![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#17 | |
|
Community Team
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: at the bar
Posts: 12,487
|
Quote:
No one is suggesting that all cyclists are dopeurs. Some cyclists are dopeurs. Some cyclists palmares and career details, suggest doping. No one has claimed that every single professional cyclist is doping. Evidence suggests that some of them are dopeurs. And people are free to express views about doping. Your lot call it freedom of speech, as far as I remember. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Community Team
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: at the bar
Posts: 12,487
|
Quote:
Not to muddy the waters here, but when I discuss this subject, I have in mind performance enhancing drugs, such as EPO. I also include HGH and blood doping and genetic engineering. In a strict legal sense, 20 cups of coffee would put one over the caffeine limit. While this was deemed to be drug use (and performance enhancing), it's hardly up there with EPO, HGH etc. I think that the majority of pros are using stuff. If this stuff is to simply survive in the peloton, it is understandable, if not excusable. But other cyclists are using stuff which cheats their fellow cyclists from podium places, prize money, records : and the drug culture which supports and nourishes and affirms these athletes, and their performances, cascades downwards through the professional ranks, thus perpetuating and sustaining drug usage at the lower end of the peloton. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Community Team
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: at the bar
Posts: 12,487
|
Quote:
I raced against Zinoviev in the early 1980's, when he was part of a very very strong Soviet squad. Needless to say, we were destroyed by them and the East Germans. They were doing what the US amateur squads were doing - and which was exposed, but covered up, at the 1984 Los Angeles Olympic Games. I think that you miss my point. There are riders who take stuff to simply survive - to race and finish in the bunch and get their contract renewed each year. Others, at the top, consume stuff in order to get podium places, large cash prizes and the like. To me, there is a clear distinction between both groups. Unfortunately, because the upper echelons are getting better performances from their enhancement intake, this requires those further down the food chain to consume (whether they want to or not) more, or more effective, enhancements, in order to improve their performance and protect their livelihood. It is a vicious snake that cascades from the top echelon, down to the lower levels. I am well aware of the ethical and moral rationalisations that the pros make in order to vindicate their actions (we all have contacts and anecdotes within this, and prior, pelotons). And you're right, the level of premature deaths in our sport, amongst the profesional ranks, far outstrips all other sports. Throw in the number of cases of ex-pros who suffer from depression and other psychotic illnesses, it does seem that our sport is pre-disposed to substance abuse. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 116
|
Looks like you two had quite a field day last night whilst I got my beauty rest..LOL
Ok, this is at a juncture where there is only one absolute. we do not see eye to eye. Flyer..you can trot out as many inuendos, circumstances and half truths as you would like, back them up with twice baked statistics, heresay and include you personal invectives and I still will not buy into ALL cyclists are dirty and LANCE MUST be a DOPER. Your simple math that he knew this person and that person was a doper so he must also be a doper isn't logical to me. Your 1/2 truths about Lance's testing in the 2000 TDF leave out the actual medical findings that he was treating a saddle sore (common for cyclists mind you, as they do tend to sit on their BUTTS for long periods of time) and that he was cleared (yup, CLEARED) of any wrondoing by a French provisional court that was desperate to find him guilty of something (whilst they turn a blind eye to a CONFIRMED doper Mr. Virenque, as he is French) Show me 1 (one, UNO, EINZ) SINGLE POSITIVE TEST for Lance. He has his blood drawn more than a naked man at a mosquito convention, yet NEVER has his blood been tested and found in question. The word of a fired masseur, embittered ex-cyclist (LeMond) or any other shady charecter is not enough to change my mind. As my original point HAS ALWAYS stated, discuss to your hearts content the ills and perils of doping and those who have are confirmed dopers, but leave your mud slinging and axe grinding at the door. Your comments always seem to be directed at making a case that LA is a doper when you have no FACTS to back this claim up. Why do you harbor such ill will? Did he run over your puppy on a training ride? Limmerickman we are actually closer in option on these matters as it seems you harbor less intent to sling mud at LA than to address a concern regarding ramapnt drug abuse within the Peleton. I would agree that the pressures to perform lead SOME (not all, but SOME) athletes to turn to dope. It happens in every single sport that pays for performance (and even some that don't). I don't deny this is a ethical and medical issue that we all hope gets attention and resolution. If there was more emphasis on the facts and less on the attempts to throw mud I think most people would be more inclined to view these comments as credible.
__________________
KUOTA Kredo: 14.5 lbs Dura Ace Controls FSA Carbon Pro Team Crankset C.A.T. USA Brakeset Kuota Carbon Post / San Marco Carbon Saddle Cinelli RAM Bar/ Stem American Classic Carbon Tubular 700c Tufo S3 Lite 215 Tubulars **Team SMCC Racing** |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 174
|
I agree that there are probably a high percentage of cyclist taking drugs today but I get tired of hearing who is or who isn't taking drugs when there is no solid evidence to prove it one way or another. I don't really care about circumstantial evidence, I want only 100% proven facts. Without 100% proof it is only a rumor and like all rumors they should be limited to old grumpy people in church or knitting clubs.
To me the bottom line is that nobody should be required to take drugs just because everybody else does. Every athlete that takes drugs to enhance their performance is a cheater, regardless if they take a podium spot or win a medal. Because of the cheaters too many athletes are now taking the same life threatening drugs to protect their livelihood. This should not happen and needs to be cleaned up so nobody has to lose a family member just because of their profession. I hate to think of kids wanting to become pro athletes, and being forced to take drugs just to compete with a bunch of cheaters. It's not fair and needs to stopped, I say there should be stiffer penalties when they are caught and there needs to be better/more testing if that's what it takes.
__________________
Visit my Weblog @ cycling-perspective.blogspot.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Community Team
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: at the bar
Posts: 12,487
|
Quote:
I wouldn't get too carried away with all this supposed concensus. I believe that LA represents the worst aspect of double standards throughout all professional sport, and not just cycling. I believe he is a cheat. As regards, the more general question of drugs in sport, we might well agree. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 116
|
Quote:
Ah, I see I was incorrect in judging your motives. It had "appeared" that you were more reasonable of the two and had less of an axe to grind. I now see that you are just as consumed with jealousy as Flyer when it comes to LA and you also can't stand to see him remain clean and untainted by any actual EVIDENCE. It's sad that you put on this whole front about a concern for the sport when really it is just a front to attack LA. Why not just be honest and post a thread that states "I hate Lance" or "My wet dream about Lance taking drugs". At least that would be a more accurate portrayal of your true intentions.
__________________
KUOTA Kredo: 14.5 lbs Dura Ace Controls FSA Carbon Pro Team Crankset C.A.T. USA Brakeset Kuota Carbon Post / San Marco Carbon Saddle Cinelli RAM Bar/ Stem American Classic Carbon Tubular 700c Tufo S3 Lite 215 Tubulars **Team SMCC Racing** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 33
|
Why do you think he is jealous of lance? What 'proof' do you have? Besides, there is waaay more to cycling than just lance.
The only way something changes/improves is if you look at it closely, scrutinize the details, and push for change. We all know there is a doping problem in sport in general. Maybe 25% of the peleton uses peds. That's a huge amount. Maybe it's 90%. I say maybe lance uses peds, maybe he doesn't. Either way, I still enjoy the sport of cycling but think it would be better off clean. Kids are doping, ex pros are dying young. LA is the most visible part of the sport, and even though it certainly isn't fun for him to be under the microscope, and part of me thinks we should leave him alone, the sport is clearly not clean and I think LA should be willing to help. No sense having a pissing match about this. I like LA, but I also like to go race my bike every weekend and will still do so, and still like LA, even if he is proven a cheat. I'd be much happier if he and the rest of the peleton were clean, however.
__________________
"The eye of the hurricane is back in Lance, and the storm is aiming directly for the Ullrich trailer park."- Bob Roll |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 116
|
Quote:
Um, about a million posts from him that directly indicates this. LOL See, you are able to verbalize your opinion of the doping problem in a way that is reasonable without the invectives and supposition about certain riders. That's been my point the whole time, but some fail to see that.
__________________
KUOTA Kredo: 14.5 lbs Dura Ace Controls FSA Carbon Pro Team Crankset C.A.T. USA Brakeset Kuota Carbon Post / San Marco Carbon Saddle Cinelli RAM Bar/ Stem American Classic Carbon Tubular 700c Tufo S3 Lite 215 Tubulars **Team SMCC Racing** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 33
|
Nice bike by the way. I ride a wilier alpe d' huez. Ridiculously fast bike.
__________________
"The eye of the hurricane is back in Lance, and the storm is aiming directly for the Ullrich trailer park."- Bob Roll |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
Community Team
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: at the bar
Posts: 12,487
|
Quote:
I'm not jealous of Lance Armstrong. I do not believe the reasons he provides to substantiate his "improvement". The reason he provides to account for his "improvement" - do not ring true. I am of the belief that he has used and continues to use, other means to account for his performances. I am very concerned at the direction of where this sport is going. The fact that the UCI indulges the likes of Armstrong and his antics, is a very serious issue. The fact that the UCI still refuses to impose life bans on cyclists found to be doping is also a worry. |
|
|
|
|