Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Other Stuff > Doping
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Why do people feel the need to start and perpetuate DOPING rumors?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 25-02.-2005, 01:02 PM   #17
limerickman
Community Team
 
limerickman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: at the bar
Posts: 12,487
Default Re: Why do people feel the need to start and perpetuate DOPING rumors?

Quote:
Originally Posted by mjolnir2k
No, it means that he has admitted to using EPO and any discussions about him using EPO are factual and therefore fair game.

It does not mean, however, that because one pro admitted to it that ALL are guilty of it, which is what tends to happen around here (one rider in particular).

That is what I am saying. Discuss those proven to be guilty beyond a shadow of a doubt to your hearts content, but don't paint everyone with the same brush for convenience sake.




No one is suggesting that all cyclists are dopeurs.

Some cyclists are dopeurs.
Some cyclists palmares and career details, suggest doping.

No one has claimed that every single professional cyclist is doping.

Evidence suggests that some of them are dopeurs.
And people are free to express views about doping.
Your lot call it freedom of speech, as far as I remember.
limerickman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25-02.-2005, 01:32 PM   #19
limerickman
Community Team
 
limerickman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: at the bar
Posts: 12,487
Default Re: Why do people feel the need to start and perpetuate DOPING rumors?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyer
In corporate America---the chief underwriters of professional and Olympic sport--we refer to it as a commercial advertisement---or if the message appears too disturbing or real---we call it; Shoot the messenger only if name calling, referring to them as a jealous idiot, full of hatred, pedophile and other hyper defensive and meanspirted tactics do not work to discredit the offender offering up public data to futher annoy people into connecting the dots.


And while I would love to believe that at least one professional TDF rider might not use medications/preparations on a daily basis---my personal research is that none do. Even the so-called clean riders uses corticosteroids, sleeping pills, and stimlulants from time to time. So a clean rider just uses lower dosages or lower frequencies than do the champion riders.

So too with the Greyhounds and ponies.

One friend of mine said to me; "It's all about the definitions" You can redefine doping into rejuvenation if you try hard enough.

Or two double Vodka Martinis every night is a NOT drinking problem for many alcoholics.

Who are we to judge them?



Not to muddy the waters here, but when I discuss this subject, I have in mind
performance enhancing drugs, such as EPO.
I also include HGH and blood doping and genetic engineering.

In a strict legal sense, 20 cups of coffee would put one over the caffeine limit.
While this was deemed to be drug use (and performance enhancing), it's hardly up there with EPO, HGH etc.

I think that the majority of pros are using stuff.
If this stuff is to simply survive in the peloton, it is understandable, if not excusable.

But other cyclists are using stuff which cheats their fellow cyclists from podium places, prize money, records : and the drug culture which supports and nourishes and affirms these athletes, and their performances, cascades
downwards through the professional ranks, thus perpetuating and sustaining
drug usage at the lower end of the peloton.
limerickman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25-02.-2005, 11:25 PM   #21
limerickman
Community Team
 
limerickman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: at the bar
Posts: 12,487
Default Re: Why do people feel the need to start and perpetuate DOPING rumors?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyer
Right on Limerickman: I agree wholeheartedly, in theory only. Those waters are alread polluted so you cannot muddy them further.

As a practical matter, the "human survival psychcology" is nowhere more powerful than in elite cycling, a team sport of peer influence and determination.

I have had many professional racers tell me that so long as there are within doping compliance, they are clean.

If hematocrit level allowed is 50%---then all that matters if blood is drawn---and it seldom ever is---then their blood must be 50%. That's the rule.

Testosterone supplements are illegal---but they are nearly impossible to detect. So how is a cheater found out?

HGH is not detectable---and that makes it "legal" for many athletes.

Caffeine suppositories were very common ten years ago----the Festina Team certainly carried large volumes of caffeine along with the Belgian Mix (clear liquid of heroin, caffeine, cocaine, morphine and corticosteroids) in 10, 15, and milligram vials.

Today, with the improvement in HBOCs hematocrit levels can be run lower than 50% whilst gaining big boosts of endurance power.

With thinners (oral Asaflow) and vasodilators (viagra)
blood pressure, viscosity, hematocrit and blood flow/efficiency can all be dialed in for a Time Trial or for a 6 hour stage.

With all of these factors coming into play along with enormous financial pressure and peer pressure brought to bear-----It is not humanly possible for an athlete---no matter how talented or determined to avoid using these powerful trauma solutions.

If you tried to resist your fellow teammates would how a cow and resent you. Never trusting you and making loyal and selfless team work impossible.


That is why Tyler Hamiton can be on the very same squad as Oscar Camenzind and Alex Zulle. They are all of the very same ilk. They have no choice.

So too with David Millar and Cedric Vasseur.

So too as Cedric Vasseur and Lance Armstrong and Tyler Hamilton, three USPO alumni buddies.

And once you accept drugs as a solution---the very next thing you become is; A bald face liar! All doper deny using drugs---even when caught red handed. They never admit it----except in a very few extreme cases (Festina, TVM, and Millar) Nobody is measuring performance results by stimulants over HGH. You injesct whatever the doc tells you--and the rest is history. Winners, losers and worker bees.

Since testosterone, corticosteroids, stimulants and EPO and HGH can all be flown under doping controls--they are accepted as rejuvenators allowed in sport.

The peloton is one fraterity, not several. One unit of Gladiators. They all live by the sword and they die by the sword too.

btw: did you read that another cyclist died on Monday?

This time it was 43 year old Alexandre Zinoviev, now a USA citizen of Ohio. Moved here in 1990. He was a winner of several team time trial world championships as well as numerous stage victories in the Giro and other big stage races.

Alex died of intestinal cancer, not uncommon for cyclists. Anquetil died of pancreatic cancer, Lance had testicular, Lance two teammates have deceases which can morph to gastric cancer.

Anyway, we have 12 unnatural cycling deaths in 24 months now, not counting new illnesses.

Only the fans can debate which drugs are acceptable and which are the really good charges. The riders cannot tell---they just want success.



I raced against Zinoviev in the early 1980's, when he was part of a very very strong Soviet squad.
Needless to say, we were destroyed by them and the East Germans.
They were doing what the US amateur squads were doing - and which was exposed, but covered up, at the 1984 Los Angeles Olympic Games.

I think that you miss my point.
There are riders who take stuff to simply survive - to race and finish in the bunch and get their contract renewed each year.
Others, at the top, consume stuff in order to get podium places, large cash prizes and the like.
To me, there is a clear distinction between both groups.
Unfortunately, because the upper echelons are getting better performances from their enhancement intake, this requires those further down the food chain to consume (whether they want to or not) more, or more effective, enhancements, in order to improve their performance and protect their livelihood.
It is a vicious snake that cascades from the top echelon, down to the lower
levels.

I am well aware of the ethical and moral rationalisations that the pros make
in order to vindicate their actions (we all have contacts and anecdotes within
this, and prior, pelotons).

And you're right, the level of premature deaths in our sport, amongst the profesional ranks, far outstrips all other sports.
Throw in the number of cases of ex-pros who suffer from depression and other psychotic illnesses, it does seem that our sport is pre-disposed to
substance abuse.
limerickman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26-02.-2005, 01:24 AM   #22
mjolnir2k
Registered User
 
mjolnir2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 116
Default Re: Why do people feel the need to start and perpetuate DOPING rumors?

Looks like you two had quite a field day last night whilst I got my beauty rest..LOL

Ok, this is at a juncture where there is only one absolute. we do not see eye to eye.

Flyer..you can trot out as many inuendos, circumstances and half truths as you would like, back them up with twice baked statistics, heresay and include you personal invectives and I still will not buy into ALL cyclists are dirty and LANCE MUST be a DOPER.

Your simple math that he knew this person and that person was a doper so he must also be a doper isn't logical to me. Your 1/2 truths about Lance's testing in the 2000 TDF leave out the actual medical findings that he was treating a saddle sore (common for cyclists mind you, as they do tend to sit on their BUTTS for long periods of time) and that he was cleared (yup, CLEARED) of any wrondoing by a French provisional court that was desperate to find him guilty of something (whilst they turn a blind eye to a CONFIRMED doper Mr. Virenque, as he is French)

Show me 1 (one, UNO, EINZ) SINGLE POSITIVE TEST for Lance. He has his blood drawn more than a naked man at a mosquito convention, yet NEVER has his blood been tested and found in question. The word of a fired masseur, embittered ex-cyclist (LeMond) or any other shady charecter is not enough to change my mind.

As my original point HAS ALWAYS stated, discuss to your hearts content the ills and perils of doping and those who have are confirmed dopers, but leave your mud slinging and axe grinding at the door. Your comments always seem to be directed at making a case that LA is a doper when you have no FACTS to back this claim up. Why do you harbor such ill will? Did he run over your puppy on a training ride?

Limmerickman we are actually closer in option on these matters as it seems you harbor less intent to sling mud at LA than to address a concern regarding ramapnt drug abuse within the Peleton. I would agree that the pressures to perform lead SOME (not all, but SOME) athletes to turn to dope. It happens in every single sport that pays for performance (and even some that don't).

I don't deny this is a ethical and medical issue that we all hope gets attention and resolution.

If there was more emphasis on the facts and less on the attempts to throw mud I think most people would be more inclined to view these comments as credible.
__________________
KUOTA Kredo: 14.5 lbs
Dura Ace Controls
FSA Carbon Pro Team Crankset
C.A.T. USA Brakeset
Kuota Carbon Post / San Marco Carbon Saddle
Cinelli RAM Bar/ Stem
American Classic Carbon Tubular 700c
Tufo S3 Lite 215 Tubulars
**Team SMCC Racing**
mjolnir2k is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26-02.-2005, 01:40 AM   #23
BanditManDan
Registered User
 
BanditManDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 174
Default Re: Why do people feel the need to start and perpetuate DOPING rumors?

I agree that there are probably a high percentage of cyclist taking drugs today but I get tired of hearing who is or who isn't taking drugs when there is no solid evidence to prove it one way or another. I don't really care about circumstantial evidence, I want only 100% proven facts. Without 100% proof it is only a rumor and like all rumors they should be limited to old grumpy people in church or knitting clubs.



To me the bottom line is that nobody should be required to take drugs just because everybody else does. Every athlete that takes drugs to enhance their performance is a cheater, regardless if they take a podium spot or win a medal. Because of the cheaters too many athletes are now taking the same life threatening drugs to protect their livelihood. This should not happen and needs to be cleaned up so nobody has to lose a family member just because of their profession. I hate to think of kids wanting to become pro athletes, and being forced to take drugs just to compete with a bunch of cheaters. It's not fair and needs to stopped, I say there should be stiffer penalties when they are caught and there needs to be better/more testing if that's what it takes.
__________________
Visit my Weblog @ cycling-perspective.blogspot.com
BanditManDan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26-02.-2005, 02:51 AM   #24
limerickman
Community Team
 
limerickman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: at the bar
Posts: 12,487
Default Re: Why do people feel the need to start and perpetuate DOPING rumors?

Quote:
Originally Posted by mjolnir2k

Limmerickman we are actually closer in option on these matters as it seems you harbor less intent to sling mud at LA than to address a concern regarding ramapnt drug abuse within the Peleton. I would agree that the pressures to perform lead SOME (not all, but SOME) athletes to turn to dope. It happens in every single sport that pays for performance (and even some that don't).

I don't deny this is a ethical and medical issue that we all hope gets attention and resolution.

If there was more emphasis on the facts and less on the attempts to throw mud I think most people would be more inclined to view these comments as credible.


I wouldn't get too carried away with all this supposed concensus.

I believe that LA represents the worst aspect of double standards throughout
all professional sport, and not just cycling.
I believe he is a cheat.

As regards, the more general question of drugs in sport, we might well agree.
limerickman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26-02.-2005, 05:56 AM   #25
mjolnir2k
Registered User
 
mjolnir2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 116
Default Re: Why do people feel the need to start and perpetuate DOPING rumors?

Quote:
Originally Posted by limerickman
I wouldn't get too carried away with all this supposed concensus.

I believe that LA represents the worst aspect of double standards throughout
all professional sport, and not just cycling.
I believe he is a cheat.

As regards, the more general question of drugs in sport, we might well agree.


Ah, I see I was incorrect in judging your motives. It had "appeared" that you were more reasonable of the two and had less of an axe to grind. I now see that you are just as consumed with jealousy as Flyer when it comes to LA and you also can't stand to see him remain clean and untainted by any actual EVIDENCE.

It's sad that you put on this whole front about a concern for the sport when really it is just a front to attack LA.

Why not just be honest and post a thread that states "I hate Lance" or "My wet dream about Lance taking drugs". At least that would be a more accurate portrayal of your true intentions.
__________________
KUOTA Kredo: 14.5 lbs
Dura Ace Controls
FSA Carbon Pro Team Crankset
C.A.T. USA Brakeset
Kuota Carbon Post / San Marco Carbon Saddle
Cinelli RAM Bar/ Stem
American Classic Carbon Tubular 700c
Tufo S3 Lite 215 Tubulars
**Team SMCC Racing**
mjolnir2k is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26-02.-2005, 06:15 AM   #26
ct2
Registered User
 
ct2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 33
Default Re: Why do people feel the need to start and perpetuate DOPING rumors?

Why do you think he is jealous of lance? What 'proof' do you have? Besides, there is waaay more to cycling than just lance.

The only way something changes/improves is if you look at it closely, scrutinize the details, and push for change. We all know there is a doping problem in sport in general. Maybe 25% of the peleton uses peds. That's a huge amount. Maybe it's 90%. I say maybe lance uses peds, maybe he doesn't. Either way, I still enjoy the sport of cycling but think it would be better off clean. Kids are doping, ex pros are dying young. LA is the most visible part of the sport, and even though it certainly isn't fun for him to be under the microscope, and part of me thinks we should leave him alone, the sport is clearly not clean and I think LA should be willing to help.

No sense having a pissing match about this. I like LA, but I also like to go race my bike every weekend and will still do so, and still like LA, even if he is proven a cheat. I'd be much happier if he and the rest of the peleton were clean, however.
__________________
"The eye of the hurricane is back in Lance, and the storm is aiming directly for the Ullrich trailer park."- Bob Roll
ct2 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26-02.-2005, 06:49 AM   #27
mjolnir2k
Registered User
 
mjolnir2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 116
Default Re: Why do people feel the need to start and perpetuate DOPING rumors?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ct2
Why do you think he is jealous of lance? What 'proof' do you have? Besides, there is waaay more to cycling than just lance.


Um, about a million posts from him that directly indicates this. LOL

See, you are able to verbalize your opinion of the doping problem in a way that is reasonable without the invectives and supposition about certain riders. That's been my point the whole time, but some fail to see that.
__________________
KUOTA Kredo: 14.5 lbs
Dura Ace Controls
FSA Carbon Pro Team Crankset
C.A.T. USA Brakeset
Kuota Carbon Post / San Marco Carbon Saddle
Cinelli RAM Bar/ Stem
American Classic Carbon Tubular 700c
Tufo S3 Lite 215 Tubulars
**Team SMCC Racing**
mjolnir2k is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26-02.-2005, 07:44 AM   #28
ct2
Registered User
 
ct2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 33
Default Re: Why do people feel the need to start and perpetuate DOPING rumors?

Nice bike by the way. I ride a wilier alpe d' huez. Ridiculously fast bike.
__________________
"The eye of the hurricane is back in Lance, and the storm is aiming directly for the Ullrich trailer park."- Bob Roll
ct2 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26-02.-2005, 10:53 AM   #29
limerickman
Community Team
 
limerickman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: at the bar
Posts: 12,487
Default Re: Why do people feel the need to start and perpetuate DOPING rumors?

Quote:
Originally Posted by mjolnir2k
Ah, I see I was incorrect in judging your motives. It had "appeared" that you were more reasonable of the two and had less of an axe to grind. I now see that you are just as consumed with jealousy as Flyer when it comes to LA and you also can't stand to see him remain clean and untainted by any actual EVIDENCE.

It's sad that you put on this whole front about a concern for the sport when really it is just a front to attack LA.

Why not just be honest and post a thread that states "I hate Lance" or "My wet dream about Lance taking drugs". At least that would be a more accurate portrayal of your true intentions.


I'm not jealous of Lance Armstrong.

I do not believe the reasons he provides to substantiate his "improvement".
The reason he provides to account for his "improvement" - do not ring true.
I am of the belief that he has used and continues to use, other means to
account for his performances.

I am very concerned at the direction of where this sport is going.
The fact that the UCI indulges the likes of Armstrong and his antics, is a very serious issue.

The fact that the UCI still refuses to impose life bans on cyclists found to be doping is also a worry.
limerickman is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 08:05 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet