![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#17 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 304
|
That there is a doping problem in cycling and in all sports there is no question. I am glad I am not on trial however with you as the judge. Your guilt by association doctrine would put all athletes on the guillotine. Once again I say a doping agent was never found in the blood or urine of Pantani the athlete. He developed a cocaine problem only after the merciless attacks of 1999. Cocaine is not a performance enhancer, and certainly Pantani had few great performances after 1999. I do not wish to enoble drug addiction, for the addict must always bear the lions share of responsability. However it is hard to find an athlete so chastised in all of sports. The raids of the 98 tour do not lessen the victory of Pantani, they exalt it. For the antidoping controllers were all over the riders. They had to be clean. With no one doping, the gap between Pantani and the mere mortals became blatantly obvious. That same Leblanc who begged Pantani to save and honor his tour, would then fail to invite him, when the false accusations and suspensions occurred. And yet in 2000 who was it who brought some interest to the tour (his last tour).
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 696
|
Ilpirata
The fundamental reason why no one was caught on a large scale in the 1998 TdF after the police moved in was the lack of a blood test for EPO (and Hgh). The police were looking for the tools of trade (syringes, etc) and stock (drugs). You said: Naturally on appeal, the charges (against Pantani) are dropped because in 1995 there was no rule against high hematocrit, and it is was not a crime. I understand that a lot of athletes in Italy were able to be acquitted of the charges of sporting fraud because the evidence of guilt related to periods before the law was introduced. The law was not retrospective and it would have been unjust if it was made retrospective. I believe this applied to Pantani's Hct level in 1995 and not the fact the UCI had not introduced the 50% health risk rule. EPO was certainly on the banned drug list in 1995 but there was no test to evidence its use in an athlete.
__________________
VF "Remember, even if you win the rat race, you are still a rat" |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 304
|
I read what you fellows write but I do not believe the opposite is true.
It is known exactly when Pantani developed a cocaine habit. (In the book "A man on the run" written by Manuela Ronchi and published a little over a year ago. It corresponds directly with the period of his career where there are no important results as a cyclist. The use of cocaine for performance enhancement would really be foolish don't you think? The fact that Pantani is acquitted because there is no law on the books to address the accusation, does not prove that he assumed epo. What kind of logic is that? What it does suggest is: Why were the charges brought to bear at all if not to harass and destroy the reputation and continued performance of the man? Like I say, he was removed for not bending over to the betting mafia and the power people. You know yourselves that PEDs are big buisiness. Soccer is big buisness. Betting is big buisiness. Who is this little guy who is taking fans out of stadiums, winning everything he enters. Coincidentally, if you students of doping would look a little deeper, instead of just falling into the "they all do it" position, You will see that when Pantani was in the limelight he was in the avantguard for fair and better testing for cyclists. With respect to the rest I admit some agreement, I believe myself that it is maybe impossible today to win a tdF without PEDs and multiple syringes following races to aid recovery. Also Italy does have their experts in PEDs, no question. But I will not let you guys get your extra kicks into the man who has already been kicked to his death, and is for me and for many the last great champion. Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 304
|
Look Flyer, that Pantani died of drug overdose is of course fact without question. That he was seeking in fact death can be inferred. To say that he cheated as a competetive cyclist you are making quite an extrapolation. And you have not got your facts straight. He had no need of epo, that is for sure. Are Kenyans winning marathons because they load up on epo? I think they dominate because they are light, they train well and have high cardiovascular efficiency. Are you referring to famous insulin needle found in a hotel room that was vacated a day earlier and that there is no proof that Pantani ever slept in anyway and for which no DNA test was ever done? Well that is real evidence to rush to a conclusion! Charges are dropped (BIG SURPRISE) but the suspension was already served. You can quote all day the cyclists found or admitting to use of PEDs, that does not justify a condemnation of specific person.
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 304
|
You add nothing new in substance. It is obvious you are done. Your assumptions are still only assumptions and not facts. Since you have wrongly inferred my first name, I can using your same logic, assume you are wrong in everything you infer. I can only give you this much; If the many are using PED's and those PED's are producing results, then there is pressure on the rest to also use PED's. This in no way means that Pantani used them, but only that the potential is there because of the atmosphere at present in cycling and other sports today. But I bring you back on the words of Merck on Pantani that I quoted earlier, and to which you might infer that he recognizes that drugs are a problem in the peleton today. But you can also infer that in his opinion, Pantani was as clean a champion as there was.
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 304
|
As I said before you add no new substance. You play the same recording back and your pathetic logic of equating drug addiction with sport doping. I would like someone to prove to me that there is a higher percentage of drug addicts among cyclists and retired cyclists than in the general population. Also you say that i fail to accept that Pantani died of drug overdose at age 34. So I return my words from previous post so that you see that you either cannot read or do not read what i have written. "Look Flyer, that Pantani died of drug overdose is of course fact without question."
Also I never suggested he was murdered by anyone. I don't recall mentioning advertisers. Sporting authorities perhaps indirectly. But, am talking about organized crime having a hand in destroying his career and reputation, if you will go back and read. Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 696
|
Quote:
Easy. According to US statistics about 5% of the general USA population are asthmatics. However, 70% of the peloton in the TdF have Therapeutic Use Exemptions (TUE's) for asthma drugs. That is 14 times the level of the general population. 11 of the last 13 TdF's have been won by riders who are "asthmatics". Certain asthma drugs increase muscle volume by 50% and mask the use of other drugs.
__________________
VF "Remember, even if you win the rat race, you are still a rat" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 304
|
This is good velo. Thanks for the post. It basically says if I understand correctly, that some amount of steroid is acceptable in blood and urine if you have the asthma certificate. Therefore a likely trick to using some PED's by cyclists including of course the defending champion. This is not what I am talking about however with drug addiction (cocaine in particular). In Pantani's case, what I am saying is this; cocaine was never used as a performance enhancer, but rather became a habit that took root in his depression. A depression brought on by what he perceived as injustices in the Italian cycling world and judicial system as well as a determined media attack on his reputation and integrity (and it was not just his perception). Thus I take issue with the idea that if a person dies of cocaine addiction he must have used PED's. If you want to say that a person who has used PED's for years, has a greater propensity to become a drug addict? Then I would say that you have an interesting theory that perhaps merits further investigation.
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|