![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#31 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: TN
Posts: 268
|
6'00", 34.5" inseam, 57 & 58 cm frames
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 128
|
Thanks for the replys. It's looking like mine may not be too small for me afterall. You guys are a bunch of help.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,189
|
5' 3.5" Inseam 27.25", 162 lbs
51cm Cervelo Soloist Team 90 mm stem Giant TCR Aero Small 108 mm stem |
|
|
|
|
|
#34 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,163
|
Quote:
Have you been to a shop, Scott? Been checked out, measured? It's tough to gauge appropriate frame sizes for a given height; there are lots of other variables. There are different body proportions to account for -- some 6'2" persons have 32" inseams, and others, 34" inseams. Some folks have long torsos, or short arms. Finally, few bike manufacturers have precisely thesame standards of frame geometry, or frame measurement. If you've got doubts, see if you can roll into a shop and get an opinion. Good luck! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3
|
im 6'0 and i ride a 58cm felt, a little to big in the top tube
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 20
|
6'0" 59cm Cannondale R600
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Washington, D.C.
Posts: 93
|
5'8", 29" inseam, 49 cm
Scott, do you have a lot of extra standover height? We have similar dimensions and i could probably go w/ a 50 or a 51 but anything more than that would be suicide for my unborn children if you catch my drift. |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Registered User
|
Approximately 5'10" 54cm Aegis
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Woodinville, WA
Posts: 36
|
One thing to keep in mind when tabulating the results is that certain manufacturers measure Center to Center (C-C) and others Center to Top (C-T). Hopefully everyone was consistant in providing there data.
Example: if you have a litespeed that is 57cm (C-T), then that would equate to about 55.5cm (C-C). |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 212
|
Height: 5' 6.5", Inseam 29, Trek 5500 54 cm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Medford, MA
Posts: 325
|
5' 11"
56 cm Fits me perfectly. Unfortunately, you are asking the wrong question. Calculating fit for a frame does not include height. Go try a fit calculator and find out for sure if your frame is too small. Good luck. |
|
|
|
|
|
#42 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Anchorage, Alaska, USA
Posts: 1,672
|
Quote:
Probably, unless it's a compact frame. Compacts convert to regular size by adding 4 cm. In other words, a 50 cm compact (like Giant) is a 54 cm conventional road bike frame. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: TN
Posts: 268
|
Quote:
That's a poor generalization across the board. Depends on how the mfctr names the frame size (ie. virtual top tube is quite common), how sloped the top tube is, etc. etc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,163
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Wales
Posts: 3
|
I'm 6ft ride 56cm on the road, 57cm on the track.
|
|
|
|