Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Tech Corner > Power Training
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


VO2max Intervals

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 21-10.-2005, 11:46 AM   #16
RapDaddyo
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 4,115
Default Re: VO2max Intervals

As I read your last post about your preferred races and your race strategy, it occurred to me that you may want to investigate the supramaximal intervals of short duration (e.g., 30s). These have been shown to increase both LT and VO2MAX as well as short-term sprint power. These would seem to help you for the last lap. There is an interesting article on this type of interval training here http://www.ausport.gov.au/fulltext/...papers/LAUR.pdf.
RapDaddyo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 21-10.-2005, 08:15 PM   #17
jeff828
Registered User
 
jeff828's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 229
Default Re: VO2max Intervals

Quote:
Originally Posted by RapDaddyo
As I read your last post about your preferred races and your race strategy, it occurred to me that you may want to investigate the supramaximal intervals of short duration (e.g., 30s). These have been shown to increase both LT and VO2MAX as well as short-term sprint power. These would seem to help you for the last lap. There is an interesting article on this type of interval training here http://www.ausport.gov.au/fulltext/...papers/LAUR.pdf.



Interesting article. The only think I can think of is they built a lot of muscular strength.

Here is my though on power & duration. I think that is the most important, you want to be able to hold more power for a longer period of time and "not" go anaerobic, the more aerobic you can stay the better. I read a post saying we all can produce just as much as lance on alp d huez (400+) but we cant hold it as long as him and he was probably at or below threshold. If your in a group ride and the pace is a steady 25mph notice how some people are comfortable, some are struggling a little and some are falling off the pace after a few minutes, and thats without any surges. What is their limiting factor? They can only produce that power for a few seconds/minutes before going anaerobic and falling off the pace. Whats your take on it.
jeff828 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 21-10.-2005, 09:55 PM   #18
Spunout
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 639
Default Re: VO2max Intervals

Quote:
Originally Posted by jeff828
If your in a group ride and the pace is a steady 25mph notice how some people are comfortable, some are struggling a little and some are falling off the pace after a few minutes, and thats without any surges. What is their limiting factor? They can only produce that power for a few seconds/minutes before going anaerobic and falling off the pace. Whats your take on it.

LT or anaerobic threshold. FT, whatever. The more watts you can produce longer aerobically, the better off you are.

The people off the back are into anaerobic zones, and they'll only last 4 minutes.
Spunout is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 21-10.-2005, 10:23 PM   #19
RapDaddyo
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 4,115
Default Re: VO2max Intervals

Quote:
Originally Posted by jeff828
Interesting article. The only think I can think of is they built a lot of muscular strength.
Well, the obvious result was the increase in sprint power. The non-obvious results were the increases in LT and VO2MAX.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jeff828
Here is my thought on power & duration. I think that is the most important, you want to be able to hold more power for a longer period of time and "not" go anaerobic, the more aerobic you can stay the better. I read a post saying we all can produce just as much as lance on alp d huez (400+) but we cant hold it as long as him and he was probably at or below threshold. If your in a group ride and the pace is a steady 25mph notice how some people are comfortable, some are struggling a little and some are falling off the pace after a few minutes, and thats without any surges. What is their limiting factor? They can only produce that power for a few seconds/minutes before going anaerobic and falling off the pace. Whats your take on it.
What you're observing is differences in sustainable power, as Spunout said. More sustainable power is the Holy Grail of cycling (other than for sprint specialists). The issue is how to get it. You don't necessarily go out and ride the durations you are training for. For example, if your objective is to increase your max sustainable 1 hr power, you could go out and ride an hour every day as fast as possible. But, you would probably make more progress toward your objective by doing 20 min repeats at a higher pace. Training rides are intended to produce a specific adaptation (e.g., LT, VO2MAX, neuromuscular). It takes different combinations of power/duration to produce the desired adaptation.
RapDaddyo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 21-10.-2005, 11:52 PM   #20
Spunout
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 639
Default Re: VO2max Intervals

Quote:
Originally Posted by RapDaddyo
More sustainable power is the Holy Grail of cycling (other than for sprint specialists)..

Qualify This: Track sprinters, right?

The road sprinter (Zabel, McEwen) still has to make it to the line in as good or better condition than everyone else. That demands as good or better aerobic power than the competitors.

