![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 63
|
Rather than go back and forth accusing riders, what would people like to see done to try to clean up the sport?
1=Life bans for first time offenders 2=Full disclsoure of all medical history to an independant body for analysis(NOT the UCI) 3=TwoYear suspension of teams if at least two riders fail tests or are found in possesion of drugs 4=Medical passport tracking all physiological points and any (unreasonable) changes in these will result in a doping positive 5=All medical staff from each team to be banned.The race should then provide a central medical staff who a rider can go to if they have a problem 6=Governmental policy that if a doctor is convicted of falsely supplying drugs to athletes that they will be banned from practising for life Any others? |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,333
|
Chemist will just get better. They always seem to get better.
It's kind of like I heard once that the manufacturer of the radar sold to police is the same manufacturer for the radar detector sold to motorist. Sorry for being a pessimist. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 262
|
As hard as this is for me to admit, I agree with Flyer to some point. I agree with the zero tolerance part. But not against the sponsors, against the athlete caught. In "professional sports," we can not get rid of the corporate sponsor, it would kill the sport. We need to get rid of the athlete, once he/she is given a fair trial and convicted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 696
|
Here is one proposed solution that has merit:
http://outside.away.com/outside/fea...n-sports-1.html Long article with the proposal detailed on page 7. Extract He calls his idea the Volunteer Program. It's driven by the concept of using science, testing, and free-will participation to prove that athletes who sign up are clean, based on thorough biological profiles of their bodies. Catlin would use these profiles to create a set of "biomarkers" that show what is and isn't normal for each athlete. Armed with these indicators, he would institute ongoing, voluntary checkups for any athlete who chooses to participate. In return for entering the Volunteer Program, athletes would receive recognition as members. The public, press, sponsors, and governing bodies would be assured that members of the program were not doping. Catlin would try to prove that athletes who take part in his system are clean. Participants would submit to exhaustive biological profiles, for comparison with cutting-edge data on what is and isn't possible in the human body. Athletes running around with insignias of quality assurance approval.
__________________
VF "Remember, even if you win the rat race, you are still a rat" |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 262
|
Quote:
It wouldn't kill a corrupt sport, it would kill the "professional" aspect/ties to the sport, thus taking the rest of the sport with it. Think about it. No sponsor would touch a pro team, why risk losing your reputation on a dumb ass cheat. As you are quick to point out, it's all about making money. No pro teams, no grand tours- No world championships. I feel that the only era brought back would be the recreational rider. Yes, you will always have racing. As long as two guys are on bikes pedaling down the same strip of road, there will be a race. If you lose sponsers, it trickles down the chain. They would pull backing for regional and local races. I would not be able to lose my $30 fee every weekend! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 262
|
Quote:
I agree that local racing is the essence of competiton. But, I also enjoy the pro cycling. I do find it entertaining to watch those guys go out and lay it on the line for the grand tours. I enjoy the team tatics used to get their best riders into position to finish the race in the great sprint. I enjoy watching guys get dropped at the top of a 12% grade! I Love that stuff! And for the most part, I do worship those guys, for doing what I could never do. Without pro sports, the amature athlete would have nothig to aspire to-dream of becoming. One thing is for sure, we do need ZERO tolerance. But we need to hold the riders accountable. THey have the final say as to what they do with their bodies. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 56
|
Yeah, I have a solution: Lose the rule. Who cares? What is the forum, the alt.i-am-a-socialist-everyone-should-be-even.org newsgroup? I don't care, if you want to go fast that's your business. I'll be laughing when your heart explodes at the top of the hill.
http://www.cyclingforums.com/showpo...25&postcount=74 |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 696
|
Quote:
http://www.procycling.com/news.aspx?ID=1456
__________________
VF "Remember, even if you win the rat race, you are still a rat" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 56
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 158
|
For as long as doping is alleged to have been around this sport, the fear of
punishment isn't a real deterrent. I think some major threshold issues to consider are: 1) Defining which substances are, or even should be illegal and are subject to testing. 2) Having impartial evaluations and untainted samples, including quality and convincing test results. It's really difficult to come up with a realistic program, isn't it? Some ideas, good, bad or stupid: Have test stations for all riders during races? Or, testing at the starting area for all riders? At the finishes? How about consent from riders for random or even widespread searches of any rider's apartment, car, gym bag, team car, girlfriend, etc. at any time during the season. Maybe try using lie detector tests??? Short of following each and every rider with 24 hour, online surveillance, I don't see how to get around the issue and feel 100% confident with the system. |
|
|
|