Today's Forum Topics
Set as homepage
|
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
 |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
28-08.-2005, 07:45 PM
|
#46 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,125
|
Re: Should FLYER be reinstated
Ah well I think it's a combination of factors..........but let's stop this discussion he won't be back so......
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
09-09.-2005, 10:55 AM
|
#47 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 36
|
Re: Should FLYER be reinstated
I know exactly why Flyer was banned. But, I can't tell any more because it would get a lot of my close friends who are European pros and coaches into a lot of trouble with WADA.
 If you don't want him back, then you are just part of the money hungry marketing scheme that is pro sports.  |
|
|
|
|
09-09.-2005, 07:35 PM
|
#48 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Arizona (USA)
Posts: 1,141
  |
Re: Should FLYER be reinstated
Quote:
These, "I can't say more", claims sound to me like ten pounds of fluff. |
|
|
|
|
|
15-11.-2005, 04:38 AM
|
#49 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1
|
Re: Should FLYER be reinstated
This is my first post on cyclingforums, so please excuse my lack of formalities. I am the site administrator of dailypelotonforums.com.
MJtje is a frequent poster on our forums, and while he is of course more than entitled to express his opinion, I hope you will indulge me a moment to comment on his characterization. MJtje is very well aware of the stance we take on doping issues at the Daily Peloton and on our forums - it has been discussed in detail. That he chooses to skew it here is disappointing. The poster known here as Flyer was banned almost a year and a half ago on our original message board for the same kind of behavior he exhibited on our current forum. I have had a number of personal emails from Flyer. Not only has he made accusations in these emails about specifically-named riders (maybe about some of you...), I am also aware that he has made similar accusations about me to others. Simply put, in almost two years, he has been unable to adapt to reasonable requests. He appears incapable of complying with our acceptable use policy; neither is he someone that I wish to associate with. Thanks. Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
15-11.-2005, 05:13 AM
|
#50 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,125
|
Re: Should FLYER be reinstated
SG, this is a post a long time ago. In that time I wasn't posting as much on DP and did NOT know what youre policy was. And I've said also on DP I'm sorry what I said..........
Although I still stand behind the LA-case, which I think should have been discussed on DP!! But nothing but good words for DP......in fact the reason why I post more on DP nowadays is because I think the discussions are much better...... Again I'm sorry.....this was a comment months ago and you need to see that comment in that context........ And insofar as Flyer/H202.......I never had problems with him, but can understand that he is hard to handle especially as mod!!! Note that I never made a problem with the recent banning of H202 on DP....... Can't turn back the time........sorry! Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
31-01.-2007, 05:47 AM
|
#51 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 440
|
Re: Should FLYER be reinstated
The Daily Peloton was exposed as a Lance Pharmstrong, Save Tyler, Free Floyd marketing platform. And that ship has been sunk along with Jeanna!
They have a pro-doping, pro denial policy. In any case---they suck and will be sold soon! |
|
|
|
Linear Mode
