Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Bike Racing > Track Racing
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Power for sprinters

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 29-03.-2005, 11:13 AM   #16
Woofer
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Northern California
Posts: 594
Default Re: Power for sprinters

Quote:
Originally Posted by VeloFlash
Vertical jump test has been the mainstay for years and years in determining comparative potential for leg based sprinting and real outcomes. Studies have been made on the elite sprint athletes and top sprint athlete = excellent vertical jump test. Tests have proven there are no exceptions..
Does this mean most NBA guards and some of the forwards would be excellent sprinters? Could Michael Jordan or Tracy McGrady have been the world's fastest man?

Tongue only slightly in cheek.
Woofer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 30-03.-2005, 04:58 AM   #17
Lee Povey
Registered User
 
Lee Povey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 22
Default Re: Power for sprinters

Quote:
Originally Posted by Woofer
If you can get timed 200/500/pursuit regularly at your track, you don't need a powermeter. In either case it's a good way to measure progress and current status.

A few people on the topica wattage list have converted PowerTaps to fixies. I thought about it and took the plunge and got an SRM.

If you already have used a PowerTap I assume you already know the benefits of training by using power and analyzing races with power files.

I live quite away from a decent indoor track so hard to do many timed efforts.
I am quite tempted by srm cranks, would love to know what you think you have gained by using them?
Also anything suprising you noticed and how have you changed your training since using them?
Cheers Lee
Lee Povey is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 30-03.-2005, 05:54 AM   #18
Woofer
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Northern California
Posts: 594
Default Re: Power for sprinters

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lee Povey
I live quite away from a decent indoor track so hard to do many timed efforts.
I am quite tempted by srm cranks, would love to know what you think you have gained by using them?
Also anything suprising you noticed and how have you changed your training since using them?
Cheers Lee
I use both PowerTap on the road/cyclocross/mtb and SRM on the track. I have definitely changed my focus in training, and do not even use heart rate for much of anything anymore. Instead of guessing about what one is good at, one can directly measure it, and monitor progress. One thing one can do is use it for racing ( I don't bother looking at it much then) and analyze the race afterwards to see where one can possibly improve or repeat performances - for instance, dropped after x efforts of N power or dropped after y minutes of N power. Both SRM and PowerTap have their pluses and minuses and you will find plenty of people happy and unhappy with both. The Power FAQ covers most of this comparison pretty well.
Woofer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 30-03.-2005, 06:01 AM   #19
velomanct
Registered User
 
velomanct's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 948
Default Re: Power for sprinters

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lee Povey
I live quite away from a decent indoor track so hard to do many timed efforts.
I am quite tempted by srm cranks, would love to know what you think you have gained by using them?
Also anything suprising you noticed and how have you changed your training since using them?
Cheers Lee


my powertap gives me a lot of motivation, because I can exactly see improvement. often you won't see an increase in speed because of changing conditions, but watts are watts no matter what. you can track progress very well. i think the SRM is overpriced. that's why I bought the powertap pro about 15months ago.
__________________
"friendship, family, religion. These are the three demons you must slay if you wish to succeed in business!" -Mr. Burns
The faster you go, the fewer passing cars
velomanct is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 24-04.-2005, 12:56 PM   #20
Roadie_scum
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,286
Default Re: Power for sprinters

Quote:
Originally Posted by Woofer
If you can get timed 200/500/pursuit regularly at your track, you don't need a powermeter. In either case it's a good way to measure progress and current status.

A few people on the topica wattage list have converted PowerTaps to fixies. I thought about it and took the plunge and got an SRM.

If you already have used a PowerTap I assume you already know the benefits of training by using power and analyzing races with power files.


If you run at an outdoor track wind changes will affect your times for a given power, as will temperature/air pressure changes and position changes. I can't afford a powe meter so I don't have one, but I'd say they're be useful even if you are regularly timed (to distinguish actual improvement from environmental changes and to establish the merits of position modifications).
Roadie_scum is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25-04.-2005, 01:34 PM   #21
Swoop
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 52
Default Re: Power for sprinters

What if you are a good squatter and a bad jumper? The best things for teaching explosiveness are explosive things that use more than one joint. Yes you need to squat...but absolute max is not entirely determinant of your ability. A better lift is a clean or clean and jerk in my opinion. You need strength but strength with slow legs is worthless. Maybe even add plyometrics.
__________________
"Will work for Jersey..."
Swoop is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25-04.-2005, 07:40 PM   #22
bikeguy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Jyvaskyla, Finland
Posts: 665
Default Re: Power for sprinters

Swoop, indeed top class olympic lifters (and powerlifters) have the best VJ's recorded, just see some of them jump after a successful lift! Still, sprint cycling is more like explosive endurance, the ability to repeat a relatively explosive movment many times. It's possible to be an explosive athlete without having good gym lifts though, I've read that Carl Lewis didn't push a lot of heavy iron and yet he won gold in the long jump and 100 m dash many times, keep in mind, he still did lift. On the other hand Ben Johnson was known for heaving heavy iron (over 400 lb incline press at 80 kg, half squats for reps with 600 lbs) and had the fastest 50-60 m time (and taking anabolics, indeed at the same gym I went to at the University of Toronto, although not while I was there) It seems some people are better at moving a heavy weight somewhat quickly (olympic lifting) while others are good at lifting a relatively light weight very quickly (bodyweight in long jump, 100 m dash, sprint cycling). I'll second that cleans and jerks and plyometrics (I like depth jumps and bounding onto boxes of various heights, also jumping over hurdles) are an excellent way to develop sprint power for both 100 m dash and sprint cycling.

-Bikeguy
bikeguy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 22-10.-2005, 12:11 PM   #23
Billsworld
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 797
Default Re: Power for sprinters

I agree with your points...tough to hammer at both at the same time. Do you mind giving me some pointers/goals. I am looking for top speed increases. Current best on a flat after a small hill 38 mph(48x14...150+ -) I did the work from 30-38. 11.2 is the masters wr.I think?? How fast is a realistic goal for a flat to get near where you are?? All the road riding I did last year killed gym and bike power. I am building it back now. How much road riding do you do? any crits? When and how much gym work do you taper out. Send me the bill.....Thanks BP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Budarz
Being now in my 3rd real season of track sprinting, I've sorted out what seems to work and what doesn't at least for me. I have really been more of a kilo guy, but can run an outdoor, sea-level, concrete, 333m track 200m tt in 11.1.

Remember always that cycling is power, not strength. The most impressive gains I've made in power on the bike included exactly zero gym work. It consisted of very intense sprint work and starts on the track bike. I dropped a full second off my already ok 1/2 lap start in 6 weeks. That says to things: 1) I had a lot of genetic potential left, but 2) That on-the-bike training is awesome for being on-the-bike fast

There is certainly merit to doing gym work, but it is not that it makes you faster as a sprinter. By itself it might make you slower. What it does do is makes more muscle - and fast twitch at that. After the gym phase, when you do get on the bike there's more to work with. Mostly you'll be training those new fibers how to fire in new patterns.

One more note on gym work - it is nearly impossible to do long hours on the bike concurrently with strength training with the goal of hypertrophy (muscle gain). There are only so many hours in a week for your body to recover. The two ideas are nearly in direct opposition. Once the muscle is there, maintaining it is easy with minimal gym work, but the building phase necessitates backing off quite a lot on bike time. A bit of a trade off, but consider it an investment for the future.

Train on.
Billsworld is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-11.-2005, 06:43 PM   #24
Hypnospin
Registered User
 
Hypnospin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: ex of santa cruz, california, usa
Posts: 798
Default Re: Power for sprinters

bill,
i can offer my take on the questions you posed to bud,
we have cat 4 and 5 roadies, crit guys, who have hit 37+ on the flats.
there have been 40 mph bunch sprints on the flat into a stiff headwind 'round here...

my preferance is for higher miles than needed for speed alone, but 120-200/wk will provide a good all 'round balance.

of course, some will insist a pure sprinter can get by on 50 miles/wk (!) with the right amount of base and specific prep cycles during a taper period.

as for weight, my best results in regards to sprinting (i am not a track sprinter, but a crit/road guy with wins and placings from scenarios including bunch sprints, kilo type efforts and prime laps) have come from lots of heavy lower and upper body training, with the general plan for the legs as high weight/ high volume for quads, calfs and hams, then transitioning into mostly quads with moderate weight high reps.
then in season, quit most all the legwork with weights, and build high mileage base, then race simulation group rides, then sprint work on the three aspects:
jump, top speed and duration. during this time i sometimes blast the calfs a bit so they do not limit quad derived power as a weak link.
during the racing season i then did no weights for the legs, but continued actualy moderately heavy (or more!) for the upper body as i believe in muscle mass sufficient for sprinting, but at the same time the legs must not be compromised from lack of recovery during this phase.

this being said, if you have been lifting heavy for more than a couple years, you likely have too much muscle for cycling, as my team mate, a district champ track and crit sprinter told me "you gotta oxygenate that sh!t",
meaning there is a break even point for cycling effectiveness that can be crossed...also, watch out for the naysayers re weights on this forum, they tend not to fall into the sprint discipline.

i could ramble on with painfully detailed specifics, but this is a general overview i can offer. let me know if you want any details, keep in mind i am not that much better than average except fof the amount of stubborn bone in my head, but i have been at it a while, and am heavily committed to next season, gotta be, i am signed on with a legendary race team which includes sponsorship support!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billsworld
I agree with your points...tough to hammer at both at the same time. Do you mind giving me some pointers/goals. I am looking for top speed increases. Current best on a flat after a small hill 38 mph(48x14...150+ -) I did the work from 30-38. 11.2 is the masters wr.I think?? How fast is a realistic goal for a flat to get near where you are?? All the road riding I did last year killed gym and bike power. I am building it back now. How much road riding do you do? any crits? When and how much gym work do you taper out. Send me the bill.....Thanks BP

Last edited by Hypnospin : 01-11.-2005 at 07:45 PM.
Hypnospin is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-11.-2005, 06:50 PM   #25
Hypnospin
Registered User
 
Hypnospin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: ex of santa cruz, california, usa
Posts: 798
Default Re: Power for sprinters

maybe we should look to soccer players for this, after all, they do not stop at just a "full court" sprint...



Quote:
Originally Posted by Woofer
Does this mean most NBA guards and some of the forwards would be excellent sprinters? Could Michael Jordan or Tracy McGrady have been the world's fastest man?

Tongue only slightly in cheek.
Hypnospin is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-11.-2005, 05:28 AM   #26
Billsworld
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 797
Default Re: Power for sprinters

Its tough to figure out how fast one has to go on the road to be competative on the track. I am guessing by saying that a 42-43 mph top end no hill sprint would translate into some good track capabilities. This is based on playing with formulas on analyticalcycling.com (I might be wrong) I think you experienced crit guys are definitely worth listening to, and I am still wondering which direction to go in. (crit..track) I love just riding as hard as I can, but last year I found that as my miles went up my knees got sore, then I started sinning faster and my knees felt better but my power was gone . Lack of experience I guess.I have always had good explosive power in the gym, I wondering how to get it to the crank. PB on flat 38.5 corrected to 38.9 48x14. 205lbs Thanks for the reply . Congrats on the sponsor too.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hypnospin
bill,
i can offer my take on the questions you posed to bud,
we have cat 4 and 5 roadies, crit guys, who have hit 37+ on the flats.
there have been 40 mph bunch sprints on the flat into a stiff headwind 'round here...

my preferance is for higher miles than needed for speed alone, but 120-200/wk will provide a good all 'round balance.

of course, some will insist a pure sprinter can get by on 50 miles/wk (!) with the right amount of base and specific prep cycles during a taper period.

as for weight, my best results in regards to sprinting (i am not a track sprinter, but a crit/road guy with wins and placings from scenarios including bunch sprints, kilo type efforts and prime laps) have come from lots of heavy lower and upper body training, with the general plan for the legs as high weight/ high volume for quads, calfs and hams, then transitioning into mostly quads with moderate weight high reps.
then in season, quit most all the legwork with weights, and build high mileage base, then race simulation group rides, then sprint work on the three aspects:
jump, top speed and duration. during this time i sometimes blast the calfs a bit so they do not limit quad derived power as a weak link.
during the racing season i then did no weights for the legs, but continued actualy moderately heavy (or more!) for the upper body as i believe in muscle mass sufficient for sprinting, but at the same time the legs must not be compromised from lack of recovery during this phase.

this being said, if you have been lifting heavy for more than a couple years, you likely have too much muscle for cycling, as my team mate, a district champ track and crit sprinter told me "you gotta oxygenate that sh!t",
meaning there is a break even point for cycling effectiveness that can be crossed...also, watch out for the naysayers re weights on this forum, they tend not to fall into the sprint discipline.

i could ramble on with painfully detailed specifics, but this is a general overview i can offer. let me know if you want any details, keep in mind i am not that much better than average except fof the amount of stubborn bone in my head, but i have been at it a while, and am heavily committed to next season, gotta be, i am signed on with a legendary race team which includes sponsorship support!
Billsworld is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-11.-2005, 07:16 AM   #27
Hypnospin
Registered User
 
Hypnospin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: ex of santa cruz, california, usa
Posts: 798
Default Re: Power for sprinters

as for my experience on how heavy lifting translates into sprinting, the main advantage that is immediately noticible is the power to jump, as in accelerating to intiate the sprint. if one has this kind of power and does not use a smooth style to jump, the bike gets torqued to the extent that stuff happens, the back wheel gyrates and hops, the chain skips and chaneds cogs, both wheels hop up down and side to side...a measure of restraint has to be applied.

if heavy lifting derived power is applied in an eficcient manner, your jump will be equal to some good sprinters. i anticipatethat others jumps will seem like no big deal to match. this is a great psyche out.

as for top speed and duration, this seems better developed from high rep moderate weight and lots of on the bike mileage leading to specific drills.

the other advantage i have seen to this kind of power is on road rides with long slight grades, and or short steep grades, this i attribute to an advantage in greater total power output. longer and or steeper terrain efforts give the nod to those with greater power to weight ratio is my belief.




Quote:
Originally Posted by Billsworld
Its tough to figure out how fast one has to go on the road to be competative on the track. I guess.I have always had good explosive power in the gym, I wondering how to get it to the crank. PB on flat 38.5 corrected to 38.9 48x14. 205lbs Thanks for the reply . Congrats on the sponsor too.
Hypnospin is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-11.-2005, 04:54 AM   #28
Billsworld
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 797
Default Re: Power for sprinters

I have limited experience on the bike. 1 yr /2crits , 20 yrs strength training though . In my humble opinion, the gym work for cyclists should take place 2-3 days in a row, and the rest (5 days)should be bike work.( Other than some real fast spinning right after a leg workout )I think the next day after legs should be another upper body gym day/stretching and no bike. I am not sure what a guy like you would do during racing season, I guess no legs a little upper body work like you said and ride alot. I am so torn up after a leg day riding seems like a waste of time...but Im old. If I were a road racer I dont think I would lift at all other than injury prevention stuff like abs etc. I think I am expecting too much too fast , As you said in a little different manner, there needs to be some physiological changes in my legs and CV system to get better. Thanks for you input. Consevatives dont go trick or treating . We are to uptight.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hypnospin
as for my experience on how heavy lifting translates into sprinting, the main advantage that is immediately noticible is the power to jump, as in accelerating to intiate the sprint. if one has this kind of power and does not use a smooth style to jump, the bike gets torqued to the extent that stuff happens, the back wheel gyrates and hops, the chain skips and chaneds cogs, both wheels hop up down and side to side...a measure of restraint has to be applied.

if heavy lifting derived power is applied in an eficcient manner, your jump will be equal to some good sprinters. i anticipatethat others jumps will seem like no big deal to match. this is a great psyche out.

as for top speed and duration, this seems better developed from high rep moderate weight and lots of on the bike mileage leading to specific drills.

the other advantage i have seen to this kind of power is on road rides with long slight grades, and or short steep grades, this i attribute to an advantage in greater total power output. longer and or steeper terrain efforts give the nod to those with greater power to weight ratio is my belief.
Billsworld is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 02:30 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet