![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 140
|
Quote:
So here's a theory (but only a theory). From 20+ yrs of rock climbing, I have a very strong upper body relative to most cyclists (I can do one-arm pull-ups). I'm wondering if somehow when I stand I'm able to gain more efficiency using my upper body strength? If that's it I'm guessing there's not much I can do to bring my seated power up to the level of my standing power. 10% is huge though so it's a bit frustrating on the flats where standing doesn't help pace due to increased drag (of course on the hills I'm happy to just stand). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 4,115
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kansas City, USA
Posts: 3,689
|
Quote:
That's my thought. More power, yes. More 20-min power, no. Of course, if I were used to hanging from rock ledges for 20+ minutes at a time, then maybe things would be different. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 140
|
Quote:
Yeah, most people stand for a bit to rest their seated pedalling muscles. I would characterize my hill climb style as sitting once in a while to rest my standing muscles. I can comfortably stand for 10 minutes at a time. The thing is, even if that is the explanation it suggests to me that my cardiovascular system can easily handle 10% more power output than my legs can, and somehow I ought to be able to train my legs to take advantage of that. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 113
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 113
|
Quote:
Wait! I'll reply to my own post. Even though the pedal torque is cut in half above, because of picking a lower gear and therefore a larger moment arm at the rear cogs, the hub torque remains the same. And it works out. I stand corrected....by myself! I just love talking to me. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kansas City, USA
Posts: 3,689
|
Quote:
That's true, but how'd you double your cadence and keep speed the same? By changing to a lower gear, of course, which changes the ratio of crank-arm torque that is transferred to the hub. Drive speed (rpm) from the pedals to the hub is multiplied by the transmission gear ratio, but torque is divided by the gear ratio, so that power remains constant regardless of gear selection. In other words, changing gears may change pedal torque, but it doesn't change hub torque. Hub torque is a function of motion resistance only, whereas pedal torque varies with gear selection, too. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kansas City, USA
Posts: 3,689
|
Quote:
Sorry, I was already typing a response. Your correction stands correctly, however. ![]() |
|
|
|
|