![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#106 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In article <maipq0p0hhr61dfa463426ek873i99fg1s@4ax.com>, Naqerj wrote:
>On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 14:26:06 -0000, "Mark" ><mark.harris.nospam@ukonline.co.uk.nospam> wrote: > >>> Indeed. It's also an unnecessary luxury, most houses already come with >>> ample built in bicycle storage, it's called the front room. >> >>Or, in my case, "the dining room". ![]() > >I've got a bike temporarily stored [1] in the dining room. >So, how many others are there who keep bikes in the main rooms of the >house? I think it's currently eight in the right hand shed, two in the left hand shed, roughly two and a half in the workshop, and a few out in the back shed (a mixture of grown out of childrens bikes and scrap frames that might one day become something). Only two of the complete working bikes are mine, along with two that I'll get round to sorting out soon honest and one fractionally built project. Six people in the household own bikes, and I've included trailer cycles as bikes. |
|
|
#107 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
deb107_york@yahoo.co.uk (David E. Belcher) of http://groups.google.com
wrote: >"Pete Biggs" <pwrinkledgrape{remove_fruit}@biggs.tc> wrote in message news:<30pc4jF30kga8U1@uni-berlin.de>... >> Hi friends at u.r.c, >> >> Just to explain why I've been quiet for the last few days and why I might >> not be posting much or at all on the group any more... well, for a while >> at least....... >> >> I had a road bike crash at 8pm on Monday and broke my hip. Annoying thing >> is, it was just a silly little incident that I wouldn't have thought would >> normally cause very much bother, but I was unlucky in how I fell or with >> the condition of my bones (for my age, which is about half that of those >> who have hip problems normally). >> > >Pete, > >I've only just happened on this thread about your accident, but along >with so many others who've replied to the original post, wish you all >the best and hope you're on the mend soon. Another late reader here, wishing you a good recovery. And I've got a bit of practical advice. Ask your docs whether the metal in your hip will be enough to set off metal detectors. If so, then get yourself a letter from your doctors to wave at security. Otherwise you may find it very difficult to get on a plane or ship. -- I simply haven't the nerve to imagine a being, a force, a cause which keeps the planets revolving in their orbits and then suddenly stops in order to give me a bicycle with three speeds. Quentin Crisp Steph Peters delete invalid from incm@sandbenders.demon.co.uk.invalid Tatting, lace & stitching page <http://www.sandbenders.demon.co.uk/index.htm> |
|
|
#108 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Pete Biggs" <pwrinkledgrape{remove_fruit}@biggs.tc> wrote in
news:30pc4jF30kga8U1@uni-berlin.de: > Hi friends at u.r.c, > > Just to explain why I've been quiet for the last few days and why I > might not be posting much or at all on the group any more... well, for > a while at least....... > > I had a road bike crash at 8pm on Monday and broke my hip. Annoying > thing is, it was just a silly little incident that I wouldn't have > thought would normally cause very much bother, but I was unlucky in > how I fell or with the condition of my bones (for my age, which is > about half that of those who have hip problems normally). Sorry to hear that Pete, get well soon. I had a similar accident this time last year, coming down a slight hill around a left-hand bend, the bike disappeared from beneath me. It was drizzly, the road was greasy; me, the bike and the pannier slid some distance in separate directions. Came out of it with a huge graze on my hip and huge holes in my 2-week-old leggings. It was my own stupid fault, going too fast. My best one though was a couple of years back. Had some shopping which wouldn't fit in the pannier, so, the inexperienced prat I was, I slung it over the handlebars. Bag jams in the front wheel as I move off from traffic lights, I go over the handlebars, land on the kerb and break my wrist. What was in the bag? A new helmet! |
|
|
#109 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Simon Brooke wrote:
> in message <maipq0p0hhr61dfa463426ek873i99fg1s@4ax.com>, Naqerj > ('andrew@pattle.globalnet.co.invalid') wrote: > >> On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 14:26:06 -0000, "Mark" >> <mark.harris.nospam@ukonline.co.uk.nospam> wrote: >> >>>> Indeed. It's also an unnecessary luxury, most houses >>>> already come with ample built in bicycle storage, it's >>>> called the front room. >>> >>> Or, in my case, "the dining room". ![]() >> >> I've got a bike temporarily stored [1] in the dining room. >> >> So, how many others are there who keep bikes in the main >> rooms of the house? > > Dining room, six bikes. While discussing this thread with Helen she has decided that the people with bikes in the front room are single and those with bikes in the dining room are a couple with no kids and those with bikes in sheds/garages are families. How right/wrong is she? -- Mark 1x1 wheel, 3x2 wheels & 1x3 wheels. |
|
|
#110 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
the.Mark wrote:
> Simon Brooke wrote: > >>in message <maipq0p0hhr61dfa463426ek873i99fg1s@4ax.com>, Naqerj >>('andrew@pattle.globalnet.co.invalid') wrote: >> >> >>>On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 14:26:06 -0000, "Mark" >>><mark.harris.nospam@ukonline.co.uk.nospam> wrote: >>> >>> >>>>>Indeed. It's also an unnecessary luxury, most houses >>>>>already come with ample built in bicycle storage, it's >>>>>called the front room. >>>> >>>>Or, in my case, "the dining room". ![]() >>> >>>I've got a bike temporarily stored [1] in the dining room. >>> >>>So, how many others are there who keep bikes in the main >>>rooms of the house? >> >>Dining room, six bikes. > > > While discussing this thread with Helen she has decided that the people with > bikes in the front room are single and those with bikes in the dining room > are a couple with no kids and those with bikes in sheds/garages are > families. > How right/wrong is she? Oh my god, I'm worried now... What about bike in the bedroom.. I don't seem to fit into any of those catagories Helen's come up with... :-) -- Velvet |
|
|
#111 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"the.Mark" wrote:
> While discussing this thread with Helen she has decided that the people with > bikes in the front room are single and those with bikes in the dining room > are a couple with no kids and those with bikes in sheds/garages are > families. > How right/wrong is she? It's quite often my wife's or eldest daughter's bike in the sitting room while mine is relegated to the Hall. Both the shed and garage are full of a whole mix of family bikes. I'm not sure where that leaves your theory. John B |
|
|
#112 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 45
|
Quote:
First of all get well soon Pete,sorry to hear of your problems. I took a decision about 2 years ago to cut down on cycling at night and stop cycling to work as I thought that the risks were getting to great. With me the problem was I had a couple of near misses with other vehicles and it occured to me that the cycling I do in the daytime on quiet country roads was conciderably more safe than the city roads in rush hours and nightime cycling. As I am a bit of an excersise adict I joined a gym and although I do not enjoy it as much as a good cycle ride on a nice day it does complement my cycling and is,in my view anyway safer than "gambling" with the rush hour traffic. The spinning classes are I find a great way to build strength. |
|
|
|
|
|
#113 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
the.Mark wrote:
> Simon Brooke wrote: > >>in message <maipq0p0hhr61dfa463426ek873i99fg1s@4ax.com>, Naqerj >>('andrew@pattle.globalnet.co.invalid') wrote: >> >> >>>On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 14:26:06 -0000, "Mark" >>><mark.harris.nospam@ukonline.co.uk.nospam> wrote: >>> >>> >>>>>Indeed. It's also an unnecessary luxury, most houses >>>>>already come with ample built in bicycle storage, it's >>>>>called the front room. >>>> >>>>Or, in my case, "the dining room". ![]() >>> >>>I've got a bike temporarily stored [1] in the dining room. >>> >>>So, how many others are there who keep bikes in the main >>>rooms of the house? >> >>Dining room, six bikes. > > > While discussing this thread with Helen she has decided that the people with > bikes in the front room are single and those with bikes in the dining room > are a couple with no kids and those with bikes in sheds/garages are > families. > How right/wrong is she? Two kids. Bikes in the shed. Julesh |
|
|
#114 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 22:09:40 GMT, Julesh
<canned_lunchmeat@hotmail.com> wrote: >> While discussing this thread with Helen she has decided that the people with >> bikes in the front room are single and those with bikes in the dining room >> are a couple with no kids and those with bikes in sheds/garages are >> families. >> How right/wrong is she? > >Two kids. Bikes in the shed. Bikes in front room, single. That's two for Helen. -- Call me "Bob" "More oneness, less categories, Open hearts, no strategies" Email address is spam trapped, to reply directly remove the beverage. |
|
|
#115 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Tony W" <tonyremove@chapmore.co.uk> wrote in message
news:31463aF35s0dbU1@individual.net... > > "Naqerj" <andrew@pattle.globalnet.co.invalid> wrote in message > news:maipq0p0hhr61dfa463426ek873i99fg1s@4ax.com... >> I've got a bike temporarily stored [1] in the dining room. >> >> So, how many others are there who keep bikes in the main rooms of the >> house? > > Where else would one store a good bike? The cheap ones go in the shed. > Oi! Leave it out you lot! My bikes are getting jealous . Three of themhave to live outside next to wall under a tarpaulin. Only one gets allowed inside the hallway, mainly because it leaves everyday in the morning and doesn't come home again until evening, by which time 'the boss' has done all the coming and going that she needs to do and doesn't have to squeeze past it. It isn't fair on them to hear about all these pampered bikes which get to live inside in bedrooms and living rooms and dining rooms and kitchens..... Rich |
|
|
#116 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
the.Mark wrote:
> While discussing this thread with Helen she has decided that the people with > bikes in the front room are single and those with bikes in the dining room > are a couple with no kids and those with bikes in sheds/garages are > families. What about those that keep the bikes in the house and the kids in the shed? R. |
|
|
#117 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dave Kahn dkahn400@yahoo.co.uk opined the following...
> In other words you got better in the end. :-) Ouch! :-) |
|
|
#118 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Iain Jones spam@freshfield4.wanadoo.co.uk opined the following...
> My best one though was a couple of years back. Had some shopping which > wouldn't fit in the pannier, so, the inexperienced prat I was, I slung it > over the handlebars. Bag jams in the front wheel as I move off from traffic > lights, I go over the handlebars, land on the kerb and break my wrist. What > was in the bag? A new helmet! Proof if proof be needed! ;-) Jon |
|
|
#119 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"the.Mark" <the_mark@hotmail.com>typed
> While discussing this thread with Helen she has decided that the > people with > bikes in the front room are single and those with bikes in the dining room > are a couple with no kids and those with bikes in sheds/garages are > families. > How right/wrong is she? We have one bike in the hall, none in the kitchen, lounge or dining room and four bikes in the garage. There are no kids. We co-habit. -- Helen D. Vecht: helenvecht@zetnet.co.uk Edgware. |
|
|
#120 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
the.Mark the_mark@hotmail.com opined the following...
> While discussing this thread with Helen she has decided that the people with > bikes in the front room are single and those with bikes in the dining room > are a couple with no kids and those with bikes in sheds/garages are > families. > How right/wrong is she? No bikes in front room. But one in the bedroom and one in the hall. Single. Pretty damning evidence I guess! ;-) Jon |