Guys like Boonen (moreso, Valverde) are true allrounders. They have won from small groups where the best rouleurs, climbers have been dropped and still win a sprint.
Spunout is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 21-10.-2005, 11:58 PM   #21
RapDaddyo
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 4,115
Default Re: VO2max Intervals

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spunout
Qualify This: Track sprinters, right?
Right. I'm not talking here about RR or crit sprint finishes. I'm talking about event specialists.
RapDaddyo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 22-10.-2005, 02:37 AM   #22
jeff828
Registered User
 
jeff828's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 229
Default Re: VO2max Intervals

Quote:
Originally Posted by RapDaddyo
[/size].

What you're observing is differences in sustainable power, as Spunout said. More sustainable power is the Holy Grail of cycling (other than for sprint specialists). The issue is how to get it. You don't necessarily go out and ride the durations you are training for. For example, if your objective is to increase your max sustainable 1 hr power, you could go out and ride an hour every day as fast as possible. But, you would probably make more progress toward your objective by doing 20 min repeats at a higher pace. Training rides are intended to produce a specific adaptation (e.g., LT, VO2MAX, neuromuscular). It takes different combinations of power/duration to produce the desired adaptation.


I agree 100% with that
jeff828 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 22-10.-2005, 02:54 AM   #23
jeff828
Registered User
 
jeff828's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 229
Default Re: VO2max Intervals

I agree with you, gaining more power for a longer period of time, this is the Holy Grail, at least for me. I took a way different approach to this theory and it has been working for me. In order to gain muscle strength for a longer period of time, last August 2004, I decided to try a different method to achieve this. I rode my rollers at a low cadence so I had a good bit of resistance the whole time (I was not mashing, just turning the gear over smoothly) in a 53x16 at 70-75rpm and my HR at 160-165max (still aerobic) and just rode it. I just let the low constant resistance & time take its toll.

I did 2x10min, then was able to do 3x10min, then 4x10min, then 2x15min, now I can do these same intervals in a 53x15.
I did this twice a week in 6 week blocks last year, then the same this year in Feb./March & in June. What I found out was I did loose a slight bit of cadence but now I’m not as pegged in a race and have plenty of reserve. This last half of the season I was attacking and going with several breaks all the time, even though the 3s were averaging 25-27mph. My Hr is averaging now in crits 185-187, RR 175. I even see my HRs as low as 170-175 in crits. Don’t get me wrong, I still get pushed into the 200s but not nearly as long or as much. I believe it also taught me how to pedal a low cadence/bigger gear more smoothly without mashing. I don’t exactly know why this approach was working so well for me but it is, I've been told its totally wrong compared to what the books are saying to do.
I originally posted the power tap question because what was working for me just a little while ago now I question myself about it since I have a new tool to try and figure out. Thanks again for everybody’s input
jeff828 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 22-10.-2005, 07:59 AM   #24
postal_bag
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 198
Default Re: VO2max Intervals

Quote:
Originally Posted by robkit
its tough to know what is the optimal duration.

its seems to be thought that VO2max can only be achieved with a workout of minimum 3 mins, and held for a max of 8 mins.

linking that with Coggans 106-120% benchmark we might conclude that 3 min intervals should be at 120% through to 8 mins at 106% and 5 mins at about 112%.

physcologically, and from my experience, i beleive it is going to be harder to hold 112% for five mins than 120% for 3.

I did a 4 x 5 minute interval workout instead of my usual 5 x 4 and used the stress factor formula (for lack of the correct terminology) to set the power level.

I knew I could do my 4 min. intervals at 120% (1.2^4=2.07x4 minutes=8.29) so I chose 112% for the 5 min. intervals (1.12^4=1.57x5 minutes=7.87). 113% would be a closer stess rating, but I was playing it safe.

I found that it was challenging psychologically to go for that extra minute, but the overall effect was similar. The last minute felt pretty much the same. I ended up "pretending" that the first few minutes of each interval didn't count, and when I would check the time, I would be well into what I had fooled myself into believing was a 4 min. interval and the psychological advantage swayed my way because I knew I had only a few minutes left, at 25 watts less than what I normally use for my 4 min. intervals.

I also found that my 1 x 15 session at +150% FT earlier in the week helped make the 112% seem "easy". I included one of these in my warm-up.
postal_bag is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 11:01 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet