Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Tech Corner > Power Training
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Improvement with Power Metering

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 28-10.-2005, 01:22 PM   #16
Peka
Registered User
 
Peka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 235
Default Re: Improvement with Power Metering

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeHains
G'day Peka. I've trained both directions. The 10 minute time was up the 'back' starting at the last intersection, and riding up towards the TV stations ... ending at Channel 10.

My best time up that way, now, is 9'09" - at average 321w.

This is fast for me, but there are plenty who ride faster especially those darn skinny young ones ! See http://www.cycle2max.com/c2m/climbs...gion=Queensland

For Mt Gravatt, my best time so far is a (lowly) 6'54". This was at average 320w.

I weigh 75kg, and my bike (with water, pump, etc) comes in at around 8.5kg
Thanks for that. My best up Mt Gravatt so far is about 8:03. I'm 73kg but my bike with water etc is 16kg (MTB) and I've only been riding again since early August.
Peka is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28-10.-2005, 07:48 PM   #17
jeff828
Registered User
 
jeff828's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 229
Default Re: Improvement with Power Metering

Quote:
Originally Posted by RapDaddyo
To be clear, what do you mean by CP12 and CP30? Is this your max sustainable power at 12 and 30 mins respectively?


Yes this my max sustainable power
jeff828 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28-10.-2005, 11:47 PM   #18
frenchyge
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kansas City, USA
Posts: 3,688
Default Re: Improvement with Power Metering

Quote:
Originally Posted by acoggan
Joking aside, though, this does raise an important point, in that all I've done is attempt to lay out a cogent system for classifying/categorizing/rating training sessions performed using a powermeter.

Agree with Rapdaddyo here, your paper is more than that to me. Specifically, it also explains and quantifies the benefits of training in the different zones, and the time cost associated with each. In my mind, that cost v. benefit explanation is paramount to an individual deciding how he will spend his limited training time, which leads directly into determining how many level-X workouts to put into the training plan.

Possibly I'm reading more into your paper than what you intended, or using a "Sample Diagram" as a "Map," but I think reading your paper has helped me structure my training plan more than any other thing I can think of. Thank you.
frenchyge is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 28-10.-2005, 11:56 PM   #19
frenchyge
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kansas City, USA
Posts: 3,688
Default Re: Improvement with Power Metering

Quote:
Originally Posted by jeff828
I have a 250watt ave for my CP12min

I was told to do these then at 10% below which would be 225watts, seems kind of easy then, my CP30 is 225.
Why wouldn’t you do them right at 250watts? Is it because you would be able to do more, 4 or 5 at 225watts verses only being able to do 2 or 3 if you did them at exactly 250watts. Is this where adaptation takes place, when its a slight bit easier but you can do more of them.

Both total time in zone and the duration of each excursion into the zone affect the degree of adaptation.

Are you saying that 250w is your best 12-min power for a "one-time" effort? If so, then you wouldn't be able to do 12min @ 250w, multiple (3-5) times with short recoveries in between. The reason for the "10% below highest ever power at that duration" is to ensure that you're able to complete the entire workout without having to drop the power on each subsequent interval.

The idea for intervals (w/ rests between) is to extend the number of total minutes spent in-zone, so it's important to be able to complete the entire set in the target zone.
frenchyge is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 29-10.-2005, 04:52 AM   #20
jeff828
Registered User
 
jeff828's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 229
Thumbs up Re: Improvement with Power Metering

Quote:
Originally Posted by frenchyge
Both total time in zone and the duration of each excursion into the zone affect the degree of adaptation.

Are you saying that 250w is your best 12-min power for a "one-time" effort? If so, then you wouldn't be able to do 12min @ 250w, multiple (3-5) times with short recoveries in between. The reason for the "10% below highest ever power at that duration" is to ensure that you're able to complete the entire workout without having to drop the power on each subsequent interval.

The idea for intervals (w/ rests between) is to extend the number of total minutes spent in-zone, so it's important to be able to complete the entire set in the target zone.


Thanks french, that is what I thought I just needed someone to confirm that I was thinking correct.
jeff828 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 29-10.-2005, 08:40 AM   #21
RapDaddyo
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 4,115
Default Re: Improvement with Power Metering

Quote:
Originally Posted by jeff828
Thanks french, that is what I thought I just needed someone to confirm that I was thinking correct.
Jeff, I'm working up a chart that connects the dots between power, FT and training zones. It might help you understand the connection. I'll post it in a few hours.
RapDaddyo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 29-10.-2005, 10:09 AM   #22
jeff828
Registered User
 
jeff828's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 229
Default Re: Improvement with Power Metering

Quote:
Originally Posted by RapDaddyo
Jeff, I'm working up a chart that connects the dots between power, FT and training zones. It might help you understand the connection. I'll post it in a few hours.


Thanks alot, sometimes I have trouble comprehending all this input
jeff828 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 29-10.-2005, 01:49 PM   #23
RapDaddyo
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 4,115
Default Re: Improvement with Power Metering

I don't think my chart is quite ready for prime time, but it is attached below nonetheless. I looked for a graphic that combined the power/duration curve and Andy Coggan's training zones. I couldn't find one, so I made my own. The horizontal axis is duration in minutes, from 0-60. The vertical axis is power as a percentage of FT. The blue diamond markers represent the power/duration markers at 5s, 1min, 5min and 60min (FT). The red bar represents the L4 training level (91%-105%), the green bar represents the L5 training level (106%-120%) and the purple line to the left of the green bar represents the L6 training level (121%+). So, the training levels increase slightly as you move left on the duration scale, but the top of the range is always less than or equal to the MP at that duration. Actually, for levels 4 & 5, the range is fairly wide. Take the L4 intervals you are interested in. The range (91%-105%) is actually pretty huge when you think about it. Based on the data you posted, your FT looks to be ~213w. So, your L4 range would be 194w-224w. I think you would find a huge difference between doing intervals at 194w vs. 224w. As to doing L4 intervals at 250w, clearly you can do them because that is your MP. But, to what advantage and at what cost? I'm not sure there is much if any advantage but there is definitely a cost. The cost is recovery time and therefore how much time you will need to complete a set of intervals. If you do your L4 intervals at 250w, your recovery duration ratio is ~1:1, so you need about 12 mins of recovery for a 12 min interval. If you do your L4 intervals at 225w, your recovery duration ratio is ~0.30:1, so you need less than 4 mins of recovery for a 12 min interval. So, if you do 4 repeats of your 12 min intervals, you can complete the set in 64 mins at 225w and you need 96 mins to complete the set at 250w. If you have unlimited time available, maybe it's not a problem to do the set in 96 mins. But, what's the advantage? You attain the desired adaptation at 194w+ and definitely at 225w (the top end of the range). So, why do them at 250w? I can think of no argument for that. I hope this is helpful.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:  Power Profile (2).jpg
Views: 64
Size:  28.5 KB  
RapDaddyo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 30-10.-2005, 12:12 AM   #24
mises
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 247
Default Re: Improvement with Power Metering

Quote:
Originally Posted by acoggan
Ironically, I just stumbled across this:

http://www.pgw.com/catalog/catalog....57846&Order=233

I'm currently checking with Hunter to see if the April '06 release date is accurate (and also to find out if they really did screw up and list me as an M.D., not a Ph.D.!).

Amazon has a February release date, and yes you are listed as MD on the pic of the cover.
mises is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 30-10.-2005, 12:12 PM   #25
jeff828
Registered User
 
jeff828's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 229
Default Re: Improvement with Power Metering

Quote:
Originally Posted by RapDaddyo
I don't think my chart is quite ready for prime time, but it is attached below nonetheless. I looked for a graphic that combined the power/duration curve and Andy Coggan's training zones. I couldn't find one, so I made my own. The horizontal axis is duration in minutes, from 0-60. The vertical axis is power as a percentage of FT. The blue diamond markers represent the power/duration markers at 5s, 1min, 5min and 60min (FT). The red bar represents the L4 training level (91%-105%), the green bar represents the L5 training level (106%-120%) and the purple line to the left of the green bar represents the L6 training level (121%+). So, the training levels increase slightly as you move left on the duration scale, but the top of the range is always less than or equal to the MP at that duration. Actually, for levels 4 & 5, the range is fairly wide. Take the L4 intervals you are interested in. The range (91%-105%) is actually pretty huge when you think about it. Based on the data you posted, your FT looks to be ~213w. So, your L4 range would be 194w-224w. I think you would find a huge difference between doing intervals at 194w vs. 224w. As to doing L4 intervals at 250w, clearly you can do them because that is your MP. But, to what advantage and at what cost? I'm not sure there is much if any advantage but there is definitely a cost. The cost is recovery time and therefore how much time you will need to complete a set of intervals. If you do your L4 intervals at 250w, your recovery duration ratio is ~1:1, so you need about 12 mins of recovery for a 12 min interval. If you do your L4 intervals at 225w, your recovery duration ratio is ~0.30:1, so you need less than 4 mins of recovery for a 12 min interval. So, if you do 4 repeats of your 12 min intervals, you can complete the set in 64 mins at 225w and you need 96 mins to complete the set at 250w. If you have unlimited time available, maybe it's not a problem to do the set in 96 mins. But, what's the advantage? You attain the desired adaptation at 194w+ and definitely at 225w (the top end of the range). So, why do them at 250w? I can think of no argument for that. I hope this is helpful.



This definitly was a lot of help, especially understanding about the recovery needed if you did them right at 250w
jeff828 is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 05:51 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet