Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Other Stuff > Doping
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Calling Out Flyer

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 02-04.-2005, 06:29 AM   #16
House
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 860
Default Re: Calling Out Flyer

You see what i am talking about, just further proof of everything I have said about Flyer.
House is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-04.-2005, 08:14 AM   #19
House
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 860
Default Re: Calling Out Flyer

I'll make a deal with you. You come up with concrete, admissable in a court proof that all of the peloton dopes and i will leave here forever, if not you do. I'll give you 24 hours. I'm betting you won't do it, just like you won't step up and take the challenge. You are flailing little man.

Your foundation isn't cracked, you are.
House is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-04.-2005, 09:25 AM   #21
House
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 860
Default Re: Calling Out Flyer

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyer
You will welch on that deal like all your others.

You will not accept even a 'tearful coffession'.

I gave you 53 names of dopers--including many TDF champions. According to you, a TDF can be won w/o drugs.

If you don't grasp the issue. DENIAL is the standard response of a guilty athlete. None of the name I wrote admitted to doping while employed---only in retirement or under police duress, as in the case of Millar.

Lance's Doctor was convicted---so I guess that means Lance's performance is too---as Michele Ferrari was his 'performance consultant' That is Lance's personal description of Dr. EPO or HBOC!

btw: Tyler Hamilton whom you presume a doper---has not had his USADA appeal ruling yet. He may still be suiting up for the July 2005 Tour. Perez or no Perez.

a) What "others"

b) should a take a page from your book and ask what a "coffession" is?

c) once again you can't step up, all you can do is keep squawking the same edited bits of information that fit your hate agenda.

d) are you going to keep either lying or simply not having any clue who has said what?
House is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-04.-2005, 11:52 AM   #23
jcjordan
Registered User
 
jcjordan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Canberra
Posts: 499
Default Re: Calling Out Flyer

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyer
All TDF winners are exempt from any 'positive test results being published'. That's a fact too.

Da!




Again we ask where is your proof of this
__________________
"Pain does not last, bones heal and chicks dig scars"
jcjordan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-04.-2005, 12:21 PM   #24
matteo moller
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 15
Default Re: Calling Out Flyer

this is an awesome pissing contest.
matteo moller is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-04.-2005, 12:29 PM   #25
Beastt
Registered User
 
Beastt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Arizona (USA)
Posts: 1,141
Send a message via AIM to Beastt Send a message via Yahoo to Beastt
Default Re: Calling Out Flyer

House, I'm not sure whether to commend you or pity you for trying. I spent months trying to suggest reason and logic to Flyer. It finally ended with him being the only one, on any of the 3 or 4 boards I frequent making it to my ignore list. He's still the only one. Do I hate Flyer? Hell, no! I don't even know him. But I do tend to hate what he stands for and that's the idea that anyone can be convicted or should be considered guilty based on suspicion.

Certainly there is reason to suspect Lance. There's reason to suspect every rider in pro-cycling. But I don't feel that because some dope and some have been caught that it's proper, correct or fair to automatically assume everyone is guilty or to assume anyone who hasn't been proven guilty to be guilty. They used to do that kind of thing where Kings ruled over the population. They still do in many dictatorial systems. I don't think we need to digress into that kind of system. Apparently Flyer wouldn't have a problem with it -- as long as he avoided being accused himself.

Assuming that because there is a lot of doping in cycling, that it automatically means that anyone winning and anyone riding is guilty makes about as much sense as the observation that sometimes it's the person pointing the finger who is only trying to remove suspicion from himself, and therefore, anyone displaying suspicion of another, must himself be guilty.

What Flyer has demonstrated here goes beyond a hatred of cheating and doping in particular. I don't think I've read a single post yet which supports doping and I sincerely hope I never do. What Flyer is illustrating is obssession along with what appears to be some kind of personal vendetta against Armstrong.

Is Armstrong doping? I don't know. I tend to feel he isn't. He's too high-profile to be able to blend in and stay undetected. But, there are techniques that make detection very difficult or completely impossible. So the possibility is always there. If he is, then he has more balls than brains because he could easily bow out now and hold a record that is sure to be maintained for at least 5-years, more likely decades. But instead, he's announced that he's going for seven.

Everyone is entitled to an opinion and these forums are wonderful as a tool for expressing, sharing and comparing those opinions. But when people convince themselves that their opinions, unsubstantiated by proof, are equivalent to fact, then I don't have a problem with someone attempting to point out their error. And when that fails, perhaps it's not a terrible thing to call them out and slap them down.
Beastt is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-04.-2005, 01:29 PM   #27
wolfix
Registered User
 
wolfix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: "Still in 1975"
Posts: 2,708
Send a message via AIM to wolfix
Default Re: Calling Out Flyer

Great post Beastt ....... I would like to meet this Flyer ... I was sitting thinking why would a guy spend so much time on a cycling forum attempting to point out his views on why Lance is a doper ????? Doe he not have a job ??? Does he not have a lover ???? Does he have a life with real people , with real names????? Then it became obvious to me .... . In a minute I will post his identity.....

But , Some questions are raised with some of his answers..... He claims to love professional cycling , but he claims it is sport that is doped 100% , and has been for many years ...... So what he fell in love with is doped cycling ...... Using his reasoning , how does he know that he will like a drug free product????

Why is Lance at the basis of his attacks and not the other "Positive" riders of the peleton ???? Think about this guys ..... What inspires a guy to dislike another guy as much as Flyer seems to hate Lance ...... A female ... As guys we always hate the guy who steals our woman ......It is a basic human emotion .... Right ??????? I was thinking that maybe Flyer hates Lance because Lance stole his woman ...... Maybe Flyer thought he had a chance to be with Cheryl ...... Then along came Lance ...........

But , thinking that thru , it did not make as much sense as who I think Flyer is ......
He is actually a "she" ..... Flyer is Jan Ulrich's mother ..... This explains a lot of things ..... She would have a maternal hatred towards Lance ...... If it wasn't for Lance , her boy would have won in July and he could be home more often eating her pastries ...... MMMMMM .....Pastries......

More on this later ...... I am supposed to be writing a report for a meeting tomorrow .......

wolfix is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-04.-2005, 01:40 PM   #28
wolfix
Registered User
 
wolfix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: "Still in 1975"
Posts: 2,708
Send a message via AIM to wolfix
Default Re: Calling Out Flyer

Quote:
Originally Posted by wolfix
Great post Beastt ....... I would like to meet this Flyer ... I was sitting thinking why would a guy spend so much time on a cycling forum attempting to point out his views on why Lance is a doper ????? Doe he not have a job ??? Does he not have a lover ???? Does he have a life with real people , with real names????? Then it became obvious to me .... . In a minute I will post his identity.....

But , Some questions are raised with some of his answers..... He claims to love professional cycling , but he claims it is sport that is doped 100% , and has been for many years ...... So what he fell in love with is doped cycling ...... Using his reasoning , how does he know that he will like a drug free product????

Why is Lance at the basis of his attacks and not the other "Positive" riders of the peleton ???? Think about this guys ..... What inspires a guy to dislike another guy as much as Flyer seems to hate Lance ...... A female ... As guys we always hate the guy who steals our woman ......It is a basic human emotion .... Right ??????? I was thinking that maybe Flyer hates Lance because Lance stole his woman ...... Maybe Flyer thought he had a chance to be with Cheryl ...... Then along came Lance ...........

But , thinking that thru , it did not make as much sense as who I think Flyer is ......
He is actually a "she" ..... Flyer is Jan Ulrich's mother ..... This explains a lot of things ..... She would have a maternal hatred towards Lance ...... If it wasn't for Lance , her boy would have won in July and he could be home more often eating her pastries ...... MMMMMM .....Pastries......

More on this later ...... I am supposed to be writing a report for a meeting tomorrow .......

Hell with tomorrows report ........ I just want to add that I have alleged inside sources for all these allegations of my alleged discovery of who Flyer "may" be ......... I will not name names for fear of losing my contacts...... I have the alleged trust of all these alleged people who let me know what I allegedly know , and I would not revel my alleged sources....... I am not even going to allege it , de-allege it , or re-allege it ..........

wolfix is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-04.-2005, 02:09 PM   #29
House
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 860
Default Re: Calling Out Flyer

Wolfix, you are dead on, I was talking to a Euro pro who's wife I am sleeping with and he told me "Mt best friend's, sister's, boyfriend's, brother's girlfriend heard from this guy who knows this kid who's going with a girl who say Jan's mother logging on as Flyer...I guess it's pretty serious!"
House is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-04.-2005, 02:44 PM   #30
wolfix
Registered User
 
wolfix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: "Still in 1975"
Posts: 2,708
Send a message via AIM to wolfix
Default Re: Calling Out Flyer

Quote:
Originally Posted by House
Wolfix, you are dead on, I was talking to a Euro pro who's wife I am sleeping with and he told me "Mt best friend's, sister's, boyfriend's, brother's girlfriend heard from this guy who knows this kid who's going with a girl who say Jan's mother logging on as Flyer...I guess it's pretty serious!"
Uhhhh House .....I heard that about you ..... I mean I ALLEGEDLY heard that from my dentist's veternarian who is married to the same kid that you know , but he told me "allegedly ' that he heard it from a guy at the store who was in school with a woman who is ........ Forget it ..... Lance told me over lunch yesterday ......
But house , which wife are you sleeping with ???? Great ...I can start a new doping tread ..... "House is doping with VIAGRA ." Yes, and everyone is using Viagra..... That awful blue menace . http://www.viagra.com/Index.asp?flash=true
Here is the link ...... A Link gives more creditability when all else fails....... I may not have proof , but if I have enough links , then we are to assume I am correct.........

I allededly did not post this post .......
wolfix is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 02:29 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet