Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Other Stuff > Your Bloody Soap Box
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Etiquette on forums.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 22-07.-2005, 01:23 PM   #31
Wurm
Registered User
 
Wurm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,148
Default Re: Etiquette on forums.

Throwing out the "conspiracy" word again, eh CR? Well, I'll remind you that because you and your ilk claim certain facts are "conspiracies", doesn't make them so.

But in your myopic milieu, anything that pins the tail on the White House/'Cons is deemed "hooey", no matter WHAT the evidence shows. That doesn't automatically render good evidence as unfounded conspiracy because you say so, but it does make you look like a blinded dolt.

As I've said re: 9/11, I don't mind being called a "conspiracy theorist", as long as you call yourself a "coincidence theorist". It seems that you're the one here that eschews any and all information that points toward the crimes of the Bush Administration. So, before you squawk again, go look into the facts and evidence as it now stands.

But we all know you can't bear the truth, so you won't bother but only to shoot the messenger.

The criminal enterprise that you support is rapidly running out of excuses for their many cover-ups. Stay tuned.
__________________
"Bush is the first President to admit to an impeachable offense."

- John Dean, former Counsel to the President (Nixon)

The aim of big corporations is to separate fools from their money all of the time and ordinary folks from their money most of the time. The rest of us must fend for ourselves.

Last edited by Wurm : 22-07.-2005 at 01:34 PM.
Wurm is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 22-07.-2005, 09:02 PM   #32
Chance3290
Registered User
 
Chance3290's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 619
Default Re: Etiquette on forums.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wurm
You gotta drink the Kool-Aid, re: Colorado Ryder, et al.
Wurm, that cat looks very familiar. I dated a woman in Germany some time back that had a cat just like that one. They both wore tinfoil hats. We'd walk into the apartment and she'd say: "Hello, Whiskers. And what how are you today?"
I heard the cat go: "Meow."
She heard the cat say: "Well, I'm a bit concern with the goings-on at the Reichtstag, but we'll talk more when HE'S not around."
The sex was great, thou. The woman, not the cat.
I left after about two months. Great sex or not, I couldn't deal with the cat's politics.
__________________
Please, don't MOO at the cows. It only confuses them.
Chance3290 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 22-07.-2005, 10:06 PM   #33
Wurm
Registered User
 
Wurm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,148
Default Re: Etiquette on forums.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chance3290
The sex was great, thou. The woman, not the cat....
I've read that the Nazi's were quite good at that aspect of their clandestine operations.

If you can't find another female operative to replace Tin Hat Girl, there's always Jeff Gannon (when he's not busy at the White House).
__________________
"Bush is the first President to admit to an impeachable offense."

- John Dean, former Counsel to the President (Nixon)

The aim of big corporations is to separate fools from their money all of the time and ordinary folks from their money most of the time. The rest of us must fend for ourselves.
Wurm is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 22-07.-2005, 10:28 PM   #34
Colorado Ryder
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,229
Default Re: Etiquette on forums.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wurm
Well, I'll remind you that because you and your ilk claim certain facts are "conspiracies", doesn't make them so.

Just because Wurmy posts some crap he found on one of his dubious websites doesn't make it the truth. No matter how much he tries to bloviate about how "independent" and "righteous" the "source" is. Isn't it strange that Wurmy and a few select others are the only ones with access to the "truth"? Wurmy doesn't care about the "truth". If it is anti-Bush then Wurmy will believe it no matter what it is. Wurmy thinks if you don't believe his political shit then you're his enemy. Wurmy is so shallow he judges people on their political beliefs.

So yes I'll call you what you are Wurmy.....a conspiracy wacko nutcase.
Colorado Ryder is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 23-07.-2005, 01:01 AM   #35
Wurm
Registered User
 
Wurm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,148
Default Re: Etiquette on forums.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Colorado Ryder
Just because Wurmy posts some crap he found on one of his dubious websites doesn't make it the truth. No matter how much he tries to bloviate about how "independent" and "righteous" the "source" is. Isn't it strange that Wurmy and a few select others are the only ones with access to the "truth"? Wurmy doesn't care about the "truth". If it is anti-Bush then Wurmy will believe it no matter what it is. Wurmy thinks if you don't believe his political shit then you're his enemy. Wurmy is so shallow he judges people on their political beliefs.

So yes I'll call you what you are Wurmy.....a conspiracy wacko nutcase.
OK, show me where what I've ever posted is "dubious" and how/why it's dubious. Sorry, but I don't frequent Faux News (TV), Newsmax (web), or Rush "Pill-Addled Hypocrite" Limbaugh (radio).

Or better yet, let's hear your denials of what's been coming out of your Hero's admin. since Day 1. Well, that would be a full-time job, wouldn't it?

Or you can try to give sane answers to questions such as:

"Why did WTC 7 fall, when it hadn't been touched by anything and had no previously known structural problems, and then it was hours after the main tower's collapse?"

"Why didn't the Secret Service whisk the Pres. away from the school in FL as soon as they knew an attack was underway?"

"Why did the official gov't story of what happened change?"

"Why was the evidence (debris) all quickly hauled off, and no proper investigation of the ruins of the N & S Towers ever conducted?"

"Why did the Bush Admin. try to prevent the 9/11 Commission from being formed?"

"Why would not Bush and Cheney agree to testify to that sham Commission under oath?"

There are many more problems with the official gov't version of events on 9/11, but those are just a start.

So IF there was no conspiracy, THEN it must be a large collection of highly improbable coincidences.

Which is it, CR?
__________________
"Bush is the first President to admit to an impeachable offense."

- John Dean, former Counsel to the President (Nixon)

The aim of big corporations is to separate fools from their money all of the time and ordinary folks from their money most of the time. The rest of us must fend for ourselves.
Wurm is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 23-07.-2005, 01:14 AM   #36
Colorado Ryder
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,229
Default Re: Etiquette on forums.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wurm
OK, show me where what I've ever posted is "dubious" and how/why it's dubious. Sorry, but I don't frequent Faux News (TV), Newsmax (web), or Rush "Pill-Addled Hypocrite" Limbaugh (radio).

Or better yet, let's hear your denials of what's been coming out of your Hero's admin. since Day 1. Well, that would be a full-time job, wouldn't it?

Or you can try to give sane answers to questions such as:

"Why did WTC 7 fall, when it hadn't been touched by anything and had no previously known structural problems, and then it was hours after the main tower's collapse?"

"Why didn't the Secret Service whisk the Pres. away from the school in FL as soon as they knew an attack was underway?"

"Why did the official gov't story of what happened change?"

"Why was the evidence (debris) all quickly hauled off, and no proper investigation of the ruins of the N & S Towers ever conducted?"

"Why did the Bush Admin. try to prevent the 9/11 Commission from being formed?"

"Why would not Bush and Cheney agree to testify to that sham Commission under oath?"

There are many more problems with the official gov't version of events on 9/11, but those are just a start.

So IF there was no conspiracy, THEN it must be a large collection of highly improbable coincidences.

Which is it, CR?

You forgot about there being no airplane at the pentagon! Or was that last airliner shotdown and who authorised it! Why were all the Jewish people gone from work!
Thank you for proving to sane people that you are indeed a crazy wacko conspiracy fruitcake!
Colorado Ryder is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 23-07.-2005, 03:35 AM   #37
lyotard
Registered User
 
lyotard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 333
Default Re: Etiquette on forums.

the conservative overview:
www.antiwar.com

you may be suprised to see there are well educated, successful, well travelled, connected,
informed and popular anti war anti bush conservatives (not the neo-cons that get all the press in representing something they are not...)
who refuse to support the deception of the bush syndicate and the criminal military attrocities and corruption that results.

how do you like your tax monies spent for support of the private interests of the business of the us ?


this link is a resource to lead one to many facts that are not in the sanitized us headlines.
a true patriot would not hesitate to avail themselves of this type of investigation.
this would in turn make for informed decisions of the voting public on many levels.

there is an awakening occuring, as we tire of the sons and daughters of taxpaying us public being sent off as sacrificial lambs to do the bidding of the war criminals of the bush petroleum syndicate.

one only needs to look at the approval rating slide of the current administration. internationally it is much lower.
do they know something we (you?) don't?
whose reality can we support? the commercial media of the us?
that got us to where we are now in terms of acceptance of war, remember?

it is indeed the duty of those who would support a democratic proccess to avail oneself of a free and objective media.

remember, like all things factual in nature,

"body counts are not conspiracy, covering them up is!"




Quote:
Originally Posted by Colorado Ryder
Just because Wurmy posts some crap he found on one of his dubious websites doesn't make it the truth.
So yes I'll call you what you are Wurmy.....a conspiracy wacko nutcase.

Last edited by lyotard : 23-07.-2005 at 03:51 AM.
lyotard is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 23-07.-2005, 04:54 AM   #38
Colorado Ryder
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,229
Default Re: Etiquette on forums.

Quote:
Originally Posted by lyotard
the conservative overview:
www.antiwar.com

you may be suprised to see there are well educated, successful, well travelled, connected,
informed and popular anti war anti bush conservatives (not the neo-cons that get all the press in representing something they are not...)
who refuse to support the deception of the bush syndicate and the criminal military attrocities and corruption that results.

how do you like your tax monies spent for support of the private interests of the business of the us ?


this link is a resource to lead one to many facts that are not in the sanitized us headlines.
a true patriot would not hesitate to avail themselves of this type of investigation.
this would in turn make for informed decisions of the voting public on many levels.

there is an awakening occuring, as we tire of the sons and daughters of taxpaying us public being sent off as sacrificial lambs to do the bidding of the war criminals of the bush petroleum syndicate.

one only needs to look at the approval rating slide of the current administration. internationally it is much lower.
do they know something we (you?) don't?
whose reality can we support? the commercial media of the us?
that got us to where we are now in terms of acceptance of war, remember?

it is indeed the duty of those who would support a democratic proccess to avail oneself of a free and objective media.

remember, like all things factual in nature,

"body counts are not conspiracy, covering them up is!"

I don't have a problem with someone being anti-Bush or anti-war. There is a problem when someone tries to perpetuate unproven theories as factual.
Colorado Ryder is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 23-07.-2005, 07:37 AM   #39
davidmc
Registered User
 
davidmc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: metro dc USA
Posts: 3,394
Default Re: Etiquette on forums.

Quote:
Originally Posted by lyotard
the conservative overview:
www.antiwar.com

you may be suprised to see there are well educated, successful, well travelled, connected,
informed and popular anti war anti bush conservatives (not the neo-cons that get all the press in representing something they are not...)
who refuse to support the deception of the bush syndicate and the criminal military attrocities and corruption that results.

how do you like your tax monies spent for support of the private interests of the business of the us ?


this link is a resource to lead one to many facts that are not in the sanitized us headlines.
a true patriot would not hesitate to avail themselves of this type of investigation.
this would in turn make for informed decisions of the voting public on many levels.

there is an awakening occuring, as we tire of the sons and daughters of taxpaying us public being sent off as sacrificial lambs to do the bidding of the war criminals of the bush petroleum syndicate.

one only needs to look at the approval rating slide of the current administration. internationally it is much lower.
do they know something we (you?) don't?
whose reality can we support? the commercial media of the us?
that got us to where we are now in terms of acceptance of war, remember?

it is indeed the duty of those who would support a democratic proccess to avail oneself of a free and objective media.

remember, like all things factual in nature,

"body counts are not conspiracy, covering them up is!"

SUPERB post lyotard
__________________
I'm completely in favor of the separation of Church and State. My idea is that these two institutions screw us up enough on their own, so both of them together is certain death.
George Carlin
US comedian and actor (1937 - )
davidmc is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 23-07.-2005, 12:27 PM   #40
Wurm
Registered User
 
Wurm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,148
Default Re: Etiquette on forums.

For your listening/viewing pleasure, CR, the following are many of the best 911-Truth audio/video clips.


David Ray Griffin's April '05 speech entitled "911 and American Empire: How Should Religious People Respond?" Broadcast twice on C-SPAN2 Book TV (1 hour 22 mins, various video/audio choices):
http://www.911blogger.com/2005/04/p...in-madison.html
transcript (without Q&A)

June 16 '05 5-hour 911-roundtable on Coast to Coast AM with George Noory. Guests were Alex Jones, David Ray Griffin, and the shills were Peter Lance and Mike Levine. In the first hour, Morgan Reynolds was on for about half of it.
CtoC link with overview:
http://www.coasttocoastam.com/shows/2005/06/16.html
Page with MP3s of all five hours:
http://www.911blogger.com/2005/06/r...s-coast-to.html

Michael Ruppert's 3+ hour speech in Portland from June '05 (MP3s):
http://www.indybay.org/news/2005/06/1746275.php

David Ray Griffin's "New Pearl Harbor", full text online:
http://vancouver.indymedia.org/news/2004/06/141355.php

David Ray Griffin's Fall '04 talk on his book "911 Commission: Ommissions and Distortions" (QuickTime movie, 1 hour, 47.5 MB):
http://movies12.archive.org/0/movie...1commission.mov

Michael Ruppert's 8/31/04 speech to San Francisco Commonwealth Club re "Crossing The Rubicon", his book on 911-Truth, oil, and US Empire (MP3s, 29 mins, 10 MBs each):
Part 1:
http://media.globalpublicmedia.com/....20040831-1.mp3
Part 2:
http://media.globalpublicmedia.com/....20040831-2.mp3
Transcript:
http://www.globalpublicmedia.com/transcripts/159

Michael Ruppert radio interview 2/14/05 re 911, Oil, and the financial markets (MP3, 49 mins, 22.2 MBs):
http://media.globalpublicmedia.com/....2005-02-14.mp3

Webster G. Tarpley 3/27/05 radio interview re his book: "Synthetic Terror: Made in USA" (MP3, 29 mins, 13.3 MBs):
http://www.suesupriano.com/audio/webstertarpley.mp3

Dan Rather remarks on the strange collapse of WTC-7 (MPEG 35 seconds, 1.3 MB):
http://www.911research.com/wtc/evid...s/wtc_7_cbs.mpg

Bush lying about 911 morning, "...the TV was obviously on" (RealPlayer, 1 minute, 880 KB):
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/I...firstplane1.ram

Bush fumbles a softball press question about 911 foreknowledge (MPEG, 43 seconds, 7.2 MB):
http://images.indymedia.org/imc/was...6/9_11laugh.mpg

Firemen recall "detonations" in South Tower (MPEG, 29 seconds, 4.8 MB):
http://www.911research.com/wtc/evid...n_firehouse.mpg

Animated image (.gif) of WTC-7 collapse. Good for posting to messageboards where posting images is possible:
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/SMALL_wtc-7_1_.gif

Fake terror staged by governments is nothing new. See the US Government's since declassified "Operation Northwoods" scheme (PDF, 780 KB):
http://www.prisonplanet.com/northwoods.pdf

Bilderberg Group, a key element of the "shadow government" which rules much of the Western World, discussed by BBC Radio (MP3, 28 mins, 4.8 MB):
http://www.propagandamatrix.com/bbc..._bilderberg.mp3
__________________
"Bush is the first President to admit to an impeachable offense."

- John Dean, former Counsel to the President (Nixon)

The aim of big corporations is to separate fools from their money all of the time and ordinary folks from their money most of the time. The rest of us must fend for ourselves.
Wurm is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 23-07.-2005, 12:36 PM   #41
Wurm
Registered User
 
Wurm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,148
Default Re: Etiquette on forums.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Colorado Ryder
You forgot about there being no airplane at the pentagon! Or was that last airliner shotdown and who authorised it! Why were all the Jewish people gone from work!
Thank you for proving to sane people that you are indeed a crazy wacko conspiracy fruitcake!

Your latest idiotic response?

As usual, you have no plausible retort to my above serious questions - just inane juxtapositions to try to escape the truth of these matters.

It STILL doesn't work, dumbass.
__________________
"Bush is the first President to admit to an impeachable offense."

- John Dean, former Counsel to the President (Nixon)

The aim of big corporations is to separate fools from their money all of the time and ordinary folks from their money most of the time. The rest of us must fend for ourselves.
Wurm is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 24-07.-2005, 02:36 AM   #42
Hypnospin
Registered User
 
Hypnospin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: ex of santa cruz, california, usa
Posts: 798
Default Re: Etiquette on forums.

W,
thanks again for your effort and service in providing information resources.
H.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Wurm
For your listening/viewing pleasure, CR, the following are many of the best 911-Truth audio/video clips.


Hypnospin is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 24-07.-2005, 02:41 AM   #43
Hypnospin
Registered User
 
Hypnospin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: ex of santa cruz, california, usa
Posts: 798
Default Re: Etiquette on forums.

check out dave emory, a tireless and dedicated research authority.
the ultimate go-to guy for the "behind-the scenes" political history.
www.wfmu.org/playlists/DX




Quote:
Originally Posted by Wurm
For your listening/viewing pleasure, CR, the following are many of the best 911-Truth audio/video clips.


Hypnospin is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 24-07.-2005, 08:07 AM   #44
Wurm
Registered User
 
Wurm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,148
Default Re: Etiquette on forums.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hypnospin
check out dave emory, a tireless and dedicated research authority.
the ultimate go-to guy for the "behind-the scenes" political history.
www.wfmu.org/playlists/DX

Good stuff. Thx!
__________________
"Bush is the first President to admit to an impeachable offense."

- John Dean, former Counsel to the President (Nixon)

The aim of big corporations is to separate fools from their money all of the time and ordinary folks from their money most of the time. The rest of us must fend for ourselves.
Wurm is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25-07.-2005, 10:11 PM   #45
Colorado Ryder
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,229
Default Re: Etiquette on forums.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wurm
Your latest idiotic response?

As usual, you have no plausible retort to my above serious questions - just inane juxtapositions to try to escape the truth of these matters.

It STILL doesn't work, dumbass.

Serious questions? Spout off some conspiracy shit and then you try to claim that those are "serious" questions? Are they "serious" because you say they are? And yes you are right, your conspiracy bullshit questions still don't work, dipshit.
Colorado Ryder is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 05:51 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet