![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Tony Raven wrote:
> Flotsam and Jetsam: unclaimed odds and ends An early musical duo, not entirely unlike Flanders and Swann. |
|
|
#17 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 13:14:50 +0000, Tony Raven wrote:
> Simon Brooke wrote: >> >> No, it's flotsam when it washes up on the shore. It only becomes jetsam >> when someone throws it (e.g. for their dog to catch). Think about what >> 'flot' and 'jet' mean. >> > > Nope: > > <Chambers English Dictionary> > > Flotsam: goods lost by shipwreck and found floating on the sea > Jetsam: goods jettisoned from a ship and washed up on the shore > Flotsam and Jetsam: unclaimed odds and ends > > </Chambers English Dictionary> > > Tony But as dkahn400 pointed out Chambers isn't totally correct either. % jetsam is cargo or other % material thrown overboard (jettisoned) to lighten a vessel in danger of % sinking. There's nothing in the proper definition that says it has to be washed up on shore. It doesn't have to be floating, either, as it could be on the bottom of the sea. -- Michael MacClancy |
|
|
#18 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Michael MacClancy wrote:
> > But as dkahn400 pointed out Chambers isn't totally correct either. > > % jetsam is cargo or other > % material thrown overboard (jettisoned) to lighten a vessel in danger of > % sinking. > > There's nothing in the proper definition that says it has to be washed up > on shore. It doesn't have to be floating, either, as it could be on the > bottom of the sea. > For brevity I omitted the part of Chambers which notes that, according to some, jetsam can also be goods from a wreck that remain under water. The Oxford Dictionary* concurs with Chambers that jetsam is washed up on shore but in any case I am minded to prefer Chambers and the OED as definitive over the unreferenced views of dkahn400 (sorry d, nothing personal) Tony * Jetsam, n, Goods thrown overboard from a ship to lighten it & washed ashore. |
|
|
#19 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Tony Raven wrote:
> > For brevity I omitted the part of Chambers which notes that, according > to some, jetsam can also be goods from a wreck that remain under water. > P.S. Apparently correctly known as "lagan" according to the OED. Tony |
|
|
#20 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 14:17:48 +0000, Tony Raven wrote:
> > The Oxford Dictionary* concurs with Chambers that jetsam is washed up on > shore but in any case I am minded to prefer Chambers and the OED as > definitive over the unreferenced views of dkahn400 (sorry d, nothing > personal) > > Tony > > * Jetsam, n, Goods thrown overboard from a ship to lighten it & washed > ashore. ;-) Personally I'm minded to prefer the definition of the Maritime and Coastguard Agency: "Definition of Wreck Wreck is defined in section 255 of the Merchant Shipping Act 1995 as including "jetsam, flotsam, lagan and derelict found in or on the shores of the sea or any tidal water" Jetsam: goods cast overboard in order to lighten a vessel which is in danger of being sunk, not withstanding that afterwards it perishes. Flotsam: goods lost from a ship which has sunk or otherwise perished which are recoverable by reason of their remaining afloat. Lagan: goods cast overboard from a ship which afterwards perishes, buoyed so as to render them recoverable Derelict: property, whether vessel or cargo, which has been abandoned and deserted at sea by those who were in charge of it without any hope of recovering it." -- Michael MacClancy |
|
|
#21 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Michael MacClancy wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 14:17:48 +0000, Tony Raven wrote: > > > >>The Oxford Dictionary* concurs with Chambers that jetsam is washed up on >>shore but in any case I am minded to prefer Chambers and the OED as >>definitive over the unreferenced views of dkahn400 (sorry d, nothing >>personal) >> >>Tony >> >>* Jetsam, n, Goods thrown overboard from a ship to lighten it & washed >>ashore. > > > ;-) > > Personally I'm minded to prefer the definition of the Maritime and > Coastguard Agency: > Since we are talking about English usage here I think my OED trumps your MCA. As we all know, definitions for official purposes can be somewhat different to their usage in normal language. For example I doubt most of us would accept the UCI definition as defining what a bicycle is or is not in preference to the OED. Tony |
|
|
#22 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Tony Raven wrote:
> Flotsam: goods lost by shipwreck and found floating on the sea > Jetsam: goods jettisoned from a ship and washed up on the shore I believe that jettisoned goods that have sunk to the seabed are also technically jetsam. > Flotsam and Jetsam: unclaimed odds and ends This is of course the usage that has passed into the common language. -- Dave... |
|
|
#23 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Tony Raven wrote:
> I am minded to prefer Chambers and the OED as definitive over the > unreferenced views of dkahn400 (sorry d, nothing > personal) No offence taken. -- Dave... |
|
|
#24 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Tony Raven wrote:
> Since we are talking about English usage here I think my OED > trumps your MCA. I bet Padders is sorry now that he fell off. -- Dave... |
|
|
#25 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Padders composed the following ...
> Oh, and no helmet. Although a knee guard of some sort might have been > handy. Heheheh, we often wear shin pads and knee guards (with a helmet) when off-roading, and they _really do_ work. Get well soon. -- Paul ... http://www.4x4prejudice.org/index.php (8(!) Homer Rules ... ![]() "A tosser is a tosser, no matter what mode of transport they're using." |
|
|
#26 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
dkahn400 composed the following ...
> Tony Raven wrote: > >> Since we are talking about English usage here I think my OED >> trumps your MCA. > I bet Padders is sorry now that he fell off. Don't you just love thread drift (wood) .. ![]() -- Paul ... http://www.4x4prejudice.org/index.php (8(!) Homer Rules ... ![]() "A tosser is a tosser, no matter what mode of transport they're using." |
|
|
#27 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Steve Peake <spam@puppet-head.co.uk> wrote in
news:keis8yajam0u$.w1ai2wzvm4ug.dlg@40tude.net: > That would be the Thames footpath , only a few sections are actually> cycle path. The real cycle path is teddington lock across the park, > which is about 2 miles shorter than the river to where your going. > > Of course you could call it towpath. Really? Oops ![]() I know it's quicker through the park, but it isn't quite as much fun. Although I must admit to liking the traffic free return journey after work. > I would be more worried by what Thames water puts in the river. A good point, there's been a lot of nasty overflow in the not so distant past. -- Padders |
|
|
#28 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Paul - xxx" <notcheckedever@hotmail.com> wrote in news:32tl10F3pihdiU1
@individual.net: > dkahn400 composed the following ... >> Tony Raven wrote: >> >>> Since we are talking about English usage here I think my OED >>> trumps your MCA. >> I bet Padders is sorry now that he fell off. > > Don't you just love thread drift (wood) .. ![]() More painful than my knee ;O -- Padders |
|
|
#29 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Padders wrote:
> "Paul - xxx" <notcheckedever@hotmail.com> wrote in news:32tl10F3pihdiU1 > @individual.net: > >>dkahn400 composed the following ... >>>I bet Padders is sorry now that he fell off. >> >>Don't you just love thread drift (wood) .. ![]() > > More painful than my knee ;O > Does it still hurtsam? -- Dave... Every time I see an adult on a bicycle, I no longer despair for the future of the human race. - H. G. Wells |
|
|
#30 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Padders wrote:
> "Paul - xxx" <notcheckedever@hotmail.com> wrote in news:32tl10F3pihdiU1 > @individual.net: > > >>dkahn400 composed the following ... >> >>>Tony Raven wrote: >>> >>> >>>>Since we are talking about English usage here I think my OED >>>>trumps your MCA. >>> >>>I bet Padders is sorry now that he fell off. >> >>Don't you just love thread drift (wood) .. ![]() > > > More painful than my knee ;O > Should have used knee Padders ;-) IGMC Tony |