harder) than the training session. The holidays have definitely interfered a bit with my training, but I haven't slacked so much that I could have lost 10% performance in three weeks.

In fairness, the race was very windy, and somewhat cold and rainy, while the practice session happened in ideal weather. Still, the wind was predominately a tailwind, and course times were fast by historical standards.

Right now, my best guess is that it is some sort of mental block I have when performing in a race context. I've had some similar experiences in the past. Oh well. Now I have some power data to work with for next year, but that's another thread...
kmavm is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-01.-2006, 04:44 AM   #25
kmavm
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 324
Default Re: San Bruno Mountain Hill Climb

Quote:
Originally Posted by kmavm
I can't quite explain it. It didn't feel like a bad day.
Sorry to reply to my own thread, but I have some more information to share. Since I last posted, I've consulted with a dietitian, who looked at a food and exercise diary for the week surrounding New Year's (I think the 27th of December to the 3rd of January). The things she pointed out were that I seem to be in a pretty severe caloric deficit, and that in particular, I wasn't getting enough calcium or fat. I've been supplementing with flax seed oil and fish oil, and trying to up my dairy consumption in the intervening week.

Probably more importantly, I've been easing up on the diet, and wow, I feel like a new man. I'm training WAY more intensely, racking up 800 TSS points this week and still feeling fit as a fiddle. I think I was just severely glycogen depleted. This is consistent with the near-instant weight fluctation of about 4 pounds whenever I go on or off my restrictive diet. As for those 4 pounds, even if they're all fat, I don't care, given the world of difference it seems to make to my energy levels.
kmavm is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 11:08 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet