Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Other Stuff > Your Bloody Soap Box
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Etiquette on forums.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 28-07.-2005, 06:57 AM   #61
FredC
Registered User
 
FredC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,819
Default Re: Etiquette on forums.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chance3290
Again, you have not show any of my posts where I put the lives of those in London above any others (except yours, of course). Therefore, I will say that you are a LIAR and a COWARD. You make things up and put words where there are no words.
The words, or in this case, the post of a LIAR mean no more than the piss of an ant.
Now, of course, you'll come back with more LIES or more or your crap.
So, I wave my pretty parts at your Aunties.
Now go away or I shall taunt you for a second time.
Goodbye, PISS-ANT.

London= Inferences from you.
Ant piss, that's a new one. You must be pre-pubescent.
Are you sure your pretty parts are large enough to wave about? Anyway waving your miniscule bits about in the cemetery should be a laugh. Do it on a Sunday afternoon if possible.
__________________
The media is a self perpetuating publicity stunt.
FredC is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28-07.-2005, 07:31 AM   #62
Wurm
Registered User
 
Wurm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,148
Default Re: Etiquette on forums.

"Waving about" one's "miniscule bits". HAHA! You Brits...I get a riot out of the way you guys talk!
__________________
"Bush is the first President to admit to an impeachable offense."

- John Dean, former Counsel to the President (Nixon)

The aim of big corporations is to separate fools from their money all of the time and ordinary folks from their money most of the time. The rest of us must fend for ourselves.
Wurm is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28-07.-2005, 01:56 PM   #63
Hypnospin
Registered User
 
Hypnospin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: ex of santa cruz, california, usa
Posts: 798
Default Re: Etiquette on forums.

ah, ignoring the root cause and concentrating on the side effects, this statement is.

britain's collusion with the us criminal war acts is neatly overlooked in this case.

this is the very definition of being reactive as opposed to proactive in regards to international policy.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Carrera
Irwin Stelzer writes with regard to the above:

So British policy remains: easy entry for potential terrorists; benefits for them while they are in the country; and relative safety from deportation and detention as enemy combatants. Little wonder that Britain's security services say another strike, more lethal than the one last Thursday, is a virtual certainty.’
Hypnospin is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28-07.-2005, 02:22 PM   #64
davidmc
Registered User
 
davidmc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: metro dc USA
Posts: 3,394
Default Re: Etiquette on forums.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wurm
"Waving about" one's "miniscule bits". HAHA! You Brits...I get a riot out of the way you guys talk!

It is quite entertaining They prove thier prowess in dry wit. Unsurpassed.
__________________
I'm completely in favor of the separation of Church and State. My idea is that these two institutions screw us up enough on their own, so both of them together is certain death.
George Carlin
US comedian and actor (1937 - )
davidmc is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28-07.-2005, 08:39 PM   #65
Wurm
Registered User
 
Wurm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,148
Default Re: Etiquette on forums.

Quote:
Originally Posted by davidmc
They prove thier prowess in dry wit.

"...very dry, please. And shaken, not stirred..."
__________________
"Bush is the first President to admit to an impeachable offense."

- John Dean, former Counsel to the President (Nixon)

The aim of big corporations is to separate fools from their money all of the time and ordinary folks from their money most of the time. The rest of us must fend for ourselves.
Wurm is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28-07.-2005, 09:07 PM   #66
Chance3290
Registered User
 
Chance3290's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 619
Default Re: Etiquette on forums.

Quote:
Originally Posted by davidmc
It is quite entertaining They prove thier prowess in dry wit. Unsurpassed.
In the liar Fredc's case the wit is only half the problem. Being as he is a half-wit. Oh, yes, and a liar as well.

By the way, piss-ant, your trying to use western ideology to explain the actions of mid-easterners shows that you don't get out much.
And if you think that living in Great Britain means they grow up and live by your standards, then you are not only a liar but also naive. Have a nice day.
__________________
Please, don't MOO at the cows. It only confuses them.

Last edited by Chance3290 : 28-07.-2005 at 09:12 PM.
Chance3290 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 29-07.-2005, 12:39 AM   #67
Carrera
Registered User
 
Carrera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Staffordshire
Posts: 4,816
Default Re: Etiquette on forums.

The point here is essentially this, I guess:
Britain should not have sided with Bush in the Iraq War. However, we were correct to back the U.S. in Afghanistan - there were terrorist training camps there churning out extremist guerillas.
But I repeat that, in my view, we should never have sided with Bush over Iraq. This is simply my view but probably a majority one.
However, here is where I tend to have issues with Blair:
It seems to me that while Blair has been busy in Iraq, making speeches of support in the U.S. and abroad, he's been providing fertile ground for radical organisations to prosper in this country. He allows large percentages of suspected criminals to come to the U.K. via Calais in France and classes them as asylum seekers (apparently fleeing persecution). But we now know many of these people are fleeing the authorities in Pakistan or elsewhere due to their radical agenda.
Not many people (if any will agree with me) but the President of Pakistan would certainly back me up and said exactly what I've been thinking for ages.
I also think China doesn't have anything like the problem we have over here as it has strong borders and strict control. Rather than spend billions of pounds in wars overseas or trying to counteract terrorism, the Chinese are investing in industry and their economy - and this is booming at present.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hypnospin
ah, ignoring the root cause and concentrating on the side effects, this statement is.

britain's collusion with the us criminal war acts is neatly overlooked in this case.

this is the very definition of being reactive as opposed to proactive in regards to international policy.
Carrera is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 29-07.-2005, 12:46 AM   #68
Carrera
Registered User
 
Carrera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Staffordshire
Posts: 4,816
Default Re: Etiquette on forums.

Well, I confess I feel sorry for the law abiding Moslems who live over here. Of course, there are many of these. Amir Khan, for one, was horrified over the London bombings.
Maybe somehow the genuine Moslems will take action themselves and kick the extremist nutters out themselves.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Chance3290
In the liar Fredc's case the wit is only half the problem. Being as he is a half-wit. Oh, yes, and a liar as well.

By the way, piss-ant, your trying to use western ideology to explain the actions of mid-easterners shows that you don't get out much.
And if you think that living in Great Britain means they grow up and live by your standards, then you are not only a liar but also naive. Have a nice day.
Carrera is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 29-07.-2005, 02:39 AM   #69
Hypnospin
Registered User
 
Hypnospin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: ex of santa cruz, california, usa
Posts: 798
Default Re: Etiquette on forums.

before your afghani horse gets TOO high, it must be noted the oil pipeline in this region (already preplanned by halibuton & co.at the time of invasion)
has always been the primary motivator for invading this region.

control of oil from the caspian sea, you know.

other commercial media publicized causes have their value to incite the us citizenry to join in the invasion efforts. this goes over with those who would believe
"we need to fight the terrorists there and not here at home".

has the ussr invading this area been forgotten? at that time, the inhabitants were celebrated by the us press as "freedom fighters", spun as rustic yet fearless against-all-odds fighters holding off godless evil empire commie invasion. admirable, they were.

these were the fathers of the current fighters, and were in large part created, armed, funded and condoned by the us only to be betrayed, abandoned and finally invaded courtesy of bush syndicate military and the us taxpayer.

the definition of terrorist training camp gets a bit blurry at some point,
as this is ultimately your friendly local us military basic training camp
here at home.



of course, the poppy seed economy resurgence figures heavily, even as the us taxpayer fund various "war on drugs" efforts...


Quote:
Originally Posted by Carrera
The point here is essentially this, I guess:
Britain should not have sided with Bush in the Iraq War. However, we were correct to back the U.S. in Afghanistan - there were terrorist training camps there churning out extremist guerillas.
But I repeat that, in my view, we should never have sided with Bush over Iraq. in industry and their economy - and this is booming at present.

Last edited by Hypnospin : 29-07.-2005 at 02:57 AM.
Hypnospin is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 29-07.-2005, 12:11 PM   #70
Wurm
Registered User
 
Wurm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,148
Default Re: Etiquette on forums.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hypnospin
...t must be noted the oil pipeline in this region (already preplanned by halibuton & co.at the time of invasion)
has always been the primary motivator for invading this region.

control of oil from the caspian sea, you know.

Absolutely the case.

If one were to look at a map of the pipeline from the north of A'stan (coming from the Caspian region) to the border of P'stan, and then overlay a map of the major US military bases, you will see that the bases closely track the route of the pipeline.

So much for wiping out "turrrurist training camps".

The fact is that the Dick n' Bush boys went to the Taliban and gave them an ultimatum: they were to make a choice of having "a carpet of gold" or "a carpet of bombs" - as to allowing Unocal to start building their proposed pipeline through A'stan. When the Taliban refused to acquiesce, the Neo-Con thugs decided to invade the country. The 9/11 scheme was the manufactured raison d'etre.

Don't forget that Afghan Pres. Kharzi is a former Unocal hump. Mere coincidence? I think not.

Once that was accomplished, THEN they went after Iraq.

Carrera, you need to get your information from better, more accurate sources instead of buying the State propaganda.
__________________
"Bush is the first President to admit to an impeachable offense."

- John Dean, former Counsel to the President (Nixon)

The aim of big corporations is to separate fools from their money all of the time and ordinary folks from their money most of the time. The rest of us must fend for ourselves.

Last edited by Wurm : 29-07.-2005 at 12:20 PM.
Wurm is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 29-07.-2005, 11:38 PM   #71
Chance3290
Registered User
 
Chance3290's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 619
Default Re: Etiquette on forums.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Carrera
Well, I confess I feel sorry for the law abiding Moslems who live over here. Of course, there are many of these. Amir Khan, for one, was horrified over the London bombings.
Maybe somehow the genuine Moslems will take action themselves and kick the extremist nutters out themselves.

A good point. But, where are the Muslim clerics? Some will quietly say how Islam is a religion of tolerence and peace and the Koran is being misused by extremist.
Why aren't the Mullahs standing in front of their Mosques, screaming into the television cameras about the atrocities being committed in the name of Allah?
When Priests were accused of child molestation acts in the Boston area, the Boston Archdiocese, and the Vatican, were quick with 'hide the Priest' game, but very slow to speak out against the acts. Public animosity, because of the lack of action on the part of the Catholic Church, is still being felt.

Where are the Muslim clerics? Against the war in Iraq? Great! Protest it. But you would think that they would more than a littIe upset by Muslims blowing up themselves, and innocents, in the name of Allah.
__________________
Please, don't MOO at the cows. It only confuses them.
Chance3290 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 30-07.-2005, 02:18 AM   #72
Carrera
Registered User
 
Carrera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Staffordshire
Posts: 4,816
Default Re: Etiquette on forums.

The thing is, though, with Afghanistan, it came as a very fast miltary reponse to the carnage in New York. I mean, Europe and the rest of the world understood. Even LA, soon as he saw the destruction in New York, came out and said they should basically go out and kick ass.
Now, in Afghanistan there were these extremist training camps that were teaching how to carry out suicide bombings and murder. Russia had been warning the U.S. about it for ages, as well as warning about the spread of radical Islam in Europe.
Here, I'm expressing my own view and I confess I'm sure I do get my share of things wrong. Nothing is black and white. Nobody has all the answers. Maybe there are many intances when Darkboong and Fred get things right and I may get it wrong.
Still, I never changed my view over Iraq or the abuse of human rights in Guantanamo and elsewhere.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hypnospin
before your afghani horse gets TOO high, it must be noted the oil pipeline in this region (already preplanned by halibuton & co.at the time of invasion)
has always been the primary motivator for invading this region.

control of oil from the caspian sea, you know.

other commercial media publicized causes have their value to incite the us citizenry to join in the invasion efforts. this goes over with those who would believe
"we need to fight the terrorists there and not here at home".

has the ussr invading this area been forgotten? at that time, the inhabitants were celebrated by the us press as "freedom fighters", spun as rustic yet fearless against-all-odds fighters holding off godless evil empire commie invasion. admirable, they were.

these were the fathers of the current fighters, and were in large part created, armed, funded and condoned by the us only to be betrayed, abandoned and finally invaded courtesy of bush syndicate military and the us taxpayer.

the definition of terrorist training camp gets a bit blurry at some point,
as this is ultimately your friendly local us military basic training camp
here at home.



of course, the poppy seed economy resurgence figures heavily, even as the us taxpayer fund various "war on drugs" efforts...
Carrera is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 30-07.-2005, 02:43 AM   #73
Hypnospin
Registered User
 
Hypnospin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: ex of santa cruz, california, usa
Posts: 798
Default Re: Etiquette on forums.

glad to hear you support knee-jerk retaliation in the name of revenge upon largely innocent people over
the war crimes that result.

this is truly having one's perspectives and priorities in line.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Carrera
The thing is, though, with Afghanistan, it came as a very fast miltary reponse to the carnage in New York. Still, I never changed my view over Iraq or the abuse of human rights in Guantanamo and elsewhere.
Hypnospin is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 30-07.-2005, 12:38 PM   #74
davidmc
Registered User
 
davidmc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: metro dc USA
Posts: 3,394
Default Re: Etiquette on forums.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Carrera
Nobody has all the answers. Maybe there are many intances when Darkboong and Fred get things right and I may get it wrong.

Whoa I wouldn't go THAT far
__________________
I'm completely in favor of the separation of Church and State. My idea is that these two institutions screw us up enough on their own, so both of them together is certain death.
George Carlin
US comedian and actor (1937 - )
davidmc is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 30-07.-2005, 01:43 PM   #75
EoinC
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Deepest, Darkest West Central Africa
Posts: 1,464
Send a message via MSN to EoinC
Default Re: Etiquette on forums.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Carrera
...Maybe somehow the genuine Moslems will take action themselves and kick the extremist nutters out themselves.
Why is it their responsibility to do what is actually the designated responsibility of the authorities? How, exactly, are they meant to "kick" them out? I doubt if there is a Westminster law giving "genuine Moslems" the powers to incarcerate or deport anybody.
If some ****knuckle was to claim that he believes in the same God as me, and then proceeded to carry out carnage, I don't see why I should be expected to run around whailing and gnashing my teeth more than the rest of the general public. The "genuine Moslems" were no more responsible for the tossers who set about blowing up parts of London than any other members of the public were. I still don't see why you expect these people to do more than they are already doing.
EoinC is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 06:10 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet