Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Other Stuff > Your Bloody Soap Box
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Assault on Fallujah - Justified?

Poll: Assault on Fallujah - Justifed?
Poll Options
Assault on Fallujah - Justifed?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 11-11.-2004, 11:48 PM   #16
limerickman
Community Team
 
limerickman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: at the bar
Posts: 12,487
Default Re: Assault on Fallujah - Justified?

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Cheat
Being in the TA I have a (limited) insight into the situation and i know that i speak for my work plas when i say that no one in my unit aproves of the way the US are handling this. The only way to beat this kind of enemy is to win over the Iraqi civilians. The US will never b able to do this if they are too scared to even talk to these civis without being fully decked out in Kevlar and having a m8 of theirs point a pistol at him.

Those Black Watch lads, even though they've had about 16 casualties (4 of which were fatal) in the 6 days they've been at Dog-wood , are still wearing the tam-o-shanters and not their kevlar helmets, and they are actualy trying to make bonds with the Iraqi's who live their... I only hope that the americans who were there first didn't ruin their chances...


Finally, a voice of sanity from the military perspective.

The Black Watch have been hung out to dry.
They're part of the most professional fighting force in the world - the British Army.
Now they're expected to take commands from the an army which has been shown to be inept, unprofessional - the US Army.
Let's be clear - Bliar has hung out the Black Watch.

I feel very sorry for those lads.
They have no choice but to obey orders.
Imagine being caught in that compromise where you're political masters sell you down the swany and let you be ordered around by the most inept
army in the world.
Doesn't bear thinking about.
limerickman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-11.-2004, 05:28 AM   #17
FredC
Registered User
 
FredC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,819
Default Re: Assault on Fallujah - Justified?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ItsikH
Unfortunately, as long as the allied forces are present, such measures are required. However, they totally ignore the effect on local population, and their hostility is the worst outcome: It is practically impossible to control a hostile population for a long period, without a huge price tag. In this kind of war you never win, at best score some points and lose others, and the trick is to minimize cost and maximize benefit - just like running a business.
Having said that, I still believe this war has been (and still is) a big mistake that could eventually lead Iraq and the region into chaos that could be taken over by Islamic fanatics .

We like you, and generally you post well. Don't you think it better, now that Yasser has died to concentrate on your own doorstep as most of your post will apply in the circumstances, unless Bush & Co can bang a few heads together in the Knesset, or is Sharon still controlling America as he stated in a cabinet meeting to Peres broadcast live on Kol Yisrael. How did your ride in the Negev go. I want to know if it was a success?
FredC is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-11.-2004, 08:35 AM   #18
ItsikH
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Kfar-Sava, Israel
Posts: 140
Send a message via ICQ to ItsikH
Default Re: Assault on Fallujah - Justified?

Quote:
Originally Posted by FredC
We like you, and generally you post well. Don't you think it better, now that Yasser has died to concentrate on your own doorstep as most of your post will apply in the circumstances, unless Bush & Co can bang a few heads together in the Knesset, or is Sharon still controlling America as he stated in a cabinet meeting to Peres broadcast live on Kol Yisrael. How did your ride in the Negev go. I want to know if it was a success?
It feels good to know that my posts are read and appreciated - thanks!
Iraq is just a few miles away - I should say a cycling distance. The future of Iraq is almost as relevant to Israel as the furure of the occupied territories. As you may have noticed, I am quite pessimistic about both. Still there is always a chance, and I would be happy to be proven wrong. In the Palestinian context, the expected outcome of Arafat's death would be anarchy followed by extremists taking over and escalation of the conflict (yes, it could get much worse). The optimistic alternative would be the relatively moderate Abu Mazen and Dachlan taking control and this time with a far better chance for a real peace process. Even then, an Israeli partner might not be available this time.
BTW, Sharon is not controlling America, he is barely controlling his own cabinet.
As for the cross-country tour - incredible! Next time in the spring. See my post http://www.cyclingforums.com/t192544.html.
__________________
Kan Ya Ma Kan...
ItsikH is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-11.-2004, 09:32 AM   #19
FredC
Registered User
 
FredC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,819
Default Re: Assault on Fallujah - Justified?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ItsikH
It feels good to know that my posts are read and appreciated - thanks!
Iraq is just a few miles away - I should say a cycling distance. The future of Iraq is almost as relevant to Israel as the furure of the occupied territories. As you may have noticed, I am quite pessimistic about both. Still there is always a chance, and I would be happy to be proven wrong. In the Palestinian context, the expected outcome of Arafat's death would be anarchy followed by extremists taking over and escalation of the conflict (yes, it could get much worse). The optimistic alternative would be the relatively moderate Abu Mazen and Dachlan taking control and this time with a far better chance for a real peace process. Even then, an Israeli partner might not be available this time.
BTW, Sharon is not controlling America, he is barely controlling his own cabinet.
As for the cross-country tour - incredible! Next time in the spring. See my post http://www.cyclingforums.com/t192544.html.

Any ideas why Sharon said Israel controlled America, when he attacked Prime Minister Peres in public, or have you already answered that above in your post? I noted that Binjamin Netanyaou castigated Yasser, and I think that BN was one of the worst, even though he did get reelected after gross failure. I think that it's best to stay in the Negev with the Sabrees.
FredC is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-11.-2004, 10:05 AM   #20
ItsikH
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Kfar-Sava, Israel
Posts: 140
Send a message via ICQ to ItsikH
Default Re: Assault on Fallujah - Justified?

Quote:
Originally Posted by FredC
Any ideas why Sharon said Israel controlled America, when he attacked Prime Minister Peres in public, or have you already answered that above in your post? I noted that Binjamin Netanyaou castigated Yasser, and I think that BN was one of the worst, even though he did get reelected after gross failure. I think that it's best to stay in the Negev with the Sabrees.
I rarely listen to Sharon or any other polititians in this country - they can't tell the truth even if their lives depended on it . BN is much worse than Sharon when it comes to integrity (poor choice of word for both of them, I must say).
As for "controlling" America - no point in even referring to such nonsense. Maybe he thinks that voters might believe that - either he or his voters aren't so smart. As I said - he can't control his cabinet ministers, how could he control America?
BTW, you called Peres PM - he is not neither has ever been the elected PM! The sad history of Shimon Peres: His first attempt was in 1974, after Golda Meir's resignation, he was defeated by Rabin, who later won the general elections. In 1977 he won the party, then lost to Begin in the general elections. It goes on and on (excpet for a short rotation period in the 80's with Shamir) until 1992 when Rabin won the party and the general elections. When Rabin was assasinated (may his murderer rot in hell), Peres replaced him until defeated by Benjamin Netanyahu. It has been said that Peres felt defeated for the last time - he didn't even get the martir's death.
__________________
Kan Ya Ma Kan...

Last edited by ItsikH : 12-11.-2004 at 10:40 AM.
ItsikH is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 14-11.-2004, 06:24 AM   #21
FredC
Registered User
 
FredC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,819
Default Re: Assault on Fallujah - Justified?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ItsikH
I rarely listen to Sharon or any other polititians in this country - they can't tell the truth even if their lives depended on it . BN is much worse than Sharon when it comes to integrity (poor choice of word for both of them, I must say).
As for "controlling" America - no point in even referring to such nonsense. Maybe he thinks that voters might believe that - either he or his voters aren't so smart. As I said - he can't control his cabinet ministers, how could he control America?
BTW, you called Peres PM - he is not neither has ever been the elected PM! The sad history of Shimon Peres: His first attempt was in 1974, after Golda Meir's resignation, he was defeated by Rabin, who later won the general elections. In 1977 he won the party, then lost to Begin in the general elections. It goes on and on (excpet for a short rotation period in the 80's with Shamir) until 1992 when Rabin won the party and the general elections. When Rabin was assasinated (may his murderer rot in hell), Peres replaced him until defeated by Benjamin Netanyahu. It has been said that Peres felt defeated for the last time - he didn't even get the martir's death.

Erevtov, vay Shabat Shalom Itsik. Sleekah, the word I intended to use was Minister. Toda rabah
FredC is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 14-11.-2004, 06:37 AM   #22
FredC
Registered User
 
FredC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,819
Default Re: Assault on Fallujah - Justified?

Quote:
Originally Posted by limerickman
Finally, a voice of sanity from the military perspective.

The Black Watch have been hung out to dry.
They're part of the most professional fighting force in the world - the British Army.
Now they're expected to take commands from the an army which has been shown to be inept, unprofessional - the US Army.
Let's be clear - Bliar has hung out the Black Watch.

I feel very sorry for those lads.
They have no choice but to obey orders.
Imagine being caught in that compromise where you're political masters sell you down the swany and let you be ordered around by the most inept
army in the world.
Doesn't bear thinking about.

Hey just look at it this way. The Wankee Doodle Yankees have encircled Fallujah for ages and done eff all. In come the UK's Black Watch and the Scot's Guard et Voila job done in days in soft hats and proud plumes. The locals say that they the Brit's have saved them the Murkyans.
FredC is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 14-11.-2004, 07:09 AM   #23
limerickman
Community Team
 
limerickman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: at the bar
Posts: 12,487
Default Re: Assault on Fallujah - Justified?

Fred C - did you see C4 news tonight ?
Lindsay Hilsum is embedded (propaganised) : she can only report what the Yanks allow her to report.
Everything according to her was going well.
But she slipped something in as well - she said that they were told to report that everything was going well last Tuesday, and again last Thursday, and again today !

Sky report that if the Merkins think they have control of Fallujah, then why are there still raging battles ?
Seems to me that there is some media management going on here - I think the Merkins are fighting hard for what they have in Fallujah and it appears to be by no means over.
limerickman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 14-11.-2004, 07:32 AM   #24
FredC
Registered User
 
FredC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,819
Default Re: Assault on Fallujah - Justified?

Quote:
Originally Posted by limerickman
Fred C - did you see C4 news tonight ?
Lindsay Hilsum is embedded (propaganised) : she can only report what the Yanks allow her to report.
Everything according to her was going well.
But she slipped something in as well - she said that they were told to report that everything was going well last Tuesday, and again last Thursday, and again today !

Sky report that if the Merkins think they have control of Fallujah, then why are there still raging battles ?
Seems to me that there is some media management going on here - I think the Merkins are fighting hard for what they have in Fallujah and it appears to be by no means over.

Good Lord Lim,
Media management, surely not. The Merkiuns fighting, surely not. They won't even understand the Scots when they speak. They might even shoot them proclaiming that they thought that they had stolen clothing from a dead enemy. Your house must like MCM's. Mission Control. Has the Beeb got an imbedded one in Fallujah?.Tell the Oirish riders where we live.
FredC is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 14-11.-2004, 08:02 AM   #25
FredC
Registered User
 
FredC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,819
Default Re: Assault on Fallujah - Justified?

Quote:
Originally Posted by fixit
This is a fact Amerikkka will never understand.
Anybody watching french News? They have a few Reporters in or around Fallujah covering the events from the other side. Scary

Erevtov Fixit,
What amazes me most on this topic is that I expected more of the same from American posters, but there is nothing from them of any construction. Of course Pseudo Judeo White arse, did a bit of token posturing as usual. But in general they have not been brainwashed enough, or might it be the case be that the American government haven't put the production together for general consumption to re-inforce that Bush is the LEADER of his people?
FredC is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 15-11.-2004, 12:42 PM   #26
Ssushi
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 303
Default Re: Assault on Fallujah - Justified?

"Attention all Liberals, dry your tears, see a shrink and get over it" - jesus what a stoopid sig.!!!
Ssushi is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 15-11.-2004, 12:49 PM   #27
Ssushi
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 303
Default Re: Assault on Fallujah - Justified?

Quote:
Originally Posted by limerickman
Fred C - did you see C4 news tonight ?
Lindsay Hilsum is embedded (propaganised) : she can only report what the Yanks allow her to report.
Everything according to her was going well.
But she slipped something in as well - she said that they were told to report that everything was going well last Tuesday, and again last Thursday, and again today !

Sky report that if the Merkins think they have control of Fallujah, then why are there still raging battles ?
Seems to me that there is some media management going on here - I think the Merkins are fighting hard for what they have in Fallujah and it appears to be by no means over.

US press was saying it was over then saying theres fierce fighting... come on make up your mind! I'm glad that they are making a fight of it, if it was my country I'd do the same... and so would we all I suspect!
Ssushi is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 15-11.-2004, 06:19 PM   #28
Carrera
Registered User
 
Carrera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Staffordshire
Posts: 4,798
Default Re: Assault on Fallujah - Justified?

Probably what has happened is the various groups disappeared. The fact remains these various groups don't have anything like the fire-power to take on helicopters and tanks - it was the same when the Afghans fought the Russians. So, they tend to fade away and use hit and run tactics.
I think there's more of a comparison here between Iraq and the Soviets in Afghanistan since the Afghan war crippled the USSR economy. But it went on for years.
It will end with Fallujah ruined as a city and the various fighters dispersed elsewhere, sabotaging oil pipelines and wreaking havoc.
The big mistake here is how the U.S. has united the moderate resistance fighters with hard-core terrorists. The terrorists you can't reason with but the former Iraqi Army just resent the occupation. It's obvious they should just hold a U.N. supervised election and then let Iraq run its own destiny or let Arab states take care of security and restabilise Iraq.
I agree with Madonna on that score.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Ssushi
US press was saying it was over then saying theres fierce fighting... come on make up your mind! I'm glad that they are making a fight of it, if it was my country I'd do the same... and so would we all I suspect!
Carrera is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 15-11.-2004, 11:12 PM   #29
limerickman
Community Team
 
limerickman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: at the bar
Posts: 12,487
Default Re: Assault on Fallujah - Justified?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Carrera
Probably what has happened is the various groups disappeared. The fact remains these various groups don't have anything like the fire-power to take on helicopters and tanks - it was the same when the Afghans fought the Russians. So, they tend to fade away and use hit and run tactics.
I think there's more of a comparison here between Iraq and the Soviets in Afghanistan since the Afghan war crippled the USSR economy. But it went on for years.
It will end with Fallujah ruined as a city and the various fighters dispersed elsewhere, sabotaging oil pipelines and wreaking havoc.
The big mistake here is how the U.S. has united the moderate resistance fighters with hard-core terrorists. The terrorists you can't reason with but the former Iraqi Army just resent the occupation. It's obvious they should just hold a U.N. supervised election and then let Iraq run its own destiny or let Arab states take care of security and restabilise Iraq.
I agree with Madonna on that score.



Yes, it will be a hit and run gureilla war - which illustrates the sheer futility of the USA attack on Fallujah.
What has that attack done ?

It has moved the "rebels" from one city - and has forced them to move to another location.
It has antagonised the civilian population of a town with no water or electricity for the past five days.
It has provided an image to the world of the USA firing at Mosques (whether the "rebels" are in the Mosque or not - the fact is that a picture of a tank with the US insignia, firing on a Mosque can be used as a great recruiting tool
by those Muslims who decide to take up arms).
The entire war has been a failure to win hearts and minds (tell me how many people in Fallujah think that the Yanks have done a good job ?).

Setting aside the ethical/moral/legal question of this entire war since March 2003 : the Yanks tactics have been wrong.
You cannot fight a guerilla warfare with equipment alone.
It doesn't matter how much technology is employed to fight.
The only way to win this military confrontation is to flood Iraq with troops.
Will this be done ?
Not a hope in hell.
That's why the USA are putting pressure on the British PM for extra troops.

I agree with Carrera - this entire adventure in to Iraq has been a failure and it is draining the US economy.
limerickman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 16-11.-2004, 05:08 AM   #30
Carrera
Registered User
 
Carrera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Staffordshire
Posts: 4,798
Default Re: Assault on Fallujah - Justified?

There was an American military man on a BBC chat show this morning who would also agree with you. I think the older American military figures totally disagree with these present policies. In fact, what this guy said is that the U.S. is trying to fight an ideological war on terrorism by using traditional territorial strategies - thinking in terms of linking terrorists to one particular country of piece of terrain. So, he said the same as you. And John Kerry talked a lot of sense so it's a real shame people he didn't manage to get his message across (maybe he was too lacklustre).
History is there to be learned from since the Russians got it wrong in Afghanistan, America got it wrong in Vietnam and the Brits and French miscalculated in Suiz. It's not so much that Americans are dumb but I think humanity as a whole tends to be a bit dumb. As Einstein said, human stupidity is infinite.


Quote:
Originally Posted by limerickman
Yes, it will be a hit and run gureilla war - which illustrates the sheer futility of the USA attack on Fallujah.
What has that attack done ?

It has moved the "rebels" from one city - and has forced them to move to another location.
It has antagonised the civilian population of a town with no water or electricity for the past five days.
It has provided an image to the world of the USA firing at Mosques (whether the "rebels" are in the Mosque or not - the fact is that a picture of a tank with the US insignia, firing on a Mosque can be used as a great recruiting tool
by those Muslims who decide to take up arms).
The entire war has been a failure to win hearts and minds (tell me how many people in Fallujah think that the Yanks have done a good job ?).

Setting aside the ethical/moral/legal question of this entire war since March 2003 : the Yanks tactics have been wrong.
You cannot fight a guerilla warfare with equipment alone.
It doesn't matter how much technology is employed to fight.
The only way to win this military confrontation is to flood Iraq with troops.
Will this be done ?
Not a hope in hell.
That's why the USA are putting pressure on the British PM for extra troops.

I agree with Carrera - this entire adventure in to Iraq has been a failure and it is draining the US economy.
Carrera is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 02:27 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet