Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Bike Racing > Grand Tours - Giro - Tour de France - Vuelta a España
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Armstrong documentary

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 13-07.-2005, 02:58 AM   #46
House
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 860
Default Re: Armstrong documentary

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyer
Who is Manfred Krikke? Was he the Director Sportif of PDM in 1991?

Did he pay for illegal EPO in Belgian to support the PDM Team's 1991 TDF?

Did his new doctor Wim Sanders overdoes his boys?

Did they drop out with high fevers?

Did they claim it was food poisoning?

Did Manfred Krikke, Steven Rooks, Peter Winnen & Maerten Ducrot all admit to the EPO abuses in 1997, six years later.

Were they lying too? Were they jealous?

Is David Millar an honest drug addict?

Are these your pals?

House, you entire life is based upon the confusion of truth. Take a deep breath, and get to the track wherupon you will be but into oxygen debt and can thus better understand anemia!

I cannot help you with your low IQ.

Yet another example of everything I've said about you. Keep proving me right coward.
House is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 13-07.-2005, 04:14 AM   #49
House
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 860
Default Re: Armstrong documentary

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyer
Let's see how well you can ride the razor then, tough guy.

Get your sorry butt to the track and eat some crow!

We'll see who is whimpering like a little baby.

How would me going out to the track to try it for the first time be eating crow??? Have I ever said I am a great track rider? Of course this follows your logic precisely...there is no logic. You open your mouth and the same, tired, cowardly shit comes out. Though I must admit you are an expert on whimpering like a little baby, with all the whimpering about personal attacks, going home and crying after your "100% doped" fiasco and the many challenges you ran whimpering away from. Will you ever learn then your responses simply solidfy everything I say about you?
House is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 13-07.-2005, 04:40 AM   #50
Ted B
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 552
Default Re: Armstrong documentary

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyer
Thierry Claveyrolat, age 40


FWIW, Thierry Claveyrolat committed suicide.
Ted B is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 13-07.-2005, 04:49 AM   #53
Ted B
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 552
Default Re: Armstrong documentary

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyer
Yeah, that would make him DEAD.


It does, and as you mentioned, it's but one death in your misleading list that was not the direct cause of drugs.

Anyway, carry on to your heart's content. No one's listening anyway.

LOL
Ted B is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 13-07.-2005, 05:05 AM   #55
Ted B
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 552
Default Re: Armstrong documentary

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyer
It is a matter of reading comprehension that you challenged by.


Better check your sentence structure before you question my reading comprehension (LOL). I'm going to add your quote to my signature.
Ted B is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 13-07.-2005, 05:40 AM   #57
House
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 860
Default Re: Armstrong documentary

Let's break this down, shall we?


Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyer
Here is what I say about you coward caller:

1) you can't ride the track

Well we don't know that since I haven't tried it, but apparently this is what you have latched onto to defend your cowardly self.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyer
2) you do not know cycling

Because I don't condemn everyone and everything based on one or two facts mixed with lies and hal-truths, bolstered by accusations that are false against anyone who doesn't agree with you?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyer
3) you do not understand race fitness

And yet you know nothing about me or my racing background...but that never stops you from personal attacks does it!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyer
4) you do not know the history of cycling

Because I don't agree with you 100%? Or because I couldn't find the Merckx confession that didn't exist on the web because it was from the 70's...no wait 1988? LOL Actually I obviously know more about the history of cycling then you...you only know about one aspect, doping, while I know about all aspects.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyer
5) you do not understand sport in general

You get that from the fact that I don't condemn everyone and everything about the sport? Coming from Mr. One Dimensional, I have to laugh

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyer
6) you are both ill mannered and ignorant

Look in the mirror before speaking, the evidence against you in this aspect is both obvious and damning

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyer
7) you deny doping or apologize for it

and yet when I made a challenege that would have seen either you or I leave this board for good, you ran away. Show me actual quotes where I deny doping or apologize for it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyer
Because you are wholly incompetent in cycling knowledge, your rants are toothless.

Then why do you keep replying with reposts full of a fact or two, lies and half-truths? Why is when I challenge you and always run away? Apparently my toothless rants hurt you way too much.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyer
Junior riders being forced to doped do not appreciate your idiotic opinions and name calling.

Innocent riders don't appreciate your idiotic opinions and name calling. I am sure that junior rider you supposedly mentored appreciated you sending him off into the 100% doped (according to you...until you got your ass handed to you here) peloton.

Why don't you get some balls and step up to the plate, actually answer my questions and challenges directly? Any response other then doing this proves what a coward you are. Go ahead and prove it.
House is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 13-07.-2005, 05:43 AM   #58
Ted B
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 552
Default Re: Armstrong documentary

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyer
Did you discover yet more cycling deaths and illnesses than I posted?


No, I just caught you padding your list, which is deceitful, much like doping on your part to further your point.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyer
If so, bring it on lest you be accused of misleading our readers by understating the problem.


'Our readers' haven't accused me of anything, but have accused you of much. Sitting here bickering and whining endlessly neither wins anyone to your side nor solves anything, which makes it a waste of my time. So with that, you're (once again) on your own.

Bye now...
__________________
Originally Posted by Flyer:
It is a matter of reading comprehension that you challenged by.
Ted B is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 05:42 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet